<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:44:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3272</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For some reason at 21:42 CET pressure suddenly decreased from about 3.62 bar to 3.56 bar. That's also about when active wire resistance increased a bit temporarily.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3272</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3271</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B: I definitely think that was intentional. I think they rolled back to ~250mw because at this stage they probably only want to apply a minimal amount of current into the wire just to get reliable resistance readings.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3271</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3270</link>
			<description><![CDATA[#90 Ecco There's 250mw of power going to the CuNi wire. It was twice that for a small while but then down to 250. I'm not sure if that's intentional or some bi-metallic reaction with the CuNi?? Indeed it's very interesting to watch the resistance.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3270</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3268</link>
			<description><![CDATA[By the way, it's interesting to see that as soon as active wire resistance started dropping at 21:07, T_Mica temperature (and other ones to some extent) started increasing. What's interesting is that the active wire is being passively heated.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3268</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3267</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP: I see from the EU experiment log (from which I am, not very straightforward ly, getting RSS update notifications) that hydrogen loading on EU cell 1.3A just began. Again (I think I've already written something like this in a few occasions in the past months), I believe that such important events should be announced in advance through the blog so that people know about them and can prepare in advance to follow them in real time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3267</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3183</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Your wish is my command, Ron :) http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/follow-3/274-pressure-rise-from-break-down-of-acetone]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3183</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3182</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For that limited time the power was on this morning the resistance was going up so that's a good sign. The pressure was going up for some odd reason so that may be why the resistance was rising. It was curious that it appears that the core temp was going down. That doesn't explain at all why pressure was going up. Very odd. I saw the net increase in power too was going to comment on it. I don't think it would hurt anything to get it 8 hours of on time. That way we can be sure everything is stabilized and get the nominal values for both pressure and resistance. Would it have still done that at a stable power input? I don't know. Advice? I believe it would have and moreover, we had to wait quite some time for the first cells to start to show excess power. Some may have discounted that excess power, but I'm not one of them : )]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3182</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3180</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan, I assume that the reason for the power cycling of the CTC is to try to trigger a reaction. It doesn't seem to be working so far. I wonder how long you will continue to try that? Is it possible to let it just run at/near the critical temperature for a couple days? I'm keenly interested in the nominal value of the resistance and it's slope. It would also allow data collection on the pressure constancy.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3180</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3160</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Public live data for the CTC cell is not being updated anymore. Are there problems or has the cell been switched off?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3160</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3151</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Interesting increase in heat after power is at zero. "Life after Death"? I had fun making a video of it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa1WOz9wpwI View Test CTC: Air Jacket Test 06/07/2013 15:25:00 06/07/2013 16:00:00]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 05:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3151</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3147</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan, Thanks so much for taking the time to answer. I remember we had those issues with resistance going through the roof as current approached zero but the odd thing about this is that the next sample in time has values even smaller in current and volts and the resistance calculation looks fine. Perhaps you are right about some odd thing with averaging values over time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 22:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3147</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ron B - I think what looks like a resistance rise there is because the power is being turned off and as the current goes to zero, the calculation get's wonky. On the next LENR-Stick cell with the multiple wires, we are going to sense the resistance with a small voltage that we never turn off, since the heat will be provided by the heating element around the outside of the stainless tube. That still leaves the question of why the calculation was done wrong. We will examine whether it is in the readings themselves, or in the averaging of the readings.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3131</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Curious glitch on the CTC resistance. It doubles in value for a couple of minutes. Also math errors from the program recording the data??? The HugData calculates 15.2068 while my calculator gets a different value. Very odd. (R=V/I) The Geiger Counter also shows a 2x increase shortly after. Date Current (A) Voltage (V) Power (W) Resistance (Ohms) Output Power (W) Geiger Counter (V/V0) (Norm) 2013-06-06 18:57:30	-0.002 1	0.0171	0	8.14 61	10.7414	0.15 2013-06-06 18:57:00	0.0035 	0.0585	0.0007	 15.2058	12.8428 	0.44 (resistance 16.7142) 2013-06-06 18:56:30	0.0686 	0.5444	0.0428	 7.978	15.6008	0 .43 2013-06-06 18:56:00	0.1453 	1.1442	0.1662	 7.8761	19.8799	 0.43]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 05:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3131</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3130</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How about a step from 24 watts to 26 watts? If the 0.2 step made the out power go above the in power.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 04:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3130</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3098</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All, n the CTC does anyone know why the power keeps turning on an off?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 05:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3098</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3096</link>
