<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 23:25:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>ZacharyAlarl says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-27203</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Подскажите где найти лучшие рецепты со всего мира: от классических блюд, которые согревают душу, до современных кулинарных шедевров, которые впечатляют даже самых взыскательных гурманов - https://hexagon.vn/2023/06/22/harnessing-the-power-of-social-media-for-business-growth - домашние рецепты]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ZacharyAlarl</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 19:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-27203</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Danielgop says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26434</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Мега - официальный сайт самой огромной торговой анонимной площадки в СНГ. Здесь мега сайт можно найти любые вещи, независимо от ваших требований. Достаточно пройти быструю регистрацию и получить доступ к площадке. Самое важное это то, что Мега onion работает без подключения через Тор. Нужно только перейти по ссылке и пройти авторизацию, не более того. Также при подборе товаров и услуг стоит рассматривать разные предложения. На площадке большое количество карточек от разных магазинов, а потому, поискав чуть дольше, вы найдете более выгодное для себя предложение. Не стоит подбирать первый попавшийся товар. Ищите лучше, и находите. У нас только актуальные зеркала MEGA https://xn--megweb18-4dd.com, которые откроют доступ к заветному сайту за несколько секунд. https://xn--m13-psa.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Danielgop</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 13:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26434</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SamuelTucky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25502</link>
			<description><![CDATA[кракен сайт зеркало рабочее: Путешествие в мир анонимности | что такое кракен маркетплейс в россии амфетамин купить телеграмм - https://amhetaminehelp.com/ Перейдя по КРАКЕН вход на сайт, вы не просто заходите на ресурс, вы становитесь частью сообщества, где поддержка и обмен знаниями ценятся превыше всего. Присоединяйтесь ккракен вход на сайти расширьте свои горизонты. Если вы новичок в даркнете, Kraken маркетплейс — это отличное место для старта. торговая платформа предлагает разнообразные товары и услуги, от редких коллекционных предметов до специфических онлайн-сервисов . Важно помнить о мерах безопасности и использовать анонимные средства доступа. Узнайте, как легко начать использовать КРАКЕН площадка. кракен купить порошок маркетплейс - https://fightthekraken.org/ КРАКЕН торговая площадка Telegram]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SamuelTucky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25502</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rickyrix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-22846</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ever dreamed of solving mysteries on the foggy streets of Victorian London? It’s not just another online slot — it’s a full-on detective journey through one of the most stylish eras in history. This game combines the thrill of casino action with the elegance of classic British mystery. Play now and explore this story-driven slot game: http://paradisep.com/casinos-online-legais-em-portugal-as-melhores-25/ From the first spin to the last bonus, this is a must-play for fans of unique slot games and immersive themes.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rickyrix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-22846</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2457</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B take a look at the pressure and the Pxs. Since the ambient temperature is more or less constant for the last few days, the dependence of the pxs to the pressure could be seen pretty clear. The sudden resistance drop at late 0703 could be simple explained by an measuring artefact as this has been found several times during the last runs. I`m sorry, to say this, but in my opinion, we are riding a dead horse with these vertical cells... But I hope to have much more stable results with the new reactor line and the upcoming new Celani protocol.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2457</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2441</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All Cells have been performing well for a few days now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 01:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2441</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2409</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All Looks like we might have "switched off" the effect in Cell 1.0 with it bouncing around 0W PXs, but Cell 1.1 is holding steady near 3W and threatening to creep up again.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2409</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2405</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Al Potenza Should the experiments that capture all the energy out prove positive then other experimental findings will be easier to accept. I understand that the Heat Flux sensors sold by Omega are Rdf ones, they sell a small selection of their product through third parties but not the high temperature ones. @P.D. Thanks for your comment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2405</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2400</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Very nice setup !!! Can`t wait to see them on the bench :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2400</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>artefact says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2399</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Re Update 8: The reactors look very very good! wow.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>artefact</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2399</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2398</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@P.D. Please take a look at the following blog post that discusses the potential for chemical. http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/follow-2/152-can-it-be-chemical We are seeking a residual gas analyser to see the composition of the gas in the cell after an experimental run. In any case, the Celani V2 protocol removes gas from the equation, so these questions disappear.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2398</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2395</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, I don't believe that hypothesis is right, or something to be worried about (though doubling pressure to see what happens would be a wonderful experiment). This is because it is -pressure-, not number of atoms, that determines heat transfer rates in convective (non-mass transfer, like we have here) situations, as pressure is the number of atomic collisions occurring between the gas and its container. It is those collisions alone that can transfer convective energy. So if you increase pressure by increasing the moles, or by increasing the temperature, you should still have the same convective energy transfer rate whichever the situation for that same given end pressure. Unless there's an obscure equation on the matter, I think that's the right interpretation. Thermal capacity on the other hand would be related to the moles of gas. However, the heat capacity of the hydrogen will only affect the rate of the temperature response, not its magnitude.