<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>ZacharyAlarl says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-27079</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Подскажите где найти лучшие рецепты со всего мира: от классических блюд, которые согревают душу, до современных кулинарных шедевров, которые впечатляют даже самых взыскательных гурманов - https://hexagon.vn/2023/06/22/harnessing-the-power-of-social-media-for-business-growth - рецепты домашнего приготовления]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ZacharyAlarl</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-27079</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ug44zef says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26770</link>
			<description><![CDATA[А вы довольны тем, как работает такси? С каждым днём всё больше водителей недовольны на низкие тарифы, а поездки — на уровень обслуживания. Почему так случается? Не пора ли что-то менять? https://dominika-okna.ru/zakaz-taksi-i-transfera-udobstva-i-preimushhestva-dlja-sovremennogo-puteshestvennika/ Мы, как опытная служба, считаем, что удобство и уверенность должны быть главным. Что считаете? Каким должно быть идеальное такси в 2025 году? Пишите своё мнение — важно мнение каждого!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ug44zef</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 04:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26770</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Annett says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-13447</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Have a look at my blog post ... 토토: https://ave122.com/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Annett</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-13447</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Amie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-13377</link>
			<description><![CDATA[constantly i used to read smaller articles that as well clear their motive, and that is also happening with this piece of writing which I am reading now. My site: junk vehicles orlando: http://www.respanews.com/Click.aspx?url=https://www.mixcloud.com/grainturtle3/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Amie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-13377</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Shenna says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-13264</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I reckon something truly interesting about your weblog so I saved to fav. Have a look at my web site :: sailing charters: http://timemapper.okfnlabs.org/view?url=http://www.video-bookmark.com/bookmark/4699273/luxury-speed-boat-acquiring-guide/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Shenna</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 21:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-13264</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hershel says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-13025</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I got what you intend, appreciate it for posting. Woh I am thankful to find this website through google. Also visit my web page; cheapest car insurance: https://notes.io/ZZfq]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Hershel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 04:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-13025</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pearlene says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-12590</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's amazing in support of me to have a website, which is beneficial in favor of my knowledge. thanks admin Feel free to visit my web-site: sell car online: https://www.mixcloud.com/caseberry1/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Pearlene</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2022 03:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-12590</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nolan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-12582</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is a great tip especially to those new to the blogosphere. Short but very precise information? Appreciate your sharing this one. A must read post! my homepage ... junk car: https://splice.com/beesing23]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nolan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2021 09:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-12582</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>money for your car says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-12469</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I haven't checked in here for some time as I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are great quality so I guess I'll add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it friend :) My web-site - money for your car: https://paste2.org/Fv8NYKzO]]></description>
			<dc:creator>money for your car</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 01:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-12469</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>먹튀사이트 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11922</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow! This blog looks just like my old one! It's on a completely different topic but it has pretty much the same page layout and design. Excellent choice of colors!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>먹튀사이트</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11922</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>genesis pro download says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11246</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You are a very smart individual!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>genesis pro download</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 03:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11246</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>카지노싸이트 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9770</link>
			<description><![CDATA[저희 바카라데이 에서는 오랜 기간동안 변함없이 안정적인 우리 카지노사이트 계열 만을 소개해드리고 있습니다. 저희 카지노탐정은 오랜 기간동안 변함없이 안정적인 카지노 사이트만을 소개해드리고 있습니다. 안전하고 규모있는 계열사가 있는 반면 이를 사칭하는 (계열사 사칭) 카지노사이트 들이 의외로 많이 있습니다. 2. 대부분의 사람들은 이 상황에서는 이런게 많이 나오더라는 자신 혼자만의 경험에 비추어 다음 배팅을 결정합니다. 하우스 승률이 낮기때문에 Banker 에 배팅을 하는것이 승률이 높습니다. 첫번째 - 배팅을 해도 되고, 안해도 되야 한다. Player와 Banker의 합이 9에 가까운 쪽이 이기게 되고, 이긴 쪽에 베팅한 쪽은 최초 베팅액의 1배를 얻습니다. 호텔 카지노의 주인이 될수있는 세계 최초 플랫폼! 바카라는 카지노의 꽃으로 많은분들이 즐겨하는 게임중 하나 입니다. 바카라는 통계적으로 플레이어 절반 뱅커 절반 나오게 되어 있습니다. 플레이어 6회 / 타이 1회 / 뱅커 13회 로 놀라운 결과를 얻었죠. 게임하는 방법이 Player (플레이어) 의 승리에 유리합니다. 딜러가 교체된 후에 바로 진행되는 게임에 플레이어 배팅하는 것입니다. 소위말하는 엎어치기 배팅법입니다 기본배팅을 1이라고 정한다면 이길시에는 계속 1을 배팅하고 졌을경우 그배수에 금액으로 배팅하는 방법입니다 즉, 1,2,4,8,16,32,6 4,128 와 같이 계속 엎어서 배팅한다는 것 입니다 이방법은 어지간해서 지지않는다 생각이 되지만 설마 10번 연속 내가 틀릴일이있겠어 라는 마음가짐은 금물!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>카지노싸이트</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 08:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9770</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>EdgardoChief says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9046</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have checked your site and i've found some duplicate content, that's why you don't rank high in google, but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique content, search for: Best article rewritwer Ercannou's essential tools]]></description>
