<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:01:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4724</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert, I have the driver for it ;) I just need "something" to calibrate it... :-*]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 12:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4724</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4723</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B Please, no Neutrons... although, we have acquired a Neutron detector in France! Just need something to drive it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 12:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4723</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4722</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Happy belated birthday Ryan! May you have gamma rays and neutrons for desert!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 04:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4722</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4721</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco After failing to acquire some Deuterium, Ryan bought some Deuterated water and has produced around 4g of deuterium for experiment enrichments. We have been told however, that it really isn't as simple as this. It was Ryan's birthday on Friday, so I would not have expected too much from him over the weekend.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4721</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4718</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i was board and reading what hard drive disks are made of NiP coated aluminum. curious for some reason i put it to a torch it bubbled into a very rough surface. i had a science teacher put a piece of obsidian rock in a kiln once and it turned into a big bubbly glass ball, i wonder if a high temp kiln at the right temp could make the perfect nickel surface texture for reactions. anyone got a kiln?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4718</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4717</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Martin - As far as looking for excess energy from wires in the CTC, yeah, we have not seen anything to get excited about, so far. They are great for studying loading of Hydrogen vs resistance, though.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4717</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Martin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4716</link>
			<description><![CDATA["...and the fact that we have never seen anything particularly interesting from them..." It seems that you have drawn a solid conclusion :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 18:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4716</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4714</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ All We are behind a few hours in the data. We are limited in our upload speed and are working on getting things fixed. Now we have a fix in place but the data will take a few hours to catch up. Thanks for your patience. The history is up to date, but the averages are still a little ways behind. Everything should be up to date.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4714</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4699</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's a sort-of-tempera ture compensated (with the average of outer glass tube temperature) graph of gamma count voltage of the past 18 hours or so: http://i.imgur.com/jHveyVl.png http://i.imgur.com/jHveyVl.png I'm not sure I'm still seeing a pattern here. Peak values do have been decreasing over time, though.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4699</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4698</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A couple graphs. Geiger counter voltage and gas pressure. Full scale for Geiger counter (V) http://i.imgur.com/EK2YFbO.png http://i.imgur.com/EK2YFbO.png High pass filtered http://i.imgur.com/RajNGwe.png http://i.imgur.com/RajNGwe.png There seems to be a pattern. But there's not enough data both before and after this time range, to be really sure that there really is a correlation with pressure.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4698</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4696</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan Hunt: I'm trying to play with different methods of converting the signal into sound, to see if there are discernible audible patterns in it. For the current signal type and range it seems that the point map representation of gamma counter readings from data.hugnetlab. com works the best. Of course, I'm using history data. Averaged data doesn't really work well with these readings. I'm using this program to convert the resulting graphs in my spreadsheet into sound: http://photosounder.com/ So far, besides the increase of the background reading with detector temperature, which is like noise (and could be filtered out), it appears that the spikes or isolated events have some loose correlation with pressure. I was about to ask if it was possible to increase it further but then I realized that since you're using a glass tube it might not be safe to push it above 65-70 PSI. By the way, what is the output rate of the gamma counter? I wonder if interesting spikes might not be lost because they get averaged out or decimated in the data. It might be useful to have a test on data.hugnetlab. com set up to contain just gamma counter readings, but at a higher sample rate than other data (in order to save bandwidth / decrease download times. An idea: what about compressing data before sending it to the public?).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4696</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4695</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco - Nice visualization. I will see if our graphing component allows that. The signal from the detector comes in brief 5V pulses. Those are filtered through an R/C time constant and the voltage from that is what we read.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4695</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4694</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@HUGteam: regardless of how they are displayed on the website, are output values from the gamma counter field in the US Cell B test to be intended as individual units/"counts", or as a waveform as a whole? Would it make more sense if they were displayed like this? http://i.imgur.com/HWiuNtv.png http://i.imgur.com/HWiuNtv.png (orange line: internal pressure)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4694</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4693</link>
			<description><![CDATA["Then we played...Try as we may, though, we have not seen that again in several more tests." Could this be in any way related to the dificulties repeating the original F-P experiments?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4693</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4688</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Peter Mobberley Thanks for the tip. Please can you use the contact form (accessible from the green "+") to send us more information on what the parameters were for your experiments where you saw gammas. Please could you let us know what we can share with the community and it would be REALLY great if you can share the gamma energies, counts and incident profiles. Also, I'm in the UK for a few weeks, would be great if I could pop over and grab some footage.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 22:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4688</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4687</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is indeed a very good news! Thank you Peter for pointing me at this software, that will be very much useful.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 20:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4687</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peter Mobberley says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4686</link>
			<description><![CDATA[G-M tubes and photomultiplyer s ARE sensitive to electromagnetic interference in the radiofrequency range, so if you have sparking or any high voltage discharge producing RF then expect errors. But Celani cells run @ low voltage and have no reason to produce RF. A mild magnetic field produced by a solenoid coil will not effect them . Heat, no the detectors are well away from hot surfaces. Yes I see increased gamma count in my Ni-H replication given in my poster@ ICCF17 in Korea. Pete.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peter Mobberley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 18:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4686</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4685</link>
			<description><![CDATA[> where else can they come from? If the gamma counters used are sensitive to electromagnetic interference (in addition to heat, to some extent), then the coil wound, actively powered constantan wires might be causing them to give false readings. This could be happening more under conditions where the wires are acting more like a proper electromagnetic coil/solenoid. @HUG team: by the way, have you observed an increase in gamma counts from the NaI gamma detector as well?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 17:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4685</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peter Mobberley says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4684</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Guys, Glad to hear about gammas from a constantan wire in H2. This is an unequivocal sign of LENR. I hear you now have a gamma spectrometer, well done Jean Paul. I think the GammaSpectacula r driver will work well with your NaI scintillator/ph otomultiplyer.. Now you need some software. Just a year ago I bought a CsI spectrometer on ebay, it came from Ukraine, brand new for just $990 US. I downloaded PRA software from the GammaSpectacula r website, it works well but is a bit fiddly and not user friendly. Then I found Theremino MCA v.5.2 at www.theremino.com it is superb, and has a built in gamma spectrum database I recommend this to you. Good luck guys, Gammas significantly above background unequivocably means nuclear reactions, where else can they come from? Pete.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peter Mobberley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 17:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4684</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4683</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wanted to check out Geiger counter values for myself on data.hugnetlab. com but I found out that FC0502 (Cell US1.3B) is giving null values for that field. Is it working as intended?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4683</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4682</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It looks glorious to me. Can you tell me the time scale on the data you show. You say noise, I say spikes that are real. I think part of the trickiness is the feature only happens at start up. It is not clear what has to be done to reset for a new start up. If I can find the data I will boxcar average and subtract the background. I think you have a fine signal. What you are calling noise may be real counts due to cosmic rays and environmental radiation. If you want to cut out the cosmic rays you can place a scintillator paddle above and below your NaI detector. Look for coincident signals and if present gate the NaI off for some time window say +-one response time. Yes, this requires some kind of time delay or stored data to retrospectively gate the signal. If you want to look at the dark noise of the photo multiplier you could take off the NaI and see the response to dark. That would be noise. The higher the PM voltage the more noise. How big is the NaI crystal? I assume most of that tube is the photomultiplier tube. Is there a correlation between the Text reading near the NaI crystal and the NaI signal?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 01:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4682</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
