<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 13:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4638</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie tapp There will be a teaser blog - to allow for another video upload. Then the blog will go live.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 20:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4638</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4637</link>
			<description><![CDATA[this is harder for me than waiting for the government to reopen.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4637</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4636</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin It'll be a biggie. Bit of recording hardware failure and more additions, but we are getting there with it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 00:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4636</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4635</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bob, excited, any news is good news. Thanks.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 01:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4635</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4633</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie tapp Don't worry, we are working on something very interesting - hopefully blog today.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4633</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4631</link>
			<description><![CDATA[were did everyone go no posts for a couple days now except for ron b.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4631</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4618</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All In order to put fixed power on the 306L we had to swap the lines over so the 260L live data is now the 306L and vice-versa, we are looking for an elegant way to resolve this. This means the R/R0 are wrong as they are based off the original resistance of the opposite wire. sorry for any confusion]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 07:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4618</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4604</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If micro crystal evolution is at the heart of this effect then care must be taken when powering down the cell(s) to avoid any shock that could destroy the structure.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4604</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4603</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All So after looking at the historical data, we decided to lower the input power of the active cell by one step, it is around 2.5W lower but showing similar output average temperature. Rough calculation assuming that only the actively powered wire is producing apparent excess - which given that the 280L looks like it is still loading, is a fair assumption. (2.5W / 42.5W) * 100 = 5.9% apparent excess 2.5W *(1 / 0.275g [approximate weight of wire]) = 9.1W/g Celani says the wires he is supplying us should show excess of between 5W/g and 50W/g. This is in that range. Putting this in context, in theory 1kg of this wire would yield approximately 910W. Mathieu intends to put the TTi PSU at a fixed level on the current wire, and ramp up the second wire. Even if we only see around the same 5.9% apparent excess, will we see the spread move to approximately 5W?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4603</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4586</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mathieu, Excellent! Hopefully a constant pressure will allow us to understand the dynamics of the other parameters more easily! Bob, That's good news! Any plans to try to replicate that experiment at MFMP? I think any noble gas should work, it's my understanding that noble gases won't pass through metal.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4586</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4585</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The cells are now plumbed with the H2 bottle giving it larger amount of available hydrogen. This will slow down the leaking rate.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4585</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4584</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B Celani is doing similar experiments to the one you suggest, but in Argon.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4584</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4582</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All See this paper by Celani et al showing one of their reactor designs, with still a clear excess heat signal. It has high temperatures, fully opaque and flow calorimetry. http://www.iiste.org/PDFshare/CMRV3N3-27-56.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4582</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4575</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: I'm pretty much sure that the commenter was not actually implying that the hotter lamps were having ongoing low energy nuclear reactions, quite the opposite instead. It could be helpful to read that comment in context. See the following link, which I couldn't add in the previous comment due to lack of space: http://matslew.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/here-are-three-good-reasons-to-have-a-look-at-cold-fusion/#comment-1463]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4575</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4573</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP: have you tried measuring flange temperature? If cell A is significantly hotter, its outer metallic parts should get hotter too, over time, compared to the other one. On a related note, this interesting thought experiment was posted a couple days ago on Mats Lewan's blog by a commenter. I think it illustrates well what problems the transparent glass tubes can bring: ]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4573</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4572</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin Pell It took 6 days to load the first wire, the second is loading passively (much slower), but we have seen differential and calibration based apparent excess now for over 20 days. We are sailing close to the upper limit of current for the Celani wires (1.8A) on the actively powered wire, so Mathieu is planning to maybe switch the currently actively powered wires (active and control) to the Thurlby Thander PSUs and then start directly powering/heatin g the second wires. This should raise the reactor temperature but prevent the current wire from sintering.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4572</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4562</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is the first step up where the percentage excess has gone down. [add] 10/10 it is late I may have done this wrong but are we up to 18% excess heat?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 17:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4562</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4553</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B, in PdD the R/R0 increases with loading up to 0.72 and then it decreases with additional loading. I would guess in NiH the resistance decreases with loading until some value (Lmin) and then increases with additional loading.