<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:21:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Al Potenza says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-455</link>
			<description><![CDATA[IIRC, Celani did say that the wires are hard to make. I wonder if there is an effort on his part or yours to devise ways to ease that process or perhaps automate it somehow and maybe generate more, lots more, of those wires?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Al Potenza</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-455</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-427</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Two main reasons. First, we have been focused on doing a replication of the experiment done with one wire. Second, we have only been gifted a precious few wires. We have not sought to try to make any ourselves. But in the future there are literally hundreds of variations like that to try.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-427</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-394</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'd be interested to see what happens with getting it back up around 270 C, run for an hour, drop the pressure of the H2 down below 1 ATM for an hour, then bring it back up again. I think static conditions are not helpful, and that maybe even Celani's hydrogen leak may have helped to trigger the reaction. Here is a paper discussing problems with static equilibrium and triggering. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CravensDpracticalt.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-394</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-393</link>
			<description><![CDATA[By the way, to not complicate things too much at this stage and help the system raise temperatures (as mentioned in other blog posts here) without applying too much power (either directly or not), you might want to try limiting hydrogen pressure to 1 bar or less (absolute). During NIWeek2012 and ICCF17 (I think) Celani had to do that because he wasn't allowed to bring containers of pressurized flammable gases to the venues. Yet, excess heat apparently was still triggered (although the active wire was already well-loaded), with his wire reportedly achieving the best excess heat results up to that time. Again, maybe asking Celani for data about those tests might be helpful (did the wire impedance anomaly show, etc). I don't know if you have performed calibration runs at low gas pressures, though.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-393</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-392</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Beaten to it by Rob L...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-392</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-391</link>
			<description><![CDATA[At some stage I would suggest you put insulation around the tube and endeavor to reduce the heating power input requirement to the 20W level – i.e. comparable to the expected anomalous heat power output. You have nothing to lose doing this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-391</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-389</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It looks like live data isn't available anymore. Was it turned off on purpose? Anyway, I agree with the choice of trying to find a temperature range which makes the sudden and anomalous decline of wire impedance to show. That is supposed to be a preamble for excess heat with Celani's wire, at least according to what I know. Maybe it might be a good idea to consult with Celani to know if with his latest wires excess heat has ever appeared without that happening first. If not, then, there might be problems with your wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-389</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mitch says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-387</link>
			<description><![CDATA[From the peanut gallery, a suggestion. Unfortunately, it requires resources I cannot contribute towards. You need your perfect control before going much farther. You should set it up as a simultaneous cell as close to the test cell as possible, and you should do it DOUBLE BLIND, so that only someone unconnected with your experiments knows which has the Celani wire and which does not. (If there are visual tells on the Celani wire, the experimenters should not have visual access to the wire.) It's very easy for even sincere and honest investigators to subconsciously start interpreting ambiguity in their favor, so going double blind at the start will really help you build confidence that what you are seeing (if anything) is not wishful thinking.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-387</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-385</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Personally, I would keep the more risky choices as secondary alternatives. Rewrapping the Celani wire around the mica support without a spare one in case of damage (since it's brittle, etc) would delay experimentation and progress. Also, it might need to be planned in advance due to the time needed (I guess, unless you can virtually stop the reactor now and fitting the wire again in a couple hours). However, if you choose to refit the Celani wire but you can't do it right now you can still experiment with higher temperatures in the meanwhile. In either cases, if you decide to increase temperatures (doing this by increasing power to the heating wire seems the safest choice currently. There's quite some headroom left, I think) I would suggest monitoring manually from time to time with the IR probe the center portion of the Celani wire which as seen yesterday gets hotter than on its ends.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-385</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-384</link>
			<description><![CDATA[hi just wondering not to throw a stick in the spokes i realy want this to work also even trying some things myself. is it possible on the very small amount of exess heat you saw that it could be caused by hydrogen embritalment ? some factories and industrial plants have to be carefull of this because it ruins metal the hydrogen finds its way into metal and tears it apart, looking at the celani wire under your electron microscopes kind of looks that way and when you distort a piece of metal it puts off heat is there any kind of calculation for that , also with the supposed ecat or even celani , if with the exess heat has anyone calculated the cost of making the hydrogen to cause the reaction into the cop just some quick questions good luck will be sending money on payday]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-384</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andre Blum says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-383</link>
			<description><![CDATA[...either that or re-wrap the celani wire soon. You want that wrap tightness hypothesis behind you ASAP.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andre Blum</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-383</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andre Blum says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-382</link>
			<description><![CDATA[One thing you might want to think about is whether you can further explore your theory about the tighter wire wrap without touching setup 1. I do not know the current status of setup 2, but you could consider running some calibration runs with normal isotan in a tight wrap just like you have in setup 1. Or maybe a somewhat less meticulous test can be performed in a quick and dirty third setup with just the components essential to find out how the temperature would vary with wrap.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andre Blum</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-382</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-381</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think you should try heating from the Celani wire first. I remember from Celani's paper, that using the Celani "active" wire doubled the excess heat effect over heating indirectly with an inactive wire. So, if we are replicating Celani's LENR effect here, switching over to the active wire for direct heating would be the fastest way to verify, by watching for a jump in excess heat production. That's my thought. This is very interesting, quite the twist.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-381</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
