<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Tessa says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-31034</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Cann I simmply just say what a relief to uncover somebody who actually knows what they're talking about on the web. You definitely understand how to bring a problem to light and make itt important. More people have to look at this and understand this side of the story. It's surprising you are not more popular because you most certainly have the gift. Also vsit my web page; Пресс-форма для литья пластмасс: https://gorplast.com.tr/%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F-%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tessa</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 03:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-31034</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jacinto says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-31033</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's a pity you don't have a donate button! I'd most certainly donate to this brilliant blog! I guess for now i'll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Googl account. I look forward to fresh uupdates and will share this site with my Facebook group. Chat: https://sohbetimsin.com/ soon!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jacinto</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-31033</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Autumn says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-30774</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi there would you mind sharing which blog platform you're using? I'm going too start my own blog soon but I'm having a tough time choosing between BlogEngine/Word press/B2evoluti on and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design seems diffrrent then mos blogs and I'm looking for something unique. P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask! My web site Yabancı Dil Kursu: https://Beylikduzubritishculture.com/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Autumn</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 13:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-30774</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>www.bilger.lt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10427</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Do you have any video of that? I'd want to find out some additional information.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>www.bilger.lt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2020 08:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10427</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>wholesale jerseys says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9752</link>
			<description><![CDATA[oqowre Hey there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog. Is it very hard to set up your own blog? I'm not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast. I'm thinking about setting up my own but I'm not sure where to start. Do you have any points or suggestions? Cheers]]></description>
			<dc:creator>wholesale jerseys</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 02:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9752</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GrettaBig says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9557</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi. I have checked your quantumheat.org and i see you've got some duplicate content so probably it is the reason that you don't rank high in google. But you can fix this issue fast. There is a tool that creates content like human, just search in google: miftolo's tools]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GrettaBig</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 08:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9557</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pb says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9379</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If you can it, hire a web-designer location a site together you. I want being your possibilities for blogging, furthermore the reasons you visit blogs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pb</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2018 21:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9379</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>EffieJuicy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello. I see that you don't update your site too often. I know that writing content is boring and time consuming. But did you know that there is a tool that allows you to create new articles using existing content (from article directories or other pages from your niche)? And it does it very well. The new posts are high quality and pass the copyscape test. Search in google and try: miftolo's tools]]></description>
			<dc:creator>EffieJuicy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9323</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nắp hố ga gang says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9312</link>
			<description><![CDATA[WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by searching for Fleischmann]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nắp hố ga gang</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 09:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9312</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ntc33 login says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9311</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Stick with just one to 2 font types so men and women will not be confused with your font selection. Them have built an empire in the mlm field by being the pay a visit to guys in SEO.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ntc33 login</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 13:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9311</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>rollex11 download says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9306</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Greetings from Ohio! I'm bored to tears at work so I decided to browse your website on my iphone during lunch break. I love the knowledge you provide here and can't wait to take a look when I get home. I'm shocked at how quick your blog loaded on my phone .. I'm not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, good blog!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>rollex11 download</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9306</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>live22 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9303</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Really feel nice a good content of blood potassium. The spacing of the text lines and paragraphs could make website content more readable. It took a while and effort but he soon started making some decent dollars spent.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>live22</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 14:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9303</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MaynardBold says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9113</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have checked your site and i have found some duplicate content, that's why you don't rank high in google, but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique articles, search for; SSundee advices unlimited content for your blog]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MaynardBold</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 12:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9113</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>download fee says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9042</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Some genuinely rattling work on behalf of the owner of this internet site, utterly outstanding content.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>download fee</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2018 06:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9042</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeff morriss says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8456</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For some reason my two precious posts were truncated. I'll try again. Using external H2 source. Based on the comments on this thread, it appears that LiAlH4 serves only as a source of H2. If that is true, then an external H2 source, such as a hydrogen generator, should suffice. Additionally, an external H2 source plus a vacuum pump permit precise control of H2 pressure up to 3 atm, which is the limit for the quartz cell. The next question then, is the mixing and pre-treatment of the Ni and Li. In the last run I used 1g AH50 Ni + 0.1g passivated Li powder, mixed by shaking in a small bottle and then loaded into a 316SS capsule which was plugged on both ends with quartz wool to keep the powder in place. The capsule fits into an alumina tube wound with Kanthal wire in a quartz cell that can be pressurized or evacuated. Pre-treatment consisted of heating the loaded cell to 250C while applying a vacuum to remove volatiles and to melt the Li, and was continued until a pressure of]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jeff morriss</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 06:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8456</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeff morriss says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8442</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Continuation from last note... until a pressure of]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jeff morriss</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 06:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8442</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeff morriss says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8441</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Using external H2 source. Based on the comments on this thread, it appears that LiAlH4 serves only as a source of H2. If that is true, then an external H2 source, such as a hydrogen generator, should suffice. Additionally, an external H2 source plus a vacuum pump permit precise control of H2 pressure, as long as pressure is less than approx. 