<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 16:34:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Jenifer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9095</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Eveгything іs ѵery open with a very clеar explanation of the challenges. It was definitely informative. Your site is eⲭtremelү helpful. Thanks for sharing! web : How To Password Protect Folder From Scratch]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jenifer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 02:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9095</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2638</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Dieter It was an instrumentation error. It has been fixed! Thanks for your attention to detail!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2638</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2625</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Dieter I see that the oxide wire in the Cell B is actually decreasing instead of increasing, like you would expect from a passively heated wire. The oxide wire in cell A is holding surprisingly constant, but it is increasing like we would expect. The resistance is calculated the same way for both cells, so I don't believe it's a software/comput er issue. However, I recall in cells 1.0 and 1.1 that we saw opposite trends like this between two different celani wires (2 layer and a 14 layer). Again, these were different wires and now we have the exact wire from the same roll. Could there be this much discrepancy from two identical wires? We will be exploring this for a while today. @ Ecco That was a curious event, I saw it yesterday as well. Could it be an environmental effect? I will take a look at that time period this morning.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 14:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2625</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2623</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Malachi, please take a look at the 1.3B cell, the R2_OX value is jumping up and down several times by exact 1 Ohm during the last 8 hours. The R1_OX from the 1.3A cell is constant @13 Ohms ! Is there a calculation error in the live data display ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 06:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2623</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2619</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ All Everything is wired up and we will start a calibration cycle today. When we have three of them done, we will perform some error analysis on the cells to see their accuracy and precision. After that we should be able to swap out the oxide wire for a Celani Wire!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2619</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2616</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Alan G You are right, there were some swapped TC's yesterday. I fixed those and now I am stepping up the power in a vacuum to see how hot we can get the wires in the 0-20 Watt range.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2616</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2613</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Both 1.3 cells now have 2 watts heater input. The temps shown suggest that some of the TC connections for 1.3B might be mislabeled. T2_Mica is substantially lower than T2_Ext2 and T2_Ext3, which doesn't seem right.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2613</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wes Baish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2605</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@all We have stopped V 1.3 tests due to a blowout in the oxide wire in cell B (control). We will have it re-wrapped with new wire and running by noon GMT-5.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wes Baish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2605</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2597</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin Pell Take a look at the last image in this blog http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/follow-2/220-additions-to-the-lab]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 23:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2597</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2592</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The US1.3 data feeds are nicely stable now. Thanks for the hard work and persistence! One detail caught my eye - the NiCr resistance is different between the cells by ~8%. Are the construction and wire batch identical for both cells?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 17:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2592</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2582</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If you would a wider angle view of the experiment would be nice. Thanks. Ed]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2582</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
