<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:10:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Eric Walker says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1823</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie tapp, #42 -- about your work on the Davey device, can you write up what you're doing and how you're doing it, post it to some form such as Vortex-L or something similar, and then provide a link here?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Eric Walker</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 23:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1823</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1799</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Maybe allow the data to modify the pitch of a carrier wave, that should work.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 05:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1799</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1794</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: I tried converting today's first 12 hours of raw data from the v1.0 cell from the live page (probably the actual data has a higher sample rate) but I couldn't discern either through audio or spectrograms any interesting pattern. Try opening this on Audacity (an open source audio editing program) so that you can see wave data too: P_out: https://www.dropbox.com/s/v3512zizmkg3fbn/12hours_pout.wav Resistance (Red) https://www.dropbox.com/s/41fjdbpvp6fa4m5/12hours_resred.wav (EDIT: I noticed too late that one of them has a frequency rate set to 8000 Hz rather than 4000 Hz as I intended to do) It takes a too much time doing this manually, but it's feasible. Anyway, at this sample rate I doubt there's much to be seen. Also, input data here is not really wave-like (unlike seismometer traces, for example) so maybe it's not the best candidate for this sort of conversion.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1794</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1792</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco That sir is not a bad idea.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1792</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1766</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: by the way, what is the maximum sample rate of your telemetry system? If it's high enough (like 10-20 Hz or more), selected raw data could be converted into sound, and interesting analysis could be performed in that way.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1766</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1765</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Both cells seem to be dropping in pressure while temp is pretty constant. Over the past 3 days 1.0 dropped about 6% and 1.1 about 12%. Is this leak-down, hydrogen loading or both?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1765</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1763</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: I'm still looking forward to seeing a flash tube firing test. Last time might have been totally coincidental, but there are reasons to think it might be able to affect the cell in unusual ways. Even a low energy camera flash bulb involves when fired several kilowatts of power (over a few milliseconds of time). This can only be performed on glass reactor tubes. Inputting a square DC wave into the active wire should be interesting to try too (not sure if this is the pulsing you were referring about).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1763</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GreenWin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1762</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Congratulations Bob on the expanded and far more detailed tests underway. As you point out, many of these experiments take many days or weeks to reach the levels where Pxs shows significant numbers. Thank you and the teams in US and Europe for this outstanding work.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GreenWin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1762</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1760</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco We have decided to keep these cells running for several weeks ideally over the kickstarter and really play with them in the ways you have described and more. Transient states seam to trigger these effects and we can get the active wire, which is on a programmable PSU to do pretty much anything we want. The passive wire is on a manual supply right now. Currently we are doing an active wire fine power drop test keeping the passive wire constant. This is producing some interesting data, some of which was discussed earlier - In the last few hours, a 1W drop over 2 hours on active wire saw PXs and T_Macor (cell 1.1) remain constant (with noise) or even rising over this time and the subsequent hour and a half. So we may do this fine up down for a while, and then maybe both moving in opposite directions. Since power applied to the active wire should raise its local temperature higher than passive heating, maybe a drop on the passive of 2W accompanied by or followed by a 0.5W rise or so on the active wire might show something interesting. How about putting 45W into active wire say and then for 10s pulsing 60W into it? This is the sort of fun you can have when you have a stable set-up. Imagine that when we have got a reliable experiment there were 100s of people doing this kind of work and reporting back useful findings for others to explore. That is when this science will accelerate and that is the point of the MFMP.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1760</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1759</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: as for the US cell, I think this has already been proposed before, but I'll try anyway: since there does not appear to be much left to do besides waiting for something to happen (high pressure runs can't be attempted since there's no calibration data for them), what about starting a run where for each step in which input power at the active wire gets decreased, power at the heater wire get increased by the same amount? Or attempting instead to temporarily increase significantly power at the heater wire in relatively big steps, up to the limits of the wire itself (should be around 100 Watts) and the glass tube? If excess power is supposed to increase exponentially with heat, then at some point the internal temperature readings should show that, even if the P_xs formula hasn't been calibrated for high power usage.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1759</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1758</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Dieter Seeliger The FLIR cannot see into the cell because of the Glass. Exact wire temp is something we would like to have.