<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:12:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Laurene says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-29888</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have to thank you for the efforts you've put in writing this site. I am hoping to view the same high-grade content by you later on as well. In truth, your creative writing abilities has inspired me to get my own site now ;) My web blog: หวยออนไลน์: https://Conte-Nu.com/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Laurene</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2025 22:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-29888</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jorge says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-28065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This guide breaks down roofing material costs, regional pricing variations and key considerations to help you make an informed decision about your roof replacement. my blog post; futbol7andujar. com: http://futbol7andujar.com/component/kide/historial/-/index.php?option=com_kide]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 03:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-28065</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ZacharyAlarl says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-27514</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Подскажите где найти лучшие рецепты со всего мира: от классических блюд, которые согревают душу, до современных кулинарных шедевров, которые впечатляют даже самых взыскательных гурманов - https://hexagon.vn/2023/06/22/harnessing-the-power-of-social-media-for-business-growth - простые рецепты в домашних условиях]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ZacharyAlarl</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-27514</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Danielgop says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26631</link>
			<description><![CDATA[MEGA гарантирует безопасность, защита и высокую скорость работы. У нас https://xn--megweb17-4dd.com вы найдете своеобразный маркетплейс, где можно купить любые позиции всего за несколько секунд. Важно тщательно изучить предложения и выбрать самое выгодное для вас. Обратите внимание на отзывы клиентов, они помогут вам найти надежных продавцов. https://xn--megweb18-4dd.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Danielgop</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 07:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26631</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ug44zef says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26314</link>
			<description><![CDATA[А ты удовлетворены своим такси? С каждым днём всё больше шофёров недовольны на маленький доход, а пассажиры — на качество сервиса. Почему так происходит? Не время ли что-то исправлять? https://51metr.ru/taksi-sochi-kak-vybrat/ Мы, как команда с опытом, считаем, что удобство и безопасность должны быть основой. Что считаете? Каким должно быть хорошее такси в 2025 году? Пишите своё мнение — ваше мнение ценно!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ug44zef</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26314</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SamuelTucky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25547</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Кракен официальный сайт: Ваша тёмная сторона | трамадол купить без рецепта наркошопы в телеграме - https://electropeople.info/index.php?showtopic=1882&st=0&p=0001 Когда речь заходит о покупке товаров в даркнете, KRAKEN торговая платформа занимает лидирующие позиции благодаря удобству и безопасности. площадка предлагает широкий выбор товаров и услуг, а также предоставляет гарантии для пользователей. Она также использует продвинутые системы защиты, такие как двухфакторная аутентификация и эскроу-сервисы, что гарантирует безопасность транзакций и защиту от мошенничества. площадка KRAKEN даркнета является популярным местом где можно Купить героин, но важно понимать, что это сопряжено с серьезными рисками для здоровья. Многие продавцы предлагают вещества, которые могут содержать опасные примеси, что может привести к отравлению или передозировке. Поэтому, если вы все-таки решились на покупку, тщательно проверяйте качество товара и внимательно следите за репутацией продавца. трамадол таблетки купить - https://dev4ata.lv KRAKEN площадка Телеграмм]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SamuelTucky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25547</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SamuelTucky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25472</link>
			<description><![CDATA[кракен вход на сайт: Защита вашей конфиденциально сти | амфетамин купить телеграмм даркнет маркетплейс - https://reefaqua.net Мы строго соблюдаем политику конфиденциально сти и защищаем данные наших клиентов. В наркошоп Kraken мы не передаем личные данные третьим лицам и применяем современные методы защиты информации. Каждый день мы работаем над тем, чтобы усовершенствова ть систему безопасности. Подробности политики конфиденциально сти на наркошоп Кракен. Кракен — это одна из самых безопасных платформ для покупки марихуаны через даркнет. онлайн-площадка использует криптовалюты для защиты сделок, что гарантирует полную анонимность. На Kraken вы можете безопасно купить марихуану и избежать рисков, связанных с анонимными покупками. Больше детальной информации про то как купить марихуану можно узнать на нашем сайте. купить амфетамин сайт - https://people-forum.com Kraken площадка Telegram]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SamuelTucky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 21:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25472</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Danielgop says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-24647</link>
