FacebookTwitterDiggStumbleuponGoogle BookmarksRedditTechnoratiLinkedin

.:StarDust:. [UPDATE#2 - Part 2: Matryoshka]

Geschrieben von Robert Greenyer am .

Shake and bake...

Imagine you had worked all your life in the nuclear industry and this had fuelled a burning curiosity to investigate further.

Imagine that you had spent decades reviewing and contemplating scientific findings from over 100 years that were just too ahead of their time to be accepted by the mainstream.

Imagine that when you started to look at this old work and apply modern understanding that you not only found out that the original researchers were on to something, but that by re-visiting that work and taking it further, you saw the building blocks of organic life emerging in your data.

Can the truth really be that we are all made from and by stardust?


Part 1 - Introduction

Dr György Egely has taken a hard look over the past few decades at what preceded Pons & Fleischmann's work, from his view as a life-long professional nuclear engineer. What he saw was an array of experiments and observations that were overlooked, miss-interpreted or dismissed but one in particular, that of George Ohsawa caught his eye because he identified that several independent research groups had observed the same phenomena but without really thinking about the underlying process.

We are honoured and proud to announce that we will be working with him and you the crowd to open up his research which goes far farther than any other researcher has done to date in the field of 'dusty plasmas'. György understands from his review of history that those that do not reach out rarely see the fruits of their imagination realised in their time - we hope others in the community can step back from the continually failed route of closed research. Of course, we will publish the work in its entirety.

Since starting our collaboration we have identified several other researchers who have replicated and extended Ohsawa's work and we look forward to reporting and collating their contributions with you through next year. We encourage you to try and get ahead of our reporting - it'll be fun, there is much to discover - it is like a whole other world.

György and his fellow researchers have already provided us with schematics for his last two generations of microwave resonant chambers which we hope MFMP followers can help us fabricate - we know many of you have machine shops and are handy with a welding plant. Please let us know.

Additionally, his colleagues have already furnished us with several generations of magnetron power supply control circuit schematics and similarly, we would be interested to hear from those with power electronic/electrical skill sets in order to help us fabricate these units.

Lastly, if anyone knows good quartz glass manufacturers / suppliers (there are several we have identified) in different geographies - then we'd like to hear about them, as we will need to create high temperature acoustical resonators which form the core of the reactor. There are other areas where you might be able to pitch in - so keep an eye on this developing story.

With an SEM/EDX to hand or a good chemistry lab, there is a real opportunity to develop a bench top device that will be able to transmute elements repeatably in the time it takes you to warm up soup.

With your engagement, 2017 can be the year that controlled transmutations via electro-mechanical and biological systems (follow our "Life Changing" thread) becomes accepted and the repercussions for medicine, technology and everyones standard of living really start to reveal themselves.

In the spirit of a Francesco Celani e-mail / presentation:

Wishing you ALL a very HAPPY Christmas and a PROSPEROUS new year!!!

Making Iron in a few minutes from Carbon and Air



Here is an older interview from over 5 years ago

In this video he describes how he and a team replicated the Pons & Fleishmann effect “brilliantly” @ 19:25

Videoton funded experiment, old KFKI colleagues did it. Presented to Gabor Szeles - half the time and 1/4 the money to do it as originally planned. Gabor Szeles put other people on the job and GE was cast out - not a penny.

They did it like this, a few micron thin layer of copper was applied to a ceramic plate, on top of this was placed a very thin later of palladium upon which was placed a very thin layer of Nickel. After the first positive results George was nearly beaten to death in a senseless 'random' attack without motive, police came, but then dropped the case saying nothing happened.

Since the early 1900s aspects of the scientific community, that advises politicians and operates at the behest of vested interests exercise what George Egely refers to as a “Criminal Strategy” - they just claim an inconvenient discovery is not true and deny, deny and deny its possibility and frustrate its realisation such they can avoid being proved wrong and in doing so maintain their sponsors monopolies and the subjugation of the masses. It is an anti-sustainable approach to research.