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1758</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1757</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert, do you have any idea of the internal wire temp of the active wire during the run? I found some FLIR photos done during the calibration runs, but no temp. BR Dieter]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1757</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1756</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think the interesting thing for me right now as we start to play with the cell is that knocking the cell off a steady state did an interesting thing. About 9 hours ago, the power was lowered on the active wire in cell 1.1 - but the T_Macor temperature went UP - less power - more heat, more excess. the biggest rise being the break from steady state.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1756</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1755</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Andrew Thanks for your kind words, we owe a debt of gratitude to those that have got us to the point where we can see something interesting with just a few months of experience. We hope that with the communities help and perseverance we can deliver a good repeatable experiment that a novice could explore the effect inside a few days. Then the pace of development will rapidly advance. @Andrew and Jeff Please keep looking into this and when we launch the triggering mini-project, please consider working on this. People do not have to be experts to do groundwork and even fairly deep review of techniques reported by others - indeed, doing this kind of groundwork is how people become experts! @Daniel Maris These experiments take a long time, in the EU cell it took over 3 days to load the highly active 350 Layer wires and then things started happening. 5 - 8W over 48W for 48 hours. These wires are far less active with just 14L and 2L - but more robust from structural and electrical failure - like de-lamination and sintering. Science takes time to find a good, reliable, affordable experiment. Given that other types of energy from the atom have not achieved long periods of excess heat in 50 years and Pons and Fleischmann took many months and even Celani's more recent tests needed to run for weeks we are cautiously optimistic that we are finding our way in this uncharted exploration. Often these experiments go up and down a lot before showing something interesting. We believe the wires are now pretty much loaded with something. We suspect that He may be filling the nano sponge and preventing Hydrogen from getting in and so we will have to come up with a calibration method that does not require the active wires to be put into He at loading temperature ranges. We feel that a reasonable number of active layers (say 200+) in a cell configured to reach high temperatures with very low input power will be very interesting to watch and you can see we are working towards that. With critical analysis and help from the crowd - we are making good progress.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1755</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jeff Berkowitz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1749</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here is some work I did on Mr. Godes' patent, in case it helpful. http://pdxlenr.blogspot.com/2012/10/thoughts-about-godes-brillouin-patent.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jeff Berkowitz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1749</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andrew Olson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1748</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For light reading. This is Robert Godes patent application for his control system. He has claimed that all of the information necessary to control the reaction is available in this document. It does look fairly thorough. http://www.google.com/patents/US20110122984?cl=en]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Olson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1748</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andrew Olson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1747</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I'm sure you guys have a plan. This project demands equanimity and thorough analysis. Given the implications, it's nearly impossible to contain excitement. I'd be sitting there in front of the power supply turning knobs, all day. :P Either way, excess heat in a matter of months is a huge accomplishment. This is thankless work right now. I've been telling people about CF for a few years now, and I'm sure some of you have close friends and relatives that think you're having delusions of grandeur and losing your sanity. On behalf of the unknowing masses that will benefit from your work. Thank You!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Olson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1747</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1746</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Andrew The cells are running quite nicely and stable - after the resistance drop has to all intense and purpose stopped we want to play with it a little and your suggestion is interesting. We had considered dropping the passive wire say 2.5W and upping the active wire say 0.5W at the same time on say Cell 1.1 and see what happens. @Ecco Annoys me too, will look into it - thanks for the research.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1746</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andrew Olson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1745</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It would be interesting to see what happens if you leave Blue Power constant, and instead stepping up with Red, go from 25W - 75W - 25W - 75W etc. Play with the amplitude, higher on the way up, lower on the way down, then try the reverse.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Olson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1745</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1744</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP: off-topic, but could you add in the HUGnetView live data page html code some tags to make the page not cache incoming data? I found out that my cache history is full of data from that page, which is useless since the graph script only shows incoming data, not cached data. When the "update with new data" option is enabled, this currently has the effect of needlessly burning write cycles on solid state drives, in addition of displacing data from more or less static websites away from the browser cache folder. On the user side, cache can only be globally disabled. However websites/indivi dual pages can instruct browsers to not cache data coming from them. You could try applying the information here to the live data page: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1341089/using-meta-tags-to-turn-off-caching-in-all-browsers]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1744</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1743</link>
