<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 21:52:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1459</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ We are currently deloading the wire with 1A of current and vacuuming the cell at the same time. It is recovering the original resistance slowly, very very slowly in fact... I don't think that we will recover the original resistance for multiple reason, if there is some hydrogen left inside and if cracks have been made during the process, this might have influenced this parameter forever. Hydrogen is very hard to extract completely from metal because the hydride form is more stable at low loading ratio.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1459</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pekka Janhunen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1452</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Concerning rock crushing and Carpieri, I continue to be sceptical. At least the idea that so much LENR would have occurred in Earth's crust that it would have altered the elemental composition in a big way appears to be contradicted by the fact that the energy liberated in such widespread nuclear reactions would have caused many orders of magnitude more heat release than the observed geothermal heat flux. Indeed, the sun is nuclear powered, but the earth is clearly not, the geothermal heat flux is only 0.1 W/m2. The idea might be tenable only if somehow endothermal and exothermal LENRs would for some reason closely balance each other, but no one has proposed that kind of mechanisms. There are some Japanese results of endothermal LENRs (nickel-deuteri um), but they have not been repeated as far as I know.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Pekka Janhunen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1452</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1451</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The data you published for the power input steps allowed me to obtain the curve of Power Output versus Temperature. The data was a excellent match to a second order function as before. I then used this new function to run within my time domain model and obtained the following preliminary values: Device Time Constant =454 Seconds Energy Stored = 22.5 kilo joules @ Power input of 51.65 watts and 121.8 Degrees C at T_GlassOut. These figures were for the latest stepped power input run for the US cell. The performance of this new arrangement is not far removed from the earlier device.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1451</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1449</link>
			<description><![CDATA[can you try the loaded wire in a vacum after all it already has the hydrogen in it why does it have to be heated in a hydrogen enviroment no more hydrogen can get in the wire? worth a try]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1449</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1445</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Andreas Van Rooijen Yes - it is new research and its consequences are very far reaching. We are looking to do a Live Open Science with the researchers to show the LENR live from Quantumheat.org . You can see it here. http://theatomunexplored.com/wp-content/docs/1carpinteri.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 23:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1445</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1444</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How well does the mineral wool prevent heat from eventually escaping to the end caps? If it acts as a baffle that just slows down the path then we may not like how it muddies the temperature data. I have my fingers crossed that it does not result in a small continuous drain of heat energy that makes it look like excess heat is leaving the cell for an extended period of time. The heat drain will eventually become a minimum once the end caps reach their steady state value. This design may add another complication to the measurement accuracy and time domain response. Keep your eyes open and watch for this effect.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1444</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andreas Van Rooijen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1442</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Rob I just watched the show. You were referring to an experiment with crushed rocks. Do you have a link for the results of that experiment?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andreas Van Rooijen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1442</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1441</link>
			<description><![CDATA[By the way, the US cell is looking remarkably good. Those pressure and ambient temperature values are sumptuously stable. My appetite is whetted for some experiments with this improved beast.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1441</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>clovis ray says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1440</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi, guys. just watched the show great interview, spot on , hey bob your getting good with this PR stuff, most important too the cause.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>clovis ray</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1440</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1434</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Pseudoskeptics are going to jump on that Smart Scarecrow segment. Be prepared.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1434</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1431</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is some impressive progress guys; coming along speedily! So looking forward to that air calorimeter. That should be an important upgrade over the Celani cell designs. Science is fun!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1431</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GN says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1428</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You can use a flow calorimeter with a liquid like Therminol VP-1 or Dowtherm A, that have boiling temperatures exceeding 400 C. These liquids are used in solar panel applications to heat the water in an isolated tank. You could use the celani tube instead of the solar panel and keep the rest of the system intact. Check then if the water in the tank reaches a higher temperature than expected ...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1428</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alain Coetmeur says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1423</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi, reading Ed Storm tutorial on isoperibolic calorimetry, your proposal of flow calorimetry seems rational. However air calorimeter might be criticized too. On of the problem, seen with Defkalion/Nelso n test, is that straight water cooling is so cold that it kills the reaction. Why not use air/gaz (argon because insulating) as just a buffer, a thermal resistor, between the reactor and a flow calorimeter below 100C... maybe you could adjust the thermal resistor with gaz composition and pressure, then you cool down the gaz chamber with a fluid flow calorimeter... problem will be to insulate all, since it will be huge... some mixing might be organized (but mixing energy should be accounted for) :sigh: I understand why many labs decide to make tiny reactors of few cm long, inside a bottle sized calorimeter... do you think my idea is rational, or naive?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alain Coetmeur</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1423</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1422</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When do you guys adjust the Power Out versus T_GlassOut curve so that the charts look accurate? The US cell is displaying output power that is far below the Input heating power. I was performing a simulation of the time domain response when I got results that did not match the current chart. A quick look at the data and it is apparent that the curve you use needs to be modified. The time constant of the US cell when the latest power reset was applied measures 454 seconds. I suspect this is an indirect way to measure the extra gas at the higher bars. The time constant is noticeably longer at this pressure. It will be interesting to see the results obtained when you put your new calorimeter to work.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 03:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1422</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chuck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1421</link>
			<description><![CDATA[#3 @Ryan, not much of my own, other than hanging out at the shop of the local neon-sign maker more than 50 years ago! (He had a cute daughter!) But a glance at YouTube turns up a couple of people who have made their own vacuum tubes--a far more ambitious undertanking, glass-wise. I'm certain that some of the lab glassblowers at Standard Oil who were old men when I was still shaving peachfuzz off my cheeks would have been able to do this blindfolded.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 02:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1421</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1418</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Rats We will post the video of the presentation in the next few days , however it will be in italian so will need translation by some kind person - I am awaiting the presentation slides from the organisers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1418</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rats says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1415</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A fraction off topic here but wasn't the report on the Celani replication by STMicroelectron ics supposed to come out on the 14th? What happened to this?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rats</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1415</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1413</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I like the way you think, Chuck. We are studying that possibility. Do you have any experience with those?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1413</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1412</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All We will be doing a live broadcast on Smart Scarecrow show at 20:00 Eastern US time. You can see the live broadcast and interact with the show/ask questions here: http://smartscarecrow.com/live/ If you just want to listen to the audio - go here: http://www.renseradio.com/listenlive.htm if you want to do straight chat: http://scarecrowshow.chatango.com/ and the satellite radio link information for those that are interested is: Satellite - Galaxy 19 Transponder 5 Frequency 11836 Symbol Rate 20.770 PID 559 - Right Side Please listen/join in if you can]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1412</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chuck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1411</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm curious as to why all the big heavy metal is needed. Why not simply seal the wire inside the tube using light-bulb type glass-to-metal connections? If you need supports, use some lightweight mica wafers. When I look at all of the thermal mass the current setup adds and it seems that it makes accurate calirometry much more difficult.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1411</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
