<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:51:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>BrainJuicy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9230</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello. I see that you don't update your page too often. I know that writing posts is time consuming and boring. But did you know that there is a tool that allows you to create new posts using existing content (from article directories or other pages from your niche)? And it does it very well. The new articles are unique and pass the copyscape test. You should try miftolo's tools]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BrainJuicy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 06:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9230</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BrainJuicy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9229</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello. I see that you don't update your page too often. I know that writing posts is time consuming and boring. But did you know that there is a tool that allows you to create new posts using existing content (from article directories or other pages from your niche)? And it does it very well. The new articles are unique and pass the copyscape test. You should try miftolo's tools]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BrainJuicy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 06:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9229</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FirstLindsey says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8913</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have noticed you don't monetize your page, don't waste your traffic, you can earn additional cash every month because you've got hi quality content. If you want to know how to make extra money, search for: Mrdalekjd methods for $$$]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FirstLindsey</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8913</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>job slogan tshirts says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8587</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I always used to read paragraph in news papers but now as I am a user of web thus from now I am using net for articles, thanks to web.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>job slogan tshirts</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 19:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8587</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5947</link>
			<description><![CDATA[During his presentation in Moskow, Robert Greenyer said that in the coming months a Piantelli replication in collaboration with Nichenergy is expected, and that an experiment attempting to demonstrate gamma emission from treated constantan/Cela ni wires is also planned in France as soon as Mathieu Valat will have enough time for it, so I would guess that all is not over yet. Apparently MFMP results with excess heat from Celani wire experiments performed so far were more in line with reality than initial claims, but I agree that having wrapping-up documents summarizing findings and conclusions for each experiment and more communication on these matters would be helpful. The video: http://my.mail.ru/mail/andrey_dolgorukiy/video/2/2.html Unfortunately I don't remember the exact time where this information was said, but I think it was not much after the beginning of this video. As far as I'm aware of, MFMP collaborator Bob Higgins will make a Pakhomov replication soon. The one made at HUG before the Hunt's went on vacation was a sort of backup plan since several things went wrong during that week and they wanted to use the remaining free time for something that might have been interesting to see; that's also why it ended up being rushed.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5947</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5945</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Guys, I share Tom's frustration. You have had many interesting starts but no conclusions. Celani wire super interesting resistance data but no follow up Various nickel powder experiments the results of which I have no knowledge of Parkhomov replication learned how to do experiment and then stopped before doing the experiment. Yeah, Ryan went on vacation but are there no volunteers to hold the fort? Of these I would most like to see the Parkhomov finished. With several slooow ramp ups and downs to increasingly higher temps. Say up and down to 700C with no breakage up to 800C, 900C, 1000C, 1050C, 1100C, 1150C, 1200C, 1250C, 1300C internal temperatures. To be clear I mean 25 to 700 to 800 800 to 700 700 to 900 900 to 700 700 to 1000 1000 to 700 700 to 1050 .........]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5945</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom Baccei says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5944</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So, time has gone by in the Piantelli matter. No statement or progress seems to have been made. What happened to the proposal? Was this "bait and switch?" I really think you owe an explanation to those of us who donated money specifically for this opportunity. Dog Bone?, Russia?: seems you have slipped into fad of the week mode. Perhaps someone there could write a recapitulation of ALL results obtained to date, both promising and non-productive? That would be most useful. Thank you, Tom Baccei]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom Baccei</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5944</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5833</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco, a point of interest the data in your graph is far from 100% radiative transfer. Posted in wrong forum. ooppss]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5833</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5832</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Inventzilla, is there any experiment measurement of this effect? If so, where can I find it? Thanks.