<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 23:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-250</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Apologies - glassin-glassou t and not as posted]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-250</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-249</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Robert – Thanks for the reply. I agree entirely with what you post. My point was not too well put. If the data is very marginal you might just see an effect in the mica temperature readings that is lost in the glassout readings. This would not constitute any useful proof, but would be a start. The other point (as you have stated) is that glassout-glassi n must be proportional to the heat flow through the glass and subtracting one from the other will reduce the spread in the calibration curves and hence increase the signal to noise. Any way good luck – this has got to be one of the most exciting experiments I have ever followed]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-249</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-248</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So, should we watch preferably (on the live data page, although there are often long periods where no data is received) the external glass temperature instead, right? What is the trigger temperature at the external glass surface, by the way?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-248</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-247</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi David, Last night in communication with Celani - he advised that the internal T-Mica was not good to use for some of the reasons you have identified. He said we must use the outside glass temp - so the numbers were crunched and the live feed excess power estimation is configured now for this based on calibration run data. Whilst there is a much longer delay now between current applied and temperature stabilisation on the outside, we are much more comfortable that the reading is around zero at the moment as we are below trigger temperature.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-247</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-246</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Other calculations you can do (in the analysis later) is to subtract the glass out temperature from the mica temperature and as you previously suggested the glassout temperature from the glassin temperature. Both these calculations should reduce the data spread.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-246</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rats says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-244</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I'd like to second what edog has suggested. For those of us who are interested in LENR, but not too technically inclined, a layman's explanation would be much appreciated if you have time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rats</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-244</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>edog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-243</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Guys and Girls at MFMP. First of all.. Good Luck! I was just wondering if any of you have time, would it be possible to get some layman explanations of what is going on? and why you are doing things? and what all the terms and values mean? I am not sure if you have like.. a cheat sheet or experiment schedule online here somewhere? I have looked but didnt find.. or didnt realise what I was looking at? But if there is someone there .. who could fill us, not so intelligent folk, in on what is happening? I would be appreciated!! :) and I do like the blog entries, they are very down to earth and have a inclusive feel to them! Thanks!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>edog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-243</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-242</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Monitoring the outer glass temperature makes a great deal of sense. I suggest that you make a strong effort to prevent air currents from extracting heat from this surface to reduce variability. The possible IR direct heating effect upon the glass should be further analyzed to ensure that the measurements are valid. There remains a question as to why the outer glass temperature seems to exhibit an impulse like response to a power input negative pulse of greater duration. Is it possible that the multiple paths and time frames for net heat flow are interacting? Thanks for the excellent work.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-242</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
