The Cookbook is in the signal... [UPDATE#6 - Symphony of the New Fire]
Prepare thoroughly (Ni + LiAlH4 + Li)
- Bake Ni
- Reduce Ni
- Hydrogenate Ni
- Mix: Ni + LiAlH4 + Li
- Bake and vac reactor, add Mix, vac warm, add H2, Vac
- Heat to above Mössbauer determined Ni Debye (say 135C), pressure regulated to approx 1bar abs.
- Hold, pressure regulated to approx 1bar abs.
- Heat slowly to as close to Ni Curie as comfortable (Say 340C), pressure regulated to approx 1bar abs.
- Hold, pressure regulated to approx 1bar abs.
- Slowly lower temp to above highest known Ni Debye (Say 220C), pressure regulated to approx 1bar abs.
- Hold, pressure regulated to approx 1bar abs.
- Go as fast as possible through Ni Curie
- Hold, pressure regulated to approx 0.5bar abs.
- Cycle through 500C internal, pressure regulated to approx 0.5bar abs.
- Hold, pressure regulated to approx 0.5bar abs.
- Raise internal temperature to over 1200, pressure regulated to approx 0.5bar abs.
- Drop to around 1000C and hold, pressure regulated to approx 0.5bar abs.
- Raise internal temperature to near boiling point of Lithium
1h Thermal > x/β- (0-100KeV) emissions thermalised in Lead > IR/THz (via blackbody) > 5h (SSM)
You will need to use this calculator
UPDATE#1-The signal...
A chart showing missed pulses (because there was too big a burst?). Spot the outlier?
The Plot shows the %age of pulses lost due to pulse overlap versus each Spectrum taken. The Absolute Error Bars are reflective of the Live/Real Time Resolution, given only in seconds. In lieu of this, the Right Ordinate Scale (thin Olive Bars) shows the actual acquisition/accumulation time of each Spectrum, so that one may see that the longer a Spectrum is taken, the less Lost Pulse %age error there is. There is a tradeoff however, in the fact that shorter Spectrum Periods help further define/differentiate a sudden burst of pulses from the background condition.
This Spectrometer follows the general structure of a Scintillator/MCA. More information on Pulse Overlap can be found at the following link, although the definitions of various terms need correction/improvement:
The following are useful online references concerning Dead Time or Pulse Overlap (in no particular order):http://goo.gl/Hk40oU
Much more detailed photometric analysis is being conducted and will be published later today.
UPDATE#2 - The video...
The team watched this video all the way through for the first time AFTER designing basically an E-Cat following discovery of the emissions.
UPDATE#3 - Iceberg in the *GlowStick*
UPDATE#4 - The Brilliance of Prof. Sergio Focardi
Whilst it is without doubt Prof. Francesco Piantelli that first discovered the Ni + H system in 1989 as we describe here, it was the long collaboration with one Sergio Focardi that allowed the early blossoming of the understanding of this nascent technology.
Whilst the MFMP had the extreme privilege of a long audience with Piantelli, we were very aware there was another man in the room. Piantelli clearly deeply respected and, in an Italian way one might say loved Sergio - it was also clear that he was moved to tears when recounting his physical and mental degradation through his twilight years.
He shared with us the following video from 29th April 1994 of Focardi talking about their work together, to demonstrate just what a formidable man he was - you don't need to understand what he is saying to see that he was a shining intellect and an engaging orator.
This paper they produced together https://goo.gl/tn1f7w supports our findings, but in pure Ni + H systems.
What we have shown in a Rossi analogue however, has not been shown by any other party to date, not even Rossi. Since it is data from nature - failing exceptional other explanations that no-one has been able to offer or demonstrate since announcement - it is likely that in time, following our exact procedure as clearly detailed, the same kind of signature will be seen by others. Moreover, when seen, scientist will know they have an active system and can iterate to one that has higher output, be that by modifications to fuel, thermal profile or to the structure and materials used in the reactor design or its enclosure.