			<dc:creator>EdgardoChief</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 21:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9046</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Carin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9026</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I konnte niicht unterlassen kommentieren. Perfekt geschrieben!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Carin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2018 02:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9026</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FirstMargarita says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8968</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I see you don't monetize your blog, don't waste your traffic, you can earn extra cash every month because you've got hi quality content. If you want to know how to make extra money, search for: Boorfe's tips best adsense alternative]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FirstMargarita</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8968</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FirstDarlene says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8946</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have noticed you don't monetize your site, don't waste your traffic, you can earn extra cash every month because you've got hi quality content. If you want to know how to make extra money, search for: Boorfe's tips best adsense alternative]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FirstDarlene</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 17:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8946</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6971</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco The complete GS4 data set is now available as csv files: http://tinyurl.com/p2362kf There are separate files for the calibration, the experiment and the reheat.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6971</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6959</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG: many thanks, but the raw 'history' data is simply too much data to download over the internet through hugnet. Could you make a compressed archive and upload it to a Google Drive folder?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 05:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6959</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6958</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The GS4.2 reheat experiment data has finally been posted at http://data.hugnetlab.com/ Click to VIEW FC0600 at the bottom of the test definitions list. Then click on the "From" time and set it to 9/17 03:00 using the slider controls. The pressure plot illustrates the reversible LiH decomposition and recombination over the range of 425-1050 °C in the core (about 50-100 degrees hotter than the outside temperatures shown).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6958</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6942</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We ended the test run at around 21:00 utc. We learned some useful things about the reactor and the test apparatus. The data will be uploaded to a Google Docs repository later today, to be announced here. Thanks to Ecco and Justa Guy for their stalwart support and help. AlanG]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 21:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6942</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6941</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ecco yes I agree but you have the memory of an elephant so anything that seems interesting I tell you and somewhere down the road it may click into place]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 21:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6941</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6940</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie tapp: thank you for the information, interesting metals and properties. @Stephen: unfortunately it looks like data isn't available in real time on Hugnet at this stage.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 20:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6940</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6939</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Alan, I hope it's still going well with the test. I don't yet have Hangouts installed if I install it does it allow to follow the test with out disturbing it or is there a limit to the number of connections? Is the data also available on Hugnet? I wasn't able to find it there earlier. Looking forward to hearing how it's going and if anything interesting is showing up.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 19:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6939</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6938</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ecco I am not at all a scientist but I got wikipidiad earlier and came across magnetic refrigeration. Seems that the element gadolinium when in certain magnetic fields raises its temp a lot and when removed drops substantially allowing scientists to get to almost absolute 0 . It also has almost the highest neutron capture capability maybe this could be a secret ingredient helping to control temps through magnetism and collecting neutron emissions at the same time. Making the device safe. It's relative praseodymium also has interesting property's and is sometimes mixed with nickel for certain processes]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6938</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6935</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The experiment is still running, and the hangout is still active at https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/rv6qbi4tqspr2oaaxupq7mj4naa We'll be doing some more heat cycles. If you have suggestions for other test parameters, feel free to chime in.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6935</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6930</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Bob Higgins rightly suggests the option to use LiH instead of extra Lithium - this may make it easier to handle. In fact the Nickel could then be treated with Aluminium first. many of these option permutations need to be tested.