<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 18:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Wes Baish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4262</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All looks like we're gonna go ahead and pull R4 off the TMD because it's pressure surpassed the mark at 1.7e-8 Torr. Check the powder experiment log for updates on its progress as it'll need some time to cool down before it gets moved back onto the reef and R4 data stream. Bring on the loading.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wes Baish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4262</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4231</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wes, sintering BAD. It reduces the exposed Ni surface area. Putting some inert material between the Ni particles stops them from touching and bonding together. I think some people use Al2O3 and some SiO2 and various ceramics. Some use zeolites but one person who had used them said they turn to mush and stop working so I would avoid zeolites. If you have no inert material my prediction is you end up with one big block of Ni foam, I did. Exact how much surface area is lost? I do not know. You might be able to tell by measuring the initial H2 load on baked un-loaded Ni and repeating after sintering. But do not worry it is a good start pure Ni powder. Just open it up and look at it after a month or so.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 20:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4231</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4212</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@robert greenyer still waiting and wondering about that big blog we were going to see after iccf. it hinted at new info on makeing this thing work any idea how long till we can know what you guys learned? i wish someone from defkalion would send you there secrets it would certanly speed up things for them they would probably even pass up rossi in the race to sell these things.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4212</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wes Baish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4211</link>
			<description><![CDATA[R4's powder is 40nm, nothing else. Do you find any advantage to sintering, Ed? I can't think of anything other than a more stable electrical path to drive off oxides.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wes Baish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4211</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4201</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The plain nickel powder what size powder? Any anti-sinter agent?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 05:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4201</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
