<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 19:03:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Dixie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-29212</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's truly very complicated in this busy life to listen news on TV, so I simply use internet for that purpose, and get the hottest information. my website karoseriboxpend inginfreezer com: https://youtu.be/y1uP28KvbBk?si=-gdjJ8UGvvn1ZvNc]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dixie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-29212</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dominic says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-19971</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It is the best time to make sme plans for the future and it's time to be happy. I've rewd this post and if I could I desire to suggest youu some interesting things or advice. Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article. I desire to read more things about it! my web-site Rekeying: https://mobilelocksmithwallsend.Co.uk/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 05:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-19971</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Joann says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-17613</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Magnificent beat ! Iwish to apprentice while why do you need vpn for iptv: https://shorl.com/hutrajusuroli amend your web site, how could i subscribe for a blog web site? The account aided me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear concept]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Joann</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 12:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-17613</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robbin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-16932</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Your method of telling the whole thinhg in this article is in fact good, every one can asily know it, Thanks a lot. Visit my web blog :: cheap vpn deals; https://images.google.bi: https://images.google.bi,]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robbin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 17:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-16932</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>waterco w300 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-12098</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi, the whole thing is going sound here and ofcourse every one is sharing data, that's in fact good, keep up writing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>waterco w300</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 05:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-12098</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>web page says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10998</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I delight in, lead to I found exactly what I was taking a look for. You have ended myy four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye Muscle bodybuilder web page: http://www.realeducated.com/forums/discussion/51771/article-n32-the-five-5-proven-steps-to-building-muscle course for bodybuilders]]></description>
			<dc:creator>web page</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 00:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10998</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>우리카지노 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10214</link>
			<description><![CDATA[물끄러미 바라보고 있었다."다혜야, 아빠가 고모랑 오랜만에 한번 붙을려고 하는데 네가 그만 분위기를 망쳐버렸어...고모가 얼마나 실망하셨겠 우리카지노 니?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>우리카지노</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2020 04:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10214</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>site says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9807</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Howdy just wanted to give you a quick heads up. Thhe text in your article seem to be running offf the screen in Firefox. I'm not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with browser cojpatibility but I fiured I'd pos to leet you know. Thee layout look grdat though! Hope you get the issue solved soon. Cheers site: http://sjyh.sseuu.com/space-uid-3912150.html parimatch rates]]></description>
			<dc:creator>site</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9807</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>site says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9806</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Howdy just wanted to give you a quick heads up. Thhe text in your article seem to be running offf the screen in Firefox. I'm not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with browser cojpatibility but I fiured I'd pos to leet you know. Thee layout look grdat though! Hope you get the issue solved soon. Cheers site: http://sjyh.sseuu.com/space-uid-3912150.html parimatch rates]]></description>
			<dc:creator>site</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9806</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5214</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Has there been any discussion about making S&G cell parts available for purchase? I'm interested in setting up some experiments of my own.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5214</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5169</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ed Pell Spot on. @All We are still waiting for the fresh wires, so I think Mathieu is going to put in some other old ones, to fill time and generate some more data.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5169</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5167</link>
			<description><![CDATA[All, I think it is just like Mike McKubre describes PdD. There must be a minimum level of H loading AND there must be a flux of H. A high loading will not work if it means the flux drops to zero. A low loading will not work even if the flux is high. As to whether one can move the loading up and down within some critical range and keep the effect alive indefinitely is an open question for NiH, the answer is yes for PdD.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2014 22:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5167</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kapytanhook says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5158</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Cool, very interesting stuff :) Yeah it would be hard to test insulated if the effect is not very stable, it could snuff itself out. Can't wait to see more testing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kapytanhook</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 17:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5158</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5157</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Kapytanhook: in Celani's presentations and papers on these experiments, the provided data show that excess heat gets produced even just by supplying indirect heat to the active wire. In the past months Ubaldo Mastromatteo from STMicroelectron ics has claimed to have replicated a version of his cell in a thermally very insulated variant which produced excess heat with only indirect heating, meaning no current passed through the active wire. What I get from this information, whether true or not, is that these active Celani wires are supposed to produce excess heat just with indirect thermal triggering (upon hydrogen loading), which most likely has to be strong enough in order to work (ie room temperatures do not provide enough energy for this excess to happen at a detectable level). As you write, a thermally well insulated setup made for indirect heating only would nicely and simply demonstrate the effect. The only caveat is that it might be more complex than it sounds. The powder cell experiment being performed in Minnesota shows that it isn't, if measurement and testing conditions consistency is required - or in other words: good calorimetry.