<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>HarleyTruby says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-28130</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Эта публикация дает возможность задействовать различные источники информации и представить их в удобной форме. Читатели смогут быстро найти нужные данные и получить ответы на интересующие их вопросы. Мы стремимся к четкости и доступности материала для всех! Изучить вопрос глубже - https://mednarkoforum.ru/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>HarleyTruby</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 09:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-28130</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Muoi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-27300</link>
			<description><![CDATA[mostbet (Justina: http://pinetree.sg/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=482930) Spin to win big! Discover endless wins! Play with ease on our safe platform! Get your luck rolling now! Join the best gamers! Tell your colleagues about us! Thank you for your comments! Very secure! You push us! Following your latest promotions! Joined your VIP club! You're the best! Definitely telling about you! Huge thanks for the share! Absolutely the best! Your talent always are rewarded! mostbet: http://xn--vk1bj3q68rhnc.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=211823 mostbet: https://glbian.com/prd/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=866689 mostbet: https://hearaon.co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=946807 mostbet: https://www.mtosedu.co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=2460663]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Muoi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2025 06:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-27300</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>João Guilherme says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26383</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Seu conteúdo é excelente ! Eu encontrei este site por acaso e vim te dizer que estou curtindo todos os posts . Vou me inscrever e te desejo muito sucesso! My blog post - datador ink jet: http://seino-jimu.net/program/keijiban-kyuukeishitsu/yybbs/yybbs.cgi?list=thread]]></description>
			<dc:creator>João Guilherme</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26383</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SamuelTucky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25538</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Кракен сайт маркет: Бесконечное множество возможностей | правило кракена песня кракен маркет даркнет только через торрент - https://kramusic.at/ KRAKEN рабочий сайт — это передовой ресурс, где технологии и инновации встречаются. Узнайте, как новые разработки могут изменить вашу жизнь, посетивкракен рабочий сайт. При покупке наркотиков важно выбирать проверенные и безопасные платформы. KRAKEN даркнет предлагает высокие стандарты безопасности, чтобы избежать мошенничества. На Kraken маркетплейс вы найдете только надежных продавцов, что позволяет вам купить наркотики с полной уверенностью в безопасности сделки. Чтобы разобраться, как правильно совершать покупки на Кракене и избежать мошенничества, перейдите по ссылке - наркотики для полного руководства. песня первое правило - https://krakensong.net/ Kraken маркет Telegram Messenger]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SamuelTucky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25538</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Danielgop says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-24451</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Мега магазин mega dark - это огромный анонимный маркетплейс с огромным ассортиментом товаров и услуг в России. На площадке представлены сотни категорий, в которых можно найти предложения от тысяч продавцов. Главное подобрать подходящее, сравнить отзывы, количество продаж и другие особенности. После чего оформить заказ и максимально быстро получить его. Главное, что MEGA гарантирует анонимность и безопасность каждому пользователю, и вы можете доверять проекту. Ссылка на Мега онион - mega вход . Это рабочее на данный момент зеркало MEGA, которое можно использовать для покупок. Потому переходите на сайте и окунитесь в мир тысяч товаров и услуг. А при возникновении любых вопросов, администрация проекта поможет в их решении. https://megaweb777.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Danielgop</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 02:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-24451</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bernie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-17405</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What a information of un-ambiguity and preserveness of valuable familiarity on the topic of unexpected emotions. Visit my homepage ... cheap vpn subscription (www.yiquzx.com: http://www.yiquzx.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=586256)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 21:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-17405</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>먹튀사이트 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-12036</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wonderful, what a webpage it is! This webpage gives valuable data to us, keep it up.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>먹튀사이트</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2021 08:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-12036</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lizette says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11774</link>
			<description><![CDATA[25% of U.S. buyrs consult social media earlier than shopping for a present.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Lizette</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2021 10:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11774</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mia says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11747</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Think about your customers’ neds whereas planning and designing your new site—this inherently leads to effective seo .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2021 10:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11747</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>바카라 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11584</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dead indited content, Really enjoyed looking at.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>바카라</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2021 05:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11584</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>web page says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11290</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thiis website was... how do I say it? Relevant!! Finally I have found something that helped me. Cheers! Kasyno online web page: https://stellapolarisinitiative.com/the-starboard/profile/quyenhockman427/ najlepsze kasyna internetowe]]></description>
