<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-138</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We have two wires in the Celani 1 cell (Celani wire and a NiCr wire). We are able to switch the power from one to the other (for independent heating) or both wires at the same time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-138</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-137</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think Al Potenza's suggestion is excellent. Once all your runs are complete you can incrementally add wires to your chamber and verify the increase in power output (if indeed there is any). This would be a powerful experiment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-137</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-128</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Whilst the Celani wire is now in the cell. The wire is currently unloaded, that is to say, it does not contain H atoms in its lattice in a way that would enable the effect. We must first run the "active" Celani wire in non active state first for control. Then we must go through the loading process. This is a critical stage and needs to be done carefully. Only after this do we even dream of seeing the effect. We have to perform controls first as after the specific loading process Celani reports that the wire is very reluctant to give up H. It gets wired... ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-128</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-127</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think this thermal lag is not a problem. When you are operating with hydrogen you will be slowly increasing the power input (I assume). As you do, this will show initially as a net energy loss due to the thermal lag before returning to zero. If any excess energy is present above a certain temperature, the time constant and magnitude of the thermal lag will diminish, furthermore, the graph should then return to a steady state position showing excess energy. This I think is useful in this experiment. No matter how detached you try to be in an experiment you are always willing the experiment to show the outcome you want and this is where experimental bias can creep in. In this situation, you know initially a negative energy will be shown and accept it, this will calm you down. Further, as you conduct the experiment it will also indicate that the diagnostics are working as they should – very important when you are hyped up on an experiment – believe me…]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-127</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