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 16:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5157</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5155</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Kapytanhook: actually, I was suggesting to make the active wires electrically "dead", not connected at all to the outside world. Since they're supposed to generate excess energy even just with heat supplied by a different, inert wire, that should still work especially if their amount is increased. Having many "dead" wires in a twisted bundle arrangement would allow to increase their total surface area inside the cell without performing significant modifications to it, further reducing testing time and cell building costs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 16:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5155</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kapytanhook says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5154</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Ahh yes, with multiple wires it would be a bit pointless or very complex. I always assumed it was all about the surface of the wire, so instead of multiple wires id suggest just trying to get a longer bit to coil up. But multiple wires does make a lot more sense, to optimize surface area you'd want wires with the lowest radius possible. And in order no to evaporate those instantly you are going to need a lot in parallel so you can keep the amperage low on each wire. And yeah it would really average out wire inconsistencies . Thanks for making me see that. If the effect is now 3% excess (big if) trying to get 10 times the wire surface in there might be the answer to getting 30% excess heat if it actually is a surface area problem. It's nice to see your insightful comments on most posts, they are appreciated.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kapytanhook</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 16:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5154</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5153</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Kapytanhook: what I'm saying is that measuring the electrical resistance of the active Celani wires can be useful, but in the end if the point of these experiments is measuring demonstrably significant amounts of excess heat, that should be given less priority than other, possibly more helpful things, like for example increasing their amount (and therefore increasing the chance that one or more *will* generate excess heat). They could be arranged in a twisted bundle like this, in order to save space and keep things similar to the single active wire version: http://i.imgur.com/izYsEtM.jpg http://i.imgur.com/izYsEtM.jpg No meaningful resistance reading would likely be possible with the active wires bundled together like this, so such measurements could be completely dropped, avoiding possible issues with the passthrough(s) needed to bring the them outside the cell. Having more wire passthroughs means that potentially more issues with gas leaks especially when temperatures increase could arise, added costs, additional cell assembly time, etc. Therefore, the opposite would also be true: having only the heating wire to come out of the cell(s) would likely make things simpler and cheaper. Of course, if the active Celani wires are not electrically connected to the power supply, no direct current heating or resistance measurement will be possible with them, I'm aware of that (duh!). This being said, I guess MFMP want to first check out if the wires are able to produce excess heat with the cell in its original configuration. My opinion is that given that these wires are reported to perform very differently between each other, testing them just one a time might take long.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5153</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kapytanhook says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5152</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ecco I think i am misunderstandin g, surely the wire resistance is measured outside of the cell right? not sure how they do it now. If they measure Amps and volts they can just deduct resistance and power more accurately than any other way right?. I doubt measuring such macro properties outside of the cell would affect the inside of the cell, even on a quantum level. Let me know how you think that could happen, would be interested to know. Also how you think they conclude wire resistance. :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kapytanhook</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5152</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5151</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Kapytanhook: having to electrically connect all test wires inside the cell for example makes it non-trivial to add several of them in the same arrangement in an attempt to overcome the probabilistic nature of the claimed excess heat effect.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 14:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5151</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kapytanhook says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5150</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't think the judge is out on that one yet, also it seems like a very valuable measurement when looking for correlating patterns, like wire stability, structure, purity. Seems like an easy enough measurement that is definately worth the extra sensor.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kapytanhook</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 14:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5150</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5149</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: if the resistance drop with loading has no bearing with the potential excess heat effect, why bother measuring it at all? The cell could be made simpler if one didn't have to be concerned with electrical measurements.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 14:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5149</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5148</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco That is an option, I think it is more about making best use of time. The wires only potentially yielded 3% at best and that was only intermittently, that is never going to convince anyone.