			<description><![CDATA[http://i.imgur.com/S2dLZgr.png Got it I had to be logged in as a member - problem solved. Circuit added for reference if reading post #75]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3096</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3095</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco – thank you. I think there is some other reason why I cannot post pictures – including no edit symbol present on my posts. @74 Ecco. Gives the output waveforms of a simple ‘single-end push-pull switch – I do not think a ‘H’ double end switch is required here – but I can do a circuit for that also if desired. Power input is simply controlled via rep. rate and/or voltage. The capacitors C1 and C2 can be optimised for whatever voltage, power and frequency envelopes are required. Further as the DE FETS have an upper limit of ~65 MHz frequency operation and 1.8kW power handling I think this will provide adequate heating.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3095</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3090</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I forgot to add this in the previously posted example, but I think you need to have the http:// portion in the URL to make it recognize as valid by the comment system. See: http://i.imgur.com/L9gRdwB.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3090</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3089</link>
			<description><![CDATA[David and Ecco, I too get no result from the img tag it just makes the line disappear. I am using Firefox. On the other hand I do have the edit symbol and have tried many variation to embed an image no luck.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3089</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3083</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Ecco - also I did not know you could edit old posts - I do not have the edit button on my posts - perhaps because I'm using Chrome or Win 7 or god knows what Also I did exactly what you suggested - so something is amiss]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3083</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3074</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ok I give up - obviously we are not doing the same actions. Could someone give the definitive steps required to post images. Bob - could you spell out in more detail (step by step) what is required as obviously I have not understood correctly]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3074</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3073</link>
			<description><![CDATA[http://i.imgur.com/L9gRdwB.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3073</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3072</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Bob I did as you suggested - did not work - I wonder if you have to be logged in to the site for it to work - otherwise I'm at a loss]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3072</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3071</link>
			<description><![CDATA[will this work... http://i.imgur.com/L9gRdwB.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3071</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3069</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Bob, The idea behind the power cycles is to try to trigger an effect, correct? If you do see excess power at some point, how will you know it's the power cycles (or any triggering event) and not just time-in-the-tes t and that even without triggering after a certain amount of time the excess power would just appear?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3069</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3067</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer No, I'm sorry: I'm not expert at all with videos.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 09:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3067</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3061</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Would you be able to do a screen grab / phone cam video tutorial of how to add images to comments and send it to us. If you can - we will post it for others to reference. Thanks Bob]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 04:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3061</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3057</link>
			<description><![CDATA[David Jones - Have you tried LTSpice for circuit simulation? It is free and works very well. http://www.linear.com/designtools/software/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 01:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3057</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3056</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@David Jones Looks like your post contains url links (url tag) rather than image links (img tag). If you're posting from the web site's "Add comment" widget there is an icon for each. I think you have to be logged in to see that toolbar. When using the icon to insert an image the full url (including http://) has to be entered. I recall having trouble with that once.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 23:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3056</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3055</link>