			<dc:creator>web page</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11290</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>купить диплом says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11113</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A fascinating discussion is worth comment. I believe that you should publish more on this subject, it might not be a taboo matter but usually people do not speak about these topics. To the next! Many thanks!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>купить диплом</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 18:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11113</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>어 야동 봐야지 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10475</link>
			<description><![CDATA[하지만 많은 경우 회사가 액세스할 수 있는 경우 회원은 가족의 양육합니다. 앉아서보 30 분 필리핀 야동 실제 친엄마와 기준 세 번 과학적인 현실이다.워커]]></description>
			<dc:creator>어 야동 봐야지</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 09:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10475</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>KorySmall says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8969</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have checked your page and i have found some duplicate content, that's why you don't rank high in google, but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique content, search for: Boorfe's tips unlimited content]]></description>
			<dc:creator>KorySmall</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8969</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FirstChong says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8917</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I see you don't monetize your website, don't waste your traffic, you can earn extra cash every month because you've got hi quality content. If you want to know how to make extra $$$, search for: Mrdalekjd methods for $$$]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FirstChong</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2017 17:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8917</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1238</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's a segment of the 12-8 calibration data, normalized to make comparing the curves easier. http://magicsound.us/Cell2_12-8_1600.jpg The effect of T_ambient on the glass temperature is pretty clear, with a delay of about 2 minutes for T_out and 3 minutes for T_in. The dispersion of glass temperature data also suggests there is convective instability around the outside of the cell, since T_out seems to lead T_in for these short -term variations.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1238</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1237</link>
			<description><![CDATA[T_ambient variability seems to be adding some significant measurement error. I'm working on a graph to illustrate this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1237</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1175</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ged: it looks like they're going to do that very soon, in a few minutes. See next blog post.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1175</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree with Ecco. The signal is much cleaner and clearer than ever, and the most conservative P_ex is showing a strong response. So, I too am eager to switch to the active wire and cross check. I see we are now at 48 W in on the inactive wire. Once that is done, perhaps we should do the same power step routine with the active wire only.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1174</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rats says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1173</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Very interesting! Seems like there was excess power for about an hour but it's dropped off now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rats</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1173</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1170</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Currently, 33W of input power seem to show a relevant amount of apparent excess power (about 3W as of writing, with the most conservative baseline). At these levels, couldn't power be safely switched to the active wire to cross-check this result?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1170</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1169</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ryan, I am using the history directly. There is typically 2 seconds of time between each event. My curve fit routine does a remarkable job of matching the data when the power is stepped to a constant value. It is very evident that the outside glass temperature begins its rise about 30 seconds before the power reading shows an increase. I have been searching for a 30 second time constant explanation for a while now and I suspect that this might be the source. Review the data for the time stamp beginning at 12/12/2012, 11:18 with the power reading 50.6236 watts blue and the glass temperature is 114.702 C. You should see that the temperature is just beginning to rise at this time but the power increase to 55.7 watts has not yet begun. It takes until 11:19 for that to begin to be registered. The actual time pass is 30+ seconds. Do you see what I refer to?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1169</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1168</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ David - Are you looking at the raw history or the 30 second average? The power meter has been real responsive in my experience. You might be seeing an artifact of the averaging? A few rows of data showing what you are seeing would be a good thing to see.