Many people have replicated this since George Ohsawa's discovery, here are a few to wet your appetite - do some digging and you'll find more than you think possible.

UPDATE#2 - Part 2: Matryoshka

Push a swing just a little at a time
Fill a reservoir bucket by bucket

Without losses the swing will eventually throw off its passenger and the reservoir will top its dam.

In this second video, Dr. Egely reveals the secret to the amazing power amplification in his 'Dusty Plasma' reactors.

In this video the phrase "peak potential" is 'maximum ability to accelerate reactants'

Comments   

 
0 #19 Robert Greenyer 2017-01-12 10:14
Hi Axil,

Actually, I asked Dr. Egely about the SPP Q value before making the video as in his paper her refers to research ... here is a quote:

"A considerable field amplification process takes place on the surface of dust particles, which is one of the bases of our processes. The local electric field can be amplified up to 10^48 times on the surface of micron and nanometer-sized particles. (Details are in Kathrin Kneipp, Physics Today, 2007, Nov, pp40, or Mark I. Stockman: Nano Plasmonics. Physics Today, Feb. 2011, pp39-44.)"

I asked him what the effective value was in his case and he said 10^3. That is the value I included in the presentation.

This system is phenomenally dynamic and non trivial to comprehend. Here are some of my thoughts.

1. Microwaves are EM oscillating and standing waves.

2. The acoustical resonator has 2 tuned ports that create two fundamental out of phase frequencies and there are expansive harmonics of both which therefore create shifting beat frequencies, these are in sub-sonic all the way to extreme ultra-sonic and in some ranges have extremely high dB values. It is my understanding that these physically compress and re-shape the plasma and its internal structure such that any internal process have this action enabling changes in relative field potentials.

3. The reactor works by loading up carbon particles with electrons and then the EM field offsets the balance of these electrons in the particle and the acoustical resonances re-distribute the relative positions of these particles leading to extreme fields between particles. Dr. Egely refers to the offset charge in the particle in his paper saying “Due to this polarisation, an estimated 10^11 V /cm electric field gradient is formed between the poles of the particle (1)”. That is 10 trillion volts per metre.

4. Surface plasmons intensify further the charge density and the field intensity as a result

5. Plasma wakefield acceleration allow for charged particles to be massively accelerated on the wake of plasma movement - this is a by product of having plasma ions in an accelerating field accelerating other components in the system. It is a secondary effect of a plasma in motion, in this case the plasmas motion is not only caused by the effect of fields on ions but also of the acoustic waves - so the fastest ions in the system are actually not merely influenced by EM fields - hence the extreme complexity in getting the message over!
Quote
 
 
0 #18 axil 2017-01-12 02:36
The polariton power amplification factor stated in the video is far to small at 10e3. It is so small that it is in error, I have seen the amplification factor quoted as 10e9 to 10e12 at the top of page 41 (see reference below) conservatively. But in other places, I have seen this amplification factor defined at a maximum level of 10e15.

See:

Nanoplasmonics: The physics behind the applications. Mark I. Stockman.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d634/cc0f9d8596c9a3e97e8fd97502550731b9c4.pdf
Quote
 
 
0 #17 Robert Greenyer 2017-01-09 11:15
Particles in Motion - NASA discovers why dust particles on the moon and more levitate - could this have implications for dusty plasma?

https://goo.gl/pounws

From the article:

"The study found that the strange properties of Moon dust combined with UV radiation or plasma from the Sun can loft single particles - or sometimes even large clusters of dust - up above the surface.

This is due to the reaction causing an emission and re-absorption of electrons inside 'micro-cavities ' formed between neighbouring particles, which can generate unexpectedly large electrical charges and intense repulsive forces."

Imagine what kind of repulsive forces are being experienced in Dr György Egely's 'Dusty Plasma' reactor!

