<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-612</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan Hunt: here's a very simple 3d version: http://i.imgur.com/NR17I.png (larger: http://i.imgur.com/NR17I.png ) In practice I think you might want the heater (blue) wire have one or two more turns on both mica ends in order to heat the active wire (red) more uniformly.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-612</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Eric Walker says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-610</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Regarding "repairing" the Celani wire by heating it in oxygen, see the article, "Are Oxide Interfaces Necessary in Fleischmann–Pon s-type Experiments?", here: http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol8.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Eric Walker</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 06:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-610</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-605</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nice picture, Ecco. Maybe we can work that into the next gen cell.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 03:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-605</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-604</link>
			<description><![CDATA[About wire wounding style. Would this make sense to you? http://i.imgur.com/HOzte.png (larger version: http://i.imgur.com/HOzte.png ) Red: active wire - above Yellow: active wire - below White: heater wire - above Gray: heater wire - below Wouldn't this arrangement allow heat to spread more uniformly along the reactor length? It would also keep both wires always at a distance between each other. Little to no risk of short-circuitin g.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 02:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-604</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-603</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Very nice pictures! Dang... this is saddening if indeed the wire is damaged, and would confirm some suspicious.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 02:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-603</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>James Bryant says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-596</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thank you for such excellent pictures. Please accept a question from the peanut gallery. How many times have you rewound this same wire? There must be a limit..Especial ly considering the SEM pics you posted that revealed separation back then. New wire time?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>James Bryant</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-596</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-594</link>
			<description><![CDATA[BTW, during the first loading you used an input power of 50W, this time it's a bit less.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-594</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-592</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes we had fun attempting the repair. I am preparing a video and blog post with some data.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-592</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-591</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Lu: I'm not a MFMP team member, but if it got damaged, in my opinion either it was already so, or it got damaged during one of the first runs where almost 100W have been applied on it directly for an extended period of time. Maybe high input power should be attempted using mainly the heater wire. From the photos it looks thick enough to be able to withstand a large power, and in case it might even be replaced with a thicker one. By the way, as of now it looks like active wire impedance is starting to drop markedly, not sure if as much as during the first hydrogen loading though.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-591</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-588</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's interesting to see, if you did heat it in oxygen, that the impedance of the active wire appears to have almost reverted back to the starting (pre-loading) value.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-588</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>wookie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-586</link>
			<description><![CDATA[are you heating in O2 now , attempting to repair it?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>wookie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-586</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-585</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The image link for the enlarged version of the second image is the same as the first one. It should be: http://www.quantumheat.org/images/blog/DSC04824.JPG]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-585</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