			<description><![CDATA[мега официальный сайт мега ссылка - инновационный анонимный рынок, работающий посредством позиций моментальных магазинов, доступных в любом городе РФ и СНГ. Площадка MEGA с развитой инфраструкторой продажи и отличными селлерами и услугами. Каждому пользователю необходимо посетить данный сайт mega link и найти для себя, что-нибудь новое и полезное. Быстрое пополнение баланса, внутренний обмен, различные способы оплаты, а также анонимность переводов. Самая защищенная площадка. Обеспечивает максимальный уровень безопасности. Устройте себе феерию удовольствия и прекрасного настроения. https://xn--m14-psa.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Danielgop</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 16:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-24647</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rickyrix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23645</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Step into the shoes of a classic British detective in this thrilling online slot game. It’s not just another online slot — it’s a full-on detective journey through one of the most stylish eras in history. Every detail — from the reels to the background music — contributes to an unforgettable slot game experience. Click here to play this Victorian-theme d casino slot and dive into the mystery: http://www.parayanken.net/?p=200177 Your next favorite online slot might just be this one — themed, thrilling, and full of surprises.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rickyrix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23645</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rickyrix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23184</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If you're a fan of Sherlock Holmes-style adventures, this Victorian-theme d casino slot will blow you away. Whether you're a casual player or a serious slot fan, this casino experience pulls you into its story with every spin. Expect high-quality design, exciting bonus features, and symbols straight out of a 19th-century London crime story. Ready to uncover the secrets of this unique slot? Start your adventure here: https://steamindonesia.id/1xbet-oficialnyj-sajt-bukmekerskoj-kontory-vhod-na-31/ Solve the mystery, spin the reels, and unlock big rewards in this standout casino slot.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rickyrix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23184</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tania says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-22663</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say tthat I haqve truly enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I will be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon! Feel free to surf to my blog: RDP Murah: http://Sfwater.org/redirect.aspx?url=https://www.mapleprimes.com/users/eogernqiot]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tania</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-22663</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jacquie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-19792</link>
			<description><![CDATA[WOW just what I was looking for. Came here by searching for Locksmith association My site Key Cutting: https://Mobilelocksmithwallsend.CO.Uk/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jacquie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 21:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-19792</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ellen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-17409</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It is not my first time to go to see this website, i am visiting this web site dailly and take pleasant facts from here every day. Here is my web-site cheap vpn subscription: http://bbs.qupu123.com/space-uid-679745.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-17409</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>79Sherrie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9157</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I can see that your website probably doesn't have much visits. Your articles are interesting, you only need more new visitors. I know a method that can cause a viral effect on your blog. Search in google: dracko's tricks make your content go viral]]></description>
			<dc:creator>79Sherrie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9157</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-7034</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Exciting results for GS2. Would love to see same for a GS run that goes for 1000 hours, 40 days, 1.3 months.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-7034</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6871</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh, nevermind, didn't see the very next comment about two week vacations. Oy vey!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 03:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6871</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6868</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All Getting there - One party has said this "I have run the analyses and am still working on the calculations. Should have some results soon. The analyses that were contracted to be performed were a comparison of isotope ratios. Elemental concentration data from these analyses are limited and should be considered semi-quantitati ve.']]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 20:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6868</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6865</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All UPDATE: One party says that the testing is still at the back of the queue and will not be done this week. Another party says they are on holiday for two weeks!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 12:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6865</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6864</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Tom I am Cautiously optimistic myself. Confirmed isotopic / elemental shifts would allow me to move my position.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 12:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6864</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6862</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Tom Clarke The GS3 fuel load was 0.30 g of Parkhomov Nickel and 0.03 g of LiAlH4 (Consolidated Chemical). The fuel was ground in a porcelain mortar before loading directly into the alumina cell.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 04:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6862</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6861</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Tom, Bit premature - we don't know which sample is the ash and which is the fuel yet - an artefact of the robust double blind process we set up.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2015 18:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6861</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom Clarke says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6860</link>
