<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 22:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>BestRosetta says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9279</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have noticed you don't monetize your website, don't waste your traffic, you can earn additional bucks every month. You can use the best adsense alternative for any type of website (they approve all websites), for more info simply search in gooogle: boorfe's tips monetize your website]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BestRosetta</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 03:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9279</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>LasonyaJuicy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9182</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi. I see that you don't update your website too often. I know that writing articles is boring and time consuming. But did you know that there is a tool that allows you to create new articles using existing content (from article directories or other pages from your niche)? And it does it very well. The new articles are high quality and pass the copyscape test. You should try miftolo's tools]]></description>
			<dc:creator>LasonyaJuicy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 18:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9182</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RichieJuicy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9177</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello. I see that you don't update your site too often. I know that writing content is time consuming and boring. But did you know that there is a tool that allows you to create new posts using existing content (from article directories or other blogs from your niche)? And it does it very well. The new articles are high quality and pass the copyscape test. You should try miftolo's tools]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RichieJuicy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9177</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MaynardSmall says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8991</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have checked your site and i have found some duplicate content, that's why you don't rank high in google, but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique content, search for; Boorfe's tips unlimited content]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MaynardSmall</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8991</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FirstCecil says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8904</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I see you don't monetize your website, don't waste your traffic, you can earn additional bucks every month because you've got high quality content. If you want to know how to make extra $$$, search for: Mrdalekjd methods for $$$]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FirstCecil</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8904</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Trey says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8625</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Excellent post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Extremely helpful information specifically the last part :) I care for such information a lot. I was seeking this particular info for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8625</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chuck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1485</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good idea with the copper--it will certain even out the spot temperature differences. Do you also plan on placing the rig in an insulating box? While it's true that IR won't pass through solid copper, it will heat the copper which will then re-radiate in the IR spectrum. I think what's really needed is a way to completely thermally isolate the cell from external temperature influences.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1485</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1484</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@123star, I concur. I found some silver wire for K type thermocouplers that was only $13 on Amazon, so seems price isn't too bad. Also found this information on silver thermocouplers, http://www.isotech.co.uk/files/document_library_file-51.pdf where it could measure upwards of 970 C with an accuracy around 1 to 4 mK. I think that's rather acceptable for our purposes if they decide to go that route. Though, if they stick with the copper wrap, then we should be good with none of those worries with our current ones.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1484</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1480</link>
			<description><![CDATA[On 12/14/2012 11:50:00 The USA Cell 1 seemed to have a jump in pressure from 0 to 12.5 Bars. I didn't find anything in the USA log for that time. According to the sensors at that time, the mica temp jumped to over 500C along with the ambient yet the board temp fell to zero.This anomaly lasted several minutes on a 30 Sec sample resolution. At 11:49 Power Blue was set from 0 to 125MW At 11:50 Resistance dropped from 18Ohms to -3200 ?? At 11:56 Pressure raised from 0 to 150 and t-mica jumps to over 500C. I'm having a hard time trying to figure out what this is telling me. Did the mica really see over 500C for several minutes?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1480</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1479</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@123star, Great find! I had been digging everywhere, but only found a graph for copper metal that went as long as the 800 nm range. That graph did seem a little different, as it showed copper as having an absorption peak around 800 nm, but who knows. Either way, you're absolutely right that there will be no other way for heat to escape, so it won't matter (IR, like most of the electromagnetic spectrum, cannot pass through metal). This is also why the copper wrap will help the cell to be warmer per input power, which is also something we very much want. We definitely want that copper wrap around the cell, in my opinion; much for much cleaner, more consistent, and far simpler data.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 01:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1479</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123star says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1478</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ged I think that in the case of complete metal wrapping any metal is good (because heat "has no other way to escape", I can't find a good way to explain that now), that's not the case if we make a small probe which is touching a piece of metal. I found a reflectance a curve for copper by the way (even if it is about "metal films" I think it's ok anyway) http://www.tvu.com/PNextGenTFwebFig3.jpghttp://www.tvu.com/PNextGenTFWeb.html. I'm still looking for a reflectance chart for NiCr 90% 10% (the meaterial of which a thermocouple type K is made). @Alan G Low reflectance for the probe is perhaps desirable, but what we need is constant reflectance all along the IR range. That way we are sure that the power absorbed is independent from the wire temperature. Silver seems a good choice.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123star</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 01:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1478</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1476</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan, thanks for the clarification about this. At the first look, I did not found a deeper description in your files and the connection cables could be made of copper too. I pointed you to this, because I do not want that anyone could critizese your results picking up this point. And I want this wonderful project to be a 100% success. 23 years of critizism and suppression is enough ! BR Dieter]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1476</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1475</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@123star, Oh, do you have a graph like that for copper? I want to see if we can convince the MFMP team to keep that copper wrap around the cell!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1475</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1474</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ged That is an option - we are going to have to re-build this cell as the NiChrome wire is broken. That means we will have to re-calibrate and so this all becomes a possibility.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1474</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1473</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@123Star, Hmm, interesting, thanks for that graph. It mildly absorbs the very highest range of short wavelength IR right before the visible color Red, which starts at 600 nm or so. That would then be sent as conduction to the coupler. The rest of the IR is reflected back into the cell. At the temperatures we're dealing with, we should be emitting a spectral wavelength peak around 4 um, which is definitely well reflected, but also absorbed by the borosilicate. Fascinating to see what this will do. I would hypothesize that indeed, any IR that the glass doesn't absorb and then conduct, would be absorbed or reflected by the aluminum. What happens with the reflected IR that the glass doesn't absorb? It seems like that would be lost energy, so as the cell heated up, we'd lose some detection? Or would we still catch it fully? Such interesting questions!