<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-308</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Sanjeev The wire is loading with Hydrogen at T 150 causing resistance to drop. The resistance going up is evidence of the effect ie the H is being used or loss of H from the wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 02:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-308</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-307</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The resistance is rising steadily, which may mean that the reactor is not operating at optimal temperature. I guess T_Mica = 150 C would be a good try since the resistance shows favorable behavior in that range. Perhaps this can be tried after a day or two and after some more loading-reloadi ng cycles.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-307</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-305</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ David We are going to be crunching numbers and taking a view on the excess calculation metric. Thanks again for your input - it feels like we have you and others on the team and that gives me a warm fuzzy. With regard to the success so far - we re-created some of Celani's findings, saw interesting things and showed how important energy loss is to the system. Frankly - if, after successful loading, we had turned on the reactor and produced excess heat, I am not sure we would have learnt much and it is a pretty boring story - well.. kinda! This is far more interesting. Thanks for your support. @Andrew It would be totally awesome if you could build a cross-platform tool like that and we could host it on the MFMP site - would be great. Please also allow us to open source the code for others that may add value. Thanks! @Nicolas 68 Gb in 24 hours!!- with nearly no one knowing about this! I think we might need to consider Torrents for 12 hour chunks of raw data with previous data to the current 12 hours at a smoothed data rate with much lower granularity.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-305</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-301</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Nicolas Chauvin: just to state this again, there's much room for bandwidth usage optimization in the live data page, considering that most people probably only want to see data plotted on the website, preferably in real time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-301</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nicolas Chauvin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-300</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I added the link to the source code in the article for those interested. Moreover, for people having problem to download CSV file from the live graph HUGnetView page, we currently set a limitation due to limited bandwidth. You can download 4h of data, but not 12h. For your information, 68 Gb of data was downloaded in less than 24 hours - this is a HUGE amount of bandwidth at a time when hardly anyone knows about this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nicolas Chauvin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-300</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-299</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And I forgot to add a 'thank you' to the MFMP people Thank you]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-299</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-298</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think this is a fascinating experiment - not only because it is open to comment and scrutiny online, but because it is a very difficult experiment to do with many variables to be quantified. This all takes time and care but above all it takes experience gained working with the experimental set up. I suspect people may be a bit disappointed that there was no positive result. But on a first run? – never happens… But so far it has been a really great start.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-298</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>J. Andrew Key says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-296</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Can you provide a link to the source code for the data processing tool? I'm interested in porting your algorithm to a FOSS language like Java or Python.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>J. Andrew Key</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-296</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-295</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have been looking at that inverse correlation too. As t_ambient rises, the T_rise gets smaller, giving the inverse relationship. It takes a little while for the cell to come to equilibrium and give a valid measurement of P_xs after that. I am hoping to see everything relatively steady for 45 minutes before I have a lot of confidence in the output.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-295</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andre Blum says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-294</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I buy that. Thanks David.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andre Blum</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-294</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-292</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Andre Perhaps this is due to the perspex safety shield not only shielding the researcher for safety but also thermally shielding the Celani tube from the ambient room temperature. It can be problematic if ambient room temperature is a significant factor in an experiment - because where do you measure it and how uniform is it? This is why in these types of experiments a Delta T across a boundary layer of the apparatus sometimes is the most accurate.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-292</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andre Blum says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-291</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am a bit worried by the apparent (inverse) relation between P_xs and ambient temperature. This morning there was a sudden increase in ambient temp, probably due to room heating starting, P_xs dropped significantly. Plotting both signals in a graph shows a very symmetric relation. This is not what I would expect. Could there be an error in the calculation? Keep up the spirit!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andre Blum</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-291</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Christian says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-290</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi guys, I am trying to download the latest CSV data but the link to the tests is blank? Do I still have the correct link or this is now blank? Here is where I go : http://hugnetlab.com/hugnetlab/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-290</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-286</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You are offering an excellent solution to the large quantity of data overload. As you know, a lot of important information is hidden within the raw data that might prove critical to understanding.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-286</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nicolas Chauvin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-284</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good point! We will add a resource page. Nicolas]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nicolas Chauvin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-284</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-276</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Will try this later. I propose again the creation of a "resource" page where software tools like this one (or the Java one posted in another thread, to make quickly charts of csv files) can be listed together, for people interested in data analysis.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-276</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