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 14:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5148</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5147</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In that case, shouldn't high temperature heating under H2 remove most if not all surface oxides? Are we sure that it's "dead" anyway? H2 adsorption seemed pretty good. What about performing some quick load-unload cycles?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5147</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kapytanhook says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5146</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Any ideas how the age of the wire would affect their performance? Suspecting oxidation?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kapytanhook</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5146</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5145</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All The old wire seems pretty dead. It was over 13 months since it was made before we started the experiment. Francesco has made us some fresh ones and they are on the way - Mathieu intends to use one of those in the next run. Quote]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5145</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG Fair point. In that data segment, the differential is around -5.25 to -2 degrees. Over last 3 days it has sat between -2.34 and +2.79 on a 5 minute average. Could it be something to do with settling thermoclines in the room? Need Mathieu with enough time to get another wire in the flow calorimeter set up he has built and Nico to get the S&G running (he has found the leak but is off on holiday for 2 weeks). Francesco has prepared a few wires for us for these experiments.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 23:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5138</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Yes, Mathieu and I have discussed deliberate forcing of non equilibrium, like having a fan pointing at the experiment on a timer and turning on for say 10 mins every 2 hours. We have also discussed the fact that these 'events' often seem to occur when ambient is in a close range and so may be an option to turn the HVAC on and target this temperature band deliberately. We also discussed that the ideal would be an auto valve that would open and shut every so often in order to equalise pressure - but since we do not have that - your proposal is the option available which will likely be pursued. Date corrected - thanks.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 22:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5138</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kapytanhook says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5136</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Ahh, I stand corrected, figured that thboth cells where pretty much clones, didnt see consider a calibration offset. That is a pretty great result then.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kapytanhook</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 17:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5136</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5135</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All Without doing too much detailed analysis, we have not seen more than 6 degrees above calibration baseline, which represents around 3%.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 17:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5135</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kapytanhook says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5131</link>
			<description><![CDATA[http://i.imgur.com/GTXmUmV.jpg This averages out be an exact 0 degrees difference, nice setup though so far, seems like the experiments are getting more solid every day. Managing the input power and wire resistance is hard but you guys seem to have conquered most of those problems. Great job Mathieu. If we now see consistent temperature differences above a degree we will know it. Seeing these big differences might look troubling to some of you but here is the same data to put it into perspective: http://i.imgur.com/QplA1kh.png Stunning accuracy, it does show that if this active cell is generating heat it is very very little]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kapytanhook</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 11:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5131</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bjogen2 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5130</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In mean while, as we wait for some interesting happenings in the cells, I can add a link to some other LENR-related information; Swedish national radio has made a series of programs, covering Rossis relationship with swedish scientists. The message of the programs is critisism on how Rossi has been able to "use" swedish scientists in promoting his scam. One guy has typed down the program here (scroll down a couple of posts to find all info): http://www.energikatalysatorn.se/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=700&start=50#p29530 The radio show is available for listening here (in swedish): http://sverigesradio.se/sida/avsnitt/375904?programid=406 PS. Are there no services on the internet for realtime speach translation..? Google - fix it! :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bjogen2</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 09:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5130</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5125</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good idea about the "just opened" valve. Yes, it is a hard life being French all those vacation day to have to deal with. :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 19:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5125</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All Mathieu has to take the rest of the month off as he has too many holiday days to use which he will loose if he does not. So what has been decided is the following, 1. keep power at 48W 2. open the bridge 3. re-pressurise the cells 4. fully close the bridge needle valve, then *JUST* open it, Mathieu's idea is that this will allow the pressure to stay the same in both cells, but prevent large floods of hotter gasses easily sloshing back and forth. Basically a *really* small deliberate leak between them. This will then run for best part of a week. After this, it is proposed to run the test as described by Ecco. As this is the first re-pressurisati on of the apparatus, Mathieu is going to try and data log any potential gamma emissions from the output of the geiger counter - but he only has 30mins left to do it - so may not happen. He still has been unable to find the time to re-condition the second scintillator he recently received and is still waiting for the lead.