<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:08:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1660</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's some info that may bear on why T_mica behaves differently for the two cells: from http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.1967-288 http://magicsound.us/MFMP/reflectance-mica3.jpg and from http://accuratus.com/macorprps5.html http://magicsound.us/MFMP/reflectance-macor2.jpg (This older data is for thin mica and might not be accurate) Note the difference in far infrared reflectance (above 15 microns), suggesting that the mica will absorb more radiated energy at moderate wire temperatures than Macor.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 21:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1660</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1658</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nice! I'm going to watch this carefully in real time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1658</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1657</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ALL US CELLS BEING LOADED WITH H2]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1657</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1650</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I second David's approach (thank you David) of running power through the passive wire in the 1.0 cell and see if it has the same offset. @All Nicolas is starting calibrations on the EU cell which will also be taking a 2L wire like the 1.1 cell in the US - both of the same type as ST Microelectronic s used in their very different calorimeter. @Media The MFMP has no relationship past or present with ST Microelectronic s.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1650</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert N. Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1649</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I belive you are correct in assuming that the 14 layer oxide coating on the Celani wire is not consistant over the length of the wire and generating hot spots along the length. Pictures with the IR camera would be really good for diagnosing the oxide layer quality of the wire. The new calorimeters you are developing would average out the hot spots and give a more acurate reading of total power, however a non-homogenious oxide coating would have other problems in over all preformance.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert N. Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1649</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1648</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When I run the latest numbers in my simulation, I get lower power output by about 2.5 watts as compared to earlier calibrations. This result is similar to what I obtained with the data just prior to the rotation of the cell. I am analyzing data for cell 1.0 for this result. It is not clear why the lower power is present, but it might be due to something associated with the Celani wire. I would like to see heating at the same levels and abrupt step by the other wire before the hydrogen is introduced. I consider the requested test very valuable. It is important to ensure that the unusual conditions are analyzed before introduction of hydrogen which will complicate the processes.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1648</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1647</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looking absolutely fantastic guys! I am enjoying how tight this data is shaping up to be.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1647</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nicolas Chauvin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1646</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great job Paul, Ryan on the thermal shut calorimeter. It looks very promising !]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nicolas Chauvin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-1646</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