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5832</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5830</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@inventzilla sounds exactly like what is going on here, clean cheap power, minus the t shirts of course]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5830</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Inventzilla says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5795</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Chemonuclear Fusion is a type of low energy nuclear fusion that has been shown to produce energy in two experiments. Aneutronic nuclear fusion can provide unlimited electric power without polluting the environment with radioactive waste and greenhouse emissions. Chemonuclear processes in small dense white dwarf stars accelerate the rate of nuclear fusion and cause them to explode in spectacular supernova explosions. We started the Chemonuclear Fusion Project is to raise awareness of this new and vitally important source of environmentally clean energy and to promote research and development. The Chemonuclear Fusion Project is soliciting volunteers to help our crowdfunding and educational campaigns. Our crowdfunding webpages will soon be up and running. We want people to post to discussion groups and help us get the word out that aneutronic chemonuclear fusion might be the radiation free way to power the world if we can get the funding to build and test reactors. We want artists who can help us design T-shirts, mugs, and promotional items to sell and give away to our contributors. Writers to write promotional materials and post to web forums are also wanted. Video producers and professional and amateur scientists who can help the public understand the concepts of chemonuclear fusion are encouraged to contact us also. Visit our facebook page and give us a like. We welcome your comments and questions! https://www.facebook.com/chemonuclearfusionproject]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Inventzilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5795</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom Baccei says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5790</link>
			<description><![CDATA[MFMP seems to be jumping around like a flea at a rodeo. Of all the previous "tests" I cannot remember finding either a concluding, nor an interim report. Just the lead of the month, and no follow through to completion. What is up with Piantelli? What ever happened to the exciting new addition, Dr. Ahern? So far I challenge you all to point me toward anything substantial, either negative or positive. Only a bevy of partially executed plans and projects with never an over view, never a concise statement of progress. Come on - this is what you have promised, and what is desperately needed. Do you all have ADD?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom Baccei</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 22:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5790</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5769</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Franco Morici We agree]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 05:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5769</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5749</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Tom, We told them we could not sign an NDA and were only interested in replicating published and patent protected research when we visited them in December on an exploratory trip, Just Mathieu and Myself. No funds were sought at this point specifically for collaboration with them. During that trip we had much greater access to Piantelli than we had hoped for and the NicHEnergy Lab, this was very encouraging. When we arrived in Italy, we were given Day one access to NicHEnergy in Milan and after we had got down and settled in Siena, we had nearly a full week of intense one on one. Still no indication of an NDA. Only as we were leaving at the end of that first week, after 5 full days of tuition, were we asked and we refused, we stood our ground for over two hours and respectfully agreed we would revert with a proposal. We did that. They really liked it but felt it was unnecessarily long. We then supplied a very short proposal which again has been accepted. We are currently waiting for final approval on their side. In the mean time, we are keeping our other funded commitments and Mathieu has begun sourcing components for the replication.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5749</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5746</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am pretty sure they did not know tom . I have been with these guys from day one and have never seen anything bad from them . I have not donated the way that you have due to my own personal finance problems . But yours and many more did make this trip happen and I am sure something has come out of it even if it doesn't seem like it. And we all appreciate what you have done. Even if all they learned was something as silly as the tube needs to be pointing north for anything to happen and nothing else that is a step forward.so thank you for everything and please be patient they are still working. Not to mention how much these guys are not at home with their families just to experiment for all of us on something that could very well not be possible at all.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5746</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom Baccei says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5745</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When you are invited to collaborate, and raise funds for that process, those who provide the funds can reasonably assume that the ONLY obstacle to completing the mission is the need for those funds. In this case Dr. Piantelli clearly did NOT make it clear that an NDA would be necessary. MFMP spent the money raised to deliver themselves to the NicHEnergy site and were THEN informed of the NDA requirement. I feel defrauded in having contributed to delivering you all to Italy, only to find, after the fact, that a non disclosure was required. Who, may I ask is defrauding me? Do I have the chronology correct? Who, I ask again, is defrauding me? As I have already said, I have developed enough respect for the sincerity and honesty of the MFMP group to donate, what for me was a significant amount. No mention of the need for a NDA was made at the time of YOUR request for funds to go forward. Did THEY ambush YOU? ( and those who funded you), or were you presumptive in your fund raising? Yes, I am pissed off! Either YOU are suckers to their manipulations, or I am to yours! Please let me know which of those exclusive choices holds.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom Baccei</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5745</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5741</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just curious and board, I have been playing around with some platinum catalist out of a car converter (only fancy metal substrate I have) and got to thinking about adsorption so I cleaned a piece with the torch until it would readily heat up by itself with propane or hho. Then instead of hydrogen from water electrolysis I submerged it in peroxide that also has hydrogen and is safe . It bubbled like crazy after being cleaned so it must bee adsorbing the hydrogen because the red hot splint test showed the gas as being oxygen . I know that it is only adsorbing a mono layer on the cat but what would happen if you used some of the nickel powder ? Would it load into the nickel and then heat it up and get the same effect . Useing it as the source of hydrogen also makeing clean water and steam simultaneously through inductive heating.i tried heating the loaded cat material with an old heater blower coil wraped carfully around it in open air. Hopeing it would just take off of course it didn't , the ceramic dinner plate I stole out of her kitchen ( shhh) blew apart and scared the hell out of me . So I don't even have amp readings or anything just half ass temp readings with the fluke thermal couple I have but I will try it again. Mabee I will crush it up into a powder. Just wondering about adsorption is it also a mono layer inside the nickel powder?