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4553</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4552</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bob, Great high level overview of the experiment! Thank You! Any idea why the resistance of the two active wires are going in the opposite direction?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 15:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4552</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4549</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B Certainly, It is essentially the same as the earlier US differential experiment. Only, with a few improvements, listed in the main blog. Two cells, one active (with 2 Celani wires), one passive in same environment with no cell cross talk - and SAME H2 pressure at all times (as bridge linked with no effective thermal transfer). The aim is to see if the external temperature is higher on the active for the same input power. As a backup, see if t-mica is higher in active than control. In addition, Newer wires are being used - and critically, Mathieu also did a calibration. The active has shown significantly higher temperatures than the control for some weeks over a range of input powers. Also, if you look at the t-Mica temp in the active, it has been higher than the control also.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 11:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4549</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4548</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bob, could you give an overview of the experiment?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4548</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4547</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin Pell Yes, it is a good dataset. And this experiment has a real opportunity to run and run.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2013 13:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4547</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4545</link>
			<description><![CDATA[10% excess at 42.5 watts applied!!! Wow. With Endurance of over 17 days of excess heat. With control at least in the up direction.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 05:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4545</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4535</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good news everyone, I found a HUGE NaI probe. I just need to check the compatibility of the spectrum analyzer I found on ebay and this should work out just fine.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 14:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4535</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4523</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Gamma spectroscopy is an extremely sensitive aspect of LENR as well as a very difficult experimental discipline. It is not guarantee that any signal will been detected by the system. There are a lot of "know how" behind the spectrometry of gamma detection, the range of detection is also extremely important aspect. My biggest concern is if the signal is a burst and if it is too short to be detected...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4523</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mika says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4522</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Ok, the Gamma-Scout models are not suited for this task then. They do have a data output with a 2-second (minimum) interval but they can't measure the energy spectrum. I would rather call it a gamma spectrometer what you are looking for. The gamma scout is very good at determining if there is any radioactivity at all because of its very high sensitivity and internal continuous data logging. It does make sense, of course, if you already have enough geiger-counter- based detectors to measure intensity but none to measure the energy.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mika</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4522</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4518</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mika We need to capture the gamma spectrum and over time - this will help to determine source events.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4518</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mika says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4513</link>
			<description><![CDATA[About the Gamma detector, I think you may want to have a look at Gamma-Scout. Their geiger-counters seem to be relatively cheap, have data-logging via USB, gamma detection 30kV up, and are very sensitive. I don't have one myself but I've chosen them to buy if I ever get involved into experimenting with LENR. The Company sells only one type of detector with some upgrades depening what model you choose. It's designed to be running for 10 years non-stop with a special battery (which can be replaced by the company if empty), monitoring the radiation levels all the time and warning at certain thresholds. I think you can read-out the stored (daily) radiation data of all models, but you need the ONLINE model for live-monitoring . More infos here: http://www.gamma-scout.com/EN/Produkte-Preise.php]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mika</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4513</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4509</link>
			<description><![CDATA[7.5% excess heat at 40 watts applied after 3.6 degree adjustment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 01:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4509</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4487</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert (Bob?), yes there is a wonderful amount of usable data. @All, from the multiwire experiment I see that loading starting in the 350 to 400 degrees range. From the EU diff. experiment I see loading starts in the 80 to 90 degree Text1 range. So can we conclude that the wire is about 400 degrees when the Text1 is 90 degrees? It seems that way to me. By linear scaling 25 90 400 25 140 700 ??? @Mathieu, great experiment, stable data, long runs at each step, excess power persists for a long time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4487</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4481</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin Pell Yes - the passive activation is the key. This is in part the purpose of 2 m in the cell A here with one passively heated and the multi-wire test in the US (which actually has less wire than the EU cell, but we can raise the temp higher more easily and know the temperature more accurately) When the excess appears to come - is it down to the wire reaching a critical temperature, or the loading level, or both or more? Is it endothermic when loading? what is the cycle balance? What variations in conditions drive more apparent excess. I think the recent experiments have answers to some of these questions answered in the rich data we are getting.