<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 23:25:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-238</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In the Celani report the strange noise tended to be associated with excess power. It is interesting to see that you appear to have it at this point. Now, let's measure that excess power and celebrate!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-238</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlainCo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-224</link>
			<description><![CDATA[thanks to share that with us. Will it be possible to measure excess heat from that run ? I've noticed that the impedance measured is quite noisy. Is it normal ? Does it happens with Helium run, or with NiChrome wire ? Does this already mean something "heretic" happens. dis you measure the spectrum shape of that noise (1/f noise maybe ? classic flat or 1/f^2 ?). One can gain insight about what is happening in the wire by the spectrum of the noise....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlainCo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-224</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-223</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As I've written in the previous post, following Francesco Celani's suggestion here, it would be interesting to measure the wire impedance after multiple, consecutive loading>cooldow n cycles. It might prove to be an effective way to increase loading (decrease R/Ro) quickly and maybe more than it would normally be possible. By the way, looking at the chart posted above, maybe 45 minutes aren't enough to reach thermal equilibrium for each power step.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-223</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