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2395</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2394</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B Not sure that you would have to double the pressure, but this idea would help address the gas density arguments without shutting down any reaction that might be occurring (which seams to take longer to get going than the time it takes for the gas to go below the calibration range). @Rats The active wire resistance going down is either a cooling or a 'loading' effect, the wire resistance increasing is either a heating or potentially the New Fire 'burning' the H2. In either case these variables are related and all are related obviously to PXs - they have to be.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 01:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2394</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rats says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2391</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My 2c worth based on my limited understanding. Feel free to poke holes in my reasoning. :-) As per Ecco's post (#62) P_xs appears to have a strong correlation with resistance. If there is excess power then P_xs should not follow any resistance trends, should it?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rats</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2391</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2389</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What about this interpretation of the apparent excess power increase? I think this is similar as Ascoli's by the way: 1) Hydrogen leaks out of the cell, wire temperature naturally increases because of decreased convection towards the glass tube. 2) MFMP restores pressure to 1.5 bar without turning the cells off, but since the wire (and the mica which has some thermal inertia) has slowly increased temperature due to the small leak, it takes a slightly less amount of gas to reach 1.5 bar. 3) Over time, after repeating step 1-2 a few times, P_XS, based on internal temperatures, appears to be increasing because there's increasingly less hydrogen inside the cell. However if we were to base calculations on T_GlassOut temperatures, we would see that there would still be a net heat balance. To test this hypothesis, both cells would have be fully cooled before every hydrogen refilling operation.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 23:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2389</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2386</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Also, it looks like we may be able to assign a linear trend to the current P_xs increase. That may give us information on the "cascade" of activation in the wire, as the higher power output should mean there's more active spots. Therefore, a growing power output over time would suggest to me that more of the wire is becoming active in the LENR mechanism over time. An alternate way to see this is there could simply be faster, self reinforcing reaction kinetics in the active spots already present, where one reaction makes the next reaction more likely to occur. Another alternate hypothesis is that the linear scaling is due to temperature build up from the current reaction speed, and it is the temperature that is speeding up the reactions, and they stay at whatever speed point they got to within a certain temperature range (system memory, or strong autocorrelation ).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 23:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2386</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2383</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All As the calibrated basis for PXs appears to have survived another pressure re-set, the questions rightly move from pressure drop relationship to current PXs calculation to the relative inactivity in the external glass temperatures. We have several differences in these experiments that could mean that the thermal losses from IR and conduction choke off rises in the external glass temperatures in this configuration. 1. 2L and 14L wires not 700+ 2. No baffles in cells preventing conduction to end steels 3. Less packing of wire These things are addressed in the V2.0 protocol experiments we are preparing, as is all the questions about gas composition, convection and conduction - as there will be no gas. Additionally, the external glass point thermocouple sensor signal could be swamped by the heater wire output and relative location. In the V2.0 protocol - the calibration and active runs will only use the exact same Celani wire - so no relative position and power swamping issues. The steel cell, which is going through another preliminary calibration and the steel and glass cells are also aimed at measuring all energy output rather than estimating based on calibration. I guess we are going to have to be patient. We are definitely moving forward, squishing bug, by bug!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 22:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2383</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andrea says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2381</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi, i started to follow your experiment, Why do you compute Pxs using the internal temperatures? It looks to me that the external glass temperature is the one that matters. If you assume the blackbody radiation law you have to use the external surface temperature. The internal one can be strongly by gas pressure and IR radiation from the wires. As Celani said at ICCF: there cen be also a nice girl dancing inside, you don't care as long as you measure the outside.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2381</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2377</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I tried making a few charts of the last 2 weeks of cell activity. The following images are for US Cell 1.0. P_XS seems to be increasing over time. H2 pressure has been kept around 1.5 bar. http://i.imgur.com/gG6QyqK.png Resistance red (active) wire for comparison purposes: http://i.imgur.com/YEmxZEk.png T_Mica and T_Wall, both internal temperatures (P_XS calculations are based on T_Mica measurements) reflect the increase in P_XS. http://i.imgur.com/J80SCgD.png T_Ambient has remained fairly constant over time. http://i.imgur.com/9SzQeU9.png T_Glass Out however hasn't increased at all. Essentially a flat trend. Over time it seems to have developed more irregularities in readings. Have testing conditions around the cells remained the same? http://i.imgur.com/l2bVqmi.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2377</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2370</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ron B It *currently* looks like the cells are trending upwards like they did a few weeks back, Celani might call this 'switching on', If we can keep re-setting the pressure without damaging this trend as seams to be the case since 26/02/2013 we may have some interesting data right at the start of the Kickstarter and for our transition to the much bigger V2.0 protocol and other experiments. I'd be interested to see what peoples predictions are!