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4481</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4476</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mathieu, it is interesting how much flux there is at the 10 second time scale. As shown here by the width of the resistance line. This is the passively heated wire. http://i.imgur.com/dumSwaW.jpg Also interesting is the 18+-2 minute oscillations on the Tint1 data. @Ryan, good to know the glass is opaque to IR. This pretty much ends the debate about IR leaking out of the glass. @All, if the passively heated wire is active this means we could put 9 passive wires and they would all be active. The COP would be much higher. If each wire gives 4% then 9 passive give 36% and we can turn down the active by 36% but lets use 30% to be conservative. The COP=1.4/0.7=2]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 18:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4476</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4468</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ed Pell - The glass is opaque to the IR cameras we have tried. I guess we have not tried the cheap web cam with the IR filter removed, though. At leas we haven't tried it on those cells. Maybe we should :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4468</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4458</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin Could this be when more and more of the wire goes through 179ºC... or the temp range over which H2 starts to be catalytically disassociated.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4458</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4432</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Interesting data. Fits to delta=(0.034*(a pplied power-20.0)^2)+ 3.7 http://i.imgur.com/pKPXTws.jpg The EU and US data are consistent http://i.imgur.com/w4KsnIY.jpg Something special happens in the 24 to 28 watts applied range.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4432</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4421</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hard to tell if it's not the effect of ambient temperature which today for some reason is increasing faster than usual. http://i.imgur.com/JKpHh8F.png http://i.imgur.com/JKpHh8F.png http://i.imgur.com/4H2w1yI.png http://i.imgur.com/4H2w1yI.png http://i.imgur.com/J2c5jFx.png http://i.imgur.com/J2c5jFx.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4421</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4420</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All Has the EU Cell A switched on? T-Mica gone through 179ºC Active wires appear to have gone through inflection point Temp differential increasing?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4420</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4412</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It seems both wires are loaded now. Power rise is affecting only the 306L wire that too in second decimal place. The excess temp is peaking to 4C , is this meaningful ? Btw the units are shown in K, should not make any difference but it can confuse people.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 02:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4412</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Giorgio says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4369</link>
			<description><![CDATA["The question is, can you think of a way to provide a constant source of hydrogen so that the pressure inside doesn't drop despite the leaks." Something like this could help ? http://www.pulsetech.ru/sl.htm]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4369</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4360</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mathieu Valat , I do understand about leaks and about the absorption of hydrogen causing the pressure to drop. The question is, can you think of a way to provide a constant source of hydrogen so that the pressure inside doesn't drop despite the leaks. The loss of pressure is not controlled nor is the refilling rate or frequency of refilling, in fact, they are quite random. With the data analysis tools I use, the random nature of the pressure is troublesome.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4360</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4358</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mathieu Valat Welcome back. I hope you had a good time in the USA and you had a chance to recharge your batteries during your holiday. I'd asked the HUG team about somehow keeping a constant hydrogen pressure on the cells but didn't see an answer. Is there any way your team could provide some method of maintaining a constant pressure on the cell? This would really help sort out the contributions to the dynamics of the experiments.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4358</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4351</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looking at temperatures shortly after the step I see applied delta 0 0.3 14.94 3.5 17.55 3.3 20.00 3.4 22.50 4.8 I do not know what to make of this data.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4351</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4347</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco, As requested, the pressure reading has been modified to increase the number of decimals.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 07:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4347</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4339</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin Pell That is an interesting theory. Well - the wires are getting close to 0.81... another 12 hours or so maybe for at least one wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4339</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4336</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bob, I bet the steps down in resistance are blocks of material coming into magnet alignment. I would predict that if an external magnet field were applied from the start there would be no steps. I believe it is the hydrogen in the metal that has a magnetic moment and is aligning.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4336</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4333</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: actually, that is the actively heated wire. The passively heated wire (280L) is slowly and smoothly hitting a plateau in resistance decrease rate. @MFMP: a request. Could Pressure (bar) precision in the "View Test Cell EU1.3: Protocol V1.2 " test be increased to 3 decimal digits (as shown in Cell B data) or more and the R/R0 values to 5 or 6 decimal digits?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4333</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4332</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Strange those sudden steps down by the passive wire... just recently did it and really knocked the power our balance down also.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4332</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4330</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ :D But I suggest placing a reasonably sensitive pickup coil or magnetic field sensor there, just in case the reaction produces any EM or M fields. It should be a tiny one, so that it does not disturb the setup/air flow etc.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4330</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4329</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I brought someone in the room because he was eager to see the system in a closeup fashion. You must see him blowing air to the cell.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 20:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4329</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4328</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What happened at 16:05??? The 17 minute oscillation is back! Air conditioning?