			<description><![CDATA[hey guys what would happen if you made a mizuno style cell that opperated like a daveys device, mabee even more heat? your presure could be atmospheric less saftey concerns.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 23:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3055</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3052</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here is my proposed circuit http://i.imgur.com/S2dLZgr.png @David Add the html IMG tags in square brackets as per Ecco's post #57 - I have done it manually for you here - Bob]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 21:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3052</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3048</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan Hunt: I meant that it would be weird if it were something caused by LENR occurring inside the CTC cell under testing. I do agree that this is something so small (it's actually at the limit of the instrument's resolution) that it's most likely caused by a fault somewhere or electromagnetic interference, if it's what you're implying.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 21:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3048</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3045</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@david jones: try this one enclosed in IMG tags: http://i.imgur.com/TWxYlPe.png Images gets resized here so it's always useful to also include the image URL without IMG tags so that the larger version can be easily accessed: http://i.imgur.com/TWxYlPe.png The link called "Linked BBCode" is also useful as it produces a clickable image URL pointing to the larger version.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 20:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3045</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3043</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco, yes we need to know if this is physics or instrumentation artifact. It was mentioned that the GC will be moved away from the CTC in a future run. That should tell us. Ed Pell]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 20:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3043</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3042</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin Pell Have you seen my previously posted graph? The increase in GC reading when power is applied is visible even without removing the ambient signal or performing averages: http://i.imgur.com/5AeD0D5.png http://i.imgur.com/5AeD0D5.png It's really weird, however. To me it's likely to be some electrical interference. The very fact that GC readings are being affected by T_Amb should raise some attention.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3042</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3041</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When I subtract the 0.0094*Tamb from the GC and use 15 min averaging I see that when the power is on the GC is above 0.2 and when it is off the GC is below 0.2 It averages about 0.23 when on and 0.175 when off. So the on rate is 31% above the background rate. Would love to see if shielding makes that go away. A nice 2" by 3" by 6" lead brick would do the job. here is the graph on photobucket http://s1292.photobucket.com/user/edpell/media/june4_zpsb1fd37cb.png.html with a 45 min average (boxcar) it looks crisper.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3041</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3040</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well then lets go ahead. I can't see any data btw.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 17:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3040</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3039</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sanjeev: as far as I understand, the power supply used by the HUGTeam is programmable and remotely controllable. I don't think it would be an exceptional feat to make it switch on/off automatically every few seconds or minutes or so. This very basic pulse signal could be arranged and tested at no cost.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 17:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3039</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3038</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, yes it looks straightforward . A pulse generator driving a mosfet will do.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 17:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3038</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3037</link>
			<description><![CDATA[doing something wrong...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3037</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3036</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A simple, push-pull switch to give well defined polarity switching. R1 is the Cell resistance. If people wish to play with the design, download the student version of Microcap. You might need to replace the DE RF FET as this may not be present in the free version. I would design a front end that simply needs a positive TTL pulse (or whatever voltage is available. Then rep-rate is simple to adjust. http://i.imgur.com/S2dLZgr.png Results http://i.imgur.com/L9gRdwB.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3036</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3033</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So finally we are at the stage of pulsing the power. I can't wait ! My guess is that it needs thermal variation, not electrical, so high frequency is not important (of course, if low frequency fails, we can try HF). HF will not produce thermal shocks, it will average out. E.g. see the Rossi report, the frequency is very low. Perhaps too low of current setup, since thermal inertia is low. Rossi's device would have a very high thermal inertia. Recently DGT directly mentioned use of plasma in their device, which they generate using a spark plug (modded). May be adding a spark plug would accelerate the H ion production and act as catalyst ? Can we try that also ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 14:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3033</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3032</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Could some kind person tell me how to post pictures.graphs etc Thanks]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 14:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3032</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3030</link>
			<description><![CDATA[David Jones - I understand now. That looks very nice.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3030</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3029</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ryan Hunt - I can probably design any circuit that you require. I just need all the details. But not straight away – I’m back in Germany next week for more testing of switches for up to a Month. But if you give me the details I can start. I use Micro-cap. It is expensive ~4K. But there is a student version that will do 50 nodes. Further, if you talk to Microcap they may be accommodating and up the node count for you. This means you would be able to look at the simulated output which is useful. I also use Eagle software for the board designs, again expensive ~2k – but it is the industrial standard and there are free versions. Jack Cole – the board is simply the driver. You use it to drive push-pull RF FETs (for example) that are capable of 1kV hold-off , ~ 1.5ns rise times and MHz frequency operation – see below. http://uk.farnell.com/ixys-rf/de275x2-102n06a/mosfet-n-rf-de275x2/dp/1347738]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3029</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3027</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@David Jones Thanks for pointing to the mosfet driver. I have never seen one of that capability before. That and the matching mosfet will certainly be on the list for a good pulse generator. You are very correct. There is little sense to trying a Brillouin style pulse without doing low inductance and careful layout of the whole current path.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 03:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3027</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3026</link>