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 01:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2370</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2369</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is there a way I can look at old data online? I get the impression that when you top off with hydrogen the excess power takes a dip. This would be consistent with the incoming gas being cold gas. Which makes sense for highly compressed gas that is decompressed and then added to the experiment without time to reach room temp or experiment temp. This is all fine it is just an interesting point. Keep up the great work. Ed]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2369</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2368</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP I want to suggest for the next cellls you are building that the sense wires of the power supplies should be connected inside the cells where the Isotan wires are connected to the copper feed lines.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2368</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2366</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@David Jones I was minded to support the use of the 720L wire in one of the dual v2.0 protocol cells, but we are looking to save that wire for a very surprising experiment that we hope to get clearance for. With respect to inductance - there is another calorimeter in the works that will not have this limitation. Even the current cells could work if the 1M wire was configured as segments in parallel.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2366</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2365</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Jumpjet Right now we are doing a long run and periodically re-setting the H2 pressure to provide evidence for discussions about pressure / apparent PXs debate. We are seeing if over the long term the PXs can be meaningful under this regime. We do intend to carry out the kind of test you describe - you can see many triggering options in the open document here which you can contribute to if you want. http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/collaborate/203-new-fire-triggering-potential-means-and-equipment-design But things take time, that is why we would like to see many good base experiments run all over the world running parameter sweeps and varying triggering/cont rol methods so accelerating discovery for all.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2365</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2364</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Put the 700 layer wire in the active cell and the 400 layer wire in the control. This gives you the best chance of initially observing excess energy with your new setup - then once you are confident in your experimental setup you can run with two 400 layer wires if necessary.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2364</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2363</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Re expensive thermocouples – ask them if they will give you some for evaluation in return for the exposure they will receive on your experiments. Second – Will people please stop going on about Terahertz vibration initiated by pulsing the electrical input. It is not possible is such a set-up and given the inductive loop of the wound wire, pulsed excitation will have no impact.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2363</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jumpjet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2362</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm not certain what your plans are for the two US Cells currently running. However, I'd like to make a humble suggestion. Why not pulse the input power? Brillouin claims to control the reaction in their boiler with precise bursts of electricity. NASA suggests that for LENR to work, nickel lattices full of hydrogen have to be vibrated with radiation in the terahertz range. And even your team, I recall, saw tantalizing results when you gave the input power large, sudden spikes. So why not raise and lower the input power in repetition? You can start at long intervals, then have the fluctuations get shorter and shorter on a regular basis. Maybe it's the key to levels of excess power that can't be disputed. At the least, it's worth a try.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jumpjet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 03:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2362</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2361</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Martin You make a lucid argument, thank you for your contribution.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 00:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2361</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Martin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2360</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've read the specifications on the heat flux sensors. Here is my humble take on the matter. In order for you to show excess heat, you need to measure the heat flux emanating from the entire surface of your device. Only then you can get the total energy output and compare it to the energy input. These heat flux sensors appears to be small, and can therefore only cover a fraction of the surface (or am I wrong). Of course, you can by more sensors and cover more spots of surface area, and through statistical means estimate the total energy flux. But your problem is that they are expensive, and that you can only afford two, at the most. In the device you are building that can facilitate liquid flow calorimetry the surface issue is not a problem, as I presume you will subject the entire surface area to the liquid flow calorimeter. Hence, as money is a problem, I would spent it on the liquid flow calorimeter test.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 22:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2360</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2359</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I see you are running with positive pressure to avoid air leak in issues. Good idea. Do we have any ideas on where the hydrogen is going? Is it leaking out through 1) hole 2) glass 3) metal is it being absorbed in 1) glass 2) metal 3) mica 4) heater wire 5) Celani wire 6) chemical compounding with ??? Do we know the diffusion rate through the glass? I do not have any feel for this. Ed p.s. Do you have a hydrogen sniffer to find leaks? Might be good to get one. Looks like $2500 buys a fairly good detector. Do you pressurize and leak check with soapy water? As near as I can tell from looking around hydrogen does not leak through glass at a significant rate. It is not the source of the loss.