3 atm, which is the limit for the quartz cell. The next question then, is the mixing and pre-treatment of the Ni and Li. In the last run I used 1g AH50 Ni + 0.1g passivated Li powder, mixed by shaking in a small bottle and then loaded into a non-sealed 316SS capsule. The capsule fits into an alumina tube wound with Kanthal wire in a quartz cell that can be pressurized or evacuated. Pre-treatment consisted of heating to 250C while applying a vacuum to remove volatiles and melt the Li, and it was continued until]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jeff morriss</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 06:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8441</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Donor#356 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8427</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer Please refer to my comments inserted amonst your original post after CAPS... I am of the following opinion now. LiAlH4, Ni and free Li should not be mixed together in the reactor. In my opinion LiAlH4 serves only as a Hydrogen source first to Hydrogenate the Nickel before the Li Melts, then to make the Li on the surface of the Ni LiH. YES! limit how much H2 is in the Ni when you get initial ignition. Add more H2 after it's burning nicely... The reversible reaction 2 LiH + 2 Al → 2 LiAl + H2 (R3) Allows the release and capture of H2 at will. YES! The primary reaction is pure Piantelli Ni+H - the secondary reaction is 1H + 7Li > 2 X 4He. CORRECT, but Li is not essential, but it does work well in terms of clean exothermic production of alphas.. Our experiments so far have had all three reactants mixed together - and in this instance, as I calculated last year - the Al can play a role but it is in the way 27Al is a much bigger target than 7Li and in time it would destroy the (R3) reaction - that which enables the control of H2 in the cell since the Al would be transmuted and loose its function and the products are in the way. I AGREE. The big yield is from 1H + 7Li > 2 X 4He, so you want nothing in its way. We, and other replicators may have seen low excess heat due to mixing everything together. YES. I then had the inspiration that we might have mixed in a specific order in GS 5.2 - so I asked which order the powder was mixed in GS 5.2. Alan seems to recall the free lithium was added first - this is as I suspected and would be not ideal - but advantageous as per the above hypothesis. So, the suggestion is to, as a half way house, mix and pestle mortar the free lithium / Ni together before adding the LiAlH4 - or add mixed & ground Ni+Li to the cell first and drop the LiAlH4 in afterwards. First clean Ni & Li surfaces with H2 then diffuse Li throughout all the Ni pores. Then adjust H2 pressure ready for take off and go up through 700C chirping the power as you go up, or maybe bringing up a 13Cs or 90Sr source to get ignition and the big initial tell-tail pulse on The GM meter. .. This is consistent with my calculations based on Piantelli theory, Rossi's 2012 interview with Ruby Carat and his diffuse LI and the claimed critical reversible reaction. It is also consistent with the implications of Ikegami, Unified Gravity Corporation and on the electron screening of molten LiH. TAKE your word for that By having LiAlH4 in a different heated part of the reactor, it allows control of 2 LiH + 2 Al → 2 LiAl + H2 (R3) which means you can seal it up and control the H2 Pressure. YES!! by varying the temperature of the Ni+LiH zone (above LiH breakdown) and LiH Al zone temperature you can control the ratio of H in LiH to enable molten LiH / Li on the Nickel at far lower temperature Li H liquid plasma. REACTION won't start until LiH is above 689C I think.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Donor#356</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 17:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8427</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wyttenbach says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8269</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looking at the gamma spectrum we see a minimum around 1300keV. This is just starting after the neutron energy missing for dark H*. (-780 - 511keV) At the lowest allowed H electron orbit -511keV there are in total 1291keV missing for a neutron. If a nucleous absorbs a H* we dont expect much radiation. H* will also not convert Ni61 because of a lack of energy!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wyttenbach</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8269</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>EccoEcco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8160</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sanjeev I'm getting empty JSON files from HUGnet too. It looks like something went wrong in the software after last week's downtime. On the other hand, I am perfectly able to download calibration data from the Google Docs folder even from a web browser where I'm not logged in with my Google account. @AlanG It would be useful if power data was included as well.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>EccoEcco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 12:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8160</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8159</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert I can't download the data from your google docs folders. It asks for a login. https://goo.gl/MGgKDz On the video page, I get just a still with some text. I hope you are aware of this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8159</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8158</link>
			<description><![CDATA[https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2991-Forget-about-the-E-Cat-It-never-worked-Replicators-and-the-Forum-should-focus-on/?postID=16601#post16601 Me356 is now claiming a COP of 2 Refuses to share results/reports or data. Did he share anything with MFMP? What is going on here?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8158</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8157</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just now tried 2 hour duration, 30 sec average, its still not correct. Looks like this: [{"group":"defa ult","raw":[]," id":16516608,"D ate":1460262270 ,"TestID":null, "Type":"30SEC", "Data0":25.69," Data1":801.56," Data2":634.55," Data3":637.82," Data4":-18.81," Data5":null,"Da ta6":null,"Data 7":null,"Data8" :null,"Data9":n ull,"Data10":nu ll,"Data11":nul l,"Data12":null , "Data13":null," Data14":null,"D ata15":null,"Da ta16":null,"Dat a17":null,"Data 18":null,"Data1 9":null,"Data20 ":null, "Data21":null," Data22":null,"D ata23":null,"Da ta24":null,"Dat a25":null,"Data 26":null,"Data2 7":null,"Data28 ":null, "Data29":null," converted":true },............. ............... ..]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8157</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8155</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ok - we have it locally... can you wait and try again? Or try different time period or averaging?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 21:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8155</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8154</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The "export as csv" is not working, I get bad data.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 09:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8154</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8152</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Yes - exactly - and I suggested just this to me356 earlier Piantelli uses very low pressure.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 19:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8152</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>EccoEcco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8151</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer If that is the rationale, you could completely get rid of LiAlH4 and simply use Ni and Li with externally supplied hydrogen. You can control pressure much easier this way, and you also won't have to back temperatures down in order to occasionally bleed excess hydrogen off in the initial part of the experiment. If the aim is also for the most part dissolving nickel in Lithium as per one of your previous hypotheses, in this way you will be also free to increase temperatures right away to high levels in order to speed up the process (as the solubility of Ni in Li increases exponentially with temperature). (EDIT: it looks like I skipped reading the last part of your comment where you write that a possible plan is adding LiAlH4 in a separate reactor zone) If I remember correctly the Unified Gravity Corporation patent prescribes very low operating H2 pressures. This would make Li transition to gaseous form earlier. If this is the model, it would make sense to not use LiAlH4 so that after preliminary cleaning vacuum cycles are applied only a tiny amount of hydrogen is added before power is applied. I joked on another venue that the "3-6 bars" in Rossi's provisional patent is actually an intentional typo/error Rossi made and it was really intended to be "E-6 bars", i.e.: 1E-6 bar => 10 ^ (-6) bar. Perhaps it really needs to be a vacuum / very low pressure atmosphere as other researchers seem to be using. Come to think of it, with HV discharge this should be similar to the UGC patent.