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6930</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6927</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Brian Albiston finds excellent source on the Properties of Lithium https://goo.gl/XUmXPd Basically - the only thing that will reliably contain it is 100% Fe (see page 48) that incidentally has a melting point of 1,538 °C. We have ordered some of this to distribute to replicators http://goo.gl/ulKGzv Y2O3, Si3N4, BN and AlN - are possible candidates. http://www.precision-ceramics.com/materials/silicon-nitride/ Could we make *GlowSticks* from these Lithium resistant technical ceramics? Could this be used http://www.precision-ceramics.com/products/stock-technical-ceramic-products/boron-nitride-paintable-coating/ "Non-wet by most molten metals, salts, fluxes and slags – Acts Like Teflon® to Molten Metal" paint inside of tube - get Boron as a bonus! We were considering this companies products nearly a year ago http://durexindustries.com/aluminum-nitride-and-alumina-ceramic-heaters few seconds to go to 1100ºC, embedded RTD and Li resistant AlN Shame about the price!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 23:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6927</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6926</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm ready to start the GS4 reheat. I have a Google Hangout set up with the various data streams and chat: https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/rv6qbi4tqspr2oaaxupq7mj4naa If you aren't able to join directly, let me know by email and I'll send an invite.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6926</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JustaGuy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6909</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco FYI: The reason it takes the web browser so long to load, is the plot! When I started the experiment back in May, I wanted to test Google Sheets out to the max, hence the plot inclusion. If I remove Sheet 1 (plot), it will load a lot faster. Edit: In other words, Google's Plot Script is very badly written, with respect to plotting large amounts of data. It should prune/sift data and have a resolution option, to quickly make a rough plot, then allow the user some subsequent control based on how long it takes to plot and/or whatever desired resolution the viewer may want (a tradeoff between plot quality/time). Or, the algorithm could realize that there is a limited screen size or resolution, and sift/filter data that way, maintaining a history of what modifications it's making to compensate for the excessive plot density (Whew, glad I finally decided to end this, here!).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JustaGuy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6909</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6893</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG: I'm still wondering if there isn't a more accessible method for presenting data and allowing others to download it. Data on HUGnet can be easily retrieved on the short term, but on the long term, weeks or months after the experiment ended, it's virtually impossible unless one knows the exact start/end timestamps and what to look for. It's also inefficient (slow) as it uses uncompressed plaintext data transfers, and availability is not guaranteed either. A possible idea: one could set up a shared Google drive folder containing raw data synced at regular intervals, and a fixed html page with javascript code to present it interactively, without need for databases (which Google Drive doesn't support anyway). An even simpler solution could be generating with a local script (in your PC) at regular intervals static graphs from the data, and regularly sync them together with the raw data to said Google Drive folder.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 19:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6893</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6892</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've received the PA1000 power analyzer, updated the firmware and installed the logging software. It all seems to work after the usual Windows glitches. The software logs data into a MySQL database, and with a bit of poking around I found the database file and successfully opened it with SQLite Browser. This is good because HUGnet also stores data in a SQL database. So it appears there may be an easier integration path than faking a DAQ board interface. It should be possible to create a php script to extract data from the PA1000 database and insert it into the HUGnet database. The two databases will reside on different computers on a LAN, so that may be tricky. Anyone have experience with SQL? _______________ _________ The GS4 pressure is now under ambient, with constant slope. So it appears that the pressure drop is due to absorption, diffusion and/or reaction with the mullite tube, rather than a fitting leak. Sometime next week with the pressure well below one bar, I'll reheat the cell and see what happens. The HUGnet streaming appears to have been disabled at HUG, though the data is still being sent here. I'll see if I can get it back on line and post a notice before the reheat.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6892</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6869</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All haha - just did a rough calculation - 20% of Li & 30% of LiAlH4 by WEIGHT gives you 94.1% of the atoms as Li 5.9% as Al - which gives you a melting point of around 250ºC This links Rossi's patent (example fuel ratio) with IHs application (reactor operating range). Note: Someone please verify http://pruffle.mit.edu/3.00/Lecture_36_web/img7.gif]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 22:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6869</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6836</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie tapp: a claimed COP of 2.7+ is unlikely to be a measurement error and so are claims of successful replications in a university environment. See this relatively recent blogpost from E-Cat World: http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/07/13/report-of-new-successful-e-cat-replication-from-moscow/ 2100/850 = COP 2.47 ...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 06:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6836</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JustaGuy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6824</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey All: FYI: I tried to make the following post here, but there was little room to do it: https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/838324122948482 I sorta titled it: Some Info Regarding the possible material/compos ition of Parkhomov's Stainless Steel Shield/Capsule]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JustaGuy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 18:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6824</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6821</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's another paper with some newer data and an extensive list of references. The paper itself is pay-walled ($35) but even the first two pages in the abstract have useful information. The references page is also free, in a separate tab. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/10915998_7]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 02:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6821</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JustaGuy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6820</link>
