<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:58:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/it/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>dkrycek says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-889</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good work! It looks like you did a great job with your mechanical calibration! I think I might just try my hand at this sort of thing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dkrycek</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-889</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adrian hodson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-106</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your work. If the ultimate goal is to demonstrate positive energy output compared to input, what are the equations and data that will be used? What are the margins of measurement error? What controls will be done. In the Test Run Plan, all I can see on this subject is "If excess heat appears in a measurable amount, hold current conditions" Best wishes]]></description>
			<dc:creator>adrian hodson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-106</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