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1168</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1167</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have a question for the EU team. What is the specified settling time for the RF power meter readings? I am seeing evidence that it might be in the range of 30 seconds and the delay appears to be impacting my curve fitting routine. I realize that this question seems to be strange, but I notice that the glass outside temperature readings are making a move upwards about 30 seconds before the power increase as plotted in the data. Perhaps someone can help explain why this seems to be occurring. How would the glass know that the power was to be increased 30 seconds ahead of time?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1167</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GreenWin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1166</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Google doc link posted by Bob for ENEA History of Cold Fusion Research in Italy (the Homework) - was corrupt in my download attempts. However here is a link to the original from ENEA: http://old.enea.it/com/ingl/New_ingl/publications/pdf/Cold_Fusion_Italy.pdf What seems typical of most H+Ni systems is the variability of lattice geometry producing nuclear active sites (Storms): "The observed phenomena of thermal energy production by the Ni-H system starts after the absorption of a certain amount of hydrogen by the nickel. The amount of absorbed hydrogen is not constant and it possibly depends on the metallic sample treatment. In some situations we did not observed any absorption (nor energy production); in others only small quantities of hydrogen were absorbed. Finally, in other situations, a very large amount of H was absorbed and in very short times (A2, A7)." P 174]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GreenWin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1166</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1164</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Good thinking Ecco, we have 4 hours, we will look at reducing the power in and see of the lines get closer. @All We are trying to add Pxs high and low estimates in to the LIVE data - so things might go/look a little squiffy for a while.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1164</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1163</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hard to tell at this stage (also because of the method used - decreasing power steps instead of increasing) if the active wire in hydrogen atmosphere (yellow line) is showing the expected behavior or just running at an offset along all other calibration lines: http://i.imgur.com/p9fH6.png http://i.imgur.com/p9fH6.png My opinion is that if it's true that there's a temperature threshold over which excess heat starts increasing proportionally with heat, then at some point (at a lower input power) it should touch or cross other calibration lines. However in this case the power was applied to the NiCr wire all along. This might be a source of mistakes in interpreting temperature readings.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1163</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1162</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We are very thankful to all the kind people that have made donations, it has really made a difference to the EU cell - including the purchase of the Thurlby Thandar PSUs - the incredible constant currency performance you can see on the live data.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1162</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1161</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco A steel cell is one of the cells that will be active in the US soon]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1161</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123star says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1159</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[continued] References: [1] Emissivity of common materials http://www.omega.com/literature/transactions/volume1/emissivitya.html [2] Deoxidation of Titanium alloy using hydrogen http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319909013056]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123star</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1159</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123star says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1158</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I propose a mechanism that could explain the excess power (without LENR). I challenge you to disprove what I say. 1 - Hydrogen exposure removes the oxide layer and decrease the emissivity of the wire [1], [2] 2 - If (roughly) Power=emissivit y*sigma*Area*T^ 4, keeping the radiating area and input power constant, a decrease in emissivity causes an increase in temperature of the wire. 3 - The thermocouples read direct IR radiation and report a greater temperature, even if the input power is the same. In other words a "hotter" spectrum heats them more (as always, even if the total power is the same). NOTES: - Oxidized metals generally have a higher emissivity, check [1] - Hydrogen exposure can deoxidize materials [2]]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123star</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1158</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1156</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco, I still have fluctuations of T_mica above 180°C. Would you mind if I ask you to compare fluctuations at 180°C and 185°C? Just to check if it is linear, as you mentionned.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1156</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1155</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco & Mathieu So much to discover - are we having fun yet? @Mathieu Really love the data stream - stirling job sir!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1155</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1154</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: If the oxidized wire got lucky and produced all that excess heat then I would make a test increasing its mass by 5-10 times and see if excess heat increases accordingly (after performing all due calibrations). That kind of wire should be extremely cheap and readily available, differently than Celani-treated constantan wires. This experiment would be aimed to find IF there is an effect by improving the signal-to-noise ratio significantly and thus making any anomalous effect very clearly visible (this would be useful for Celani wires too, however). Anyway, I doubt that those oxidized wires produced that much excess heat, if any at all.