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>EccoEcco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 18:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8151</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8150</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All I am of the following opinion now. LiAlH4, Ni and free Li should not be mixed together in the reactor. In my opinion LiAlH4 serves only as a Hydrogen source first to Hydrogenate the Nickel before the Li Melts, then to make the Li on the surface of the Ni LiH. The reversible reaction 2 LiH + 2 Al → 2 LiAl + H2 (R3) Allows the release and capture of H2 at will. The primary reaction is pure Piantelli Ni+H - the secondary reaction is 1H + 7Li > 2 X 4He Our experiments so far have had all three reactants mixed together - and in this instance, as I calculated last year - the Al can play a role but it is in the way 27Al is a much bigger target than 7Li and in time it would destroy the (R3) reaction - that which enables the control of H2 in the cell since the Al would be transmuted and loose its function and the products are in the way. The big yield is from 1H + 7Li > 2 X 4He, so you want nothing in its way. We, and other replicators may have seen low excess heat due to mixing everything together. I then had the inspiration that we might have mixed in a specific order in GS 5.2 - so I asked which order the powder was mixed in GS 5.2. Alan seems to recall the free lithium was added first - this is as I suspected and would be not ideal - but advantageous as per the above hypothesis. So, the suggestion is to, as a half way house, mix and pestle mortar the free lithium / Ni together before adding the LiAlH4 - or add mixed & ground Ni+Li to the cell first and drop the LiAlH4 in afterwards - even as a "pellet" or after a piece of alumina felt. This is consistent with my calculations based on Piantelli theory, Rossi's 2012 interview with Ruby Carat and his patent and the claimed critical reversible reaction. It is also consistent with the implications of Ikegami, Unified Gravity Corporation and on the electron screening of molten LiH. http://unifiedgravity.com/styled-10/ By having LiAlH4 in a different heated part of the reactor, it allows control of 2 LiH + 2 Al → 2 LiAl + H2 (R3) which means you can seal it up and control the H2 Pressure by varying the temperature of the Ni+LiH zone (above LiH breakdown) and LiH Al zone temperature you can control the ratio of H in LiH to enable molten LiH / Li on the Nickel at far lower temperature Li H liquid plasma.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8150</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8149</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Jeff The recipe was for brevity at the end of an exhausting evaluation. In the GS 5.3 experiment - that we are about to start calibrations of today - we will be doing extreme levels of documentation. As we go - please pay attention and ask for clarity on any aspect and we shall endeavour to clarify the live document.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 16:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8149</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen Cooke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8147</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Interesting article about Hydride Ion conduction: http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Hydride_ion_conduction_makes_its_first_appearance_999.html http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6279/1314]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Cooke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8147</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeff morriss says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8145</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The 18 step process outlined above is not quite the same as an experimental protocol, where each step is called out in terms of specific variables and conditions. For those of us who are attempting replications it would most useful if the steps above could be written more in a format such as typically appears in journals.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jeff morriss</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8145</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jeff morriss says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8143</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Unfortunately, the radiation was ultimately traced to decay progeny of Rn222 that adhered to dust. Null experiments (air flow without the cell and the cell without airflow) confirm that radioactivity is detected only when airflow is present. As a final confirmation, I was able to borrow a CdTe detector, and the observed gamma energies matched those for Rn222 decay products.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jeff morriss</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 02:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8143</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Kalle That was an instrumentation wobble.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen Cooke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8134</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This might be a bit simplistic thinking but I wonder if low energy proton capture can only occur if the daughter nucleus has a positive Qbeta+ ? Perhaps in these cases the beta+ emission or EC is even stimulated. It might also explain why Protons are not absorbed by Ni62 since Cu63 has a Qbeta+ value of -66.9 keV. Once Internal Bremsstrahlung emissions are generated from EC or beta + emissions could these excite electrons to higher energy levels in other atoms outside the group 10 elements to allow H- anion absorption in those atoms in the same way as occurs in the group 10 elements such as Nickel? Perhaps then copper and zinc atoms could absorb H- anions In the same way as Nickel and their nuclei would also then absorb protons?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Cooke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8134</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8130</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Artefact Thanks for that - it is in good correlation with my understanding.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 01:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8130</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>artefact says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8128</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here is a links that paradigmnoia posted on lenr-forum: "They found that the typical target had so many electrons ripped away (26 in total) that the nickel atom was left with just two electrons" http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/11/hairy-metal-laser-show-produces-bright-x-rays/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>artefact</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 08:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8128</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8126</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Stephen Thanks for that.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8126</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen Cooke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello Bob I found a very interesting link to an excel sheet online. It contains the beta emission spectra for a very large number of Nuclei. Note this is the kinetic energy beta spectra not Bremsstrahlung spectra from the beta emissions. But includes EC as well as Beta emissions I thought it might be useful and interesting resource anyway. Here it is: http://www.doseinfo-radar.com/BetaSpec.zip I suppose it might be possible to derive the Inner Bremsstrahlung emission curve from these beta emission curves somehow. (I found it originally in this link on research gate https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_can_I_determine_the_energy_spectrum_of_beta_decay )]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Cooke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8124</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8113</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All New video - "Opening the door - Part 1" https://youtu.be/NqyYYAXox4c]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8113</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8112</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Webbie The power down (temperature drop), pressure down and power up (temperature up to near boiling point of Lithium) were all attempts to trigger the process - at the moment, we don't know if one, two or three of these steps are important, perhaps - just being hot enough for long enough would do - so we must replicate, which may take some time - first attempt will be from the 5th April. We are getting a module added to the Spectrometer that will tell us the timings of dead pulses so that if we get it triggered again - we will have a handle on the timing and duration of the event.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8112</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>webbie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8111</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What is the "shock" that could have triggered the supposed reaction during timeframe #7? Could it be the manual drop in pressure around 02-02 1:00? The sudden temperature increase that followed? Maybe both together?