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 16:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5124</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5114</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: on update #5. Have a look at this: http://i.imgur.com/pXqmFou.png http://i.imgur.com/pXqmFou.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 13:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5114</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5113</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@RonB You are right about the "loading" phase, it occurs at a lower temperature, this is known and written about by us, Celani, Piantelli, Rossi, Mizuno etc. There is a law of diminishing returns on the drop in resistance and we have found in previous experiments that we have seen apparent excess heat at lower drops in resistance than this wire had achieved before its applied power was increased. As Ecco notes, the one in the active cell is a Celani wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 12:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5113</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5108</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mathieu You are right... it was the HUG group that saw levels that were somewhat higher. It was a long time ago.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 06:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5108</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5106</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Feels like a long time ago too :) It was in the range of 6 to 8% only. You can find some of the materials here: https://drive.google.com/#folders/0B0yO8n6-0MjNbjI1YUNiR1dRSFU]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 18:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5106</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5105</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ How much did you see on the first run you did so long ago?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 18:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5105</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5104</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've never seen 15 to 18% excess energy while running Celani's wire on my own. Regarding the ambient, I've called my colleagues that were around my lab, nobody came in today, I'm off today, so I have no idea of what happened. Sorry]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 15:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5104</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5103</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mathieu Do you mean on this experiment only? On your very first experiments we saw a couple years ago, we saw good excess power. The deviation on ambient that I see is very small (0.2 degrees).. that seems like pretty tight control doesn't it?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 15:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5103</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5102</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I guess it will be in everyone's best interest if I keep watching data silently.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 14:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5102</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5100</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: granted, averaged data on the longer term shows an increase overall (as for its exact nature though, that's a different story), but on the short term there's much noise which makes makes discerning the actual signal difficult.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 13:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5100</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5099</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco I am trying to establish cause, I think Mathieu is on Holiday today, so it may have been the cleaners coming into the corridor on which 3 rooms come off (centre one where experiment is) and flooding the rooms with higher temperature air. Normally the experiment room is locked.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 12:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5099</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5097</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco The data is starting to get interesting. Will be interesting to see what happens when we take it to Celani's original 48W and when we re-charge with H2.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 00:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5097</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5096</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Disregarding short term variations, there appears to be a correlation between active wire resistance in Cell A and T_MIca. This might sound like an obvious statement but it implies that since the rise in resistance appears to be leveling off, the temperature rise might as well. http://i.imgur.com/PljjMCF.png http://i.imgur.com/PljjMCF.png Again, this doesn't seem to be a side effect of the decreasing H2 pressure. T_Mica didn't appear to increase like that when pressure was higher and its drop over time quicker.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 20:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5096</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5095</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All We are considering turning the AC off.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 08:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5095</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5092</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All We'll let it sit for a while before taking the power up a notch, early days.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 22:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5092</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5088</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: I think we need to be realistic here. It doesn't look like they really did except for a few data points. Averaged data doesn't seem to indicate that temperatures will diverge soon: http://i.imgur.com/JeLD15W.png http://i.imgur.com/JeLD15W.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5088</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5086</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco There is legacy naming on the per cell data labels from the Vacuum experiment, we are looking at the best approach to resolve this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 13:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5086</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5084</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good point on the evaporation Ecco, this can be the case indeed. I ran into a bad connexion on the connector strip. Cell B was receiving full power for few minutes. The bonding of the TC is darker but it seems that its reading is not affected. I have to find time to rename the entries of the test. As soon as I put a fresher wire in the system I will do that.