<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>drew says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-489</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Celani in his paper did say that somehow variations in the ambient room temperature seemed to help the reaction get going!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>drew</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-489</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-479</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I see you have started a new run with an initial pressure of around 0.5 bar (something more). Is this one with hydrogen?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 23:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-479</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wookie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-478</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert, @Ryan, @ David , @everyone involved great job, keep it up! I*d like to express my joy and admiration, watching these wonderful scientiffic research LIVE with all the great comments from people actively helping to improve the experiment. Thank you all. and make it watertight :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wookie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-478</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-477</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Re-reading the article, I may have misunderstood what they were talking about with the temp ranges, but maybe somebody can make some sense of it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-477</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-476</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here is a paper that within discusses the optimal hydrogen loading temperature for material prepared similar to Celani's method. It suggests that the ideal temps for the loading may occur between 225 and 255 C. Go much above or below that and not much happens. http://144.206.159.178/ft/53/87555/13438462.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-476</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-475</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I concur with Ryan - some great suggestions @David You do not need to apologise for posting regularly when you are doing such a great job! Thanks to all for your thinking]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-475</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AB says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-470</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This may be a stupid post as I'm not technically qualified to comment, but it could be important. Impedance implies alternating current, right? Celani uses direct current though, or at least he did during the NIweek demo.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AB</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-470</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-469</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry, but another point - What I have said below could be all wrong. It could simply be that at the first event when the room temperature dropped (presumably because some heating turned off) that less air is circulating around the cell - that is the air is more still and hence less heat is drawn away from the cell - this affect should also therefore show up as an increase in the glass wall temperature too. The second event results in more air circulating. Now, I will shut up]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-469</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lu says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-468</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think the rise in the T_Board temperature is telling. I assume it's probe on the board somewhere. Not sure where the T_Ambient probe is.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Lu</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-468</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-467</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That's a good point, David. I hope they give that a look, and at least it should be easy to test that. Also like Alain's suggestion a lot. So many mysteries to solve; science is a constantly unfolding detective's novel.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-467</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-466</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Final note - then I will shut up Your temperature probe boxes may have the facility to do a differential reading from two probe wires - by-passing the temperature reference control circuit.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-466</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-465</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My point about differential readings is as follows. Temperature probes connected to a box use an internal temperature compensation circuit to act as a temperature reference point for the subtraction. If this is not working correctly then cooling the room (ambient) and hence the probe box may give a false indication that the cell temperature has risen. Connecting the ambient and cell probes together removes this problem as they directly read the differential temperature. You simple read off the temperature from the calibration table provided for the particular wires you are using. Of course this might not be the problem at all...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-465</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alain Coetmeur says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-464</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just an idea: add similar small periodic signal of ambient temp, an make analysis of the spectral response... it is used to detect strange correlations in noise... now whether it is artifact or fact... but the causality will be clearer.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alain Coetmeur</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-464</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Matt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-463</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I really think there should be annotations associated by time with the data stream. Information such as when the power blew out, what gas is in the chamber at the time. Any time relevant data should be viewed in the data view. I'm also interested in adding click and drag to zoom capacities. I think it would really improve the ease of use in terms of exploring the data. I think these two things combined would aid interpretation. Also perhaps clearer labels and information regarding the experiment in the data viewer itself.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-463</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-460</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Another point, do you have two temperature probes reading ambient and cell wall temperature separately? You might be able to reduce any errors here by connecting the two directly together to do a differential reading with one box.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-460</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-458</link>
			<description><![CDATA[First anomaly means the cell does not see the same ambient temperature that your ambient temperature probe does. My first guess. Second anomaly, no idea yet - but try taking a low flow heat gun to your temperature probe boxes and see how heating them affects the readings of the thermocouples. Probably no problem here but worth a try.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-458</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