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>webbie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8111</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8110</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Stephen Nice... new video coming - editing now. Keep looking!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8110</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen Cooke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8109</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Alan for those links. I also found the paper yesterday. It's very interesting I think. I had no idea of its historical significance though, that's great! The book looks great too I still need to look through both the paper and the book more closely. I must admit inner/internal bremsstrahlung (IB) is new to me, but it's certainly interesting. It seems it is associated with beta - or + decay or electron capture rather direct than external stimulation as in external bremsstrahlung (EB). It seems interesting to me as it is generated locally to the decaying nuclei. It has been used in the past for characterizing the weak force in nuclei, attempting to help determine the mass of neutrinos for example. The shape of the spectra has a particular signature which depends on the source which is interesting. There are a number of theoretical models that are used to explain the spectra but none work that well in certain ranges. The KUB model for example fits best at lower energies but deviates at higher energies where the experimental values are higher than the model. I attach here some papers that might be relevant they are again pay walled but I think are available from the link provided by Bob earlier. Inner bremsstrahlung from Ni63: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0954-3899/16/12/012/pdf Inner bremsstrahlung from Fe55: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02710930 Inner bremsstrahlung from Be7: https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:9362099 It would be very interesting to see if there are any from the Cu isotopes mentioned by Bob and also any from the CNO type cycles he has mentioned previously. Maybe there is astronomical data for the latter. I will look into it to see what I can find. Do we know if Ni 63 isotope was checked for in the Lugano or parkhomov ash? It has a half life of 100 years The Q value for its beta- decay is about 66 keV which may lead to lower energy X -rays than they were looking for?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Cooke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8109</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8108</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Here's a seminal paper on the topic from 1951: http://goo.gl/bre7AV The math is a bit abbreviated but its progression seems logical. It may be the first time this diagram appeared in publication: http://magicsound.us/MFMP/Inner_Bremsstrahlung.jpg Josef Jauch worked with Pauli, and he followed up with a full book on the subject in 1955 with Fritz Rohrlich (another collaborator with Pauli): https://goo.gl/T9ylrl]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2016 05:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8108</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8106</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Stephen Take a deeper look at "Inner Bremsstrahlung"]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8106</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8105</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Stephen Thanks for that - if you need a paper - look here http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/home/general-updates/518-sci-hub-for-when-you-need-more-understanding]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8105</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen Cooke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8100</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I found an interesting link on X-Ray continuum radiation following proton bombardment of certain materials. Unfortunately it is paywalled so I haven't read the whole paper but fortunately the first pages are available in preview, and these already give some interesting information i think. They talk about a number of different possible source for continuum radiation which is interesting. They also have an example spectrum from Aluminium on the 2nd page. I thought it might be interesting context information so here it is: http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01406798#page-1 I think they are looking more at softer X-Rays than those observed by MFMP with the Nal Scintillator in Spectrum 7. But they do seem to see a bremsstrahlung like behaviour in this lower energy range between 1 and 17 keV. I suppose these are from secondary electron Bremsstrahlung I'm not sure what Q value they have but I suspect it is a lot lower than the energies implied in Spectrum 7.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Cooke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8100</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8092</link>
			<description><![CDATA['Signal' - Part 1... A video related to the 'Signal' which will warrant discussion. This video discusses one of the key aspects of what Prof. Francesco Piantelli shared with us that helped us to conclude we may have seen a critical event occurring in the *GlowStick* 5.2 experiment. It is also what may tie the two leading emerging 'New Fire' technologies together https://youtu.be/k9ALuWrmXBo]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8092</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8091</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Potential Characteristic X-Ray table for GS 5.2 by Stephen Cooke https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/169a5WL1uABgXum9pQk2d1mtY92bZcBtMkAj7sh206u8/edit?usp=sharing Thanks again Stephen!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8091</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8090</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Stephen Good find! I personally had not seen that. Can you do a favour for me, can you go through all the fuel elements / SS / Alumina and pull out the list of characteristic X-Rays that might be expected. The fuel container was 316L Fe, C, Cr, Ni, Mo, Mn, Si, P, S Additionally, there is O in the Mullite at least and Li Al in the fuel. I am not sure we need to consider the Kanthal as I am not sure this adds much more.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8090</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen Cooke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8089</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Interesting table of Characteristic X-rays and absorption edges for various elements: http://www.kayelaby.npl.co.uk/atomic_and_nuclear_physics/4_2/4_2_1.html Maybe you have it already but note it here just in-case]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Cooke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8089</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8088</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@TOP No - that is thermite, it is nothing to do with the New FIre - it is a vigorous but standard chemical reaction. The Ice exploding is most likely the recently crowd science discovered coulombic explosion. https://youtu.be/LmlAYnFF_s8]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8088</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TOP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8087</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Do you think it's possible that the Mythbusters have ignited the "new fire" in www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6cMmk8LZgQ ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TOP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8087</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8085</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Stephen You are getting closer! Kudos to you for actually thinking! I fully agree and predict that the vast majority of the energy of all parts of the way this works will be at the bottom end. I am looking forward to if SKINR getting their reactor working in the run this week or next as they have much more capability to do full spectral analysis for the photons that are able to escape with energies down to 1KeV (Arguably many would not). Keep looking at Piantelli's Patent and the quantum mechanical models - it would be so nice if you can come to the same insight as Piantelli before I spell it out.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8085</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen Cooke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8084</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Whilst on the topic of materials. Would an anion conductor such as Mayonite serve some useful purpose in these devices? http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2015/CP/c4cp05442c#!divAbstract It seems quite robust to high temperatures.