<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 02:46:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8614</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bob Higgins' first comments on the published paper in regard to our GS 5.2 / 5.3 experiments "I have made a quick read of the paper. It is unlikely that this is the cause for our signal. Let us consider a couple of reasons why I say this. Neutrons could come from spallation of the Li from the high energy protons that Piantelli says comes from the Ni-H reaction. Let's look at the cases of fast, thermal, and cold neutrons. Neutrons have a long half life of 880s or about 15 minutes. This is mentioned in the paper. They specifically mentioned use of cold neutrons in their experiment (velocity less than 1E3 m/s) in a vacuum. First, it is likely that the Li spallation would create relatively fast neutrons in the 100keV to 1MeV range. Such neutrons would likely exit the reactor. Fast neutrons in this range have a velocity of >1E6 m/s and would statistically be 8.8E8 meters away for the mean time to decay - twice the distance to the moon. If, for some reason, the reaction created abundant thermal neutrons in the 1eV range, such neutrons have a velocity of about 1E4 m/s; so the mean distance for neutron decay is 8.8E6 meters, or about the diameter of the Earth away. Now, what about cold and ultra-cold neutrons? First, they would be unlikely to be created by spallation. But, if they were created in large numbers, long before they decayed, they would be captured by the nuclei of the metals of the reactor because at such low velocities the capture cross-section for a neutron is very high. In such a circumstance, it is not clear what the emission would be (would depend on the metal), but it would not be the neutron decay spectrum that would be observed."]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8614</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