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2359</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2358</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The 1.0 graph of excess power and pressure versus time makes me wonder if the hydrogen that is going somewhere is releasing energy say by bonding with the glass, metal, or mica and releasing chemical energy in the amount being measured as excess power? I do not know your volume. How much hydrogen in moles is being add per hour (delta hydrogen/delta time)? How much energy per mole is represented by the excess power if we attribute it all to the hydrogen? Ed p.s. I made a crude guess about volume and get 160eV per lost H2. Well above chemical. It does not seem like lost H2 is the source of excess heat. :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2358</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2357</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@David Roberson We are, but the time constants on the steel and steel/glass cells are long. We have another calorimeter in development, but in all of these cases you cannot see the active component for credibility and inspection purposes. We agree that the cost really challenges the value proposition and that is why we put it to you all. We have challenged them to give us a good price on two units to consider and referred them to the non-profit and socially funded/voluntee r basis of the MFMP.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 12:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2357</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2356</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP Team, I thought you were going to start testing a unit that was not IR transparent. The cost of that sensor appears to be too much to pay for little extra gain. Why not start testing the stainless steel one first before you make a commitment to buy it. If the experiment is a success then the excess heat will be obvious and the added accuracy would not be required. This is just my opinion, you must make the tough decisions.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 02:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2356</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2355</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Dieter Seeliger & Ron B When they said cost effective on their site, I certainly did not think the price of a top range programmable PSU! My thinking was exactly that Dieter... for this price we could do a lot! However, what price is the opportunity cost of not getting accurate results? If, as the company claims it solves many of the questions that have been raised about the calorimeter that are not already solved by the Celani V2 protocol then it is tempting to get a few at least to measure their worth against a straight TC. I think it is a good idea to ask them for a good price for 2 and make a decision.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 19:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2355</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2354</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bob, Since this site gets a fair amount of traffic it may be possible to get the company to loan the probes with some mention of them (more than you already have) and get "free samples" :) Since often a company that has IP that garners a higher price, the actual cost to the company to get them out there is much lower. As my father used to say "it never hurts to ask".]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2354</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I have no idea. Seems to be just symbolic, encouragement sort of thing. Anyway its the first lenr prize in the history.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2352</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andrew Olson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2351</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I haven't read every single comment on the site so this may have already been addressed; Is STMicro ever going to publish their independent verification?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Olson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2351</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2350</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Dieter Seeliger Got you and yes. First option is to attempt to disable the Celani wire in the first active cell by putting over current into it. an in-situ test. Then we can consider a swap out.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2350</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2348</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Dieter Seeliger I take your point, however, we would have to disassemble the cell to swap out the dummy wire. second - we need to show that there is nothing 'in' the wires from the outset that makes it produce Pxs. Third - we want the 'dummy' wire to be the same as the active - diameter, initial constituent elements etc. so that the emissivity is the same in both the active and control - just one is loaded.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2348</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andreas Van Rooijen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2346</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Sanjeev, a price of 200 GPB? I am sure that every bit of help counts, but why go through the trouble of adding a Diploma?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andreas Van Rooijen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2346</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2345</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I second Dieter's idea. :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 04:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2345</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2344</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why not use the 700 layer wire in the liquid flow calorimeter which you are building ? Br Dieter]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 03:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2344</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2343</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would also like to note that both current cells are finally showing a health P_xs while staying at the 1.5 bar range. This is highly interesting.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 02:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2343</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2342</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Kresenn awarded their (small) prize to Celani. MFMP also can apply. http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?1203-Kresenn-Ltd-unveils-plans-to-support-LENR-research]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 02:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2342</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2341</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh man, that 720 wire... I think we should stay to the original plan and use the dual 400's. That way we can switch which one is the "active" one and which one is the "control", and gain a very powerful experiment. If we put the 720 in one, we can't do that dual type switch. As much as I long to see what that can do, I guess we should wait, or... build a third cell! ;)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 02:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2341</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2339</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sanjeev As annoying as it is, we can only report on our own findings and those we