<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 10:38:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Randolph says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-28057</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello there, I discovered your website byy way of Gogle even as looking for a related subject, your site goot here up, iit looks good. I've bookmarked it in my google bookmarks. Hi there, just become alert to your blkg via Google, and found that it is truly informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I will appreciate in the event you continue this in future. A lot of other people can be benefited out off your writing. Cheers! Here is my site massage near me: https://www.facebook.com/UTBPuyallup]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Randolph</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 03:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-28057</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rhettsousy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-27972</link>
			<description><![CDATA[lesby https://mazaltovman.ru/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rhettsousy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-27972</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ug44zef says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26860</link>
			<description><![CDATA[А вы согласны обслуживанием такси? Постепенно всё больше водителей высказываются на низкие тарифы, а поездки — на уровень обслуживания. Почему так обстоят дела? Не следует ли что-то пересматривать? https://zabota32.ru/kak-vybrat-taksi-osnovnye-kriterii/ Мы, как профессионалы, считаем, что удобство и надёжность должны быть приоритетом. Что скажете? Каким должно быть хорошее такси в 2025 году? Расскажите, что думаете — интересно услышать всех!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ug44zef</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 14:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26860</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Danielgop says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26759</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Желаете узнать о маркетплейсе,гд е возможно приобрести товары особой категории, которые не найдешь больше ни на одной торговой онлайн-площаке? В таком случае кликай и переходи на крупнейшую платформу Мега: https://megaweb777.com. Здесь вы всегда найдете подходящие позиции товаров на любой вкус. мега официальный сайт занимает место в рейтинге Российских черных рынков, считается одним из самых популярных сайтов сети TOR. Маркетплейс https://xn--megweb18-4dd.com особый в своем роде — сделки совершаются в любое время суток на территории СНГ, шифрование сайта гарантирует максимальную анонимность. https://xn--m13-psa.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Danielgop</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 02:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26759</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wes Baish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3591</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG It's not a WFG artifact because I haven't turned it on yet. Though it's a pretty small blip (4mV), I think it might lend some merit to odd behavior in the powder. On Sunday I was in the lab figuring out why R3's data turned off and shortly after fixing the problem P_Resistance did another small but noticeable jump. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5yt9J8j8CWbd0tfT1RKYWRGakE/edit Again this is small 4mV jump, but the instantaneous peak is puzzling. I brushed off Sunday's event, chalking it up to some effect of the data coming back on or some sort of tiny vibration from my lumbering around the lab shifting the powder just slightly. However this new anomaly can't be dismissed so easily as the motion sensor of the US1.3 tests indicate no one was in the lab at that time. We may find it telling that these two separate leaps are the same size and could be a result of the endpoint's sense limits. One of its architects might know more.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wes Baish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3591</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3584</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ P_voltage jumped up at 22:21 utc along with P_resistance. Is this an artifact of turning on the waveform generator? There's a tiny increase in the pressure as well, but it's very close to the noise level.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 22:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3584</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jamie Sibley says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3583</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am putting this forward as a proposed experimental apparatus. http://i40.tinypic.com/nqbhfr.png With the spring loading and constant vibration from the piezo transducer, we should be able to get much more stable resistance readings.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jamie Sibley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 22:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3583</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wes Baish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3579</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So pressure has flat-lined over the weekend. Additional power to the heater didn't seem to help. Are there any objections to turning on the WF generator? The powder should certainly see an effect; whether or not it's a positive one I can't say. . .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wes Baish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 19:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3579</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3533</link>
			<description><![CDATA[One idea is that the nano powder is packed so tightly that the hydrogen can't fully penetrate at lower pressures. With enough pressure it is forced into the voids and eventually permeates the whole powder volume. This creates a bulk thermal conduction path to the T_powder TC. The inter-particle voids represent a very small fraction of the powder volume, so only a small drop in pressure right at the transition would be expected. The hydrogen somehow also creates a bulk electric conduction path to the core, and how that works is the real question. If the powder had been exposed to air at some point, maybe the process is simply reduction of the non-conductive oxide layer in the bulk powder. It could also be something like electron migration from H+ (proton) absorption into the nano nickel. That doesn't seem likely at this temperature and voltage.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3533</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3526</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Regarding the RF stimulus voltage, we discussed earlier the probable need for much higher voltages before any effect is seen. One easy way to achieve this with the current apparatus would be to use a matching transformer. Even something as crude as a plate transformer salvaged from an old AM radio would give several hundred volts of AC waveform from the function generator, up to 10 kHz anyway. The goal of this is to fluidize the powder by piezoelectric agitation rather than to supply direct emf stimulation of the Ni.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3526</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wes Baish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3444</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@all Ryan and I had a discussion this morning concerning calibrations for powder cells. We haven't planned any calibrations in powder protocols - much like this test (protocol is located on the info link next to the test name as well as a number of other places scattered in powder docs), where the "calibrations" we mention are just one-time frequency sweeps with and without heat. Our determination of excess heat in powder has simply been if powder temperature exceeded shell temperature. However this method of determination is not set in stone! We have considered doing an average of each temperature rise at equilibrium which, right now, seems a good option. There is also potential for He atmosphere calibrations. The thermal coupling in a vacuum compared to a H2 atmosphere is cause for concern, and H2 loading happens almost immediately following charging (adding the H2 to the cell) which adds complications. Are there any other supposed options for more legitimate calibration?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wes Baish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3444</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3433</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Celani V2.0 protocol experiment comparative test data is not useful at the moment as the cells are loading. When they are in active run - the calculation for the excess heat based on calibrations is here http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/follow-2/285-us-eu-cell-calibration-results on the first spreadsheet. the Powder cell will likely have something similar when it has finished calibration.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3433</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Ellefson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3431</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Good question! In theory, you should be able to find it in the experiment's protocol description, located under "Follow"->"Expe riment Overview"->"Pow der Test Cell #1"->"Info" However, it seems that this document does not yet describe the analytic models applied for derived results. Although this experiment is not reporting P_xs, it is reporting power and resistance values, which are derived from raw sensor readings. I'm currently working up an experiment definition document protocol that will contain both human-readable and machine-readabl e sections. There will be a checklist of information that needs to be included in all experiment descriptions, including raw sensor data descriptions that have references showing where in the apparatus the measurements are taken, as well as derived data descriptions with formulas. I'll be posting the live document soon.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Ellefson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 04:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3431</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>h veeder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3430</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What is the formula? Is it displayed with the data? (The formula should be easy to find. )]]></description>
			<dc:creator>h veeder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 03:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3430</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Ellefson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3423</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Excess power is not a data point that is measured specifically; rather, it is an analytic result that comes from applying measured data to a formula intended to model the behavior of our apparatus. Based on the results, a number is produced, which we are calling excess power. It is your responsibility, in fact it is your contribution, to determine how trustworthy this analytical result is. If you have reason to believe it is incorrect, by all means, please share!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Ellefson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 22:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3423</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>frasp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3421</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Couple of retard questions again... Can I now trust the excess power readings that are shown here and there on the live data pages? How much active material is there on one meter of Celani wire?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>frasp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3421</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