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Cooke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8084</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen Cooke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8083</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Interesting article on Carbon Nano Tubes improving resistance of metals to radiation damage. http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Carbon_nanotubes_improve_metals_longevity_under_radiation_999.html I wonder if this technology could improve the robustness of the components and materials used internally in LENR devices to radiation damage. Especially the long term life. Such as the mulite tubes or SS fuel containers or Tungsten, or Lead radiation shield. It seems to me it offers a way out for trapped alpha particles that may collect in thes materials as well. May be this offers a way to avoid pressure build up from Helium.... Unless we need it to be there of course. Edit: I suppose we should be careful it does not dampen the LENR effect, but I think Axil has suggested that carbon may even enhance LENR somehow. Also given their 1d nano structure and interesting electrical and hydrogenation properties CNT may play an interesting role in SPP production too]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Cooke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8083</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen Cooke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8082</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Bob given the broad spectrum from the bremsstrahlung like X-Ray "burst". As has been discussed this propagating radiation may extend to lower frequencies with even much higher intensities down in the UV range below the sensitivity of the scintillator to around the plasma frequency (15.9 eV for Nickel, 14.9 eV for Al, 13.2 eV for W, 9.0 eV for Ag ) At these frequncies the photons could excite electrons from their current energy levels to higher ones. If propagating photons are needed presumably the higher energy transitions would be most effected and optical ones below the plasma frequency less so. Once excited to higher energy levels the lower energy orbitals will contain vacancies. Would this not impact the quantum electon orbitals you mentioned. I.e. The electrons in these excited atoms would no longer be in their ground state? If the particular electron orbital state is important for the absorption of the H- ion this could be important. Interestingy I read that for the transition metals both the higher couple of occupied orbitals in ground state may normally contain vacancies not just one. These levels are important as it is the electrons in these levels that are a available for bonding and conduction in metals. Perhaps this is a chicken and egg situation though as I understand the bremsstrahlung type radiation occurs once the H- ion is already being absorbed. Do the auger electrons released however come from the inner S1 Electrons? Is this part of the process to "open the door" by releasing S orbital electrons to allow the H- ion in to lower levels? Just trying to guess what you might have in mind here. I'm looking forward to seeing yours and Piantellis ideas and explanation. On a slightly related matter If an atoms electrons are excited to higher energy states these would normally return to ground state emitting a photon. what happens to those transitions if the photon that would be released is below the plasma frequency? Would it couple directly to thermally heat the free electrons or bulk plasmons with out releasing a propagating photon? Would it preferably perform a high energy transition to another energy level? Would it stay in some excited state? Could we have an atom with electron shells sustained in some rather excited state with additional vacancies at some levels. Probably this is speculating and confusing things a bit far though.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Cooke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8082</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8079</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All, Analysis from Bob Higgins in his own words. "Based on comments from Jones and others, I have done some analysis to determine if the GS5.2 signal in Spectrum-07 could have come from gamma produced from radon gas decay progeny. First, Alan Goldwater produced a map showing the areas where radon levels were high in his area. In the area of his lab, radon levels are low, but they are higher where Jeff Morris did his work. Internet participant, Ecco, found a plot of gamma emissions from radon progeny - I put it here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5Pc25a4cOM2cnV6U0V5Z3MxSXM I took this graph, digitized it, calibrated the energy scale, and resampled it to the same energy scale and samples as the GS5.2 Spectrum-07 calibrated signal data. Then I hypothesized, what if the Spectrum-07 signal came from radon? So, I normalized the radon progeny spectrum to have the same total counts as the Spectrum-07 signal and overlaid the two on the same graph. You can find the high resolution graph here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5Pc25a4cOM2Yk8xQlNZOHo3ZVk What can be seen in the overlay is that the two spectra are clearly different. If the GS5.2 Spectrum-07 signal were due to radon progeny gamma, a distinct peak would have been seen at 610 keV, and by contrast, the GS5.2 Spectrum-07 signal is clearly smooth."]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8079</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ascoli65 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8075</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ charlie tapp, all the ecat tests held on 2011 took place in Bologna, where is one of the hardest water (highest content in limestone) in Italy. Bologna is in the red zone (1). Here you have a summary of the tests held on that year: http://i.imgur.com/rB93G1X.jpg. The first documented fat-cat test was held on July 7, 2011 (2). Maybe one of the 2 fat-cats shown in the photos has been used also in the two successive tests, and a lot of limestone and/or rust could have accumulated inside it. I don't know which specific steel has been used in the fat-cat, but it has a little effect on its heat capacity. As for the pump, it was on the cold side, no problem. Maybe, the greater risks were for the relief valve. (1) http://www.ecowater-systems.it/la-cartina-della-durezza-dell-acqua_1013906.html (2) http://22passi.blogspot.it/2011/10/test-e-cat-7-luglio-2011.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ascoli65</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 18:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8075</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>webbie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8074</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Rossi mentioned recently that there is a way to produce electricity and no heat, but with a lower COP. I wonder if this due to not using lithium, therefore not having alpha particles in the system.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>webbie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8074</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>webbie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8073</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think I figured out why adding more Ni62 in a Ni-H (no Li) system would help. Ni62 is the source of "high" energy protons as described in Piantelli's patent. Ni58-61 are the reagents and will emit radiation that is thermalized by the lead shielding. There is probably an optimal ratio of Ni62 to Ni58-61 that will maximize production of radiation. This ratio just happens to be higher than the one in natural nickel. Each nickel isotope would have a different probability of being a catalyst or a reagent. Ni62 being mostly a catalyst, Ni58 being more on the reagent side. So a pure Ni-62 system would not do much. This coincides with what Rossi said in 2011, that he enriches his nickel but doesn't eliminate Ni58, just reduces it. To me that explains why Rossi added more Ni62 in his Ni-H system back when he wasn't using Li.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>webbie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8073</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8072</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Webbie This is probably because that was where Focardi and Piantelli where when they stopped working together. Piantelli told us specifically that his understanding, born out of the scientific method subsequent to his work with Focardi, lead to far greater understanding which he put into his 2008-11-24 priority patent, which was published on 2009-11-24. Rossi will have got the isotopic significance from Focardi. The reason 62Ni helps will become even more clear as we proceed - but it is in Piantellis 2008 patent in text. It was Li at first as far as I can work out as he still added H. The extra gain came from Li acting to make it easier to get H- and the secondary reaction. I think you will find that you can get a good COP with enriched 62Ni and H alone - look at the radiation that Jeff and Me356 are getting - and Randall Mills for that matter! Adding Alkaline metal is what takes it up a notch.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8072</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8069</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ascoli65 thanks did not know that still do not understand the very rust water you would think the boxes would be made of stainless to avoid this mess would not be good for the metering pumps , thermocouples , valves anything to do with the water. Also the pumps should be on the cold side so I don't get the rust unless I saw it wrong but who knows maybe they are in flint mi. Not Florida.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8069</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ascoli65 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8068</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ charlie tapp, the fat-cats were weighed empty of water. The fat-cat tested on September 2011 weighed 80 kg, and the so called SSM lasted for 35 minutes, preceded by an heating phase of 90 minutes. On October the weight increased at 98 kg, and the so called SSM lasted 3.5 hours, after an heating phase of 4 h, included 3 pause of 10-15 min each.