can gain sanction to release from others. What I can say is that you should expect the unexpected from Celani and I mean that, hopefully at or before ICCF18. @Clovis Thanks so much for your kind words. It means a lot, science at this level takes guts and determination. Many others have given up when they got a bad result or could not be bothered to wait and understand the data. By producing bags of data and letting everyone review it - we hope that we can sort the wheat from the chaff and understand what is going on and build on that. We would like to flick a switch and have the answer, but then again, the satisfaction would be less in the end. We are not trying to make this hard - it is hard, but with collective thinking, it is easier. @Frasp The data we are seeing at the moment in combination with our previous results is not so easy to explain. We work hard to dismiss any findings, we work hard to address doubts... We hope that sooner or later, there will be no reason to doubt an interesting result at which point - if we can't disprove something - we are starting to prove something... that is the path to an incontrovertibl e experiment. @All With gas out of the equation and low input powers in the V2.0 protocol, Things may get very interesting - bring it on!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2339</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>frasp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2338</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Figure the effect would be proven by now? Or can anyone explain why you would get more and more heat from the same input and the same hydrogen pressure over an extended period of time?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>frasp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2338</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>clovis says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2337</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi, guys, just wanted to giver your team,( an at a boy) and i have been following your work/play as closely as i can, and wait with baited breath, on the edge of my seat, the out come of your next test, it should be very exciting, so steady as she go's,-- :-) kuyey]]></description>
			<dc:creator>clovis</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2337</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2336</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thats interesting. How much excess did he get at these pressures and temperatures and with same number of layers and length ?. Any data to compare?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2336</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2335</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sanjeev & Ecco Celani performed a number of experiments at different pressures. We were acting on his advice for the current regime however, we too would like to try higher pressure tests and may well do this with these cells down the line. Our current direction is to focus on the replication of Celanis best current protocol, that as described in the GOC thread. Our aim, as ever, is to find something that is incontrovertibl e and economic that can be then widely replicated. Our final experiment may be very different to the easy to challenge one that was presented in NI week and ICCF17.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2335</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2334</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes, it needs to be sweeped from 1 bar to 16 bar at a constant temperature. Then from room temperature to 400 C at constant pressure. This will give a sweet spot of operation (possibly). If the sweet spot is already known, you can simply calibrate around that, but I don't think Celani is testing his wires before sending them. I've always said that its very important to get a wire which is known to work consistently at a certain pressure and temp. This will take less time to prove it and then the road to more experiments will be paved with pure gold. I have no clue why can't Celani provide such a wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2334</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2333</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've called for higher pressures often too. It is a too big difference from Celani's experiments to be ignored.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2333</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2331</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B Let us see what happens over the coming weeks - we'll keep these things on the burn and keep the pressure up!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2331</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2330</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All, Doesn't this latest bit of data really point us to believe that the +10W of excess power we saw some weeks ago is the real deal? Not that I ever had any doubt *sheepish look*]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2330</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2329</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco They both dropped but are both now above where they were before the re-pressurisati on.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2329</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2328</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You will also note that the T_GlassOut sensor is rising with the inside of the cell. This is over the last 8 hours or so. @ Ecco We will be leaving within the hour or two and it will be interesting to see what happens over night when the room is left alone.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2328</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2327</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Cell 1.0 dropped, though. As long as there are people working around the cell assembly, readings are not to be fully trusted in my opinion.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2327</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2326</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Martin Thanks for your kind words. We REALLY love the engagement. Our followers help us bug squish in a way no one could do in an isolated team. If the New Fire can be lit - we'll do it together! @All Malachi has just re-pressurised the cells and the 1.1 nearly instantly recovered its current run up of Pxs and is now well above where it was before... Hmmm?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2326</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2325</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ron B #11 Yes, I am counting 4 plug valves besides the needle valve that are in the way.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2325</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Martin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2324</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP-team I don’t know if this has been properly acknowledged before on this forum, but here is a thought. Even if time will show that the Celani effect is just a calibration error, you have made another huge achievement. You have proven the power of social network research (or whatever you would like to call it). Perhaps you have, and perhaps you haven’t, invented it but you have surely put the concept to the test. If I dare looking into the crystal ball; I would think that when all this is settled, and you look back at the Celani experiments, you will think that your main result wasn’t related to LENR, but to social network research. Your site (quantumheat.or g) ought to be the topic of numerous social science doctoral theses. I tip my hat to you Sirs!