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1473</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123star says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1471</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Regarding update #2 Is the cell wrapped completely or just partially? Please put a thermocouple on the outside surface of the copper and then make your calibration/exp erimental runs using that value! This will more than probably flatten all the calibration curves together! Oh... wait I see from the live data that you have removed the copper?!?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123star</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1471</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1470</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, It should completely nullify the issue. Either the glass absorbs the power in the IR range and conducts it to the coupler, or the aluminum absorbs the power in the IR range and conducts it to the coupler. Just trading one absorber for another, but the energy from the IR is accounted for either way. And, now the coupler is sandwiched, so no issues of contact for conduction. @Robert and all, Maybe you should leave that copper around the cell and just rebaseline with it :D? Copper is a great thermal spreader for more uniformity, no worries about IR that way, and it should help the cell maintain higher temperatures at lower input power (which is why you're using it I see). I totally motion for keeping that copper, but it's up to you guys, as it's a lot of work doing baselines -again-.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1470</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1469</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For a bit of fun - we are doing a LIVE Mizuno type cell on a Google Hangout - the hangout name is Mizuno Type Experiement and you might need to search for Mathieu Valat]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1469</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1468</link>
			<description><![CDATA[After paying more attention, I see in previous photos that the T_GlassOut thermocouple is between the glass tube and the aluminum piece. Wasn't the fact that the thermocouple directly "sees" emission from the wire a potential measurement artifact source? Or does placing the thermocouple in that way still reduces or nullifies this issue? Why have T_G1, T_G2 and T_G3 been mounted in the old way? Don't you plan using them for Power_Out calculations? Or is the "new" T_GlassOut sensor that you don't?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1468</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nicolas Chauvin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1467</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If you wonder where the 20W excess heat came from in the Euro cell, check our Update #2 of this post.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nicolas Chauvin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1467</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1466</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Dieter - The junctions you see are all Type K connectors and wires so there is no potential difference at those connections. The actual cold junction is made right on the data acquisition board where the temperature is measured and accounted for. Careful planning was put into the thermal design of the circuit board so all the junctions would be as close to the same temperature as possible. Right now we are examining the difference between the thermocouples themselves and trying to determine if we can calibrate them to a common baseline.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1466</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1465</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@123Star I have read the paper you refer to, thank-you. I will make sure it's findings are considered. Indeed, we are going for a lot more certainty of thermal variance as we move forward so any results will have far higher certainty.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1465</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nicolas Chauvin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1464</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Bernhard Yes, we have bought silver thermal paste to improve the T_glassout measurements. We will upgrade the Euro cell today.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nicolas Chauvin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1464</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123star says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1463</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Chuck Yet again I will post a link to this article (Investigation of anomalous heat production in Ni-H systems E. Cerron-Zeballos et al, http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CerronZebainvestigat.pdf), that should be considered a reference for proving as well disproving excess heat claims. You have the compare the experiment described in the article to the Piantelli/Focar di one (1994), in which there was no temperature sensor on the outside surface. In the article that I linked it is acknowledged that there was an increase of temperature of the internal active element (Nickel rod), but there was no increase in temperature on the outside surface, so it was concluded that there was no excess heat. Now, can we prove that the external surface gets hotter? That's why we placed the thermocouple there.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123star</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1463</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1462</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great job guys! You appear to have an excellent device now and I look forward to reviewing the new data. My models are doing a reasonable job of duplicating the time domain responses so far. I hope to have them perfected soon. One output of my model suggests that you have a very large amount of energy stored within the cell when the input power is set to greater than 100 watts. I hope this calculation does not indicate that there is danger of explosion. Be careful.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1462</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1461</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nice improvements and it´s perfect, that you have the assistance of Edmund Storms for your calorimetry ! Let me point you to another possible source of measurement error. Though you are not measuring absolute temperatures, I would assume to keep all of your cold junctions at the same place at the same temperature. I saw all your junctions spread around the reactor. With this setup, you could have different readings from the TC`s. I would fix all these connectors to one place and keep them isolated from every possible thermal influence from the reactor. BR Dieter]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 04:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1461</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1460</link>
			<description><![CDATA[These are some serious improvements. With this flood of data, we should be able to dissect out a lot more.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1460</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chuck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1457</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm probably being a little thick here, but why are the thermocouples located on the outside surface of the cell?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1457</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1456</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wouldn't mounting the cell vertically invalidate previously made calibrations?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1456</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1455</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great improvements ! Perhaps the shield makes the air stagnant inside, resulting in higher than usual temperature on glass surface. What can be done to improve this ? Perhaps a cage made of metal wires (net) instead of solid shield will keep the air in motion ? The glass should radiate directly into the room instead of another enclosure. What do experts think about this ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1455</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bernhard says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1454</link>
			<description><![CDATA[or use this "two part adhesive", then you don't need this tapes, maybe a test with and without this aluminium pieces and however perhaps use a small temp. resistent isolation(tape) over the sensor and take a picture with your FLIR http://www.arcticsilver.com/ta.htm]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bernhard</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1454</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bernhard says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1453</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looks fine! Do you use thermal compound between senors and glass? Most computer stores sells it, like this one here http://www.arcticsilver.com/cmq2.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bernhard</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1453</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
