<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 02:23:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/95" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Dale G. Basgall says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-68</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It is apparent that contamination within the cell, wire length, and control current are factors of this failure. When high resistance ie 1 wire requires a specific voltage to maintain the desired temp any deformations within the fuel wire result as wire failure. Nice work replicating the Celani reactor. I wonder if touching the wire is like touching the hallogen glass on a headlight? Are the wires sterilized or did they get contaminated? Maybe a dent in the outer surface of the wire prior to install, interesting.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dale G. Basgall</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-68</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-67</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ouch. But it was a NiCr wire, wasn't it? Could you post a chart showing reactor data around the breakage event?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-67</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
