<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:13:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1664</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We are on the way now. Congratulations guys, and thanks for the special request! I just analyzed the 49 Watt step and the calculated power input is very much in line with that of earlier today. My program suggests that the power is 47.04 watts input versus the actual that is approximately 48.9. The time domain behavior is stable and matches the calculated curve so all is well. I will review the data that I used for the calibration and see why the small error hangs around. My work is with cell 1.0 for this information. As the power slowly falls off from 49 watts to 48.8 watts it is very easy to observe on my chart.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1664</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nicolas Chauvin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1656</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We are having a little issue with the ambient temperature. I turned on the air flow inside the vent hood. I thought it could average the ambient temperature by mixing the air around the cell. It was actually a bad idea and it is amplifying the oscillation of the room temperature control. I will turn the air flow off asap.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nicolas Chauvin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1656</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andrew Olson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1655</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am no scientist so forgive me if I am making so sense. But looking at the curve of P_xs after you powered down on cell 1.1 it almost seems like you would have much more excess power if you sort of intermittently pumped power to the wire instead of a constant charge?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Olson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1655</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1654</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks guys for giving me a test run of data to analyze at the power transfer between the inactive wire and the Celani wire. A quick run of my program suggests that the NiCr inactive wire is now reading approximately -1.9 watts as compared to the original calibration. The Celani wire reads -2.3 watts under similar conditions. The amount of data that I had to analyze is very limited at the exact switch point, so noise is affecting the readings somewhat. The best conclusion I can reach in this case is that the Celani wire allows .4 watts less power to be registered at the glass outside. I will post the calibration data to this message soon.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1654</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1652</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Are there plans to improve ambient temperature control?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1652</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kapytanhook says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1651</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I live close to germany, do you guys allow visits, this stuff has really spiked my intrest, also would not mind swinging by Lausanne some day if possible. Would like to aid in some ways.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kapytanhook</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1651</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