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ascoli65</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 00:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8068</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8067</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Webbie Rossi's claim is completely consistent with the linked hypothesis. As I said there - further down the line, having Li and H is great for heat removal. You have made a fair assessment and are starting to demonstrate a good understanding of the process and reaction chain. I think you and Stephen are the closest. Hoefully - if I can find the time and energy this week - many more people will be up to speed and see how everything just fits together. Keep thinking!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8067</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>webbie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8066</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Rossi once again repeated on his blog that lithium is the main source of energy in the e-cat. @BobGreenyer I think you were onto something with this post: https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/1035061893191176 How does that connect with your recent hypotheses? I think Piantelli's patent is worth a re-read. My current belief is that starting with natural Nickel you would have a reaction with the following characteristics : low COP, Ni-62 forming, higher external emissions. Nickel being the main fuel. Once you reprocess and reuse fuel that has been enriched with Ni-62, then the reaction would switch to a higher COP. The main fuel lithium in this case. I wonder if this theory would negate the need to thermalize radiation with W or Pb in order to obtain excess heat... Once we are in "lithium mode" we are dealing mainly with alpha particles... Therefore I hypothesize that you won't see much excess heat just by shielding the reaction and that the key is the nickel enrichment. Once you master the radiation phenomenon it would be nice to have a long run that might produce Ni62. Maybe Jeff Morris is closer to that. Testing isotopes after running his experiment over a longer timeframe would be nice. Buying Ni62 is a nice shortcut too!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>webbie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2016 21:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8066</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8064</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@all is it possible that there is something mixed with the water in the ecat may even add to the weight issue. I remember being disgusted with how nice the ecat plant looked inside of the container except for the clear tubeing used for the water very very rusty looking. Kind of like my radiator Water when I am to cheap to buy antifreeze or could something be mixed in it to help with thermalizing. Or maybe it is just iron used for shielding and thermalizing causing the rust]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2016 16:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8064</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ascoli65 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8062</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Bob, - "You can follow the work we are doing to its logical conclusion then judge eh?" You invited people to let you know their opinions on your hypothesis, and that's what I'm doing. - "I am just not sure why you go to so much effort to find alternative explanations, what is your motivator?" Probably the alternative explanation is yours. Until few days ago, you didn't even know that the ottoman ecat (or fat-cat) weighed nearly 100 kg. Since its first appearance on September 2011 (1), this fact perplexed many commentators, and many of them argued that this huge weight was only for storing the heat required to sustain the so called SSM. The same objection was raised after the October test. This fact puzzled me too. A couple of months later, I verified, with the help of a simple numerical model, that this straightforward explanation was "autoconsistent e" with the data shown in the Lewan report, and shared this finding in an Italian site (2), along with the same diagrams linked in the previous post #189. About my motivation, it is the same of most people, you included, which are following this story going on since January 2011: catch the truth. - "If it is not real, we'll establish that through experiment - it is not like we have given up because people have called us fools over the past 3.5 years and we are not going to stop now... nothing you can say will stop this - so why go to so much trouble?" I never called you fools. I always appreciated the activity of MFMP in every occasion in which I wrote about it. I have been among the first estimators of the MFMP initiative in looking for the truth, and, since the beginning, I gave my contribution to the effort of the HUG team (3). So, it's absolutely not my intention to stop you. Vice versa, I hope that the MFMP will continue to investigate the soundness of every cold fusion claim with the same spirit of the past 3.5 years. For instance, I don't know if the HUG team is still operatively involved in the MFMP activity, but I am quite confident that if they want they can in short time make a simulacrum of a fat-cat, and possibly replicate the same results obtained in the 2 tests held in 2011. - "Did you see Jeff Morris replication of Celani, which is a replication of JPB who replicated us replicating Celani - I guess you have adequate conspiracy theories to account for 3 independent replications of Celani?" I followed the work of Celani since August 2012, when he presented at ICCF17 in Seoul (4) what I deem some of the most absurd graphs in the history of cold fusion. His cell has been thoroughly investigated by the HUG team. After almost an year of struggle, conducted with the best skill, the utmost good will, and, most importantly, with the original wires and the active cooperation of Celani himself, the MFMP was not able to confirm any excess heat, as reported at the ICCF18 in Missouri (5). The summary table on this poster well describes the situation: only one out of 5 verifications confirmed the excess heat, and this single positive result came from someone which signed almost every documents issued by Celani in the previous 20+ years, not a so much independent replicator. Why should I waste my time in looking at the results of someone else which says today to have saw some evanescent and controversial signal, during his trying to replicate a device that, as the MFMP has already shown, behaves like a normal wire inside a normal glass tube? (1) http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3264362.ece (2) http://www.energeticambiente.it/sistemi-idrogeno-nikel/14728165-apparato-rossi-focardi-verita-o-bufala-135.html#post119275652 (3) http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/162-some-comparison-results#comment-869 (4) http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnalloa.pdf (5) https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36265/VerificationsFrancescoCelaniLENR.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ascoli65</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8062</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8060</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ascoli65 You can follow the work we are doing to its logical conclusion then judge eh? I am just not sure why you go to so much effort to find alternative explanations, what is your motivator? If it is not real, we'll establish that through experiment - it is not like we have given up because people have called us fools over the past 3.5 years and we are not going to stop now... nothing you can say will stop this - so why go to so much trouble? Did you see Jeff Morris replication of Celani, which is a replication of JPB who replicated us replicating Celani - I guess you have adequate conspiracy theories to account for 3 independent replications of Celani?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 23:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8060</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JustaGuy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8058</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ All One/more of you need to go to the experiment chat site and take on the task of retrieving Muon Shower Data (5 second resolution) during the exact time of the supposed event. This will help rule out Cosmic Muons as the source, especially to critics. This will take some e-mails to actual cosmic ray observatories near the area, to zone in on the data. Thanks. http://magicsound.us/MFMP/video/ http://mfmp1.chatango.com/ Update 1: anon(s) have provided the following two useful links regarding Cosmic Ray Events during that date/time: http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/communities/space-weather-enthusiasts ftp://ftp.swpc.noaa.gov/pub/warehouse/2016/WeeklyPDF/ Many thanks on this. So far, no strange things happened during that period (btw, here is the missing 3-4 second supposed burst period, which could have lasted several minutes, from the PA1000 Pwer Analyzer in #124 Alan G post (time in UTC with PST as the local time zone): Date Time UTC Watts V rms A rms Watts R ohms 2-Feb-16 2:50:41 998.80 99.01 10.09 998.80 9.81 2-Feb-16 2:50:41 998.97 99.02 10.09 998.97 9.81 2-Feb-16 2:50:42 999.31 99.04 10.09 999.31 9.81 2-Feb-16 2:50:42 608.98 77.32 7.88 608.98 9.82 2-Feb-16 2:50:43 41.82 20.26 2.06 41.82 9.82 2-Feb-16 2:50:46 867.18 92.18 9.41 867.18 9.80 2-Feb-16 2:50:47 924.54 92.56 9.45 924.54 9.80 2-Feb-16 2:50:47 928.76 93.15 9.51 928.76 9.80 2-Feb-16 2:50:48 935.18 93.85 9.58 935.18 9.80 So, 2016-02-02 02:50:43 to 02:50:46 UTC (about 6:51 PM PST on Feb 1st)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JustaGuy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 19:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8058</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8056</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Jeff is reporting significant radiation from his Celani-type of experiment. https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2847-Celani-Type-Replication/?postID=14761#post14761]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 13:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8056</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Slad says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8052</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ascoli, Please ignore my drunken comment! I don't disagree with you]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Slad</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 01:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8052</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Slad says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8051</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ascoli65, You say the most logical candidate for the heavy mass is steel, because the volumetric heat capacity is at least the double of the lead... BUT, this difference is 2nd order compared to the volumetric latent heat of fusion of lead, which unlike for steel, is accessible at a reasonable temperature.