			<description><![CDATA[(continued) If you are going to be driving high power (which you are), you'll need a heat sink and possibly a fan on them. You could also use a second PWM signal to control the repetition rate, but would need more components.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 01:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3026</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3025</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ryan - if you want optical isolation, you could use 4 solid state relays running off of 1 PWM signal. Get 2 NC and 2 NO relays. Run the same input PWM signal to all of them. Replace the single DPDT relay in the diagram I set earlier with the 4 SSRs. When the PWM signal is on (2.5V), the current will run one direction, and when off, it will run the other. You may not be able to go much over 1khz with that. I guess it all depends on what you want. If you want to run up to 100khz you can use 4 mosfets in an H-bridge configuration (two NPN and two PNP). Standard mosfets might be problem as most require a certain level of input current to achieve the desired level of output current. In such a case, you have to use some smaller transistors and additional power source to drive the mosfets. I have found one type that does not suffer from this problem. https://www.sparkfun.com/products/10256]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 01:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3025</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3023</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Now with the power-in turned off the GC tracks with ambient temperature. Take a look at the 15 min average. Ed]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3023</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3022</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan Hunt: EMI can affect battery operated geiger probes. I was thinking that the CTC cell power supply might be the culprit for those anomalous readings, even if it doesn't feed the probe or isn't used on the same power line. See also my comment here: http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/follow-3/255-lenr-stick-1-loading-complete-and-live-data-streaming#comment-3013 on this matter. Watch this video for an example of EMI-induced false readings: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuGL97jjI3k I don't know where the cell PSU is located exactly, but It could be an idea to test this by placing the Geiger counter right next to it to see if it affects its readings when load is applied. By the way, it appears that the live data feed for the CTC cell is stuck at 21:12 CET.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3022</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3017</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So here's a probably naive question: what does POUT > PIN by a few percentage points mean? I recall this experiment's resolution was pretty high, in the milliwatts range. Is this an indication of excess energy or is it considered a false reading?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3017</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3016</link>
			<description><![CDATA[David Jones - Yes, that looks interesting. Looking at the spec sheet, I don't think it can quite get to what is needed. The pulse width looks good and so does the current capacity. However, the output voltage capacity appears to be limited to ~30-40V if I understand it correctly. Robert Greenyer - It wouldn't hurt to try the relay approach for switching at low rates with the CC. The time, money, and effort investment would be minimal, and existing measurement procedures for voltage and current would continue to be adequate.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3016</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3014</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Jack Cole – exactly so. You need IXYS RF FETS and a driver topology similar to below. But you also need a low inductance topology for your experiments. It all has to be thought out. http://ixdev.ixys.com/DataSheet/9200-2032.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3014</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3012</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dear guys, sorry for beeing a party pooper, but please check this wiki article abt the skin effect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect Looking at the nomogram half the way down, the skin depth will only be useful at higher frequencies. Please keep in mind, that we are dealing with an surface effect in the lower nm range here. Br Dieter]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3012</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3011</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@david jones I would be interested to see a circuit that could do bipolar pulses up to 200V with 40 to 80 ns pulse widths. My understanding is that you need high voltage and high frequency to get the skin effect. Brillouin Energy runs with the specs above with a repetition rate of ~100khz. So, there would be a lot of dead space between pulses.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3011</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3010</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The CTC looks like a very good test platform for experimenting and it sounds like lots of people have ideas for experiments. What's the total manufacturing cost for the unit? Could it be replicated and cost reduced so that it could be available for the garage experimenter?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3010</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3009</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco - sorry did not mean that you should give an explanation - one from Celini would do. Pulsed switching has two advantages that in effect become one. Skin effect and increased peak current for constant power, the skin effect also increases the current density at the surface - so they have the same effect. To do this effectively requires probably switching via FET devices as you can achieve ns risetimes and d.c. to MHz switching frequencies quite comfortably. Which is why I offered to design the circuits.