			<description><![CDATA[FYI (All) Here is the link where I gave all of my LAH & LiH References, back in the beginning of January: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg100726.html Hopefully, the link to page 2 of Ref [4] will work for you (it seems to be intermittent and working right now): http://www.tempid.altervista.org/Page2.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JustaGuy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6820</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6819</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Peter From wikipedia on the synthesis of LiH from molten lithium in hydrogen atmosphere at varying pressures and temperatures.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 22:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6819</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6818</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ AlanG in regards to your automation project I have a Alan Bradley panel view plus 1000 color touch screen display module with a dh+/dh485/r10 module attatched. And a Alan bradley rack with slc power supply, slc 5/05 CPU, 4 analog input cards, 1 115v input card, 1 triac output card, and 1 output analog card.if you or anyone else could use these let me know I will get them in the mail]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 17:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6818</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peter Mobberley says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6817</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Rob, Adding a very small amount of carbon enhances the creation of H- (from Wiki): Yes , I think so. Please elaborate on your reference. Pete.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peter Mobberley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 14:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6817</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6815</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have a feeling that actually causing breakdown of LiH - so that the H is evolved removing H- may be one of the control mechanisms, IE add extra heat to shut the reaction down. That maybe why it is inherently safe and nothing to do with Ni state, Nickel/Nickel agglomerations could possibly be in solution/emulsi on under certain circumstances - but still, the release of 2H->H2 makes it safe. The reaction only starts according to the IH patent application at the temperature LiH first forms. Having more Li allows for lower temperature molten state and activity, with less lithium, the temperature at which the bulk of the H- is removed goes up. By having stoichimetric LiH - only when you are above 900-1000 do you get the LiH breaking down and the H- being pumped into the Ni - this will result in a singular period of self sustain like Parkhomov saw or 1 period of high COP after which nothing - to repeat you need to NOT have a leak and the right pressure regime so that LiH can again form for the next cycle. Note, there will always be some LiH, so you can "keep it on the boil" and this maybe what Lugano was doing. Reaction will also stop if you add too big a load and reduce temperature to a point when either 1. LiH is not LiH but something else with Al 2. below freezing point of solution 3. below Nickel Debye temp H2 gas is only important as a reservoir in the same way it is in Celani and Piantelli/Focar di work - all the evidence is consistent in this regard. Piantelli goes to extraordinary lengths to create H- on the surface of the nickel - in the Rossi system, as was obvious after the SEMs of "Bang!" there are bucket loads of H- on the surface of the nickel ready for action - and any ejected protons only have to leave the Nickel surface to encounter lithium. Adding a very small amount of carbon enhances the creation of H- (from Wiki): "This reaction is especially rapid at temperatures above 600 °C. Addition of 0.001–0.003% carbon, or/and increasing temperature or/and pressure"]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6815</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GlowFish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6812</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Assuming that there is no "missing ingredient" as in some sort of fuel stimulation (such as direct electrical stimulation or electric field) other than heat that may inadvertently have been incorporated in a successful experiment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GlowFish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6812</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6809</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Alan, Skip, and all those that took part!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6809</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6808</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've ended the run at midnight UTC. The total elapsed time is 47:10. This long experiment wouldn't have been possible without the generous help and good company of Skip and Justa Guy, and I thank them for their patience and support. The data is all available at hugnetlab.com. A good part of the analysis has already been done by GED and ECCO, who I also thank for the time and skill they brought to the party. Best regards to all, Alan Goldwater MFMP]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6808</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6805</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Alright I admit I do not know what is happening. There is a large delta with the active side hot during calibration. Why? There is little or zero additional delta with fuel. Net no excess heat seen???]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2015 17:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6805</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6804</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The lab got pretty warm overnight but is now cooled down and the fan turned off. After things settle a bit more we'll start an abrupt ramp up to 1020 °C (1280 core). In response to popular request, I'll try to do this in constant voltage mode for more accurate power comparison with calibration. But I need to also keep the PID on line and ready to catch any thermal runaway. It will take careful tuning of the variac voltage but it should be possible.