			<description><![CDATA[OK, so I note these results, and estimate the heat released from this conversion assuming (as does Bob) that 1H is the source of the extra nucleons needed to go from Ni58 to Ni62. There is no uncertainty in this calculation, except the total mass of Ni in the reactor. I assume this is 2g. Spreadsheet (how do i post this?) then gives: Total heat release: 1.16E8J (this is equiv to a mass fraction conversion of 0.00031 on 2 H1 + Ni60 -> Ni62 This heat release corresponds to an average 1kW over 30 hours. That would appear to be much larger than the possible excess heat from GS3? It would be good to clarify: (1) total energy in to GS3 (2) upper bound on total exergy excess of GS3 (3) mass of Ni (not total fuel, this contains LiAlH4 as well) in GS3 Best wishes, Tom]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom Clarke</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2015 17:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6860</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6859</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All The New Fire MK1 - A controllable reaction driven and moderated by heat, pressure, element ratios, phase states and morphology... by Bob Greenyer https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/1035061893191176]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2015 10:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6859</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6858</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Yes - Cubic - with nano/sharp promentries Yes - probably from contamination from transit/storage C - will no from ICPMS, might be just surface. In any case - the 200ºC treatment will remove the water (source of O) and C.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2015 10:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6858</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6857</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: I see, so perhaps the varying oxygen content might be mainly from moisture contamination. I find odd that the Ni particles have in all cases consistently roughly 25-30% carbon content by atom percentage though. Is that really just from the background carbon tape? And is it usual for micro Ni particles to actually have a geometrically cubic appearance (with relatively "sharp" edges, even)? EDIT: some more info. Parkhomov's Ni powder is supposed to have 0.15% carbon (by weight), max: http://i.imgur.com/EhHgpeJ.png Source: http://docs.nevacert.ru/files/gost/gost_9722-1979.pdf EDIT2: even less than that, according to newer standards (GOST 9722-97): http://eng.arsenal.dn.ua/products/nikel/poroshok/ According to the same specifications, particle size for this Ni powder is supposed to be less than 20 µm, with larger particle sizes not exceeding 20% of the total powder content by weight. This seems to be in agreement with the grain analysis submitted in late 2014: http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/12/29/nickel-grain-analysis-from-alexander-parkhomov/ (which apparently was from the "old" supplier, though) EDIT3: have a look at this 2013 Rossi powder analysis: Source: http://pesn.com/2014/10/13/9602545_Leaked-Second-Paper_With_High-Magnification_of_Rossis-Nickel-Particles_Brings_Replication_Closer/11-Askanalys.pdf http://i.imgur.com/eoTs8nW.jpg http://i.imgur.com/eoTs8nW.jpg http://i.imgur.com/PMUxFwU.jpg http://i.imgur.com/PMUxFwU.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2015 04:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6857</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6856</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco They are from the same source. However, different paths. Ed Storms sample was part of the Nickel I got from Parkhomov in Moscow, it was placed in a styrene screw top petri dish and flew with me, then packaged in a polyethylene lock bag and sent via air mail to Bob Higgins, who split it and sent it in a glass sample container with plastic lid from New Mexico to California. Ubaldo Mastromatteo's sample was received in a glass container with metal lid in Padua from Parkhomov that had travelled by air - apparently from the same batch of 0.5 kg as I took the first sample in Moscow. Ubaldo presented a polyethylene sample container to take the Ni in which when via land to be tested. University of Missouri's sample that has undergone SEM/EDX came from the Padua lot. I sent it in Clear styrene/polyeth ylene sample containers that had a synthetic rubber seal via Air Mail. goo.gl/j7gtm4 Slide 15 onwards is the Parkhomov Ni. This is expected to undergo full elemental and Isotopic analysis.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 23:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6856</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6855</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is anybody aware if the Parkhomov Nickel powder analyzed by Ubaldo Mastromatteo and that analyzed by Ed Storms (Kiva Labs) were from the same source? They do look very similar visually, though: http://i.imgur.com/J2rujBl.jpg http://i.imgur.com/J2rujBl.jpg Mastromatteo's analysis showed (by weight) 7.389% C, 0.759% O, 91.852% Ni https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZrRUXk43tcLYN3S3g4ao-HTzQDC_JfwAe5bDcw_WCf4/edit The percentages sum up to 100%, and there's much less oxygen compared to Storm's sample. However the ratio between Ni and C is roughly the same. (this shows his analysis showed percentages by weight too in his case, btw)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 16:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6855</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6854</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Of course, I meant to say "bringing" not "beginning", but hilarious typos make life just that much more interesting.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 14:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6854</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peter Mobberley says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6853</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Marissa, Thank you for your post. It was not my intention to critisize your excellent research. I just wanted to post the explanation for the variability of commercial lithium. Best wishes Pete.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peter Mobberley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 15:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6853</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6852</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'd like to second Geds shout out to Marissa - thankyou for joining the discussion here.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6852</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6851</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Loving the discussion here. Such mystery, can't wait to see the key and have the veil pulled back. Also wanted to say hi and welcome to Marissa! Thank you for joining the discussion here and beginning your expertise. It is much appreciated!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 23:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6851</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mark Davidson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6849</link>