			<description><![CDATA[OK I will wait for this developed cell. Do you have any idea about the price level because I have to fund this experiments from my private pocket.....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1743</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1741</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Dieter Seeliger We will be offerring exact replica cells as the one that seamed to be successful in the first EU run as part of the Kickstarter. They will be supplied with the same "unknown oxide" layer wire that seamed to load with hydrogen to 2.5% and potentially create excess heat to get people started. You purchase of one of these units would really help the project. It will not come with all of the electronics and test gear - however, we are about to launch a Live Open Science mini-project based on Raspberry Pi to replace the laptop etc for the experiments and we hope everyone will then have access to a robust data reporting setup. After the end of our internal investigations and international replications the cell that reliably produces the effect will be made available for sale to help support the ongoing aims of the MFMP.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1741</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1740</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes this would be very nice ! Is it possible to get a ready made cell from you ? 16 channel TC measuring equipment & gas source and power supplies are at hand.. BR Dieter]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1740</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1739</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Dieter Seeliger I think we should launch a Collaborate mini project along these lines. It would be great if you are able to participate and share your ideas.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1739</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter Seeliger says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1738</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Robert If the emission of energy in an LENR reaction comes in bursts of energy which is supposed by some researchers and which correlates very well with some SEM pictures I saw(I think published by Celani), then you should be able to detect some clear audio signatures. This should not be difficult, as hydrogen is known for his high sonic velocity. I had this idea some years ago, but as I have no access to a well equipped lab, I only made some sketches for a cell equipped with some audio picups. Using a good soundcard with a high sample rate would do the job. It should be possible to hook up a piezzo element to your cells with both sides on the same pressure level. Because this kind of detection is more or less "just in time", an audio signature could also be used to control the process if the signature can be clearly identified. BR Dieter]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter Seeliger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1738</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1728</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Andrew Olson Thanks for the slides. I find it amazing that we note the same characteristics in the waveforms with the Celani wire. Whatever is causing this it's great to get correlation between completely different ways of triggering the effect.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1728</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andrew Olson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1726</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The graph of P_xs looks very similar to Brillioun's results with their second phase reactor. (Granted at much lower levels (His cell was insulated)) Slide 4 on this presentation. http://www.brillouinenergy.com/docs.php?doc=phase_2_data]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Olson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1726</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1724</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A couple of ideas occur to me for passive study of cell activity: 1) Look across each of the core wires with a fast storage oscilloscope for any RF activity or spikes that might result from reaction events in the wires. This supposes that the power supplies are RF-quiet and have sufficient inductance on their outputs to present a high impedance at RF frequencies. 2) Time exposure with a sensitive optical camera, with the test area totally dark. This is to look for the surface activity of micro eruptions reported in other LENR research, and would depend on the absence of steady-state visible light glow from the heated wires. A good IR filter on the camera would help.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1724</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1723</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@robert greenyer, on the dc voltage,is it battery or rectified if rectified does polarity matter , doing some studies on a gizmo i found called a daveys device that uses ac power on a bell shaped capacitor,the ac for what ever reson makes the water boil very fast , i do not know why but mabee it is an lenr effect.i do not think it will boil with a plate capacitor only the bell shape mabee presure is a factor.i made one from two doornobs it works realy good,i want to make one out of nickel to see what happens.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1723</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1722</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco - We have not done anything in that room today.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1722</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1720</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: a challenge to the original hypothesis: could it be that the resistance is dropping not because (at least, not directly) of hydrogen absorption, but because the outside nano-structured layers slowly get detached from the inner core due to different thermal expansion, with heat coupled with the penetrating properties of hydrogen gas (sort of acting as a "wedge" for this to happen) ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1720</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1718</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bob, Thanks for the additional details. Since the active wire is still dropping resistance can we assume it's still taking on hydrogen? Notice how the inactive wire resistance seems to track the cell temperature so well, it seems like that response might be a good measure of the cell temp close to the active wire. What's the confidence factor for the excess heat displayed on both cells at this time?