Could this be one reason why LENR reactions have been reported to be stimulated by UV and LASER light?

Original report: https://goo.gl/9LIXYu
Quote
 
 
0 #16 Axil 2016-12-23 22:51
Post 7 part 3

es, what Rossi is producing is "TAO balls" by applying a static charge to those electrodes. Just the optimum charge level produces the TAO balls but too much charge distroys them. Rossi is continually adjusting the charge on those electrodes to optimize his reaction. If Rossi adds to much charge, the balls disperse and the reaction stops.

In a bit of remembrance, DGT people told me privately, that they also saw balls of glowing light floating around inside their reaction chamber. They said that the color was proprietary information but when I guessed that the balls were blue, they said that I was not wrong. In some speculation, the very high electron density on the surface of the "TAO balls" must setup up a auroral ionization of the air around the balls where nitrogen and some oxygen produce colored light emission.

Contrary to most opinion, this sort of reaction insight leads be to beleive that DGT has something going, but that is only an opinion.

But what are the superconducting microparticles that the TAO balls are formed from?

Hydrogen gets absorbed into the occlusions formed in a flaws in the nickel metal where these hydrogen atoms accumulate and form superconducting metalized crystals of gas. The disrupted metal bonds in the nickel apply huge pressure as the hydrogen accumulates. So nickel with many flaws is good for LENR. These crystals have been determined to be superconducting by demonstrating the Meissner effect in experiments by by Miley and Holmlid(1). These crystals can leave the lattice and remain superconducting and structurally intact in a metastable state. It is the metal bonds strengthen by the imperfections in the metal lattice that compress the hydrogen together to form metalized hydrogen.

Quote:
1- http://phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS&PROFESSORS/pdf/MileyClusterRydbLPBsing.pdf

Ultrahigh-density deuterium of Rydberg matter clusters for inertial confinement fusion targets Leif Holmlid , Heinrich Hora, George Miley, and Xiaoling Yang
But what keeps these superconducting hydrogen crystal together over time, when the nickel bonds are gone what ties the hydrogen atoms together?

You are sitting in your chair right now because of the repulsive force that is produced by the electrons in your butt. In superconducting metalize hydrogen, EMF does not penetrate into the hydrogen crystal; this behavior is called the Meissner effect. In addition, electrons are repelled away from the surface of the hydrogen crystal. This EMF shield makes this crystal very tough. This EMF shell enables this crystal to withstand very high heat and pressure.

There is a charge amplification process that must somehow be going on to add strength to the metalized hydrogen EMF shield. We know that there are huge numbers of electrons being produced in the LENR reaction. Those electrons must contribute to the electric charge that accumulated on the surface of the metallized nanowires. This positive feedback loop in electron production must produce such strong EMF shielding that the nanowire become imperious to heat and pressure.

Mark LeClair says that the ability for cavitation to erode any substance including diamond is due to the shielding that superconductivi ty of metalized water provides. When a cavitation bubble collapses and the metalized water crystal jets forward at many times the speed of sound, the diamond gives way but not the charge on the surface of the water crystal. The accumulated negative charge of all the electrons at the tip of this water based nanowire points the nanowire forward to the solid surface of the material. So most of the electrons aggregate at the tip of the nanowire. Now we will understand how charge works both on metalized hydrogen and TAO balls.
Quote
 
 
0 #15 Axil 2016-12-23 22:50
Post 7 part 2

Quote:
Theorists succumb to Tao

Mysterious microscopic spheres could point towards an unconventional theory for superconductivity

From: the Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia US

Some 20 years ago physicists thought they understood almost everything about superconductivity. Below a certain temperature elements such as mercury suddenly lose all resistance to electric current due to electrons forming pairs, in accordance with the famous Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory. But in 1986 the discovery of copper oxide materials that become superconducting at relatively high temperatures wrecked this view. Today, high-temperature superconductivity in the cuprates still remains a puzzle, but could it be that our understanding of conventional superconductors is even beginning to show cracks? According to Jorge Hirsch of the University of California in San Diego, a phenomenon called the Tao effect cannot be explained by the conventional BCS theory, and instead requires an alternative electrodynamic description that applies to all superconductors (Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 187001).