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2015 16:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6804</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6803</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I increased the set point to 1020 °C. That will bring the core to ~1280.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2015 04:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6803</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6802</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The set point is now 1000 °C, corresponding to 1250 in the core.. The Tdif at 64 degrees compared to 54-56 for the calibration.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2015 02:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6802</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6801</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is the power going down right now with the active at same temp - or am I imagining that? on a 15 min average we are now at under 82V, there was a 15 minute average of over 82.5V on the previous power step when the temp was 49ºC cooler.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2015 01:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6801</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6800</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What is happening at the temperatures where it can not decide what value to take? http://i.imgur.com/2tXSlGP.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2015 01:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6800</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6799</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Tdif is up to 56 degrees, which is around 10% above calibration. Encouraging but not decisive. I'll be bumping the set point up to 950 °C soon.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6799</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6798</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Alan, Ecco Thanks for explaining. It confused me :D The dT is going up fast, a good sign.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 22:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6798</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6797</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I cranked up the variac to 90 volts, to prep for the ramp up to 900. That put the PID into active control mode. Now running up to 900 °C. Pressure dropped, then flattened out. Tdif is 48 degrees, in line with calibration]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 22:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6797</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6796</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sanjeev: Y values represent calculated input power (from volts RMS and heater resistance). Alan switched from constant voltage to PID control in preparation to the jump to 900°C he mentioned in comment #99. He then increased peak voltage a few times, which made the PID work harder to maintain the temperature achieved during the constant voltage period.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 22:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6796</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6795</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco That can explain it. Why would PID jump so much at this time (1000 to 0 is the range and at high frequency)? Also see Ged's graph on ECW.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 22:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6795</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6793</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Alan Is the power going down ? If yes, you may want to postpone the jump.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 21:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6793</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6792</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We're about ready for the jump to 900 C. It will be a fast ramp to thermal shock the cell. Here's where it might get interesting.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 21:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6792</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6791</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie tapp: upper screen = gamma spectrum lower screen = gamma count]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 20:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6791</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6790</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ecco can you tell me what each screen represents on the you tube kind of small and blurry for me to see thanks]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6790</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6789</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ed Pell https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/gqoyvgat3jrhrzuc4jc3wyurdia]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6789</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6788</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In the first ramp up 853 versus 803, holy cow! Currently 436 versus 424. I am so happy. Yahoo Alan and Skip. 28 vs 28 delta 0 55 vs 58 delta 3 193 vs 203 delta 10 424 vs 436 delta 12 685 vs 708 delta 23 800 vs 852 delta 52 ** out of sequence data 923 vs 981 delta 58 ** out of sequence data http://i.imgur.com/wmdMRN0.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 17:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6788</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6787</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ ALanG speaking of a great team how about Ecco and these graphs do you ever sleep, thank you to everyone, and I probably can't offer much to you but if you guys need anything call me I'm in az. Close to Yuma and would fly right over if needed,]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 16:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6787</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6786</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All Pressure inflection]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 16:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6786</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6785</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Alan Yes, it works great. But now its past its range already.