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3009</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Miguel Borges says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3008</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Jack Cole #23 Nice module! Given the low driver current of the relay, i'd risk to control the switch directly (through a series resistor) with a function generator and a square wave. That way, you could control the switching frequency and duty cycle with precision. -- Miguel.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Miguel Borges</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3008</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3007</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, yes, if that is the case, then there is probably no need to delay.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3007</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3005</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, I would suggest not doing that because the reactors running all along with DC are not the same ones currently being used. You won't have a good comparison. If you start without the switching, you will be able to see if the switching makes any difference for excess heating.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3005</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3004</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I made a quick diagram of how you could do it with one DPDT relay. http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/altdc.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3004</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3003</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Jack Cole: the cell has been running with regular DC all along. I would start right away with a relatively quick switching rate.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3003</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3002</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It also might not be a bad idea to run regular DC first for a few days, and then every 24 hours half the rate of switching polarity. Say something like: Every 10 mins Every 5 mins Every 2 mins Every minute Every 30 seconds If you measure the voltage/current before the relay in the circuit, you won't have to worry about the switching polarity in your measurements.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3002</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3001</link>
			<description><![CDATA[(continued) I wouldn't mess with high frequency unless you are going to try to replicate Robert Godes' q-pulse technique. If you try to go that route, you will spend a lot of time trying to get something that will produce a 40 to 80 ns pulse at high power. The other thing is that this will produce RF that interferes with sensors and you would have to have a complicated method of measuring the input power. It's maybe worth doing at some point, but you will unnecessarily complicate what you are trying to do now in my opinion.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3001</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3000</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@#17 Miguel Borges -- I think with standard relays I've been able to get up to ~100hz. It can be a little noisy as the click every time they switch. Still, I don't think Celani is suggesting a rapid rate as I think he would have said "AC." You could actually use just 2 relays (single pole double throw). One circuit is made on the normally open side (when the relay is triggered) and the other is made on the normally closed side (relay not triggered). You could also do it with one double pole double throw relay. Here is what I use (SPDT): http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0057OC5WK/ref=cm_cr_rev_prod_title The relays are rated at AC250V 10A ; DC30V 10A.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3000</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2999</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Johan Eriksson Afaik, they're getting a continuous voltage (V) from the Geiger probe, sampled at regular time intervals. This voltage is then divided by the average background radiation (V0) measured in the HUGTeam lab over a certain period some time back. The end result is plotted in the chart. This is also why it's called "Geiger Counter V/V0". So they're not really "counts" as I've previously written.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2999</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Miguel Borges says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2998</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Jack Cole Do you know what kind of load we're dealing with and what are the specs? max switching freq., currents and tensions involved. Anyway, I think your ideia could be the way forward. Either with relays or with a solid state bridge package. -- Miguel.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Miguel Borges</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2998</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Johan Eriksson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2997</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How is the geiger counter interfaced? Is it a digital counter input that counts each "click" and integrates over a specific time? Or is there some analog conversion involved?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Johan Eriksson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2997</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2996</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ambient temperature seems to affect geiger readings as well: http://i.imgur.com/AjZZUZO.png http://i.imgur.com/AjZZUZO.png Is the probe working correctly? It's like it's just being affected by heat. BTW: I've read that electromagnetic interference (EMI) can affect geiger readings as well.