<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 14:12:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Games 06 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10698</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Excellent post. I was checking constantly this blog and I'm impressed! Very helpful information particularly the last part : ) I care for such info much. I was looking for this particular info for a long time. Thank you and good luck.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Games 06</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 03:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10698</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>welho webmail says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10102</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If some one desires to be updated with newest technologies afterward he must be pay a visit this site and be up to date everyday.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>welho webmail</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 00:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10102</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lonnie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9023</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hallo zusammen, lesen i Blog von Zeit zu Zeit und ichh besitzen eine ähnliche und ich wwar nur wundern neugierig, wenn Sie eije Menge von Spaam erhalten Feedback? Wenn dem so ist, wie Sie verhindern, dasws Schutz voor es, jede Plugin oder alles, was Siie können schlagen? Ich bekomme so iel in letzter Zeit es macht mich verrückt verrückt so ddass jeder Support wird sehr geschätzt.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Lonnie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9023</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lavina says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9012</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hallo, Icch fühle mich i i saaw besucht Sie meinen Blog hier ankam zu Rück der Lustt Ich?. versuchen beei der Suche Fraen zu verbessern verbessedn mein Ich gehe davon! seine gut genug zuu nutzen machen einige von Ihre Ideen !!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Lavina</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 20:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9012</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cecile says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6247</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Users tend to be more responsive to pages and people that make posts often and automation can hhelp to track the how many posts arre being made and when. Today, Facebook is among the best if not the best social network that is visited by the maximum number oof people every day. Mark Bush is an expert author of Telecommunicati on industry and contributes his valusble thoughts for telecoms industry readers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cecile</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6247</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4385</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I was looking at a Celani powerPoint and see the same ambient and external temperature oscillations. Very cool.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4385</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A 0.4 degree rise on the incoming air is amplified to a 3 degree rise of temperature_1_e xternal. The ambient leads by about 90 seconds.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4352</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4350</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is the air incoming to cell B. Is the thermocouple isolated from cell B? http://i.imgur.com/UvlP6yJ.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 16:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4350</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4346</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We have a nice strong 1.5 degree (min to max) oscillation in cell A external and a 0.4 degree (min to max) oscillation in cell A ambient. I can't tell who is the leader and who is the follower. http://i.imgur.com/1DiK297.jpg This differential method is not working. The reference side is not stable. http://i.imgur.com/C3rZNi7.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 02:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4346</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4341</link>
			<description><![CDATA[US Cell 1.3B (active) is more sensitive to ambient temperature variations than US Cell 1.3A. I don't think this is due to a LENR effect: http://i.imgur.com/3aG4N4L.png http://i.imgur.com/3aG4N4L.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 21:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4341</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4310</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@robert greenyer on the subject of magnetic alignment, whan welding sometimes it is required after the weld is done to ping the metal to realign the ions of the metal for a stronger weld. only works with hot metal. throw a bass speaker in front of it for some vibration. just some dumb ideas i have.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4310</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4297</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Charlie tapp It is to do with magnetic alignment in the body of the wire and how that relates to the Hydrogen. It is not about inducing electric current in the wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 05:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4297</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ake malhammar says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4295</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am very sorry for my linguistic mistake in the comment below. It should be “assures that the air flow enters horizontally”.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ake malhammar</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4295</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ake Malhammar says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4292</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I do not new if this is news for you but I will pass it on anyway. The wire is cooled by convection and radiation. Some of that radiation escapes through the tube glass wall without impacting its external temperature. A metal shiny wire radiates less than a dark wire. As a result the control cell must dissipate more heat form its external surface and thus be warmer. This could explain the differences for low input powers in the curves shown in the video. So it might be that the actual difference in heat dissipation is larger than the difference of the temperature curves. A remedy could be to colour the passive wire dark.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ake Malhammar</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4292</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4287</link>
