<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:02:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-561</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ryan, Have you noticed any gamma emissions since the tests have started? The test plan called for having this monitored by the computer, is that completed? Is there any plan to put that item on the log window? Any idea what the least amount of time that Celani had a new wire running before he found any AH? When I read the paper by Celani I noticed times which appeared to be days. Do you expect less than that and if so, why?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-561</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>robiD says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-558</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Actually the T_mica got around 290°C but at 15:50 the P_in decreased from 113W to 100W, did you planned to do so, or was there any problem? Would have been interesting to see what happened for long time around 290°C.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>robiD</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-558</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-557</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And also: 4) How much power can the heater wire withstand? It might be an idea trying to reach higher temperatures using only this one at high power - let's say 150-200W - since there are indications that passing current through the active wire might cause the anomalous heat effect to not appear in certain cases. This might be combined with the previous ideas.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-557</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-556</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ged: actually, before input power was backed off a bit, it hit 293 C, yet with no effect. It would have been interesting to measure wire temperatures with the IR probe. I wonder if it actually went over 350 C locally. As of now no excess heat has been clearly detectable yet; however there are several things that can be done before dismantling the reactor and trying to refit the existing wire, a new one or adding thermal insulation: 1) Increase temperatures further - if the activation temperature can be as high as 350 C, aim for 10% more. 2) Increase hydrogen pressure - perhaps 0.8 bar of hydrogen pressure (at working temperature) is not enough. Put back 3.5 bar or even attempt 7.0 bar (might need a lower input power to avoid explosions), which might also improve wire loading. 3) As somebody else suggested, try wrapping the reactor with a sheet of aluminum foil. This should help containing IR radiation within the reactor.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-556</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-555</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looks like the mica's hit 273 C, but I don't see any apparent affects yet.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-555</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-552</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ged: with a final total input power of 114W I suspect T_Mica won't be able to increase over 290° C, assuming no excess heat. Local peak temperatures on the active wire might be significantly higher than this, however (it would be nice if it heated uniformly). @Enrique: maybe you mean this? https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1e3t4J-x208AIlt1dwQ2Wo2MVgjgnocAWH63ivL5R0oM (to the MPMP team: please use zip compression for csv and xls files!)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-552</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Enrique says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-551</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Cant find test definitions in http://hugnetlab.com/hugnetlab/ is online ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Enrique</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-551</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>wookie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-538</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ged yeah, after all as i understand it, the unknown is still ahead and the behaviour at higher temps/pressure in this cell is too ? truly exciting]]></description>
			<dc:creator>wookie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-538</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-536</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is exciting. Maybe we can finally get past the "magical" 270 C and even up into the 300 C's, safely. Keeping an eye on it all! Really glad for this great idea suggestion.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-536</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>wookie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-534</link>
			<description><![CDATA[thanks for the update. +75 % heat in the cell ? wasnt the max temperature in the previous run around 260 C ? an index woul be awesome. i know u guys dont sleep much these days. thank u!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>wookie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-534</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