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2996</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2994</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It cut off the bottom of the post so How much stuff do you have to put between the CTC and the GC to get back to background rate? (1mm aluminum, 1cm, 10cm?) Dekalion talks about 0.18uS/hr with 3mm lead(unknown power, unknown distance). This is super interesting data. Ed Pell]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 05:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2994</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2993</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Paul, if i go back to May 17 the GC is at -0.6V and then it goes to +0.5V. What happened? What is the true baseline? In the 22nd to 25th range is is smoothly falling without noise? Why? What is the background rate say from a GC that is shielded with lead (or an environmentally sound equivalent) bricks from the CTC? How do I translate from CG voltage to say uS/hr? Do you have a calibration source or are you using background as calibration? When the input power is shutoff why doesn't the GC go back to background rate? It did once on May 21st??? How much stuff is between the GC tube and the Celani wire? My guess is enough that we are not talking about beta or alpha just gamma??? This looks like the mid-range gammas that Defkalion talks about they see]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2993</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2992</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The theory advanced by Robert Godes proposes that for a sufficiently fast current transient, the electromigratio n force generates a phonon compression wave in the lattice. Because of the skin effect, current density at the conductor surface is quite high for fast pulses, and the resulting phonon energy is thought to promote NAE activation.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 04:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2992</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2991</link>
			<description><![CDATA[On the migration in dc electric flow it is the electrons that flow. Statistically sometimes they get going fast. Then they can knock an atom downstream. At constriction points this can cause thinning of the conductor, this is called electromigratio n. It is the limiting factor for current flow in IC chips. Reserving the flow puts the atoms back where they came from. So far less electromigratio n damage in ac versus dc. Since the whole wire experiences the same current I do not see that there will be thermal gradients. Ed Pell]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 03:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2991</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2990</link>
			<description><![CDATA[On the concentric calorimeter test june 2, from about 14:00 to 19:00 the geiger counter slowly rises about 30% then suddenly drops. The rise and drop coincides with the power pulse. Looking further, it appears that the geiger counter drops every time the power to the Celani wire is reduced to zero. Is this a real reading or an artifact?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 03:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2990</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2989</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In looking at the Rossi paper he uses a dc pulse with about a 5 minute period and 0.33 duty factor. One thing pulses can do is heat up the sample allowing cracks to open up allowing diffusion of H2 into the crack. The off cycle allows cooling and crack shrinking allowing compression of the H2 and maybe disruption of the traditional Bohr orbit in the short direction. Is there any evidence to believe high frequency is needed. I would say turn it on for one thermal time constant of the wire and then turn it off for two thermal time constants and then go negative likewise but I doubt the negative is the important thing. Ed Pell]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 03:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2989</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jack Cole says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2988</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Probably the simplest way would be to use 4 relays in an H-bridge type of configuration. This would be if you don't care about doing high frequency shifting. Otherwise, you could use an H-bridge if you want high frequencies. I think doing high frequencies would require a re-evaluation of measuring input power, but I don't think you would have that problem with relays (particularly if you are going to be switching polarity on the order of seconds or minutes).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Cole</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 02:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2988</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2987</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ron B #4 I've been pursuing this idea for a while in discussions of the powder cell experiment. One amp I like for this application is the Alesis RA150. In bridged mono mode it's rated at 150 watts RMS (8 ohm load), -3 dB bandwidth of 70 kHz, slew rate of 120 v/us. And it's cheap, under $200 new. I've used one in my studio for years and had no problems, so it's reliable too. One problem with this technique is accurate measurement of the input power. A broadband calibrated rms meter (or equivalent a/d hardware) would be needed, and a high sample-rate digital recording of the signal at the cell should be made for analysis of the harmonic content, to support the meter data.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 01:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2987</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2985</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If it's just a few watts that we're after (50-100) I've got this cool audio amp that would work perfect. You could play "Stairway to Heaven" and make the reactor glow. The wire in the CTC is close enough to an 8 ohm speaker that it might just work fine! Currently it's at 7.8479. Hope you're all having a great weekend and some time to yourselves. Remember to spend time with your family. My nephew was the game and preserve officer that went down in the line of duty in Arkansas this past week.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 22:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2985</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2984</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Some food for thought: http://i.imgur.com/5f84mxV.jpg @david jones as for the physics I don't think I'm in the position to explain why exactly (it has to do with getting hydrogen atoms moving to the active sites supposed to induce LENR), but other players in the LENR market appear to be using some sort of impulsive triggering. Pulses do not necessarily have to be of electrical nature, but they are the easiest to set up, I think.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 21:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2984</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>david jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2983</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A bit of physics explaining why, would allay my scepticism. But whatever, if you require unusual and fast switching topologies - give me the switching specs and I will design the switches for you in Microcap and do the board designs in Eagle.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>david jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 20:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2983</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