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5741</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5739</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Tom I just arrived in Minesota with the Key equipment for up and coming tests. Ryan told me of the kindness of your comment and we will try our best to honour the sentiment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5739</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom Clarke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5738</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dear MFMP, I am deeply sorry you have such a difficult time. Your response is entirely correct. You can take comfort from the fact that you are pretty well the only can-opener around for LENR claims. Whether the cans you open contain worms or wisdom, opening cans is a worthwhile thing to do, and it requires an open mind as to the contents. In fact it is invaluable - many people are tempted by LENR. The stakes are high in both directions. You have my greatest respect. Tom]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom Clarke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5738</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5737</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Tom It is truely annoying and exhasperating situation, we are trying to establish truth whatever that may be. Your support helped us make this trip and we are told that NicHEnergy has agreed to our proposal for "fair use of their technology" in a "replication". We hope that the joint statement will be forthcoming as we are already sourcing some of the finer parts required for the cell.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5737</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom Baccei says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5736</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The possibility of any "short statement" having a significant effect on either the discussion or "rollout" of LENR seems remote at best. Either those holding the "secret sauce" are willing to prove their credibility or they are not. If they have, in their hands, such a secret, and delay its revelation by even one hour in a world choking to death on our collective carbon exhalations, their greed has placed them among the most evil humans to have ever walked this earth. Further I believe that anyone holding such a secret would understand that truth from the very beginning, and have done everything in their power to hasten its implementation. Thus, my belief that you will find more smoke and mirrors here - and cowardice in place of courage. Over the past years I have had growing respect for the MFMP and its members. But the tempting, teasing and doubletalk of the charlatans no longer creates a sense of hope, but one of disgust toward anyone willing to either lie about having such knowledge or keep it to themselves out of greed. Non disclosure my ass!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom Baccei</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5736</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5734</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: coincidentally, I've often used the smartphone analogy too, although in the opposite manner: it's because this isn't just the next big consumer product that that all this secrecy and confidentiality appears so illogical, incomprehensibl e to people like me who don't know the entire story. I'm referring to LENR / LENR claims in general, not just Piantelli and NicHEnergy. Hopefully we'll have more background when the joint statement will be published.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5734</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5733</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All We have written a short statement, as requested by NicHEnergy, which if accepted would be announced by both parties and form the basis for moving forward. Our experience in Siena did not constitute a dead end, we do need to be respectful of what is at stake, this is not just a new smart phone. We feel your frustration.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5733</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5732</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Seems like a dead end.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5732</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom Baccei says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5731</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It seems likely that you have uncovered another "sham" LENR claim. Obviously MFMP would never be able to sign or comply with an NDA. Subjecting you to an impossible condition is just a ruse to cancel the collaboration. This endless "not quite" teasing on the part of virtually all LENR claimants has become smoking gun evidence of fraud in my opinion. Your efforts at MFMP have been honest and open Kimono, but the results have never really indicated a genuine phenomenon. I'm depressed by the seeming futility of any renewed efforts.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom Baccei</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5731</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5730</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All After a week of meetings and direct knowledge transfer, in which we neither had the time or energy to report on our learning, we were presented with an NDA to sign. We refused to sign it without even reading it, it is not who we are, only bad things can come of signing an NDA for an organisation such as ours. Compounding that, is the fact that we are volunteers, why would we leave ourselves open to potentially ruinous legal repercussions when we have nothing to gain! It was a generic NDA that would have been appropriate for an investor or employee, neither of which we are of course. The MFMP is only interested in finding the truth and adding to, rather than taking value from participants that have real technology that should properly be investigated. The NDA would have required us to cease all other activities in related research and gagged us on the knowledge we knew and was to learn from NicHEnergy. It was not deliberately written that way, but all the same, that would have been the implications. Obviously it was an impossible ask, especially as we are already funded and committed to doing other experiments. We then spent 4 full days, writing a cooperation agreement which respected both parties and which was well received by NicHEnergy. We are considering doing a live-streamed in-principal discussion to debate the way forward, both NicHEnergy and the MFMP wish to find a way to cooperate that meets both of our respective goals. We are in a unique position and one that will not likely be repeated by any other kind of partner. If it is possible, we wish to demonstrate incontrovertibl y that Piantelli is the father of the Nickel Hydrogen system. I have just had a short conversation with Mathieu who is back in France and on his way to home, the airline left his bags in Germany! We must have a chance to digest the discussions on the last day in Italy before moving forward.