<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:37:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Martin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2676</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looks impressive. However, you speak of "water flow concentric tube calorimeter". Does this actually means that you will use water as the fluid? As I understand it your working temperature for the Celani-wire is well above 100 degrees C. I would go for another fluid with the boiling temperature well above the Celani-wire temperature (somewhere on this site I've raised the similar question and got a suggestion for such a fluid). In this way you could control the aimbinent temperature to nearly match the working temperature. Then you would only need a few watts of input to the wire to raise the wire to the correct temperature. This would lead to a much higher output/input ratio. In essence, you would leave the few % excess power range and thus also the calibration error range. Very impressive work, keep it up.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 09:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2676</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2666</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Andreas We actually have not done any calibrations with the Water jacket CTC. We are tuning the PID controller right now and actually developing a different type of controller that we may implement before long. Once we have a few calibrations we can get this information out.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2666</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Brad Arnold says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2665</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Been trying to pimp your company to the MN politicians - my read is that they are waiting until LENR emerges (hopefully Leonardo this April) before getting out in front of it. Your rep is outstanding, so it is the too-good-to-be- true LENR that is the disconnect. Good luck! 8)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Brad Arnold</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2665</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andreas Van Rooijen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2663</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Wes, what is it for the water CTC?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andreas Van Rooijen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2663</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2661</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Kapytanhook Respect]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 01:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2661</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kapytanhook says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2659</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It was a pleasure, glad to be a part of this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kapytanhook</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2659</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2658</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The 100 mW is for the air jacket CTC, not the water jacket CTC.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2658</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>artefact says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2655</link>
			<description><![CDATA[>Tired of these megablogs? Never! Very good work. Cool software! @Kapytanhook]]></description>
			<dc:creator>artefact</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2655</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andreas Van Rooijen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2654</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How accurate is the CTC? Did we get the 10 milliwatt accuracy Paul hoped for?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andreas Van Rooijen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2654</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2652</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Mathieu has this week been tutored by one of the foremost scientists working with cutting edge flow calorimetry and they came up with a very good design using latest techniques. In time, when the critical replication of Celani's type cell work is advanced, and with resources, Mathieu is keen to develop this cell, but the project remains focussed. @ Edwin There is an outline of the wire treatment process in this paper. http://www.iiste.org/PDFshare/CMRV3N3-27-56.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2652</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2651</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Paul Hunt: I stand corrected then. For some reason I assumed this was a simplified water mass flow calorimetry setup. I still think that would solve most of your problems/provid e more definite answers about actual heat production, but it has to be properly arranged (no transparent tubes, some basic insulation, etc).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2651</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2650</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco, This is not a flow calorimeter. The water jacket is to keep the outer shell at a very consistent temperature. The electronics are mostly easy to access because the outermost tube is just a housing. The entire assembly slides out of it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2650</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2649</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Edwin Pell I agree, there are more ways for open air calorimetry to fool us than I initially could have dreamed possible. No IR makes it through the water because the cell under test is inside a copper tube, that is inside another copper tube. The temperature difference between them is proportional to the heat in the cell.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2649</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2648</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The new concentric tube reactor looks cool (BTW, water flow calorimetry was pretty much needed, I think making that sooner would have saved you much time and money), but now that I get to get a close look at it, I ask you: are you certain that functionality hasn't lost a battle against looks? For example, I would have kept the electronics outside the tube, safe from possible water/gas leaks, explosion risks, heat and possibly low energy ionizing radiation. Ease of maintenance (for example to replace wires in case of damage, etc) could also be a possible issue here, although I can't say this for sure at this stage.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2648</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2647</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How are the Celani wires made? Is there a paper by Celani?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2647</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2646</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What fraction of IR makes it through the water? Is it worth painting the inner cylinder black? Ed]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2646</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2645</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am glad you are doing calorimetry where heat in and heat out are measured. I am doing temperature versus a base line and have found out how many way that can be misleading. Out versus in is the only way to really know what is happening. Ed]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2645</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