			<description><![CDATA[These are extremely encouraging results provided that MFMP #93 was the fuel and not one of the ash samples.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mark Davidson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 20:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6849</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6848</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@JustaGuy: According to the "To Russia With Love" Google document from Robert Greenyer, Parkhomov switched to an internet supplier earlier in 2015 (...) . http://i.imgur.com/1xCYf5Ql.jpg Larger: http://i.imgur.com/1xCYf5Q.jpg Source: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BbE6V6HKHC3NOOSJmI9QEgP3H5EXcuGDPNn5Oc787RQ/edit However we know from Ed Storms' analysis that it was far from being 99.90% pure. http://i.imgur.com/OsmUtvpl.jpg Larger: http://i.imgur.com/OsmUtvp.jpg Source: https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/photos/pcb.953840867979946/953834611313905/?type=1&theater Was it Ni powder from the old supplier? What he used before reportedly switching to this new supplier is not known exactly. Parkhomov did submit grain size info in 2014, however: http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/12/29/nickel-grain-analysis-from-alexander-parkhomov/ On a related note, you might find this comment from Rossi... interesting, if you can read between the lines: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=879&cpage=13#comment-1093304 ]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 19:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6848</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JustaGuy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6847</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I tend to agree that #21 & #59 are GS3 & #93 is GS2, but this leads me in a slightly different direction of investigation/s peculation than the rest of you (maybe not!)... ... So let's ignore the Li results altogether (since some further analysis is needed) and upon just looking at the Ni Ratio, in a worst case scenario, these are null results and we are left with trying to understand where Parkhomov got his Ni from. Do we have the company name? Assay from the particular lot (I know I'm asking much, but these questions must be asked.)? ... ... Perhaps the company is digging up Ni near a Reactor Plant or perhaps a meteorite sight, and it's strange Ni to start with because of something like that. Or this company has stumbled upon a way of doing minor enrichment by how it's refining it's Ni? Perhaps we can get a hold of some of the raw Ni before any [carbonyl] processing... We can speculate as to what the Li is doing, but I would rather investigate the Ni. Does this make sense, or am I the only one that sees this? ... It may take weeks to finish the double-blind test, when we already could get a jump on the only solid evidence we may have... (starting to dig/sift for Ni in the back yard, right now! :) )]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JustaGuy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 19:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6847</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marissa Little says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6846</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ And that is precisely why the report states "Due to this potential variability, it is uncertain if the differences seen in the lithium ratios are significant or not in this test. " Perhaps I did not word that section quite correctly either as I mainly mentioned natural abundance variances. There is quite a range on the commercially available materials. Again, why I said "To draw a firmer conclusion on these results, one would need further investigation. For example, access to information regarding the parent material, the supplier, lot numbers, etc. A study of the variability of the raw materials would yield a range of isotope ratios to which the current results could be compared."]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marissa Little</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 15:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6846</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marissa Little says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6845</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Perhaps the wording is not quite correct. It should be "textbook value" or somesuch. Sorry this was not clear. This NIST value in the table is from an actual test using a NIST standard for the material. Essentially, it is a control or calibration of the device run just before the test samples.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marissa Little</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 15:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6845</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peter Mobberley says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6844</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Theoretical ?? Isotope ratio.?? The natural isotope ratio of an element is that ratio which is observed in nature. If I come up with a theory that predicts a different ratio then my theory is definitely wrong. Some nations have required stocks of lithium6 for their weapons programs. In order to acquire these stocks they purchased large quantities of natural Li (ratio about 12) This was then subjected to the COLEX process (LiOH / Liamalgam) and cost a lot of money. In order to mitigate some of these costs they sold the depleted Li back to the Li suppliers. (ratio about 15) So if you buy your Li from Chile (Li brine lakes) it will be about 12:1. But if you buy it from US, UK, Russia or France etc it could be anything between 12 and 15. The NIST figure is not natural nor is it theoretical, it is a guess.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peter Mobberley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6844</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6842</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco The GS3 Fuel was not previously run Parkhomov Ni in our case.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6842</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6841</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: sorry, I guess I was too tired when I first read your comment yesterday and didn't really grasp what it was actually about. In the end, I managed to find a reference about that from AlanG in comment #224 here: http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/home/mfmp-blog/477-glowstick#comment-6326 After reading it again carefully, I would agree with you that given that Parkhomov's Ni powder seemed to be rich in Ni62 too, samples #21 and #59 are likely from GS3. I'm not sure that Parkhomov's Ni might been enriched from a previous run/used though - wouldn't this show up from SEM analysis? Interestingly, GS3 was also the only GS experiment (that I remember) which seemed to show visibly anomalous thermal effects, even though briefly. Now, as for why GS4 didn't...