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5730</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5728</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco / Tom None more than us are aware of this. Mathieu and Bob Higgins are in transit now having been the last wave to be there, I arrived back home Thursday night and have had to do my day job (including back log) and am working right now. Other team members had left a few days before. We will have a de-brief when Mathieu and Bob Higgins have got back and settled in their respective countries. We are walking a knife edge and as annoying as it is for everyone involved we must do this right, we only have one shot at sealing this cooperation. It took well over two years to set up and we need to avoid damaging all that hard work in the interests of all. What I can say now is that NO experiment was conducted in Sienna, we tried to arrange it and brought all the necessary equipment. Having said that, a lot was learnt and captured and the intention is that experiment(s) will be conducted.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5728</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom Baccei says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5727</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Having made a sizeable donation to support the Piantelli effort, I too must say that I am disappointed with the lack of ongoing communications. Please realize that a steady, if terse, stream of information is VITAL for your credibility and continued crowd support!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom Baccei</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5727</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5726</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP: not blaming you, but so far your prolonged visit to NichEnergy labs is less live&open than many people expected, that's what I'm getting from the wording in your latest update. @charlie tapp: the MFMP page on Facebook has no read access restriction: https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 04:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5726</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5724</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't have Facebook is there anyway to have the Facebook posts also land here? Or do I have to join the new world and open an account at Facebook?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5724</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5722</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All We have a meeting with NicHEnergy this afternoon before going on to the lab.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5722</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5721</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Freethinker: their latest message on Facebook is: I think they are still busy with Piantelli, although even brief status updates would be welcome.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5721</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Freethinker_ says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5720</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So what is happening in Italy? It has now been well more than one week since the last brief. How did it go? :sigh:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Freethinker_</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5720</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5706</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Franco, I was also disappointed that MFMP lost interest in the Celani cell. I am hoping Mathieu is going to continue with it. I thought there was all sorts of interesting activity in the resistance measurements on the Celani cells. Does anybody know if the Celani wire contained any Lithium in the coating?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 20:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5706</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5698</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Franco Morici - Once we see something that looks like excess heat that we can make happen more than once, we will definitely be interested if wider tests with more instruments. We have attempted an air flow calorimeter and a high precision water flow calorimeter here at HUG. The air flow calorimeter was not stable enough and not precise enough for small excess heat. The water flow calorimeter suffered from the common problem of not sampling the water temperature evenly, even in the approximately 4mm tube it was in. That problem may have been solvable, but without ever seeing anything that looked credibly like excess heat in our lab, we never got back to fixing it. Our latest tests have been in a nicely refined calorimetric test cell for powder. If we see anything in this environment, we will eagerly seek to replicate it and get others to test it. Our problem is not calorimetry, our problem is still in finding something that is even worth putting into a calorimeter. I am hopeful that Piantelli will have something that interesting.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5698</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5691</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Franco, as an observer of this process I offer that it may be more comfortable to do the first pass with the current group and add other parties on a second pass. It is not a question of obfuscation more a question of personal ease.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 02:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5691</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5669</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Franco - That is very good information to be aware of. Is that experiment written up somewhere? I would definitely be interested in dialog with you or Mario Massa to see how we would work together. The decision to collaborate will have to be made by the whole team including Piantelli. The results you describe make me wonder what else might be causing the temperature difference, then.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 03:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5669</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Franco Morici says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5667</link>