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Slad</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 01:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8051</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ascoli65 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8050</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Bob (in response to your comment #274), I saw once again your video, where you talk about the ecat test held on October 6th, 2011. The sequence of the events is clear, but it doesn't demonstrate by itself that your interpretation of the functioning of the "ottoman" model is correct. What you say can be essentially divided in 2 parts. In the first, you resume the main data contained in the Mats Lewan report. Such informations were well known to each one, me included, that was following the story at that time. In the second part, you imagine (as you said) a series of phenomena that could have happened inside the sealed inner box. I will not enter these arguments, many others did already criticize them, I just say that what you imagined is not (or still not) in the physics books, and it would need some materials not so easy to find on the market. I suggest you to imagine a different explanation, which is based on the physics that you already find in the present books, and requires very cheap and already available materials. This is my alternative recipe: A - Ingredients: 1) Take an heating element like this one (http://www.ricambicucine.com/resistenze-forno/151-resistenza-grill-forno-tipo-samet.html), which is able to completely thermalize the energy of a flow of electrons up to a power of 2500 W. 2) Fix a couple of steel slab of about 25x25x4 cm at both side of the heating element. 3) Put the above wafer into a 30x30x13 cm sealed box. 4) Weld a series of fins on the upper side of the inner box, and, maybe, a second series on the lower side. 5) Put this all inside a larger casing of about 50x60x35 cm. 6) Place on the upper cover of the external casing a relief valve calibrated at about 2 bar (abs). 7) Wrap all with a thick thermal insulation. 8) Procure a peristaltic pump able to inject a flow of 2 g/s, against a backpressure of at least 2 bar (abs). 9) Provide all the necessary wiring, tubing, and instrumentation . 10) Check all the safety aspects. B - Cooking: 1) Switch on the pump at half flow rate, and start filling the external casing with water. 2) After a suitable delay, switch on the heating element. Then switch it off when its temperature reaches a suitable safety level. 3) Repeat the above point, switching on-off at two suitableT levels. Possibly, the last cycle can be prolonged until the heating element breaks up. 4) Look very carefully at the decreasing trend of the internal temperature and when it approaches, let's say, 150 °C, decide to stop the cooking, and maximize the pump flow to speed up the cooling. C - Serve your SSM. :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ascoli65</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 23:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8050</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8049</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Implications of Signal 2, Seeing into the SunCell with X-Ray Eyes https://youtu.be/9jdEXoFmYVo]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 20:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8049</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8048</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Arnaud, When we have something that is reliable we'll let you know]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 20:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8048</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8047</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Charlie, Thanks for the link - I should be with me356 on Sunday.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 20:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8047</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8046</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@robert Greenyer and me356 tungstuntoolwor ks.com may be able to help with the fuel container. You can design your costum part online and get quotes]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8046</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JustaGuy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8045</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ All (Alan): Since the main criticism so far, seems to be Cosmic Muons --> [Lead] Neutron Activation --> [Internal] Bremsstrahlung, I think we should run the Gamma Spectrometer/Ca ve as it is (no cell needs to be there), using the new automatic spectrum accumulation (10 minutes each?) setup in the software. and let it run for some time, to see if we can see any similar events in the data. This will allow us to practice viewing/analyzi ng Gamma Spectra in near real time, as well as provide some useful data to the issue at hand, while giving us a long background accumulation with the open cave (and the different bricks) which we still don't have. Alan, I know you're very busy, but if we can set this up, I think it would be extremely useful. Once running, it shouldn't require much "tending" to.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JustaGuy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8045</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pekka Janhunen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8044</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Jamie Sibley, others I think that there cannot be a significant amount of fast alphas because if there were, they would occasionally strip neutrons from Li7 and D, and we would see those neutrons. The stripping probability is small, only one per million or so, but in a kilowatt scale reactor the flux of neutrons would still be significant. By fast alphas I mean 8.5 MeV alpha as from p-Li7 fusion. If the alpha energy is of order 1-2 MeV or less, then neutrons are not produced (because the stripping reactions are endothermic with energy thresholds). I looked the details (cross sections etc) up some time ago but don't have them at hand now. But this was my conclusion.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Pekka Janhunen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 17:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8044</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jamie Sibley says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8043</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Pekka Janhunen You got me there. However, since there are a lot of fast alpha particles shooting around in the fuel, those could trans-mutate 58Ni to 62Ni via alpha capture, then electron capture. This is wild speculation of course.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jamie Sibley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 17:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8043</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Arnaud says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8042</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I would love to buy a few capsules !]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Arnaud</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8042</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen Cooke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8041</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Interesting article on Toms Hardware site about thermal imaging: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/accurate-infrared-thermal-measurements,4453.html Its about an evaluation with the use of Optris PI 640. I think they use the one that goes to 900 degrees C but i think there is a version that goes to higher temperatures too?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen Cooke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 14:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8041</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8040</link>