More specifically, this work by Focardi/Piantelli et al. does not show any separation between high broad band transitory event prior to onset of 'excess heat' and lower band events during periods of and only in periods of 'excess heat'. The combination of which explains both Celani's hitherto unexplained experience in 2011 and the consistent claims of Rossi. Indeed, the suggestion is that heat and emissions may have been mutually exclusive in their work at times.
This is good historical supporting evidence that allows us to have more confidence in what we are seeing, but it is a very different experiment with neither Li or Al present and conducted at very different temperatures.
UPDATE#5 - Looking under the cats skin, with the help of X-Rays
This "bad hand waving" video, recorded by Bob Greenyer on the 22nd February, discusses the early analysis of the E-Cat that developed between 16-22nd February as a direct result of seeing two shapes of EM radiation emitted from the *GlowStick* 5.2 Experiment.
CORRECTION: When Bob says that Mathieu's associate had said the signal was typical of a beta release, he actually said Bremsstrahlung radiation.
Bremsstrahlung Radiation: https://goo.gl/32s0Iq
Attenuation Calculator: http://goo.gl/ciBtsR
Lead Weight to Volume Calculator: http://goo.gl/EH6asj
Volume Calculator: http://goo.gl/LvIHCw
UPDATE#6 - Symphony of the New Fire
The major part of "The Cookbook is in the Signal" announcement will be ultimately contained in the dynamic live document below. Context for the sense of validity of our findings in the *GlowStick* 5.2 will be released into the program sections. We hope you join us in this revelation process, analysing and understanding each step until you see the consistent whole.
Be as critical as you are able, with justified reasoning, where gaps are identified - let us know in the comments and your contribution will be made public and date-stamped. We will endeavour to fill them together - we lit the New Fire together, let's explain it together.
This is your chance to make history the Live Open Science way.
Comments
hard effort to make!
pinterest course: youtu.be/oWd9vBKExHA
продаж. Поэтому обычно промокод вулкан: vse-o-sochi.ruы можно найти в рассылках магазинов.
Мы помогаем нашим партнёрам
(магазинам) распространить информацию
о скидках. Если наш пользователь совершает покупку
с промокод детский: promokod4u.comом или по акции - мы получаем вознаграждение.
find out some additional information.
Hey there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog.
Is it very hard to set up your own blog? I'm not very techincal
but I can figure things out pretty fast. I'm thinking about setting
up my own but I'm not sure where to start. Do you have any points or suggestions?
Cheers
and i see you've got some duplicate content so probably it is the reason that you
don't rank high in google. But you can fix this issue fast.
There is a tool that creates content like human, just search in google:
miftolo's tools
topic. I must spend some time learning more or figuring out more.
Thanks for fantastic information I used to be on the lookout for this info for
my mission.
I want being your possibilities for blogging, furthermore the reasons you
visit blogs.
I know that writing content is boring and time consuming.
But did you know that there is a tool that allows you to create new articles using
existing content (from article directories or other pages from your niche)?
And it does it very well. The new posts are high quality and
pass the copyscape test. Search in google
and try: miftolo's tools
for Fleischmann
in the mlm field by being the pay a visit
to guys in SEO.
break. I love the knowledge you provide here and can't wait to take a look when I get home.
I'm shocked at how quick your blog loaded on my phone .. I'm
not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, good blog!
make website content more readable. It took a while and effort but he soon started making
some decent dollars spent.
that's why you don't rank high in google, but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique articles, search for; SSundee advices unlimited content for
your blog
utterly outstanding content.
Using external H2 source.
Based on the comments on this thread, it appears that LiAlH4 serves only as a source of H2. If that is true, then an external H2 source, such as a hydrogen generator, should suffice. Additionally, an external H2 source plus a vacuum pump permit precise control of H2 pressure up to 3 atm, which is the limit for the quartz cell.
The next question then, is the mixing and pre-treatment of the Ni and Li. In the last run I used 1g AH50 Ni + 0.1g passivated Li powder, mixed by shaking in a small bottle and then loaded into a 316SS capsule which was plugged on both ends with quartz wool to keep the powder in place. The capsule fits into an alumina tube wound with Kanthal wire in a quartz cell that can be pressurized or evacuated.