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 10:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5084</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5078</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All I concur with Ecco that there is no tangible evidence yet of excess heat, but there is apparently resistance led spikes in heat in the active cell. As Ecco said, the control cell has ALWAYS and consistently run hotter than the "active" cell (put in quotes because technically it has spent most of its time so far in calibration and is only now loading). Being a H2 atmosphere experiment - this is closer to the original Celani experiment than the vacuum protocol, so more power has to be put into the wires than in a vacuum to achieve the same wire temperature. The wire is currently at 45W - Celani ran at 48W. If we saw the active cell temp exceed the control, that would be very interesting.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2014 22:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5078</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5076</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Am I missing something. We have a 4 degree excess on the active side. The nominal offset is about 0.25 degrees. So we have excess power. Yes?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2014 21:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5076</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5075</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My thinking is that the oscillations are not due to air conditioning but to the cold fusion. Yes,it could be oscillations in the convection inside the tube. I am thinking that at some times a "large" section of wire gets in sync and breaths in and out together. That is when we see the oscillation. Even then there are parts of the wire acting independently. So we see a base excess temperature and the oscillation on top of that. When there is no synchronous behavior we get the small variation jitter. I am struck by the repeatable structure of the cycles big "up" (actually a decrease in delta temperature) then a smaller up and then a close with down/up/far down/. To explore this we could have many temperature sensors along the tube to see if a particular part of the wire is causing the oscillation.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2014 18:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5075</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5068</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey guys, sorry for replying so late. The AC outlet is on the side and the flow is targeted to go down and not be in direct sight with the cells. The only air flow that would interact is the fans form the power supplies. I put a A0 size paper sheet on the system to reduce this flow and prevent it from interacting with the setup. Celani's tests are in free air too, and he is taking much less precautions to make the room stable. He is only looking at averages values too. Anyhow, I will set the heating differently monday to try to keep the regulation made by the heater within the room and less by the heating A/C. See if it helps.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 19:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5068</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5067</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Yes the vent is in one corner of the room but away from cells]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 17:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5067</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Because they affect both, but one more than the other, it looks like it could be due to uneven air currents.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 15:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5065</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5064</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan Hunt: it looks like this was already happening before the cells were filled with H2 which supposedly activates the treated constantan wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 14:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5064</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5061</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin Pell: I think it's just the effect of the air conditioning system used to keep room temperature more or less constant. Have a look at T_Amb: http://i.imgur.com/CAZkPrl.png http://i.imgur.com/CAZkPrl.png Cell temperatures have overall been flatlining. Nothing noteworthy going on yet.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 08:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5061</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5059</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We are back in the 18 minute 12 seconds (1092 seconds) oscillation. Compared with 1088 from an earlier day. http://i.imgur.com/dXTcuvq.jpg Looking at the structure between two minimums we see the a first peak and then a smaller second peak. The first peak may be the hydrogen flowing into the wire and the second half the hydrogen flowing out of the wire. One way to explore this would be to run with wires of varying diameters.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 03:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5059</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5053</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: I see. What about gamma readings? They could be more important than excess heat measurements if bursts upon H2 loading (and hopefully other circumstances as well) are properly verified with multiple instruments operating at the same time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 00:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5053</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5052</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco The foil wrap is for a later run of this apparatus, Mathieu wanted to do a close replication of Celani's original experiment first. Mathieu has an IR camera on a Raspberry Pi and has been trying to find time to set it up streaming images of the cell(s)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 00:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5052</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5051</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes maybe at a later time, before switching to higher power.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 22:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5051</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5050</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mathieu Valat: I haven't noticed that just yet, but after turning power off temporarily, it looks like active wire resistance decreased a bit. Is this the effect of tweaking the power supply or did removing power (heat in this case as it doesn't seem to be actively powered right now) to the cell affect the wire somehow? If it's the latter, then it might be interesting to try that again.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 22:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5050</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5049</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looks like the reaction starts to kick in.