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1154</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1153</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I made a print out of the document you are mentioning Bob. Piantelli talks about Ni. I believe that NiCu is a little different regarding the triggering tenmperature.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1153</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1152</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mathieu As was reported in 1993 by Piantelli (quote above), even without very exotic Ni he saw Pxs at 150 degrees +, there is a crossover between this and Celani's reported loading temperatures - with the Celani wire now clearly above 150 and certainly loaded, there is a good chance that if there is any effect, it is in line with previous research. If this is so, the non-special oxidised wire used in calibrations that seemingly got lucky and produced potentially Pxs of the order of 15W, if you add your guestimate of 7.25W now that is a total of 22.25W if we take the lower baseline. This is the range of the Pxs reported by Celani. This is very, "shoot from the hip" thinking on my part of course I am just musing... Anyone else got an opinion?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1152</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1151</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco, No, please take a look at the experimental log https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AkyO8n6-0MjNdG85Wk05TWRLSHNjWFY0aGdXejBFVFE&output=html.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1151</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1150</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mathieu Valat: to clarify, was aluminum foil still applied to the cell this morning (when I performed again p_xs estimations) or after removing it yesterday evening at 23:02 you haven't played around with it anymore?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1150</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1149</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wired the two PSU together to drive more power. I am done with aluminium foil. It is to much unstable and perturbs the cell too much. This excess is decreasing. I want to go @ 1 bar and see if hydrogen recombination impacts this anomalous power generation.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1149</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1148</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mathieu Valat: it currently looks as if the more input power is applied, the more excess heat appears to increase (according to my graphical estimation). Unless you are doing something around the reactor, it would seem that Celani's thermal anomaly is being replicated together with its positive feedback behavior with temperature. That would be around 7.25W of p_xs, currently (with the highest - most conservative - baseline) However, it could still be that using the NiCr wire for heating is somehow artificially increasing higher glass_out temperature readings compared to using the active wire, given the same input power. I'm currently using this chart for p_xs estimations: http://i.imgur.com/zs49f.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1148</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pelluet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1146</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Bob Greenyer: maybe this document and particularly fig 2 could give ideas too ... http://www.mhi.co.jp/en/technology/review/pdf/e421/e421050.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Pelluet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1146</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1145</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Bob Greenyer: > In fact, I could go and point out all of the important insights in this document, but I need to prepare to go to Rome, so I would ask that you, the crowd, help pick out the juicy insights (there are very many) and quote paragraphs and page numbers for their relevance to what is happening this week in France and Italy. You may be surprised, the link is given below. Chapter 2.6 applies to D/Pd, but it appears that very low temperatures (at around 150K or less) can help greatly loading. That's food for thought.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1145</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1144</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@David Roberson: excess power with Celani wires doesn't seem to show suddenly like a stepped function. It appears very gradually and proportionally with heat/input power. This is a graph made from data from the latest STMicro slides showing the relationship between input power and excess power on a 200mm wire: http://i.imgur.com/L9CV7.png http://i.imgur.com/L9CV7.png The EU cell seems to behave like this. The more the input power applied, the larger the excess power (estimated from the highest available baseline, to be very conservative) appears to be. At some point it will be interesting (perhaps with automatic calculation with that baseline) to verify with a proper test if excess power generation in this cell has the same behavior as from STM slides . A possible point of concern is that this "input power amplifier" behavior looks almost too smooth and could indicate an unexpected artifact somewhere.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1144</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1143</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It appears as though the glass outer temperature and the pressure were slowly falling together in the EU unit after you ceased playing with the aluminum foil. This is more as it should be. It is good news that the increase in power from 47+ to 50+ watts is very easy to detect. When the excess power starts to show up we should be able to determine that very well. The calibration at this juncture is critical so take your time and get it the best possible. Thanks for the super effort guys!