Discuss QuantumHeat.org http://www.quantumheat.org Tue, 05 May 2026 12:23:31 +0000 JComments http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25743 Danielgop Tue, 22 Apr 2025 07:10:58 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25743 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25319 ZacharyAlarl Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:57:47 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25319 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23973 Publickt Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:24:47 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23973 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23708 Rickyrix Thu, 17 Apr 2025 05:15:57 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23708 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2035 Robert Greenyer Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:15:13 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2035 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2032 Maxwell61 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:08:04 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2032 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2031 Maxwell61 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:00:37 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2031 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2030 Robert Greenyer Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:35:50 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2030 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2028 Maxwell61 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:41:50 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2028 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2027 Dieter Seeliger Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:03:12 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2027 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2025 Chuck Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:20:47 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2025 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2021 Robert Greenyer Thu, 31 Jan 2013 06:30:54 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2021 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2019 Ascoli65 Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:50:22 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2019 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2018 Ecco Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:36:53 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2018 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2017 Ryan Hunt Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:54:29 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2017 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2016 Ryan Hunt Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:41:49 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2016 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2015 Ecco Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:33:52 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2015 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2011 Ryan Hunt Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:10:18 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2011 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2010 Ryan Hunt Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:03:59 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2010 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2005 Chuck Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:39:14 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2005 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2003 Bruce Ikelheimer Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:18:05 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2003 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2001 Ascoli65 Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:33:48 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2001 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1999 David Roberson Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:02:34 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1999 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1998 Ascoli65 Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:59:40 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1998 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1997 Robert Greenyer Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:54:42 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1997 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1993 Ged Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:53:04 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1993 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1991 Ecco Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:05:34 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1991 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1990 harry v. Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:53:30 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1990 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1988 Ron B Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:59:39 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1988 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1987 Ascoli65 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:44:12 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1987 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1986 Ryan Hunt Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:14:03 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1986 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1984 Ascoli65 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:29:01 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1984 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1983 more IR through glass -> falsely high pout estimate (due to "tape-like" IR absorption by the probe) 2)hydrogen loading -> decresed emissivity (my guess) -> higher wire temperature Point 2) is supported by the article I often cite, http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CerronZebainvestigat.pdf @harry v. Nice objection, maybe the glass in these conditions behaves a bit like an opaque light bulb. Also, the transmitted IR portion is probably less than 10% of the total radiated power. Check this plot and substitute "cell temperature" with "wire temperature" (the graph is from http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/follow-2/104-energy-density-calculations) http://www.quantumheat.org/images/blog/BorosilicatePowerPowerLossPercent.png]]> 123star Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:04:53 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1983 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1982 David Roberson Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:51:26 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1982 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1981 harry v. Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:17:41 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1981 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1979 David Roberson Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:47:19 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1979 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1978 David Roberson Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:35:31 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1978 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1977 David Roberson Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:24:59 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1977 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1975 Ecco Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:53:56 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1975 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1974 123star Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:47:29 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1974 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1973 123star Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:46:59 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1973 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1972 Chuck Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:45:39 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1972 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1971 jfab Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:36:10 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1971 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1968 Ecco Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:48:38 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1968 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1966 jumpjet Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:48:03 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1966 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1965 Ryan Hunt Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:29:52 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1965 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1963 jfab Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:42:13 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1963 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1960 Ascoli65 Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:07:46 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1960 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1959 Ron B Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:18:55 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1959 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1958 jumpjet Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:42:02 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1958 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1957 Dieter Seeliger Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:01:35 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1957 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1956 Ecco Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:31:27 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1956 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1955 Dieter Seeliger Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:30:11 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1955 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1953 Robert Greenyer Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:50:51 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1953 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1952 observer Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:48:07 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1952 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1951 Martin Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:55:26 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1951 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1950 Dieter Seeliger Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:05:21 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1950 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1949 Dieter Seeliger Sun, 27 Jan 2013 07:34:10 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1949 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1947 David Roberson Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:27:54 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1947 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1946 Edwin Pell Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:41:11 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1946 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1945 Edwin Pell Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:38:45 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1945 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1941 David Roberson Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:28:42 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1941 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1939 1/25 20:00 Cell 1.0 When I look at ambient, power in (red and blue) I don't see a reason for the t-well to increase by 1.5 degrees. The bump up in both resistance readings as well as pressure indicate that the internal heat values are real yet the t-glass out doesn't indicate that it ever occurred. Why would t-glass out not indicate it?]]> Ron B Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:02:05 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1939 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1938 Ecco Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:54:08 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1938 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1937 Ecco Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:52:58 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1937 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1936 Robert Greenyer Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:21:43 +0000 http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1936