FacebookTwitterDiggStumbleuponGoogle BookmarksRedditTechnoratiLinkedin

Status report on claimed progress by me356

on .

Bob Greenyer reports the following from recent communications with me356

“Firstly, may I say that me356 is a very diligent individual - he likes to work on things until they are done using just the amount of time on an iteration needed to move forward. He is also a very private person and as such does not like to be hounded, though, frankly, I don’t think anyone does. 

He said in communications made between the 9th and 12th September 2016 that he is satisfied with his research and development.

He states that his reactor can ‘work’ (whatever that means) “for a long time without interruption”. Which in this field is no small feat as some researchers, across a wide range of variants, continue to discover!

He believes that it is using a new approach, specifically he says that he has not seen his approach described in other patents. I cannot confirm if that is the case. He feels this is “very good” - read into that what you will.

He says he is “still trying to achieve SSM (self sustain mode/production of heat without input power) for longer periods and increase COP ([overall] coefficient of performance) without harmful radiation”. Like the MFMP, me356 claims to have observed photons in a range of energies and neutrons, though, he has indicated that the neutron flux is higher if the reaction is overdriven/incorrectly driven. Again, I cannot confirm his specific claims.

He feels that after “some tweaks” his work “will be done” and at that time it would be perfect to precisely measure the COP.

I have offerred to visit him at the earliest possible opportunity which is between 22-29th October with the intention to observe and to test/verify the system and me356 has said that he hopes he will have finished everything by then, he believes he is probably on the last iteration after which the “device will be ready for daily usage (heating/steam production)”. 

Visits have been discussed before but the nature of LENR research is that it is not deterministic (unlike, say software programming) so the above plan is not a certainty and cannot be relied on.

I must also say that I cannot in any way at this stage confirm if me356 has what he claims, but I can say that he is a fast and insightful, multi-skilled experimentalist and I would suggest that if any other parties have working embodiments, they need to get them to market fast or run the risk of becoming irrelevant.

In addition, it must be noted that if he has achieved what he claims - then it demonstrates that with around 18 months of hard graft and focussed research by competent researchers conducting rapid cycle experiments using publicly available material as a starting point - it may be possible to develop a working device. I hope to test the veracity of this in the coming months. For now, we have not even seen the evidence.”

Comments   

 
0 #4 Ajay 2018-03-21 09:20
Hii gyu's i am new here this topic
Quote
 
 
0 #3 axil 2016-09-17 07:16
There have been at least three LENR developers who have noticed intense and widespread EMF interference generated from their experiments that in some cases have spanned a distance of influence of many tens of meters from the LENR reactor. All these LENR experimenters as well as myself all took this interference to be related to RF generation in the LENR reaction. But this assumption about RF might not be correct but instead be related to some form of sub-atomic particle generation via the LENR reaction.

This interference could have a disruptive effect on the body, especially, the electrical nature and workings of the brain and nervous system. This EMF interference has been near impossible to detect using RF meters or to shield against including the use of lead, iron, steel plate, electrically charged metal, mu metal and faraday screening. If the nature of this EMF interference can penetrate deeply and completely into the body and access all the electrical activity in the nerves cells throughout the body, unpredictable complications might be produced inside the body at a considerable distance from the LENR reactor and/or inactive stored used fuel.

Different people might be more susceptible to this type of nerve activity interference than others based on the strength of the interference produced by any given reactor design. If you are a LENR experimenter, keep a lookout for abnormal neurological symptoms related to your LENR experiments.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 axil 2016-09-14 20:33
In conversations with eros who claims to have been mentally affected by the LENR reaction, at least he thinks he has, he has found a way to reveal hidden radiation from the LENR reaction.

eros places a block of high Z material(iron, thick steel plate, or lead brick) in front of his reactor. then he covers the front of his GM counter with a copper shield(copper pipe?). This process seems to reveal LENR reactions taking place inside the copper shield. The GM counter seems to register counts due to secondary ionizing reactions in the copper shield.

eros reports: "I found radios react, (to LENR radiation) but it is not for radio transmission but possible muon/betas that hit radio electronics (some clocks etc)."

But when eros measures RF with a detector, he does not see any so the radiation he is seeing is not RF.

ME356 says that he sees RF but maybe like eros, he is seeing something else.

Before ME356 lets his tech out to the world, he should checkout these reports from eros to see if me356 can replicate them with his system.

gameover states as follows:

"3. As you say, others may be experiencing similar effects without being aware so it would help to confirm that methods exist for detecting such unknown radiation.
4. This may sound harsh, but if a novel but potentially harmful effect is behind LENR disclosing it to the public will likely accelerate its scientific and public recognition. This will most certainly eventually result in bans of various kinds, but the end point is that law cannot render illegal something that "officially" does not exist or cannot work. "
Quote
 
 
0 #1 charlie tapp 2016-09-14 20:26
@robert Greenyer do you think he would disclose to you what not to do that seems to cause the bad radiation he has seen for safety reasons? Would be nice if he did even if in private. Be even better if he gave some tips to make it work that would not infringe on his stuff.
Quote
 

Add comment


Here is your generous contributions so far towards our $500,000 target, thanks everyone! : $45,020   Please Donate
See the current state of our booked costs here