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1143</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1142</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mathieu Valat: while it will certainly be interesting to see how the cell behaves while running by itself, it might have been an idea to try fitting the foil more carefully around the glass tube alone after letting the reactor cool down (which by itself might have some positive effect on loading after reapplying heat), for example to see how much heat it can help contain within the reactor (in addition of helping loading with temperature of course). Heat resistant tape could also have been used to secure the aluminum foil wrapping around the tube once placed. But I can understand that you might not want to tamper with things like the placement of the glass_out thermocouple at this stage (which is not permanently fitted as far as I understand).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1142</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rats says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1141</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm getting confused with all the data and comments posted. Am I right in saying that during calibration runs the cell was already showing excess power? I can't help but feel there are still worrying measurement errors in the experiment. Feel free to tell me otherwise.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rats</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1141</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, Hmm, I kinda like the idea of treating the wire very delicately for now, since we don't know if we fried the US one. But, I might be being way overcautious. Definitely need a nice baseline with the heater wire to see if we did get a few watts of excess there. That would be fantastic. Also like seeing the tinfoil idea going in. Seems to be working.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1139</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I decided to let the cell run by itself and stop struggling with aluminum foid. It is 23:02CET.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1139</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1138</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco. At the time you did that, there was no foil involved. So it still may be valid. The lack of comparable test using the NiCr wire for heating is still a problem if trying to make an excess energy calculation right now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1138</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1137</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ok , so lets wait for the actual run. Its safe to say, for now, that the Pxs estimates done below are not valid.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1137</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1136</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Picture of the cell, currently (from Mathieu) http://docs.google.com/open?id=0B9qCtGOFmvhmMXpOb2hsbTZKd1k]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1136</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1132</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, In that case, its a good news. But guessing from Mathieu's post, the Celani wire was directly heated during He calibration so that baseline is not applicable , strictly speaking. We need a baseline with indirectly heated wire.(For present comparisons, not necessary for actual run) Mathieu just commented in the last blog entry that Aluminium foil is there now. I don't know whether we can still compare this run with the calibrations.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1132</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Arnaud says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1131</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello Mathieu, What happened to the cell at 21:32 ? Temperatures rise . Glass In, Glass out and mica. However, power supplies give the same amount of power. Which channel is powering the constantan wire ? (Blue or Red) Btw, nice work ! Good luck, Arnaud]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Arnaud</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1131</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Toine says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1130</link>
			<description><![CDATA[According to the Experimental log, Mathieu is putting an aluminium sheet on the cell.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Toine</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1130</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1127</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sanjeev: if you give a look at this document (https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9qCtGOFmvhmNGRCQUJoanlLZ28/edit ) on page 3 you will see that calibrations performed under He with the active wire (named 360L) have significantly lower glass_out temperatures than those previously made with the oxidized constantan wire. So, if there was a mistake in placing the thermocouple, it probably caused a decrease in reported temperatures. If one were to put the actual base line for p_xs calculation down there, that would make estimated excess heat even larger (again!) . At this point, however, it's indeed hard to tell which baseline to use. Given the room for possible (now likely) errors, it might be anywhere, although indications are that it should probably be below current temperature levels.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1127</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1125</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mathieu Valat > We don't have a baseline for heating with that wire. If as you're implying, during the previous calibration runs the oxidized (and untreated?) Constantan wire was already showing excess heat (that is, higher glass temperature than expected), then this would make my previous excess power estimation even more conservative. Somehow, I find his unlikely.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1125</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I wanted to mention that earlier, argon (all rare gases) does not absorb IR at all (if not electronically excited). The same is true for all homonuclear diatomic molecules (like H2, N2, O2). The reason is, that this spectral range is covered by rotational and vibrational transitions in the molecule, which single atoms simply don't have and for the molecules in question the transition dipole moment is zero. These molecules are basically completely transparent for IR (and the reason CO2 or methane increase the greenhouse effect in our atmosphere so strongly as they do absorb IR). The heat is transferred by collisions of the molecules (with the wire and each other). Thanks a lot for your knowledge in this specific field! So that is one option out... I think the latter calibrations with He and the active wire reveal that some excess heat was generated from the oxided wire during...calibr ations.