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2324</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[#12 Robert That's great to hear. It's true that the long term data is really interesting. I wish that the bogus values for resistance could be removed from the data set though. Those values of several thousand ohms and negative resistance really foul up my data analysis. Each time I sample for long periods of time, I have to down load the data and then hand edit the data to remove them.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2323</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2322</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@RonB The last time we re-pressured the cell - it made only a short term dip effect to the Pxs and within the burst cycle sizes but the overall trend has been upwards. For these cells, we intend to keep it running like this for a good while as they are generating great data. B]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2322</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2321</link>
			<description><![CDATA[0 #10 Malachi It sounds safe. So with the multiple values, then tank is never directly connected to the cell?? That's great news about bringing the pressure back up.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2321</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2320</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Our procedure for "hot loading" is the following: We vacuum out the lines to ~100mTorr We inject Hydrogen into these vacuumed lines We purge the lines with either the vacuum or venting to the air We load and purge again Then we load the lines and slowly release hydrogen into the cells using a series of plug valves and a needle valve. It's a slow load and if you look at a few of loading sequences you will see many steps up in pressure during a 5-10 min period. Anyone see any obvious safety concerns? We do not have a flash suppressor in line but we feel it's safe without oxygen in the lines or cell. We will be pressurizing back to 1.5 bar today.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2320</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2319</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It appears that the last hydrogen bump on the 1.0 (mica) cell happened when the cell was at temperature. Was that the first time you folks had done a "hot load"? Was it scary? Since the cell temp is below the flash point of hydrogen it shouldn't be too risky but wanted to ask if you're using any kind of flash suppressor in line. Also I wanted to ask if you have plans to bump the pressure back up to 1.5 bar.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2319</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2318</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All As far as we know - a new patent has been applied for but this will take time to show up in the public records. The biggest constraint is the demands on Celani for his time. We are extremely fortunate that he is taking time out of his own experimental work and other commitments to ensure that we can deliver the experiments we want to and that the community is helping to finance. You need to bear in mind that this deep exploration of condensed matter and nano structures is likely to spawn a whole host of unexpected properties that will have profound commercial application in the energy sector regardless of the commercial realisation of the New Fire. This is like the space race, things will come out of this that were not even the intention of the research. That is the wonderful surprise that comes from not thinking everything has already been discovered!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2318</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2316</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Dieter Seeliger: keep in mind however that the patent publicly known (which apparently has not been renewed so it will eventually expire - although I have yet to find confirmation for this) is for an older process. I think Celani currently processes his Konstantan wires differently. During ICCF17 he told the audience that a patent for this was being prepared.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2316</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2315</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looking at Celanis patent, the preparation of the wire is a lengthy process of repeated deposition of Ni on the surface. Oxidation and reduction steps are used to build this skeleton surface which could be seen in the SEM pictures. Depending on the composition of host material which is used, more or less layers could be created.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2315</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2314</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Celani confirmed that he is finishing the wires 25/02/13 we need for the US and EU Dual V2 protocol experiments in the V1.3 cells Is preparing active wires a lengthy process?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2314</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andreas Van Rooijen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2313</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Robert yes, I agree. Although in itself this not a way to produce energy, an abundance in non background neutrons cannot be easily dismissed as measurement- or calibration errors.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andreas Van Rooijen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2313</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2312</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Andreas Van Rooijen That is very interesting. There was a young man at ICCF17 that reported similar high level Neutron emissions from D loaded palladium immersed in liquid nitrogen. I would class this as Cold Fusion, but NOT New Fire, which is a subset LENR (that which produces excess useful heat). However, the co-deposition experiments of Mitsubishi and Toyota, the rock crushing and these kind of experiment are good repeatable experiments that show that nuclear reactions can occur at less than solar temperatures. It all adds evidence which makes it easier for sceptics to overcome the mental barrier that restricts them from following the evidence and getting behind more focussed research into the New Fire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2312</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andreas Van Rooijen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2308</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is good news. In a meantime a link to an article with perhaps more idea's for further replications. It seems that a thermic shock produces massive neutrons in a titanium lattice... http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/PrelasMAneutronemi.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andreas Van Rooijen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2308</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
