<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2803</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ All Quick update. We have found a few bugs relating to the power controller. Our problem was that the power wasn't controlling as tightly as we have seen before. This will be worked on over the weekend and hopefully fixed. In them mean time, we have the controllers working well enough to re-run the tail end of our pre-calibration on the oxide wires. This will be done over the weekend to complete our data set and then next week we will be at the point of loading celani wires inside our cells. In regards to the LENR stick. We are going to pressurize it to 10 bar and let it run over the weekend. Hopefully there will be some more loading and some interesting activity.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 21:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2803</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2801</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie tapp: no, I'm not a member of the MFMP and I don't have nor can afford the equipment for any serious test on a Celani cell replication. I'm just a curious person who happened to have followed this endeavour since its early stages, thinking it would soon provide clear confirmation of LENR. Today I'm less positive than before that it will, but I still keep watching.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2801</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2800</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ecco just wondering are you part of mfmp? you seem to have a lot of knowledge of these expierements and i am in the same mind set and want to see undeniable proof which should be attainable without calimatry. but, i dont want to be pushy on asking for things because these guys are great and trying to make replication easy. so why dont some one do "like you mabee" do sepperate expierements that go outside of celani's box and somehow incorporate it into mfmp website. they might even see something they could use for replication. mfmp should send you an old cell to play with.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2800</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rats says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2796</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the summary.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rats</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 23:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2796</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rats says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2793</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have not posted here in a while. Would it be possible to get a summary of where we are and, more importantly, are we showing excess heat?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rats</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 20:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2793</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2768</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco It should hold, 15 watts is right in the middle of our range. We don't know this for sure. Our preliminary calibration could tell us this once it is completed. @ Edwin I think you are right, especially for Cell A. Though, now we have thermal grease under Cell A's TCs. It should be tighter now like Cell B. How, is the question. We will try to turn off the effect, assuming there is an effect to turn off :) Suggestions will be welcome before that moment arrives.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2768</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2767</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The month of May is going to be very exciting. How about making the range 3 mBar to 10 mBar? It does not seem so constant between 1 mBar and 3 mBar. Step 9 burn time is of interest to me. I hope you have a chance to do this. What do you mean by disable active cell in step 11? How will you disable it? Ed]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2767</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2766</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Does this still hold at different temperatures/in put power too?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2766</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Ellefson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2765</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bravo!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Ellefson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2765</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