Pre-treatment consisted of heating the loaded cell to 250C while applying a vacuum to remove volatiles and to melt the Li, and was continued until a pressure of
until a pressure of
Based on the comments on this thread, it appears that LiAlH4 serves only as a source of H2. If that is true, then an external H2 source, such as a hydrogen generator, should suffice. Additionally, an external H2 source plus a vacuum pump permit precise control of H2 pressure, as long as pressure is less than approx. 3 atm, which is the limit for the quartz cell.
The next question then, is the mixing and pre-treatment of the Ni and Li. In the last run I used 1g AH50 Ni + 0.1g passivated Li powder, mixed by shaking in a small bottle and then loaded into a non-sealed 316SS capsule. The capsule fits into an alumina tube wound with Kanthal wire in a quartz cell that can be pressurized or evacuated.
Pre-treatment consisted of heating to 250C while applying a vacuum to remove volatiles and melt the Li, and it was continued until
I am of the following opinion now. LiAlH4, Ni and free Li should not be mixed together in the reactor. In my opinion LiAlH4 serves only as a Hydrogen source first to Hydrogenate the Nickel before the Li Melts, then to make the Li on the surface of the Ni LiH. YES! limit how much H2 is in the Ni when you get initial ignition. Add more H2 after it's burning nicely...
The reversible reaction 2 LiH + 2 Al → 2 LiAl + H2 (R3) Allows the release and capture of H2 at will. YES!
The primary reaction is pure Piantelli Ni+H - the secondary reaction is 1H + 7Li > 2 X 4He. CORRECT, but Li is not essential, but it does work well in terms of clean exothermic production of alphas..
Our experiments so far have had all three reactants mixed together - and in this instance, as I calculated last year - the Al can play a role but it is in the way 27Al is a much bigger target than 7Li and in time it would destroy the (R3) reaction - that which enables the control of H2 in the cell since the Al would be transmuted and loose its function and the products are in the way. I AGREE.
The big yield is from 1H + 7Li > 2 X 4He, so you want nothing in its way. We, and other replicators may have seen low excess heat due to mixing everything together. YES.
I then had the inspiration that we might have mixed in a specific order in GS 5.2 - so I asked which order the powder was mixed in GS 5.2. Alan seems to recall the free lithium was added first - this is as I suspected and would be not ideal - but advantageous as per the above hypothesis. So, the suggestion is to, as a half way house, mix and pestle mortar the free lithium / Ni together before adding the LiAlH4 - or add mixed & ground Ni+Li to the cell first and drop the LiAlH4 in afterwards. First clean Ni & Li surfaces with H2 then diffuse Li throughout all the Ni pores. Then adjust H2 pressure ready for take off and go up through 700C chirping the power as you go up, or maybe bringing up a 13Cs or 90Sr source to get ignition and the big initial tell-tail pulse on The GM meter. ..
This is consistent with my calculations based on Piantelli theory, Rossi's 2012 interview with Ruby Carat and his diffuse LI and the claimed critical reversible reaction. It is also consistent with the implications of Ikegami, Unified Gravity Corporation and on the electron screening of molten LiH. TAKE your word for that
By having LiAlH4 in a different heated part of the reactor, it allows control of 2 LiH + 2 Al → 2 LiAl + H2 (R3) which means you can seal it up and control the H2 Pressure. YES!!
by varying the temperature of the Ni+LiH zone (above LiH breakdown) and LiH Al zone temperature you can control the ratio of H in LiH to enable molten LiH / Li on the Nickel at far lower temperature Li H liquid plasma. REACTION won't start until LiH is above 689C I think.
At the lowest allowed H electron orbit -511keV there are in total 1291keV missing for a neutron.
If a nucleous absorbs a H* we dont expect much radiation. H* will also not convert Ni61 because of a lack of energy!
RSS feed for comments to this post