<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 02:44:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2978</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For those interested: US cells and CTC calorimeter live data is now live again. EU cells data is still catching up.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2978</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2977</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We are working on it. Most other sites are blog and response in this field, or search and interpret (for scientific papers - which are often mind numbingly tedious to grasp). This site works good on mobile (now that we have a responsive logo) as well as desktop and all the key functions work, like contact form, forum, comments, galleries, donations. We just need to make it really easy to access the experiments, status and key data etc. We are doing something different, there is nothing to emulate, so we are having to define as we go forward. Thank you for our patience.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 11:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2977</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2976</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The web site was reasonable easy to follow during initial Celani US experiment. It was still ok when the EU lab opened for business because both were similar. However, now that the number of experiments exploded I can't figure out what's happening (for instance, why was the concentric test's excess power invalid). I'd rather have the experimenters experiment and not web develop but perhaps they could maintain a simple summary post. Anything that would provide a single source of context would be great.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 04:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2976</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rats says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2974</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Frasp, the people at MFMP do not owe us anything. However I hear what you're saying. I've been following progress on this site since inception and I am disappointed by the choices made and the lack of any substantial findings. What I have learnt though is it is incredibly difficult to measure heat and no one method will ever satisfy everyone!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rats</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 21:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2974</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>frasp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2973</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm really starting to give up on this. Where do i click to follow, in real time, the latest experiments? Where do I find a column that hints about P/Xs? Where are the frequent posts? Since I'm a retard when it comes to the science behind this and just curious and interested, I honestly do think that you are turning this show into something for the interested few... There is no overview or navigability when I come to the site. When i click things, I dont get what I expect and if I want what I expect I have to dig around for it. If your plan is to get people interested in this, you really need to Shape up!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>frasp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2973</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Roderick Vos says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2972</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Robert Greenyer Thanks for checking! Never been to Brussels but now i have a good reason to check it out. I will join the meeting if i can still register. Would be nice to have a small chat with Mathieu before the meeting. If he has the time and likes to do that, why not. Is it possible to send me some contact information to make the arrangements?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Roderick Vos</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 21:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2972</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2971</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Roderick Vos Good news from Mathieu! "Sure [people can meet me] an hour before, no more than 30min. It is free to register. I'll send you the form tomorrow."]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 14:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2971</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2967</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco That is a good observation. Excepting the in development Thoriated Tungsten + H High Pressure Mizuno we have in progress, all the rest of our wire and powder experiments are based on Ni + H. So we might be in a good position to say we are offering research in a different space.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 11:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2967</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2963</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think main proponents at the EU parliament meeting are going to push funding towards Pd-D LENR research. As highlighted by veteran Peter Gluck, even though this might still prove scientifically worth, it's an industrially and commercially dead path for LENR. Focusing on Ni-H systems would allow more widespread, extensive experimentation at the same cost. This point has to be raised, even though it might gain you some enemies.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 10:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2963</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2961</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Roderick Vos I have emailed Mathieu to check, I think not, but let's see, there may also be the option to meet him and/or others before or afterwards, I'll get back to you.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 10:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2961</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Roderick Vos says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2959</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would like to know if the meeting is open for the public. I live not that far away from Brussels and would like to know if i can attend the meeting.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Roderick Vos</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 10:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2959</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