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1124</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1123</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ We don't have a baseline for heating with that wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1123</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Gipsel says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1122</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I wanted to mention that earlier, argon (all rare gases) does not absorb IR at all (if not electronically excited). The same is true for all homonuclear diatomic molecules (like H2, N2, O2). The reason is, that this spectral range is covered by rotational and vibrational transitions in the molecule, which single atoms simply don't have and for the molecules in question the transition dipole moment is zero. These molecules are basically completely transparent for IR (and the reason CO2 or methane increase the greenhouse effect in our atmosphere so strongly as they do absorb IR). The heat is transferred by collisions of the molecules (with the wire and each other).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Gipsel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1122</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1121</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is to explain how I got that value (roughly 4.5W after checking out a second time): http://i.imgur.com/RtmLH.png http://i.imgur.com/RtmLH.png I hope I didn't misinterpret anything. T_Ambient is currently increasing, so that would cause a decrease of calculated output power.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1121</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1119</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just a quick note on the current status: we are loading the wire @2bar with pure H2. Watch for resistivity drops! I do not want to use thermal paste now, as it will means my calibrations are worthless. We already planned on using it. This will be discussed later on.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1119</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1117</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Do you have a reference that shows the mass of the various parts of the cell? I have constructed a simple LTspice model of the device that seems to demonstrate the time domain behavior and one output is the energy stored in joules versus time. The model suggests that the device stores energy in a manner similar to 231.56 grams of water in the liquid phase. I would like to understand how this relates to the real life cell if possible. Of course, my model may be removed from reality, but a quick sanity check suggests that it is correct. If we can indeed prove it generates a good estimate, then the results might prove valuable to the project.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1117</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1116</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know a friendly Italian (hopefully with some English) that can host me in ROME for a few nights if I come to capture on film Celani / ST Microelectronic s etc on Friday?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1116</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1114</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Of course, the worst case baseline ! If there is excess energy in worst case, you can say it more confidently that the experiment was a success. Eager to see the P_in vs P_out calibration curve. It will be interesting to compare it with US one.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1114</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1113</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You said in the log that the glass tube got damaged and is now replaced. Do you plan to do a sample calibration again with new tube to see if it exactly matches the old curves ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1113</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123star says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1112</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, the results compared to the other experiment show less spread @ different pressures. Would you consider running a calibration with a different wire (i.e. maybe the other one)? You know, my concern is that the emissivity of the wire could affect the results; I'd like to verify this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123star</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1112</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1111</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[continued] Excluding the outlier H2Ar run, in the temperature range of interest there are about 5°C of difference at most in T_GlassOut temperature between the lowest and the highest calibration given a certain input power. However an excess heat of, say, 10W, would increase temperatures above this difference even in the worst case scenario, and be clearly above any possible error margin. This is a conservative, non-expert opinion, so please correct me if I'm wrong in my reasoning.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1111</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1110</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What is the input power range of interest for the active run? I'm assuming 36-60 W (48W +/- 25%). This is probably the range to be taken into consideration in order to select the proper baseline. It appears that H2-Ar runs at 3.5 and 2.0 bar in this range deviate more or less significantly from other ones in this graph: http://www.quantumheat.org/images/PinTout-Calib-Final.png Which is a bit of a problem because they're calibrations for the gas mix the cell is going to be ran with for the active run. Anyway, it all depends on the excess heat magnitude you're expecting to see. If it's relatively large, then you can play it conservatively (and solve most problems, although in a "dumb" way) by choosing a high baseline. [continues]]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1110</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