Superconducting surprise: The Tao effect was discovered in 1999 by the present author and co-workers at Southern Illinois University and Princeton University. To our complete surprise, when we applied a strong electric field to a group of superconducting microparticles we found that millions of them spontaneously aggregated into balls about a millimetre in size. Normal metallic particles either bounce between the two electrodes in a DC electric field or form chains in an AC electric field, so the field-induced formation of balls appears to be unique to superconductors.

The Tao effect was first observed with powders of high-temperature superconductors such as bismuth strontium calcium copper oxide. However, subsequent experiments performed in 2002 and 2003 with low-temperature superconducting powders, and also with magnesium diboride, confirmed that die effect occurs for all superconductors. The interaction between superconductors and an electric or magnetic field is an important topic in superconductivity. As early as 1935, more than 60 years before superconducting balls were first observed, Fritz London and his brother Heinz suggested that superconductors and normal conductors should respond differently to static electric fields. In particular, they predicted that a static electric field could penetrate into superconductors as far as a static magnetic field. In our initial experiments with low-temperature superconductors, we found that two critical values of electric field occurred as the strength of the field was increased. The first was the point at which the superconducting microparticles suddenly started to aggregate into stable balls, beyond which the size of the ball started to decrease until the second critical value was reached. At this point, the balls instantaneously disintegrated and flew onto the electrodes.
Quote
 
 
0 #14 Axil 2016-12-23 22:45
Post 7 part 1

Metalized compounds that have free electrons covering the positive charges (holes) will be superconducting at high temperatures while the structure of the superconducting compound is maintained. In metalized hydrogen, all the holes are located in the center of the crystal(nanowir e) and the electrons are orbiting on the outside of this positive core lattice. Highly compressed hydrogen holes and associated electron bonds lead to high temperature superconductivity,



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNhcKBStRW0

Superconductivity is important in LENR because it directs how electric charge and magnetism behaves in LENR. One of the clues that bring us to that conclusion is some details that have slipped out of the normally secretive experimental observations from LENR experimentalists.

For example Fulvio Fabiani states:

Quote:
"We have it all filmed, which still cannot be disclosed. We have photographs of creatures that emit pure light that have completely melted the reactor down, all in a very quiet way. You just turn off the stimuli system and the reaction is switched off. It’s impressive."
I would like to venture an opinion about what those balls of light are and how they are created and how they are destroyed. Those balls of light seem to be the origin or active agent in the Rossi reaction.

Another clue comes from the Rossi patent and that clue provides some insight into Rossi's potential control mechanism. The patent describes a set of electrodes that produce an electric field of 100,000 volts. Rossi is exposing his reaction to a very high electric field. The idea is that an electrostatic field produces these balls of light. I would like to venture some speculation about how that is done.

The next concept to introduce is "Hole Superconductivity"

Quote:
http://sdphln.ucsd.edu/~jorge/hole.html
This reference has more than 100 sub-references if you are interested.
"Hole Superconductivity" pushes out of the positive core of the crystal all electrons and magnetism to the surface of the crystal in a meissner effect.

Quote:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.3912.pdf

Kinetic energy driven superconductivity, the origin of the Meissner effect, and the reductionist frontier
J. E. Hirsch
Now we get to the punch line, "The Tao effect"
Quote
 
 
0 #13 Axil 2016-12-23 22:26
Post 6

I found another interesting experiment that G.A. Shafeev collaborated in that was not included in the list that I initially sent to you.

Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid targets in heavy water

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.0830.pdf

Other systems using laser irradiation of various transition metal nanostructures show both the formation of tritium and its rapid decay as a simultaneous operation.