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1718</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1717</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Andrew Olsen All are welcome hear, insight can come from anywhere, please - keep thinking and contributing. We are first doing simple passive and active heating and then look at more dynamic environments. We intend to launch a few mini projects in the Collaborate section on this area. @Charlie Tapp DC voltage - at similar power and above Celani's experiments . Celani had a smaller area of the cell with the same length of wire, this combined with a far more active wire (well in excess of 360 layers) meant he could achieve higher temperatures with smaller input. We are building a cell with a more tightly wound active area at the moment. @Chuck Wire has been scraped clean but is under pressure contact.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1717</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chuck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1715</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Are the connections between the power supply and the wire purely ohmic? In particular, what's the nature of the connection at the points where the celani wire enters the system? Is it welded or attached with some sort of solder? If it's purely a pressure-contac t connection, that could be a source of some of the noise we're seeing, especially if the surface of the wire hasn't been scraped clean at the connection point.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1715</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1714</link>
			<description><![CDATA[what is being used for a power source is it ac or dc and what voltage and is it the same as celani setup?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1714</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andrew Olson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1713</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've noticed that the P_xs seems to oscillate a bit when under a constant power as if the wire has some sort of resonance. Do you think it might be reasonable to try and oscillate the input power along with the oscillation of P_xs kind of like pushing a kid on a swing? Maybe that's why Robert Godes calls his catalyst the Q-"Wave". Just a thought. Disclaimer: Not a scientist.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Olson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1713</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1711</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It looks like public access to the live feed got lost.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1711</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1710</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just set the heating wire to 60 Watts and starting to ramp up the Celani wire to near full power over 2 1/2 hours in 30 5 minutes steps. If a trigger does occur, we may not see it because of the increasing power. If we do see it we'll know what temp and current it happened at.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1710</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1708</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Now that the extra power supplies are on there, we have a dilemma because we only calibrated up to about 100 W. We will push that limit first before attempting to extend the calibration formula into uncalibrated ranges. We are, in fact, already pushing the calibration by testing with both wires heating when we only calibrated with the red channel heating. It appears to be within the confidence limits for the most part, though.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1708</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1707</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What ist the maximum total input power you're planning to apply?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1707</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1706</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We are shutting the cells off so we can install independent power supplies on the blue channels. Then we can push the power and temp up in the cells.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1706</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1705</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Data is back online. So far nothing special to report. For 1.0 T_Well is reading 5C higher than T_Mica, which means one of the sensors has a problem.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1705</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1704</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Offt-opic, but I'm seeing just now that according to the experiment log, the EU cell is being loaded in hydrogen with the 2L Celani wire. It would have been nice to read a notification about it in comments or as a blog post and to see the public data stream for the EU cell fixed for the occasion (it's not working at the moment).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1704</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jeff says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1702</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm particularly interested in the answer to Chuck's question (#19). Is electrical current in any way essential to what's being tested here?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 04:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1702</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1701</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The internet connection to our research campus is down this evening. We are working on it, but it may take till morning to get it working. Sorry for the inconvenience.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 04:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1701</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chuck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1700</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm sure there's a lot about this project that I don't understand, so please forgive me for asking stupid questions. Am I correct in assuming that any nuclear effect is anticipated to be occurring on the surface of the treated Celani wire? If so, what's the point in heating the wire by running a current through it? Wouldn't indirect heat be more than satisfactory? Introducing the variable of an electrical current through the wire would seem to me not be desirable.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 23:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1700</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1699</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan Hunt: another reason for just increasing power at the active wire (though I understand there might be technical constraints against doing so ie too much current likely to damage the nanostructures) is that temperature sensors might respond differently (ie show a higher temperature) when the heater wire is used or generates the most heat. I thought of this yesterday after seeing that when the heater wire was used, P_xs calculations were higher. Under conditions where no or very little excess heat is being produced (where the cells yesterday were supposedly), that shouldn't happen at all. I do remember that in the horizontally mounted cell tests were performed to determine if temperature sensors responded the same way for both wires, given the same input power, but was this done for the new vertically mounted cells? I could have missed these tests, so sorry if you've already made them.