<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 21:27:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Lu says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-491</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Since the goal is replication of Celani, one difference is the amount of amperage currently going through the active wire--almost double what Celani used. One option, offered as a suggestion to consider, is to drop the amperage down to Celani's level (48A?) and run enough through the other wire to bring the overall temperature up to 250-350C. I think calibration will still be good but if we do activate the reaction then it will be very obvious anyway.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Lu</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-491</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-488</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Has Celani produced a many of these wires or are there only a few in existence? Will it be possible for the HUG team to be able to produce them in the future? Has anyone coined a name for these wires? ie C-wire or c-biscuit lol I see that this question has been asked/answered already.. I missed that earlier.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 15:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-488</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-483</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I get the impression the glass temperature is less steady at this lower pressure (or for some other reason), but not completely sure.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-483</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-482</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is it possible for you to point the IR gun directly at each of the internal thermocouples? That might be a quick way to determine whether or not the glass and gas, etc. are modifying the readings due to IR absorption. If you knew the temperature accurately at certain points that could serve as a calibration of first order.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 05:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-482</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-480</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Once reactor conditions at the current power level have stabilized (in 15-20 minutes?), I would try performing a manual temperature check with the IR probe on the wire, to see how is the temperature gradient this time with a starting pressure of 0.5 bar. I'm thinking that with lower gas pressures the difference between the low and the high temperature points might get higher, which I'm not sure would be a good thing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 23:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-480</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