I like these laser based experiments that reveal in the most basic terms what is happening in the bare bones LENR reaction.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is the point relating to the aforementioned statement:

Superconductivity is central to the LENR reaction because it brings coherence as an indispensable catalytic factor to the LENR reaction.

The LENR reaction is produced by a greatly amplified weak force interaction with matter that destabilizes nuclear matter through coherence.

Like any other subatomic particle, protons and neutrons are inherently unstable. They just appear stable because of their long half lives. The supersymmetry (SUSY) prediction of the grand unification theories, such as the SU(5) Georgi–Glashow model and SO(10) is on the order of 10e34–10e36 yr

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_decay

Particle physics is based on finding supersymmetry to complete the standard model. Not finding proton decay would mean that the standard model was wrong.

To produce proton decay through coherence, it is important to find the conditions where superconductivi ty persists at high temperatures up to 7000K where some instances of the LENR reaction have been observed.

In this system, an interesting observation about how the weak force is operating in LENR

http://www.newinflow.ru/pdf/Klimov_Poster.pdf

Quote:
Spectrometer X-123SDD records soft X radiation (0.1 - 30 keV) in heterogeneous plasmoid. X-receiver is arranged at different cross sections of PVR testing section and cross sections behind nozzle at L = 1 ÷ 100 cm from it.

• Heterogeneous plasmoid behind PVR nozzle is γ-radioactive. Soft X-radiation 100 - 10000 eV from this plasmoid. X-radiation decrement is very small (radiation intensity decrease is about 20% at L = 100 cm)
At the very tip of the reaction nozzle, there is gamma radiation produced by the weak force decay. But over a very short time as the plasma moves away from the reaction nozzle at supersonic speeds, even though the reaction temperature is initially 7000K or more, the level of radiation is reduced in stages until at L = 100cm, the x-ray energy level is nominal at 30 keV. This nominal 30 keV x-ray level is the level reported by Defkalion in their system using spark discharge.

Other systems using laser irradiation of various transition metal nanostructures show both the formation of tritium and its rapid decay as a simultaneous operation. The laser brings coherence to the LENR reaction as a catalyst for weak force amplification.

See

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.0830.pdf

"Tritium is another unstable isotope with half-life of 12.2 years. It would be interesting to induce its beta-decay by exposure to laser radiation, as it was done previously for other nuclides. In this work we demonstrate for the first time the nuclear synthesis and decay of Tritium under laser exposure of various targets in D2O.

I like these laser based experiments that reveal in the most basic terms what is happening in the bare bones LENR reaction.
Quote
 
 
0 #12 Axil 2016-12-23 22:20
Post 5 part 2

Kvazineytron produced during triple collision e + p + e (ep) + e and, on belief
author, is the principal agent of low energy transformations atoms [2].
At the core of Cs137 electron emission occurs in a vacuum and possible. In eyadre (eCs137) Departure
Cs137 nucleus of an electron would occur not in a vacuum but within the scope of the surrounding
electron that is apparently difficult or even impossible. Therefore eyadro
(ECs137) stable, or more likely, has a substantially greater half-life than
conventional core Cs137. Let us explain why. In the experiment, in fact, it is not measured by the number
Cs137 particles in a closed volume, and the number of disintegrations per unit of time, at which
permanent life time proportional to the number of radioactive nuclei. But if some of the nuclei
Cs137 during laser processing enters a different state, with the other,
long lifetime, the average speed of their disintegration will be reduced, with
decrease rapidly at first, and then, upon completion of the transition to a new Cs137 nuclei
condition (eCs137) everything slower and slower. This is the nature of the rate of change
Cs137 nuclei decay was observed and analyzed in the experiment for 10 hours. Therefore, most
all new eyadro (eCs137) is not stable and decomposes under the scheme (eCs137) Ba137 +
e + e +  c lifetime considerably greater than that of Cs137 nucleus which equals 30,167 years.
If an increase in the duration of laser irradiation the rate of decrease in the number
decays per unit time will decrease monotonically and tends to some
constant value, it means that a new state in the form of core (eCs137) (or in which either
some form of that, a priori, can not be excluded) it is not sustainable. This method of solutions
unusual problem? Yes, unusual. Unlikely? Maybe someone will seem even
incredible. But from the point of view of the theory of non-point of the electron is the solution to the problem
is a natural and consistent with the observed maximum continuous
X-ray spectrum at energies ~ 100 keV. And, most importantly, a different compelling
explanation of this method is very interesting experimental fact is not, and
therefore it has the right to exist until such time until a proposed
perfect way.
Literature
1. Laptuhov AI, Rukhadze AA Note on the characteristic size of the electron // Engineering
physics. 2015. №3. S. 19-23.
2. AI Laptuhov Electronic structure and electron-nuclea r forces. Kvazineytron as one of the
the main agents of the low-energy transformations of atoms // Engineering Physics. №9.
2014 S. 09-16 ..
Quote
 