			<description><![CDATA[me356 proposes 2 fuel cartridge formats, to be made in SS or Tungsten - depending on use. Capsule https://goo.gl/59pmjF Cartridge https://goo.gl/DxPTHd]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 13:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8040</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8039</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ascoli Please look at the video again and see the sequence of events.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 11:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8039</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ascoli65 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8038</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Bob (answering your comment #267), anyway, now you know that the "ottoman" model weighs around 100 kg. This is for sure, because many people put it on the scale. But you don't know for sure what was contained inside the inner bolted box. There are no independent witnesses that can say what is contained inside it. How can you be sure that there was a shield of 50 mm of lead? Please, use your good sense. How it is possible to put around the heating elements a metal like lead which melt at the temperature reached inside the box? How can you replace them when the "supposed" nuclear charge is depleted? Moreover, there was absolutely no space for a shield of 5 cm of lead in the first ecat models (1) and no external emissions were reported. So, the most logical candidate for the heavy mass contained inside the inner box of the "ottoman" ecat is steel, whose volumetric heat capacity is at least the double of the lead, ... and does not melt. And many dozens of kg of steel store a lot of thermal energy. (1) http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3166577.ece/BINARY/original/Test_1_april+049_600px.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ascoli65</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 07:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8038</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pekka Janhunen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8037</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Jamie Sibley But one needs about 3 neutrons per nickel atom to go from natural Ni to Ni62. Loading hydrogen to nickel could only achieve about 1:1 ratio, or at least in PdD the ratio is like that.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Pekka Janhunen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 06:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8037</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8036</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Simpler fuel - circumventing Rossi patent? Pre-process Nickel + add AB5 HydroStik + Passivated Lithium or other Alkaline metal such as Rubidium / Ceasium , maybe add Al powder. http://fuelcellstore.com/horizon-hydrostik-pro-fch-020 Would need to pre-load Hydrostik then freeze in Liquid nitrogen or maybe solid CO2 to take apart and add to reactor... or can take out and load under 40bar.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 04:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8036</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jamie Sibley says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8035</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I believe that the consensus is that the Lugano fuel was pre-processed, and therefor, probably highly loaded with hydrogen in the nickel lattice. This hydrogen would probably not have been detectable by the mass-spec equipment measuring the fuel samples. This explains where all the missing neutron mass came from, if there is electron capture taking place.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jamie Sibley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 04:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8035</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8034</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes Mike.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 03:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8034</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Henderson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8032</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The big problem I had with the Lugano report was 62Ni enrichment and the question of "where did all the neutrons come from?" For 1 g of Ni 58 / 60 / 61 to become highly enriched 62Ni, there must be an absorption of .02 to .06 g of neutrons. There simply was not enough Li7 or D to donate a neutron to the cause. The only explanations were 1) other stuff donated neutrons or 2) sampling error -- perhaps the selected grain of Ni pulled from the ash for composition analysis was either selectively enriched (seems unlikely) or perhaps THE FUEL WAS ENRICHED with a few grains of 62Ni. Light bulb.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mike Henderson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8032</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8031</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ascoli65 Easy to be wise after the fact None of the MFMP knew about the lead and no one told us. I had to argue that the ECats had to have 50mm of lead with Bob Higgins, before we found out that is exactly what they had.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 23:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8031</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>webbie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8030</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My belief is that Rossi managed to enrich Nickel in his reactors but was nowhere near having 96% pure Ni62. So the money making scheme might not be attainable after all.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>webbie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8030</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ascoli65 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8029</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Bob, Ok, I see. So the answer is negative. That's a pity, because if you had tried to replicate first the solid and heavy "ottoman" model of ecat tested in 2011, instead of the later and more evanescent "dog's bone" model, you would have had much more chances to show to the world where the energy source of the "New Fire" comes from, as stated in the first aim of the MFMP mission.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ascoli65</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8029</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rod says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8028</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ When I was a young boy, Cocaine was only a penny a pound. Lol!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 21:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8028</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8027</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mike $13,000 - makes breeding ash a good plan. We're at the dawn of a new age - it's like the first people to make working reactors will, in all sense of the phrase, be the equivalent of the first bitcoin miners. This could be bigger than any Gold rush - this is a Nickel Crush.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 21:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8027</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ascoli65 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8025</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Bob, in the second video ("Why 62Ni? The complete justification") you say that "heaviness" is the cause of the excess heat claimed for some ecat experiments. I agree with you, but not at all with reference to the atomic weight of a specific Ni isotope or of any other transition metal. More easily, the so called SSM period in the ecat test of the October 6, 2011 was allowed by the weight of a large mass of metal packed inside the inner box, whose thermal energy, accumulated during the first heating phase, was sufficient for keeping high the water temperature for a few hours in the subsequent cooling phase, as I already tried to explain you in a previous comment (#189). So, if you don't mind, I would ask you if have you already considered this much simpler justification.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ascoli65</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 21:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8025</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Henderson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8024</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Price per gram (according to Google) Saffron = $6.30 Platinum=$30 Cocaine = $200 Plutonium=$2000 Ni62 > 5x the sum. 8) Note: > means "greater than" hehehe If Rossi is correct and this process enriches Ni62, we have found a fantastic way to fund this effort.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mike Henderson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 20:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8024</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8023</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The price of 62Ni is going up! Get yours whilst stocks last... We were told a few weeks back, the price of 96% pure 62Ni was a snip at $11,600 PER GRAM... we got our quote back today and the inflation monster has hit! This stuff, needless to say, is MUCH more valuable than Gold Dust - even the inflation is! Thanks to the generosity and courage of the crowd, we didn't have to go through committees to get this approved - it is on its way, see here: https://goo.gl/f0XN8B We are going to get 70mg: - 4mg to hold back for isotopic analysis. - 10mg to add to Bob Higgins non-exact replication which is focussed on maximising observation of emissions, this is also meant as a conservative amount to see the scale of any effect, should there be any. - 56mg to quadruple the amount of 62Ni and approximately triple the amount of 64Ni.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 20:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8023</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8022</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Pekka, Thanks for the note on X-Rays, good to know.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8022</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