			<description><![CDATA[(cont') The result of the measures demonstrated unequivocally that there was no production of excess heat from the reactor and this happened while simultaneously, on the same reactor, the measuring system of Piantelli declared tens of Watts of excess heat. During your meeting in Siena or in other event, did he tell to you about this negative independent test result? It is therefore a clear matter for which we need a scientific clarification and to participate even who is not a believer in Piantelli claims. Please therefore to allow publicly that an engineer member of our group, specifically skilled in Calorimetry (the eng. Mario Massa), can attend and participate actively on field to your tests, as demonstration of scientific transparency (in accordance with a true "open source" spirit) and collaboration between workgroups. If you unconditional agree with this proposal, it will be our care to contact directly Piantelli. Awaiting for your clear and prompt answer and your approval Best regards GSVIT]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Franco Morici</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 17:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5667</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Franco Morici says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5666</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ MFMP from GSVIT following your FEDORA project, we understand that you now intend to collaborate with Piantelli, and run (in short) tests in his laboratory (probably already starting from mid-January). This project is inspired by Piantelli claims to have achieved indisputable results concerning the production of excess heat from Ni-H reaction (recently got a patent). Maybe you don't know that these his claims are the same for the past several decades, though Piantelli has never provided independent evidence of what he says. In particular, about 15 years ago, a member of the GSVIT (a scientific group composed by "skeptics" engineers) checked personally a Piantelli reactor under the supervision of prof. Focardi that at that time collaborated with Piantelli. On that occasion it was specially designed and built an high accuracy mass flow Calorimeter (air used as fluid) which enabled the measurement of thermal energy produced (note carefully: "working at the same time with Piantelli mesurement system") in parallel with Piantelli measures that were based just on Calibration and Thermometry. (cont')]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Franco Morici</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 17:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5666</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5612</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Cold Fusion research has been going on for over 25 years. I do not think who is first is relevant at this stage. There have been many steps and there will be many more steps. It is more a question of who is working to move humankind's understanding forward. To all the pioneers thank you.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 05:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5612</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5608</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I guess he did not actually measure the pressure inside his tube, but it can be a factor. I suggest to keep the option of building a reactor without getters, open. It can provide useful data.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5608</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5607</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sanjeev We think the Al that evolves from the LiAlH4 will capture the O2 and N2 from the air etc and reduce the pressure requirements. And as said before on FaceBook - we intend to put a getter like this one http://www.getters.com/Zirconium-Aluminum.html in the cell - which will capture and hold all gasses. Then at very high temperatures, it releases the H2. This will further reduces stresses.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 11:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5607</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5605</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What do you think about his comments about the pressure inside the Alumina tube ? He guesses approx 100 atm is reached in the hot cat. Will this be a problem for existing cells, where you plan to add the Li?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 08:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5605</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5603</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sanjeev The Sparker cell is expected to have sparks turned on today, this old Ahern powder sample did not do much of interest. After a few days of sparking experiment - we will add LiAlH4 as planned. This experiment will be able to reach over 1400ºC in the arc. Later, the powder cell, which has Higgins Ni/Fe2O3 powder in (which again has seen no excess heat) will have lithium hydride and Magnesium Hydride added under argon. This plan was to test Ikegami's theory of the low temperature E-Cat. This cell is not able to reach the temp required to break down LiH and so MgH2 acts as an intermediary.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5603</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5602</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It seems Rossi now admits that its possible to replicate the hot cat from the info published in the Lugano report. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=866&cpage=7#comment-1041389 I guess an experiment can be arranged before your camera arrives ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5602</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5601</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert It does look like that Parkhomov was motivated to release his replication result because of Piantelli coming forward. The date ,25th dec is a very big coincidence to be merely a chance. This may mean that Piantelli does have goods. The rat race among the inventors to be the first and to get their names on LENR can only be good for all. Lets see how others react now, especially IH/Rossi will be forced to license their tech to others asap.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5601</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5600</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sanjeev It is great news and actually it is relevant, because we must remember this story stated with Piantelli's discovery. We said at the beginning in ICCF-17 "It does not matter how or who gets this technology out - just that it happens. We may never need to do it, we might just need to do enough to encourage others to do it or show their hands if they have already done it." Many inventors and scientists tend to play their cards close to their chest unless the fruits of their labour look like they are about to be matched or surpassed. Exactly this kind of thing forced the hands of Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons in Utah, 1989, thankfully that happened, because without it, the Italians would never have embarked on LENR research and Francesco Piantelli might never have explored his anomaly. In some cases - work is carried out independently and developed simultaneously, but when another similar technology is released, some nuances, understanding and improvements of others maybe lost - this is one reason why it is imperative that we undertake Project /Fedora\. When someone captures an idea and adds a different perspective, the originator of that idea can be overlooked, again with possible loss of key information. This will not be the case with Piantelli (and Focardi) - we will do all we can to ensure that his incredible key contributions will not be lost. The point about Live Open Science is that many people can have their contributions logged as they make them - and no one is wasting time repeating the same errors. It is intended to capture the knowledge as it happens.