 
0 #11 Axil 2016-12-23 22:19
Post 5 part 1

I used google translate from Russian to english via cut and paste.

Here is the text in English

A possible mechanism of "quenching" of the radioactive isotope Cs137
AI Laptuhov
On Peoples' Friendship University Seminar (Head NV Samsonenko) 24/11/2016 DF-SN PhD Andreev
(GPI) made a report, "The nonlinear quenching of Cs-137 radioactivity at a laser
ablation in the liquid.

" The report about an interesting phenomenon: the disappearance of the nuclei from
Cs137 ability to spontaneously disintegrate. It summarizes the essence of the experience. Private well
a sealed volume (water containing gold nanoparticles with a size of R = 3-10 nm
concentration n ~ 1012 1 / cm3 and a quantity of a radioactive isotope Cs137)
treated with low-power laser beam. As reported in the report, in the process
treatment, the amount of the radioactive isotope Cs137 was relatively fast
decrease. After termination of the rapid decrease in laser isotope Cs137
ceased. It stressed that the observed decrease is not due process
decay Cs137Ba137 + e + , since in this case the intensity of the radiation
during operation of the laser would have to increase by 1200 times, and in fact it was maintained
approximately at the same level. It turns out that during the operation of the laser cores
Cs137 lost the ability to disintegrate or perhaps more accurately, the time of their lives
significantly increased. How to explain this? In the framework of modern ideas, the
apparently can not be. But it has, and therefore need correction of our ideas.
Below is a natural explanation for this interesting phenomenon in terms of the theory
non-point electron. It was established experimentally that the charge radius of the proton with
mass mp is Rp ~ h / (mpc) ~ 10-13 cm, where h- Planck's constant, electrodynamic c-
constant. It is natural to assume that the charge radius of the electron with mass me too
defined by a similar formula Re ~ h / (mec) ~ 10-10 cm, which is grounded in the work [1].
It is known that the electron can not be in the core of an atom (or at least just because he
large and small kernel). But the nucleus of an atom to the size of Rn may very well is inside
an electron to the size of the kernel Re >> Rn. At least no fundamental prohibitions on
it is not. With this in mind, it is natural to assume that under the influence of laser radiation and the
complex processes in nanoparticles of gold atom Cs137 disturbed stable equilibrium
state and as a result of a triple collision of two electrons with the nucleus of one of Cs137 electron transfers its kinetic energy to the second and can not fly away from the nucleus.
There is a reaction e + Cs137 + e (eCs137) + e, where (eCs137) is the electron to the size of ~
Re ~ h / (mec) ~ 10-10 cm in the center of which lies Cs137 nucleus with charge Ze = 55e. such a system
the particles will be called the electron-ion core, or briefly eyadrom [2]. The formation
eyadra (eCs137) should allocate energy ~ Ze2
/ Re ~ 100 keV (see. Also [2]) in the form of kinetic
electron energy, which is then transformed into x-ray observed in the experiment
continuous emission spectrum with a peak at ~ 100 keV. Eyadro (eCs137)
similarly kvazineytronu (ep), i.e. electron, which lies in the center of a proton.
Quote
 
 
0 #10 Axil 2016-12-23 22:17
Post 4

The definitive LENR experiment type.