			<description><![CDATA[At this point I agree with Ecco excess heat is not correlated with flux. It seems to be correlated with time of day. It seems to peak at midnight in Greenwich, England. I guess about 7pm in the lab. Is there any automatic air handling turning off for the night around 6pm? http://i.imgur.com/KgxOoju.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 01:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4287</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4286</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've already posted this on ECW in their latest MFMP blogpost, but thinking a bit more about it, I guess it's perfectly fine here. @MFMP: What about putting both cells in two separate open tubes (made of plastic? That would have some advantages. Or of metal with an external insulating jacket) with a temperature controlled constant input air flow, and then comparing the output air flow temperature of both cells? You could set up the cells in a vertical orientation which would help not only keeping the flow controlled and uniform along the cell length, but also saving space. This would an improvement over the current setup, I think. It will ensure that both cells are receiving about the same air flow. and therefore that they're heating up in the same way, in addition of protecting them a bit from random air currents from lab activity. EDIT: I'm aware (actually, I just remembered) that you already had something similar in place when you were running this experiment with the v2.0 protocol, but it wasn't quite the same thing as what I am suggesting here. EDIT2: I couldn't resist making a diagram of what I have in mind. However I can see there might be problems in setting up a good, undisturbed air flow and choosing carefully a good place for measuring output air temperature. http://i.imgur.com/y5VBFYS.png http://i.imgur.com/y5VBFYS.png Maintenance (ie disassembling/r eassembling the thing) might also get tricky.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2013 23:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4286</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4278</link>
			<description><![CDATA[With the magnet we have excess heat at a wire resistance of .934!!! The delta T varies from 4 degrees to 0.5 degrees with an average I GUESS/estimate of 2 degrees. Hurray Dennis! Hurray team! @Ryan before adding the Helmholtz can you do a measure of the magnetic field on A and B with no magnet? But cell running. @Ryan yes cell A resistance effects with magnet are puzzling. [add] 12 hours of excess heat now at 4.6 degrees. Resistance declining on almost straight line. Very little noise on resistance line. I think the magnet has a real effect.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 21:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4278</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4276</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Jack - I hear you. I would like to see an unassailable result. We'll keep working on it. @ Mailin Wong - Our data acquisition samples and averages the current and voltage between a 100 times a second and 20 times a second depending on what all we have that board configured to read. In this experiment it is closer to 20 times a second. The power is all stable DC. The control loop samples it and adjusts to a target point of voltage, current, power, or temperature ten times a second. @ Charlie - We do have another cell made up that we could play with. We are almost maxed out on manpower, though, and we don't have another Celani wire at the moment. We could try to make one, though. @ Ecco - the manifold between the two cells is 6mm copper pipe and never varies from room temperature. I don't think there is any heat conveyed between the cells.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 19:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4276</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4275</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan Hunt: I think the shared gas plumbing might be causing more problems than benefits, in unexpected ways. You might want to use it just to periodically (every couple days? Depending on how severe has leaks are) equilibrate pressure while both cells are cooled off.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 19:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4275</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4274</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am not sure if CellB is hotter than expected or if CellA is cooler. We set a magnet on the side of the cells several days ago. I took it of of cell A to take a magenetic field reading with an app on my phone. I didn't want to disturb cell B. Then I put it back on in nearly the same location. Shortly after that, the power to both cells was raised by 2 watts. Cell A rose very little from the previous temperature. A bit later Malachi adjusted the location of the magnet very slightly (a few millimeters) to what he remembered was the location it had been in originally. The resistances of the wires behaved very strangely. The temperature of the cell behaved very strangely. We are preparing an annotated graph or two. Then I could use some more minds on this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 18:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4274</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4273</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Are we already at excess heat on wire #2? [add] 4pm east Still looks like excess power. Reference A is flat and stable. [add] When on the 3rd was the magnet added? Was it 21:24? If so, after that the curves (temperature) become smoother. Less short time scale jumping up and down. This is a result. Magnets do something. [add] Ryan points out the smooth could be due to the extra thermal mass near the thermocouple]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 18:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4273</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4272</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@mfmp i personaly think we have replicated celani. why not, ( or is there one already) build a cell that can just be played with. with out protocalls. lets throw a spark plug in one and see what happens seems to be what works for flux with most working cells. might not even be the flux mabee the presure wave gets the hydrogen wiggleing inside the latice building up resistance and makeing heat. i dont know just want to see some serious heat. then build some protocalls and try to replicate that.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 17:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4272</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4271</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco I don't think the sensitivity can be increased, it is designed for on/off situations. I will make sure though.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4271</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mailin Wong says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4269</link>
