Padua Cell - did we bake a cake? [UPDATE#1 - Fuel components tested now alongside ash re-test]
The very first 100% Parkhomov supplied fuel reactor the MFMP ran was the Padua cell. It was heated 2 times, once in Padua, Italy and again at me356's place. In total, it ran for far more than 1 week live and for a large proportion of that over 1000C.
Padua cell re-heat
Whilst there were signs that the "active" side ran hotter than the null side, the point of the experiment was to cook the ingredients with a view to seeing if there might be any transmutations and if there were, would they be in line with Rossi's or Parkhomov's related claims.
There were several test arranged by us and done by various 3rd parties of Parkhomov's fuel components that supported Parkhomov's own analysis.
The reactor tube was made of Coorstek 99.8% Al2O3 - no fuel capsule - and there was Air (Nitrogen, Oxygen, Carbon and air based noble gasses) in the cell as it had no vacuum. The heater wire was Kathal.
A student at a Danish university has conducted, at the universities expense, the first analysis of the ash, and here are the results.
We are not going to comment too much at this stage on these raw results, we just wanted to get the data out for review.
We have asked for the raw data and have a whole bunch of questions for them. We'd be very happy if you could add your own questions below for us to put to the testing party.
Here is a live document to discuss and learn from the raw report
UPDATE#1 - Fuel components tested now alongside ash re-test
The independent researcher that previously did an initial test of the Padua Cell ash, has since been supplied with samples of the two Parkhomov fuel elements (his LiAlH4 and Russian Nickel powder).
We would appreciate any graphing/analysis prowess the crowd can provide.
Comments
высокое качество производства Индии
широкий выбор препаратов для повышения потенции с доставкой
которые впечатляют даже самых взыскательных гурманов - hexagon.vn/.../...
- домашние рецепты
searching for a related topic, your website got here
up, it looks good. I've bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
Hi there, simply become aware of your blog via Google, aand found that it's truly informative.
I'm going to be careful for brussels. I'll be
grateful should you proceed this in future. Numerus folks can be benefited from
your writing. Cheers!
My web-site; download Auto & Vehicles Apps
apk: WWW.Apkdl.cc/.../...
Expect high-quality design, exciting bonus features, and symbols straight out of a 19th-century London crime story.
Play now and explore this story-driven slot game: ankereng.com/.../...
From the first spin to the last bonus, this is a must-play for fans of unique slot games and immersive themes.
friendly (:.
goo.gl/6GsYuw
I did something similar, I sampled
6Li 6.010182 - 6.300047
3752
7Li 6.998976 - 7.300138
37355
7Li ratio
37355/41107=0.90873
6Li ratio
3752/41107=0.09127
Since we know from previous ICP-MS testing that the Lithium ratio was natural in Parkhomov LiAlH4, then the relative amount of 6Li has increased by
0.091 / 0.075 = 1.213
Relative 6Li proportion may have increased by over 21%
Sputter cleaning, blank test and much longer integrations times are important now.
7Li/6Li Ratio
UOM determined the Parkhomov LiAlH4 fuel component to have a 7Li/6Li ratio of 12.48 (average from five runs)
Parkhomov's precedent independent testing by Vernadsky Institute of the Parkhomov LiAlH4 fuel component shows it to have a 7Li/6Li ratio of 12.51
Both of the above testing was done by ICP-MS
The Padua Cell ash by my calculation from the raw Danish university TOF-SIMS has a 7Li/6Li ratio of 9.96
Yes, I know they are not directly comparable.
Tester has made some responses in the live document
Raw data as a compressed ZIP file of a TXT is now here
goo.gl/1qKesR
Short of waiting for the actual questions to be answered, this is what I can ascertain.
The specs on the ionTOF TOF.SIMS-5 show:
Variety of Primary Ion Species:
(Ga, Bin, O2, Cs, Ar, Xe, SF5, C60)
iontof.com/.../...
Looking at the Raw .ITA file that was supplied, we see the following records:
I n s t r u m e n t . P r i m a r y G u n . S p e c i e s B i 3 + +
I n s t r u m e n t . S p u t t e r G u n . S p e c i e s C s
- Mark
We have requested
"Can you dump the data as a CSV file in full scan mode rather than as nominal masses"
Just got off the phone with Nathan @ ionTOF USA and he says the best thing to do is request an ASCII File of the data. He also mentioned that an ITA File is not a raw data file (ITM is?), and that just to analyze these type of files by other parties requires purchasing their software, unfortunately.
- Mark
Thanks for this.
You will see from the live Q&A doc we have asked for a CSV of the data - we also have another party calling on associates that may have the software.
larger
While waiting for the raw data I digitized peak values from one of the screenshots in the report. The assumption is that it didn't cut off maximum counts. If this assumption is valid, the Li isotope distribution here should be approximately 6Li=15% and 7Li=85%
A questions/sugge stions/notes document has been started to capture crowd input and post to the testing party
goo.gl/upTm6s
Regarding this analysis, it would be useful to know how the sample was prepared, what was the support, if it was sputter cleaned, etc.
RSS feed for comments to this post