Anyone who want to understand LENR through experimentation is well served by doing laser irradiation of gold nanoparticles in a solution of a salt of a radioactive isotope as Andreev has done.

A comment on the The Andreev paper

docviewer.yandex.com/?url=ya-d…5%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5 Cs-137_%D1%81%D 0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B 8%D0%BD%D0%B0%D 1%80 %D0%A0%D0%A3%D0 %94%D0%9D 24_11_2016.pdf&c=58387351efa1

For the English translation see the post above.

using laser ablation for quenching the radioactivity of Cs-137.

Using laser light conversion to a coherent magnetic field through the interaction of coherent laser photons and gold nanoparticles shows how the LENR reaction works.

The LENR reaction is mediated by an amplified weak force. The production of a coherent magnetic field through the use of laser light irradiating gold nanoparticles greatly strengthens the weak force.

LENR is a consequence of the amplified strength levels of the weak force that existed at the beginning of the cosmos where it reaches grand unification strength levels. At these immense levels of strength, protons and neutrons decay into strange matter mesons.

A.V. Simakin has also produced a full range of laser based irradiation of gold nanoparticle experiments that show accelerated weak force activity including stabilization of radioactive isotopes, fusion and fission.

see

scirate.com/search?q=au:Simakin_A+in:physics
A comment on the following paper in Russian
A.I. Laptukhov"The possible mechanism of the quenching of the radioactivity of the isotope Cs137

lenr.seplm.ru/articles/ai-lapt…ioaktivnogo-izotopa-cs137

Among other things, this paper remarks about the steady production of gamma radiation even when the rate of stabilization of the isotope CS137 is accelerated by some 1200 times the expected rate. The decay of Cs137 is an exothermic process; excess energy would be expected to be generated from the conversion of the unstable isotope to the stable daughter decay product.

Where does all that energy produced by the stabilization of the isotope go?

At the most basic level, I have always expected that LENR is a result of a single foundational mechanism, namely the accelerated action of the weak force under the catalytic effect of quantum coherence.

This decay process should always produce positive energy. But in this particular case, no excess energy appears, so the energy flow away from the reaction is not detected.

Holmlid faced this issue in the early stages of his experiments where there was an expectation of a large amount of energy production that did not become apparent. Holmlid finally detected the production of sub-atomic particles that formed a chain of decay from strange matter based mesons through kaons, pions, muons, and finally electrons.

Under the single cause of LENR posit, the same thing might be happening in this laser based experiment. Muons may be coming off the gold nanoparticles as a result of an energy storage mechanism inherent in the LENR reaction.

In more detail, this energy storage mechanism may be centered on the Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) produced by the laser photons as they interact with the surface of the gold nanoparticles. The gamma radiation coming off the decaying Cs137 isotope might be absorbed by the SPPs and stored until enough energy is accumulated to produce strange matter mesons that eventually decay to hard to detect muons that distribute the weak force based decay reaction energy to the far field.

This process of particle production from stored energy is called Hadronization

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadronization

An experimental method that might show this energy migration path is to detect muons using the Holmlid method or place the Cs137 salt solution with gold nanoparticles in a cloud chamber and look for charged particle tracks coming of the isotope solution as it is being irradiated with laser light.

The detection of muons would point to an amplified weak force reaction catalyzed through nanoplasmonic based laser induced coherence.
Quote
 

Add comment


Here is your generous contributions so far towards our $500,000 target, thanks everyone! : $45,020   Please Donate
See the current state of our booked costs here