<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>HarleyJuicy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9184</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello. I see that you don't update your page too often. I know that writing posts is boring and time consuming. But did you know that there is a tool that allows you to create new posts using existing content (from article directories or other blogs from your niche)? And it does it very well. The new articles are high quality and pass the copyscape test. You should try miftolo's tools]]></description>
			<dc:creator>HarleyJuicy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 22:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9184</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-471</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Jfab Interesting suggestion B]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-471</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jfab says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-456</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Have you considered asking Celani to come to your lab with his own experiment setup and apparatus for a couple of days? You could test your measuring instruments on his cell? I'm sure some of us would be keen to donate for its travel expenses. I would.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jfab</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-456</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-453</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Actually, I don't take off the shield. But I did notice that the IR gun was leaving a thin streak of film on the cell from the plastic melting where it touched. :(]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-453</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-452</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My mistake, then. The process of taking off the lid and measuring temperatures does cause a slight drop in cell temperatures, though. Or at least, it did each time you said you were doing so. Excess power calculation currently seems in line with that of the previous power step.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-452</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-451</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco: No, I did not get close to the cell at all this morning. I did increase the power to see if the excess power increases with the temperature and the increased current.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-451</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-450</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Let me guess: after increasing input power a bit, have you have measured wire temperatures with the IR probe? It appears that every time you do this (not the measuring itself, but removing the lid, staying in front of the reactor, etc), reactor temperatures drop a bit in a [now] typical manner.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-450</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-448</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ron In http://www.nist.gov/data/PDFfiles/jpcrd221.pdf Page 235 is interesting too. It is a long read!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-448</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-447</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ron We have been discussing the potential for annealing to modify or disable the Celani wire. I guess as we start testing more wires in both the US and EU, running SEM on them afterwards - we will build up a pool of evidence we can dip into to understand what is happening. With the live and near live publishing of raw data and images and the help of people like those interested in looking at it on here we will together form a good understanding of what is going on.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-447</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-446</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Interesting paper http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Sankaranarevidencefo.pdf We speculate that the electrically self-heated wire method, is probably helpful in obtaining higher loading values.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-446</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-445</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks to everyone for sharing ideas, this is great! There's some research on alloy resistance across temperature that may be interesting to some. http://www.nist.gov/data/PDFfiles/jpcrd221.pdf On page 53 there are graphs of electrical resistivity of Nickel/Copper alloys at different ratios across temperature. There's also some interesting information about annealing of Ni in the temperature range that the wire has seen already. (just something to look at while waiting on the experiment! : )]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-445</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-444</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Chauvin: not related to your hypothesis, but after reading recent Celani presentations, yesterday I found out that he typically loads Hydrogen at a starting pressure of around 7 bars, which is higher than the 3.5 bars typically used by the MFMP. This would increase convective losses toward the glass tube, but on the other hand wire temperature would also be more constant along its length, which coupled with higher hydrogen pressure, might significantly help loading and therefore showing anomalous behavior. I'm also thinking that once an active wire has been well-loaded with Hydrogen at a high pressure, afterwards it might not be necessary anymore to keep it at 7 bar. So I'm asking: are there plans to try this "high pressure path", which anyway would be more faithful to Celani's testing conditions? Can your reactors withstand them? (There are also potential safety issues with this, btw)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-444</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nicolas Chauvin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-443</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It is possible that at this particular temperature, the hydrogen protons loaded in the wire get a higher mobility in the nickel lattice. This would reduce the wire resistivity, even if no additional hydrogen/proton s are loaded in the wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nicolas Chauvin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-443</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-442</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Robert - not a problem.. I keep forgetting to tell you how to simply add a large ballast vessel. We used to use an empty gas bottle (big nitrogen ones) and connect directly to the laser (in your case the cell). In this way you have a very large reservoir (>1000:1 ratio) filled to the gas pressure you require and you can simply use this to accurately refill and keep your cell at the required pressure.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-442</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-440</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ David Good points as ever David - this is why we planned the internal replications first, to identify and iron out any doubts or bugs in the system in a public way to form a tight understanding of what affects certainty and how to deal with it. Thanks for your diligent attention.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-440</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-439</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My point is; until you address the calibration errors you can not positively identify any excess anomalous power output. Any possible anomalous heating point has to lie outside any calibration spread error to be identified with any certainty.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-439</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-437</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Alex There appears to be a step down in ambient at that time - but pressure and impedance are both dropping.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-437</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ivone M. FitzGerald says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-436</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Guys, it's early days yet, but this null test is a strong indication yet that the regular beat of between 5.5 watt and 7.5 watt over a cycle of eight minutes that you had earlier is what you are looking for. Right now it's random noise. Next time aim for 10 watts average, and I think you can allow yourself some self congratulation. And then what? Manufacture your own New Fire wires, (rhymes) with a thick rough appearance, make say a thousand, pump 500 watts through them, get 10 KW, and you're away!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ivone M. FitzGerald</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-436</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alex says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-435</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello; Sorry for my poor english. What happens to power-out on October 16 at 7:05 am? (HUGnetView™ time) Sudden increase of 2.5 W ? Thanks for your great job Regards]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-435</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