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 21:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5049</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5045</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Alain You thoughts are in line with our Facebook post made yesterday with the added in test modifications in response to the crowd which is basically the LOS method we apply to our own work here on QuantumHeat.org . This would require a longer commitment from the test participants but it is too important to get this right so that should be seriously considered. As I understand it, the real issue is not that they can't make it work, but that the reaction matrix is not robust enough for long term operation, which would make the kind of test, consider, challenge, test scenario you rightly propose difficult. It seems they have a materials engineering problem to resolve above anything else - they have to make their powder/mesh robust enough to work for long runs. This is the focus of MFMP team members Bob Higgins' work being published here http://bit.ly/1uWpCgK Maybe we should open a mini-project to formulate an approach for rules of engagement for testing third parties - which would include long and short term testing options.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 15:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5045</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5043</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Alain - Great input. If the opportunity arises, I really like the idea of crowdsourcing the testing. I am perfectly willing to protect IP, like you suggest, as long as it doesn't compromise the confidence in the test.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 14:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5043</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5041</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ed, Yes there is a common plumbing. The cells are still calibrating, I am just checking the stability of the room and the drift over time. Celani has large variation of claimed excess power. I am going to update the post as the experiment will start today.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 13:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5041</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5039</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Some interesting oscillations in delta T, 2 degrees peak to peak. At times it appears the two cells are oscillating out of phase. Is there a common plumbing connection between the two cells? Has Celani ever reported oscillations in excess power? What is the active wire? A Celani wire?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 12:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5039</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alain Coetmeur says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5037</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It may be a great opportunity, but it should be well done. Refusing to participate because an honest NDA may be an error, but the NDA should only cover things inside the reactor, or business data... The calorimetry should be open science. About the way to do it I have proposed a method, which have the advantage to be "open". the idea is to propose a protocol to the community, have feed back, then start the tests. then follow the critics by all the Mary Yugo on the planet and iteratively address them. This will takes time, and I know the basic manipulation method of skeptics, called the Hypercritical Method (only french wikipedia cover it) is to move the target continuously. they continuously raise concern on things that you cannot anymore see because the report is published and the test finished. making iterative check is a way to address those critics. You have to respect the fear of industrial spying which are real, confirmed by a handful of reports (not even on reactor builders), but not at the cost of the calorimetry credibility. being allowed to choose your instruments, youe measurement methods is key to the credibility. Being allowed to choose the protocol and the instruments is 99% of the victory, since no liar will accept free instruments and free protocol (however they can forbid anything endangering their IP that you have to respect, like gamma spectrometer).. i see a problem with electronic spectrometer or scope, that may divulgue trade secrets, but in that case you may agree on checking data that eliminate claims of fraud, while not divulgating IP. one way for example is to have a spectrometer result that just sumup power over a bandwidth, above a given level, hiding the trade secrets. This protocol may be applied to any company, and since there is huge reason to doubt on the Defkalion claims, so no risk to have overconfidence. This is a point to exploit.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alain Coetmeur</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 12:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5037</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5029</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco We were made aware of the potential MFMP invite to test the new v.6 Hyperion reactor about 1 week ago through a 3rd party. The expected time frame would be in 3 months. No direct approach has been made, nor has any agreement been made. We would only work within the Live Open Science methodology. We are not interested in the reactor internals and so see no reason to sign any form of NDA - nor would we participate in any test if there was any restriction on fair reporting or our ongoing research flexibility. If we were to take part, we would look to develop the test structure and procedure through open dialogue via quantumheat.org site, taking on best practices to resolve the outstanding criticisms - challenging experiment apparatus design and protocols. We would also expect to execute a blank and other control tests as demanded to establish credibility. We would also only perform the tests if independently financed with funds over and above those resources committed to our established research. We await to be formally approached.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 21:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5029</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5028</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco - Thanks for pointing those out. It is definitely not clear to me that Defkalion has a functional technology. It'll be interesting to see what they have to say if they contact us. The only thing that is clear is a long history of what they claim being somewhat at odds with the perception of outside observers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 16:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5028</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5026</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP: you might have already read about this by now, but in other news, very serious flaws in Defkalion GT calorimetry protocols (and possibly something even more serious) have been exposed on Mats Lewan's blog here: http://matslew.wordpress.com/2014/05/12/defkalion-demo-proven-not-to-be-reliable/ On a related note, I've read on DrBob's blog that MFMP has been invited to test one of DGT's reactors: http://www.drboblog.com/dr-bob-transylvania/ Given the very negative testing report by former Defkalion Europe insider Luca Gamberale, I would suggest keeping your eyes well open for possible faults in the flow calorimetry system which could render heat measurements unreliable - in case you ever decide to accept such invitation. On a more positive note, this is a lesson worth keeping in mind when designing self-made flow calorimetry systems too.