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6841</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6840</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Glowfish You are not wrong - that is why we have the {Garbage Can} experiment to look for helium Please not that the document does state that the lithium readings are not outside apparatus potential error.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 09:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6840</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6839</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco That is my guess - please read my posting to you and Marissa below - I make this observation and relate it to the knowledge that Parkhomov Nickel, based on his own isotopic data, has a low 60/62 ratio. Parkhomov Ni used in GS3 fuel and ash. A full Ni isotope study is needed.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 09:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6839</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6835</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: were the ash samples crushed to powder consistency before being sent for analysis? EDIT: it would appear so from page 4. @Justa: Thanks for the spreadsheet. I doubt the Mn is an impurity. There also are other oddities with that fuel sample from Parkhomov. I wonder if this+strangely high Li content in the ash mean that he tried adding material from a Li-ion battery. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_battery LiMnO2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_ion_manganese_oxide_battery http://ww2.duracell.com/media/en-US/pdf/gtcl/Technical_Bulletins/Lithium%20Technical%20Bulletin.pdf http://i.imgur.com/4wacV3q.jpg This would bust my hypothesis where he added Li after the "fuel" analysis were made and wouldn't explain why the Mn in the "ash" pretty much disappeared. However one could justify this by speculating that Parkhomov inadvertently switched Cr and Mn values in his chart shown at ICCF19. We'll never know unless we'll have the original analysis scans.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 04:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6835</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JustaGuy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6834</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Back in April, I built a spreadsheet with all the Parkhomov and Lugano Isotope Analysis Info (on two sheet tabs) under this post: https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/photos/a.587293604634676.1073741827.466698113360893/959227510774615/?type=1&comment_id=959743094056390&reply_comment_id=961032213927478&total_comments=18&comment_tracking={%22tn%22%3A%22R%22} Would anyone volunteer to add the MFMP Analysis to a 3rd sheet, to make it all available in one place? The direct link to the Excel 2010 Spreadsheet is: http://tinyurl.com/nz4gjdh There is also another spreadsheet link a few posts up, which just has the virgin Parkhomov Results (digitized), if that is useful. Also, I mentioned a post about the strange Mn Impurity in the Parkhomov Assay to Ecco during the last experiment run, this is it: https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/photos/a.587293604634676.1073741827.466698113360893/959227510774615/?type=1&comment_id=959245480772818&reply_comment_id=962727900424576&total_comments=14&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D Thanks!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JustaGuy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 02:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6834</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marissa Little says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6832</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Very interesting! When looking at this again, I hadn't paid much attention to the "fuel" results as the "ash" results were so startling. Perhaps ToF-SIMS has a much larger error? The testing lab for the MFMP samples said that the ~6% deviation from natural abundances was significant because that was beyond the errors on natural abundance or any readily performed man-made activities. It would be interesting to run more controls - not necessarily NIST standards but just nickel powder obtained from Sigma Aldrich and other suppliers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marissa Little</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 22:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6832</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6831</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Marissa Look at the notes in here https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxxJkjesxe4kfm9pVEhvU3RKNzR6ZEcxUktYYThPRXBHZHBPOFBCV1RiMzdmbU45RW13cm8]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6831</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6830</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I tried looking back again at the isotopic analysis for Lugano's reactor: http://7e72c9bee7854d60c2a6e8fad86f23e2d586523e-www.googledrive.com/host/0B7eIOSe9g5EnVlJFWmlURGdFeU0/img/lugano_ni_enriched.png If one computes the Ni60/Ni62 ratio of the "fuel", it's similar to that of sample #21 and #59 of this analysis. However in the Lugano report it's noted that "in the fuel sample, the detected ions (have) a natural abundance". Did they?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 20:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6830</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marissa Little says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6829</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've read through much of that...I guess I was hoping for a shiny simplified executive summary of the testing and results!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marissa Little</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 20:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6829</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6828</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Marissa See the general blog - look for GS2 / 3 http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/home/mfmp-blog]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 19:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6828</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marissa Little says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6827</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ah! I thought it would be "control", "fuel" and "ash". Two ashes and a fuel makes more sense... Is there a summary report of GS3 and GS2? I haven't followed test by test until now. This has my interested piqued, of course!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marissa Little</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 19:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6827</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