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 12:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5600</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5599</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looks like someone in Russia already beat MFMP http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/12/27/lugano-confirmed-replication-report-published-of-hot-cat-device-by-russian-researcher-alexander-g-parkhomov/ Yet another collaboration opportunity here. You have everything ready, just add powder.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 11:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5599</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5598</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm curious to read how Piantelli's theory will be applied in practice, but given that thermal shocks are reported to be one of the keys needed to achieve LENR anomalies, I wonder if the fact that he used liquid helium to cool his hydrogen-loaded nickel samples when he discovered the effect in 1989 isn't more important than it would seem at first.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 08:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5598</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PAUL D KENDALL says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5597</link>
			<description><![CDATA[THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU ARE DOING -- OPEN SOURCING --AND CONGRATULATIONS ON MR PANTELLI MERRY XMAS...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PAUL D KENDALL</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 07:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5597</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pekka Janhunen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5596</link>
			<description><![CDATA[1/ At this stage, theory is almost irrelevant, compared to experiment. 2/ "If communication can fail, it will" (Wiio's first law, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiio%27s_laws). Especially when there is language barrier, generation gap and the subject is the world's most difficult one. Let him check that you have understood correctly by explaining back in own words. Do ask stupid questions.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Pekka Janhunen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5596</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Roderick Vos says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5595</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great stuff! Finally more people willing to share some of their secrets. Piantelli has been an important researcher for me to keep faith in LENR. He seemed to me as an intelligent and trustworthy person. I have been wondering about Piantelli's research for some time but not much news has come out. So it is absolutely great MFMP secured this cooperation! We need some convincing evidence to fire up the base. With clear, none arguable, simple data data it will be much easier to attract attention and get people involved. Piantelli claimed to have the data in this presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmfQJwWLo0I (time: 11:57) I would love some more info on Piantelli. Like, what is the status of his business and the research? Why has he not shared more info sooner considering the importance of this technology? Would it be possible to set up a Q and A with him? A kick-stater campaign could be a very good idea. Project Fedora could be something people would donate to since it can set clear goals and a time-frame. The most important thing is to make a good video for the kick-starter. I am willing to help out with setting this up. For instance, i could pitch some ideas for a script for the video or some sources/texts for on the page. I hope 2015 will be the year we can finally all agree that LENR is real and deserves far more investments.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Roderick Vos</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5595</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5594</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Eyedoc That is very kind of you. We will need help getting the word out as we build the "Lighting the New Fire" campaign this year.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 22:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5594</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Eyedoc says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5593</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great Christmas present !!!......I'll be donating today & hopefully more on a regular basis....if MFMP also ever needs any 'hands on help' at some point , let me know (I can flex my schedule as needed) .... Good health to F Piantelli and insight to MFMP :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Eyedoc</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 22:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5593</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5592</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Don We want to help make make it real and to ensure it happens and that the true pioneers are given due credit, that is the MFMPs purpose. NicHEnergy have invested huge amounts of money to secure their IP as you will see. It is only right that they get the best chance to seek a return on Francesco Piantelli's invention. What they do as they move forward is their decision - perhaps a benevolent billionaire might free the IP for all - we need to ensure the how-to is secured.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 22:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5592</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Don Martin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5591</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is big news. We appear to be on our way to bringing LENR out of the backwaters and into the light of Open-Source reality.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Don Martin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 19:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5591</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alain Coetmeur says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5590</link>
			<description><![CDATA[:-) great. I wish you the best for the replication and to Mr Piantelli!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alain Coetmeur</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 18:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5590</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5589</link>
			<description><![CDATA[OMG]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5589</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