			<description><![CDATA[At what rate [Hz] are you sampling current and voltage levels?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mailin Wong</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4269</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4268</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Since the gas leak has been pretty much fixed, could you raise H2 pressure back to 3.5 bar? It will be interesting to check out how pressure drops from those levels compared to last time. Since (if) pressure will stay longer at higher values, wire loading will likely be more effective.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 23:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4268</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4267</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan Hunt: are the relatively large, almost periodic temperature swings in Cell B a feature of said investigation? EDIT: I see in the latest update that motion was detected around the cell when those occurred. So this is what the motion detection data column is about. Interesting. http://i.imgur.com/zdh0LXA.png By the way, can the sensitivity of this motion detector be increased?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4267</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4266</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There is an interesting rise in cell B, but we are investigating to see if it is due to Wes standing in the airflow as he works out there. We will continue to keep you posted.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 20:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4266</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4264</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Holy cow. Normally, when the applied power is stepped the resistance decreases but the rate slows exponentially, this time the rate is increasing exponentially!! ! Really!!! interested to see the next hour of data. [add] Still accelerating 3pm east coast time. [add][4:20pm east] Double holy cow. acceleration continues. [add] just plain weird, at this rate it will be fully loaded in 48 hours [add] not sure what to make of this http://i.imgur.com/oVDBvsC.jpg [add] It would appear that flux at far below high loading produces some short lived excess heat. That is new! [add] To the best of my knowledge this is the best instrumented cold fusion experiment in the world. I love open science. [add] Even if the temperature spike is from Wes blocking air flow it provides great data. A half hour heat pulse (the last one) causes a flux pulse. It takes a little less than 30 minutes for the effect of the pulse to decay away. If only we knew the diffusivity of hydrogen in NiCu and in the added layers we could calculate the depth.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4264</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4263</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[edited] Bob, the first half R/R0=0.81 is just read from the wire #1 data. The second half depends on what temperature wire #1 was at when 22.5 was applied. If I guess 300 degrees and the Text was about 100 degrees then at 22.5 the second wire will add 100 degrees. So to turn the temperature to 300 degrees we will need less power. What power corresponds to 100 degrees at the wire? Well 1/3 of 22.5 or 7.5 watts, so two steps. 15.0 watts. I use 300C [595K] because that is where Takahashi sees his powder ignite. @Bob, I am not sure I see your point. We trigger with applied power. It might be excess power would go on indefinitely at the 30 watts applied if we just left it there but we do not have the data yet. The thermal gradient from wire center between mica supports and the mica touch point is large. It might indefinitely drive excess heat. The two KW companies use thermal gradients to drive their reactors. But one also uses "spark plugs" :) I just love that.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4263</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4261</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All I think that one of the most encouraging things about recent data is that the process (loading for sure) has been demonstrated again in the data, to be triggered passively. This has important consequences, as different designs of reactor that used heat source sources and forced thermal gradients in an appropriately insulated environment off steady state has good potential to be able to drive a large body of active material that could self re-enforce.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 11:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4261</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4260</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, Edwin I think your suggestion of periodic equalisation of H2 pressures is a good one. @Edwin It is interesting you say that, because that is ballpark what Celani claims. Can you give the basis on which you, yourself, calculated that?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4260</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4259</link>
			<description><![CDATA[From the data from wire #1 I predict wire #2 will start to produce excess power at R/R0=0.81 Further, I estimate/guess that will occur at wire #2 applied power of 17.5 watts.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 02:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4259</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4258</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The cross connect valve could be kept closed and opened for 5 seconds once every 6 hours. Just a thought.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4258</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