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 20:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4328</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4327</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin Pell No magnet... not yet]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 19:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4327</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4326</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mathieu, I am impressed with how smooth and consistent the data is. Are you using a magnet?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 18:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4326</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4325</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hmm... I think it will be more of interest to check out wire color again when differential ∆T values will be larger.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4325</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4324</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Both wires are now completely orange.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4324</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco, "By putting 0.1W using another power supply, I can compensate the systematic thermal error and increase the tension in this second Celani wire, hence make the resistance measurement smoother. After some test 0.1W is a little too much. Since the resistance is expected to go down, I used a constant current mode, that will then reduce the power injected instead of increasing it." The last steps of the calibrations were done with and without 0,1W in the 280L wire in cell A. The current value of power added by the additional power supply to cell A by the 280L is 0.05W.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4323</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4322</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mathieu Valat: It looks like since input power was increased on both cells by 2.5W, Cell A has had a 0.1W greater input power than Cell B. Live data has stopped updating, by the way.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4322</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4320</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why is it loading so fast? Why is the mica temperature different by only 0.5 degrees A versus B.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 03:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4320</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4319</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You have very good loading already ! All the best. I agree with the comments on emissivity issues, wire color and glass transparency etc. However I think its best to go ahead with this and just subtract an error from the excess (if any). It will be nice if you or some readers can estimate the approx value of the error due to these issues. If we see any encouraging results, even with the error compensation, the next step will be obviously to cover the glass and repeat the experiment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 01:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4319</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4318</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This graph shows a lower delta, only about 1.5°C as of now. However it's the delta of the average of T_Ext1 and T_Ext2 glass tube mounted thermocouples (as far as I can see). http://i.imgur.com/Jhsvwpj.png http://i.imgur.com/Jhsvwpj.png By the way, it appears the passively heated wire is loading hydrogen almost as much as the actively heated one. Actually, at this rate it will soon reach a lower R/R0 ratio.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4318</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4317</link>
			<description><![CDATA[3.5 degrees delta already! http://i.imgur.com/2rQ7OI0.jpg I agree with Ecco the wire is MUCH more than 15% above mica at the point half way between the two mica touch points. I would say 600 degree is a reasonable estimate for the high applied power levels.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4317</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4315</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And no I'm at home right now, I wish to get some sleep and get on fixing this leakage issue ASAP...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4315</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4313</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What's this cyclical pattern in internal temperatures on Cell A (active) ? http://i.imgur.com/IO6yGOM.png http://i.imgur.com/KpnhUoa.png This is also visible on Tb_In2 on Cell B. http://i.imgur.com/mciFgwJ.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4313</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4311</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Second wire's resistance is starting to decrease too!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4311</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4307</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I fixed the permission on the text file.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4307</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4306</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Loading in Cell A started: http://i.imgur.com/NjyGrJ2.png http://i.imgur.com/NjyGrJ2.png @Robert Greenyer: By the way, the document embedded in this blogpost isn't publicly accessible, as of writing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4306</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4305</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Johan Eriksson For the US cells, we are discussing putting thin sheet steel through a roller, so that it wants to become a cylinder, then inserting that around the glass suspended by split silicon o-rings. This would be non-destructive , allow for thermocouple placement on glass and steel outer with pass throughs, can "breathe" with no thermal transfer to the flanges. This should also work nicely in differential.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4305</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4302</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Could this help? https://spreadsheets.google.com/feeds/list/0AkyO8n6-0MjNdG85Wk05TWRLSHNjWFY0aGdXejBFVFE/od6/public/basic?alt=rss]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4302</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4301</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Mathieu has been looking at paints to potentially apply to the glass in the latter stages of this experiment as you have suggested. I wonder if you can recommend paints that would have high reflectivity (maybe contain gold) for base goat and high black matt for top coat, that would stay bonded to the glass and each other over temperatures of 0-280ºC]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4301</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4299</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP: after looking around, it appears that you have to activate RSS feeds for the EU cells log in order for others to use it. ]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4299</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