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 11:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5026</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5023</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In addition, I should switch the A/C system from heating (winter mode) to cooling (summer mode) soon. That will counter even more these effects and make the additional heat more effective. You know how Celani's cells are extremely unstable and very much sensitive to external stimulus. Just a guy standing in the room, far for the cells is affecting them...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 09:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5023</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5022</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Ed, Good to see you posting back on MFMP's website! I am very happy with this differential measurement setup, since I have figured the co-centricity (hence wall thickness of the glass tube) was the issue preventing consistent measurement, I see correlating calibration that will make the system more predictable. I just took you advice in account, I added a heater in the room to lower the effect of nighttime on the room. The blinds are always close, unfortunately the lab is facing south.... I cannot make much more about that for now. We might add external insulation for the building at some point, but not anytime soon.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 09:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5022</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5021</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It is interesting that delta T is most variable at local noon and quietest at local midnight. http://i.imgur.com/OptFcha.jpg Does sunlight enter the room? If so, can the blinds to closed? Here is data from May 11th, min and max delta T values. Noon is in the middle, OpenOffice has problems dealing with time. http://i.imgur.com/zf0WZAz.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 00:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5021</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thomas says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5019</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thank you for the update. Splendid. To be continued :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2014 11:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5019</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5018</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Thomas Some have in the past. Mathieu is trying to find time to write up about High Pressure Mizuno experiments he has done with Jean Paul Biberian that have shown clear excess, the way this is calculated is difficult to live stream. Mathieu currently calibrating the Differential cells and is very happy with their performance. In the coming weeks, we will see if they produce apparent excess heat again. Nicolas is close to running the Steel and Glass cells, live this time and hopefully we will see apparent excess like last time. Ryan is working on pass throughs for the first of the new generations of powder cells.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2014 01:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5018</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thomas says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5017</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is there any MFMP experiment so far showing signs of LENR?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5017</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5016</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Fair points Can you message on the "+" and I'll send you a working critique that you might like to add to.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 23:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5016</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5014</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco We want to make the site really easy for newcomers to understand and navigate and have started that process. It would also be really useful for tips like the ones you have given here and tutorials on how to get RSS working to be in a "How to get the most from the site" group of pages. Would you be interested in authoring these for us? - they can be as a group of Google docs if you like, we could make a new collaborate mini project for it. If we again see excess heat/gamma in France/Switzerl and/Minnisota/C alifornia/New Mexico, we will likely move to the Kickstarter and we will need to have the site really easy for newcomers to the project, I think you would be brilliant at it as you have as much an overview of what we do as we do (oftentimes you see things before we do!)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 21:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5014</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5013</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's another tip for MFMP followers using Firefox. By downloading the Private Tab: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/private-tab/ extension you can keep the data.hugnetlab. com website as a private tab on your current window rather than a separate one. Why do this? This way that website won't clog your browser cache with data packets from the experiments you're monitoring (displacing other cached websites in the process and causing extra wear if you're using an SSD as your drive). Private tabs in firefox don't use any disk caching. This also saves the user from the burden of having to use a different browser or browser profile with web caching turned off.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 19:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5013</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5011</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Thanks Pretty much the same except the new thermocouples. Interesting about the firefox plugin, can you do a screen capture of how to install and use it. Tomorrow or Friday I hope to set up zapier to create Google sheet rows from Evernote entries so this should be an end to end solution.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 18:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5011</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5010</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Will watch this closely. Are there photos of the new, improved set-up or do the cells look pretty much the same as before? By the way: for Google docs logbook updates I'm now using the Firefox Update Scanner: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/update-scanner/ extension. It's very useful especially when an RSS feed is not available or not correctly working.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 17:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5010</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
