ULTR - Affordable ultrasonic driven transmutation?
Below is the live document for this experiment.
Here is your generous contributions so far towards our $500,000 target, thanks everyone! : $45,020 Please Donate
See the current state of our booked costs here
Comments
friendly? My web site looks weird when browsing from
my iphone4. I'm trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able
to correct this issue. If you have any suggestions, please share.
Many thanks!
Here is my blog post - selling used cars: maps.google.co.tz/.../...
great written and come with approximately all significant infos.
I would like to look extra posts like this.
Have a look at my homepage ... successful business owner: images.google.co.za/.../...
Also visit my web site; boat fishing
inflatable pontoon: www.fearsteve.com/.../
jmcchina.org/.../20170501.htm
The cirrus was not attached to the apparatus, it was only attached to the blocked off vacuum system.
Also, the burst out areas in the DI water only look more definite than in the original experiment. I have been wondering if just heating the bath with the same energy input that the ultrasound emitter has would cause any kind of damage at all.
I do think we need to find more pure Indium. will plating make it more pure or make impurities harder to detect?
buy.solder.com/.../C1043_1
www.indium.com/.../
I would like to find suppliers of a re-fillable gas discharge tube similar to the ones in this e-bay listing (but re-fillable),
ebay.com/.../...
I guess with some glass blowing skill one could open the nipple on this, and add pipes and manifold to vacuum and gas source.
one that could be used say with a 3D printed diffraction grating mobile phone based spectrometer.
www.youtube.com/.../
youtu.be/hZkVYuw4pJ4
spectralworkbench.org
You might be able to work out where I am going with this.
These are good diffraction gratings
ebay.com/.../...
ebay.com/.../...
no exposure to Ultrasonic and some attempt to abrade the surface without introducing contamination
Or just nothing...
We have to be really careful calling this, yes. Also, we must not be immediately dismissive of potentially synthesized elements purely because they were there to begin with. This is why I feel isotopic or evolved gas studies will be the only way to know for sure and I am coming up with a real simple test for the latter.
The likely-hood is that these elements are mostly contaminants - however the 'blow-out' features are interesting and have to be explained.
I cannot speak as to the validity of Mondaini's claims in their entirety. Sulfur from 2 x O is something we appear to have observed in NOVA and 10 Yen + Ohmasa Gas. It is a known Ohsawa product. The one that I made reference to in my CE interview was the increase in alkalinity that he observed which he put down to the production of excess OH, his hypothesis being that H was becoming D (this would be an inverse beta process with H + H + e +v > D. It is noteworthy because of Slobodan Stankovic's observation of OH radicals that I refer to as being able to self-MASE and that could possibly account for the laser like 'cut' in the 10 Yen coin. Again I would refer to the analysis of Ohmasa Gas also.
Yes this is still all from the run with DI and EDTA - actually for 4 mins not 3 as in the original run, so not quite a true replication. Next data to be looked at will be the run with DI water only for 3 mins.
Regarding comments on the first data set.
I think that it could still all be contamination. I think that the first series of experiment with and without EDTA and DI should form a baseline alongside a null, then I would like to compare that to
+ D2O
+ K2CO3
+ Rb2CO3 (For VERY specific reasons)
in short and long runs, possibly with a LOT of indium foil.
I think that our best shot for confirmation is to look for Krypton - this should absolutely not be there unless transmutation is taking place.
Some really intriguing features and elemental compositions. That sort of carbon grain clearly embedded in the Indium is impressive. This is still all from the run with DI and EDTA, or there is already a pure DI run?
Well, thanks for confirming you were aware of Mondaini's claims. I have started to see the CE interview at least three times but never got past the discussion of cryptocurrencie s. Is a very extended interview!!! LOL. I am intrigued by the results, do you think is plausible and that is not just an interpretation mistake? the claim of copper sulphate is kind of easy to dismiss as it could be easily to misinterpret the blue color if is just Copper Hydroxide, (not saying that this is the case, but from the video alone we only have Mondaini's word and the analyses to go, and also the analyses could be Ok and the S be coming from the S present already in the system as impurities in the water, KCO3 and copper wire, but somehow concentrated in a very small volume, so without a mass balance is impossible to tell for sure). But the missing K replaced by Na, is another tale. Yet, doing such a seemingly simple experiment with all proper things and methods in place is not trivial. Well, the same happens with the ULTR project, simple experiment, difficult to be absolutely certain without all the instruments and methods, Earth shattering implications if the results are confirmed, so no surprises there.
RSS feed for comments to this post