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1699</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1698</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco. We have been told that more than 1.9 amps is likely to damage the nano structures that are believed to be the active sites. We're are 1.75 amps, so we can go up a bit, yet. If I want to be sure the surface of the wire is at 350C, though, I will need to put more power into the heater wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1698</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1696</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Woohooo.. getting some xs action now!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1696</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1695</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Now we're seeing some resistance dropping. I think these wires like higher temperatures.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1695</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1694</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just turned on the NiCr heating wire in addition to the active wires to try to run at a higher temp. Right now we have only one power supply per cell and we switch it between wires. If this doesn't get the wire itself up to a trigger temp, then we'll have to add another power supply and try again.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1694</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>drew says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1692</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Hugnet is telling that the FC0101 , created never modified never I'm sure I'm not the only confused person :cry:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>drew</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1692</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1691</link>
			<description><![CDATA[FC0101 & FC0103 are the 2 active cells (active Celani wires a at least part loaded and have power running in them) - FC0104 is the EU cell undergoing calibration and FC0101 is extra environment data for the 2 US cells. All data seams to be working fine for me here on a 3G connection in India. Please wait for a little time after clicking on the data feed link as the site is receiving a lot of traffic at the moment. It is not expected to be producing any excess heat at the moment as the cells are running too cool but the active wire resistance is dropping which indicates that the wires are still absorbing Hydrogen. Which is good.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1691</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>drew says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1690</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm not having the same problems as others I think(?), why can I only see temperature data and no power data for cell FC0102 (cell 1.1)? I thought both cells are 'active'.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>drew</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1690</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1689</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Clovis, I had that problem too. You have to use the 4 hour view, as the 30 minute one shows no data for some reason.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1689</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>clovis ray says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1688</link>
			<description><![CDATA[SORRY, I GET THE HUGNETVIEW SITE , BUT NO DATA.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>clovis ray</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1688</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1687</link>
			<description><![CDATA[http://data.hugnetlab.com/ works for me.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1687</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>clovis ray says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1686</link>
			<description><![CDATA[HI, WHERE DO WE FIND THE DATA FEED, ALL I CAN FIND IS NO PREVIEW, AM I MISSING SOMETHING, THE OLD HUGNETvIEW, IS BLANK. AND THE LINK YOU GAVE ON E-CAT WORLD DON'T WORK,.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>clovis ray</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1686</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1685</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Certainly it's not encouraging that excess heat according to the previously used calculation isn't currently being reported. I find somewhat worth of attention, however, that on the v1.1 cell there appears to be a lower p_out than during yesterday's indirectly heated run.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 12:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1685</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1683</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@David No real expectation at this cell temperature - the wires still seam to be loading a little so little chance of seeing excess power at the moment. Need to up the cell temperature after things have really stabilised - maybe with the other wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 08:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1683</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1682</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A run of my time domain program demonstrates that there appears to be no evidence of LENR activity within the Celani wire during this brief run. The live data leads me to conclude that approximately -3.2 watts of excess power is calculated by observing the outer glass temperature. This figure is compared to the calibration using NiCr just prior to when the Celani wire was introduced. The time domain response of the waveform falls very close to the predicted curve when the input power step is reduced by the above 3.2 watts. If an actual endothermic reaction were occurring, I would have expected to see more variation from the ideal function as the temperature increased. It seems plausible to assume that the amount of endothermic reaction occurring would depend upon the instantaneous temperature of the system. Simulation Data: cell 1.0 1/13/2013 5:03 to 1/13/2013 6:37 by live data.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 07:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1682</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