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 16:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6785</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6784</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Morning all. I have a great team here to help so I was able to get some sleep. I've started easing the temp up and you can see that the pressure response is almost flat. This suggests that the first phase of LAH decomposition is mostly done (or maybe not...) and we can proceed with heating the cell a bit more aggressively. But with due caution of course. @Sanjeev: The thermal images are from a Seek camera on an iPod. It works pretty well (for the price) but is limited to 350 °C.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 15:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6784</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6783</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Difficult for me to see anything significant there.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 14:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6783</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6781</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco How much lower was it ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6781</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6779</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG Nice IR images. What are you using to get those?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6779</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6776</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All - now that is a pressure curve.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 10:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6776</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6774</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's the calibration graph for GS4.2 http://magicsound.us/MFMP/GS4-2_Power_vs_Temps.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 04:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6774</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6773</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's a thermal image of GS4.2 warming up. Pressure is up to 45 psi already!http:// magicsound.us/M FMP/GS4-2_warmu p.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 02:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6773</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JustaGuy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6772</link>
			<description><![CDATA[MFMP GS4.2 Live Run Relay #1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh0gJr8DCyo]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JustaGuy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 01:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6772</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6771</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ready to start the active run. The Google hangout is at: https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/gqoyvgat3jrhrzuc4jc3wyurdia]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6771</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6770</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG: could data in the hugnetlab.com stream be configured for higher precision? Pressure especially, if possible.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6770</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6769</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Calibration completed. I'm about to shut down the hugnetlab feed to substitute a faster computer. It should be back up in a few minutes.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 22:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6769</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6767</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We can already see that this cell is behaving quite differently from the first GS4 cell. The Null TC is running almost 30 °C cooler than the Active TC. I attribute this to the tight press fit of the filler rod in the bore of this mullite tube. The attached thermal image shows the effect of heat conduction away from the coil into the exposed end of the tube. This cools the heated area. If I'm right, the difference should get smaller at a higher temp where 4th power radiant dissipation begins to exceed conduction. http://magicsound.us/MFMP/GS4_2_rod_end_temps.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6767</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JustaGuy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6766</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here is a Interim GS4 YouTube Test Feed Link until things start (OK to chat there): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQgXNiU3wjI]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JustaGuy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6766</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6765</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@JustaGuy: Thanks for handling the Youtube chat. We probably won't start the fueled run until around 17:00 local time. I'll let you know when we're ready.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6765</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JustaGuy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6761</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am ready to set up a YouTube Video Relay/Chat, I just need the valid Google HangOut Address, thanks.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JustaGuy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6761</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6759</link>
			<description><![CDATA[From Alan "We have a new GS4.2 reactor assembled from a fresh mullite tube and new heater coil, but using the same thermocouples as yesterday's test. We installed a dummy fuel load of Ni+Al2O3 like the previous cell, and started the fixed step calibration at 18:00 UTC. The data stream is available at data.hugnetlab. com After calibration, we'll install a fuel load of Parkhomov Ni 1.0 g and LiAlH4 0.15 g. This is 50% more of the hydride compared to the previous run."]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6759</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6758</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco: Nice chart, thanks. I agree with your conclusion. @Charlie: We have a new GS4.2 reactor assembled from a fresh mullite tube and new heater coil, but using the same thermocouples as yesterday's test. We installed a dummy fuel load of Ni+Al2O3 like the previous cell, and started the fixed step calibration at 18:00 UTC. The data stream is available at data.hugnetlab. com After calibration, we'll install a fuel load of Parkhomov Ni 1.0 g and LiAlH4 0.15 g. This is 50% more of the hydride compared to the previous run.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6758</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6749</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I tried comparing calibration and the live run during the final decreasing power steps using the last 30 second-averaged sample before power was stepped down. I think we can safely assume that there was no statistically significant excess heat, at least during this final test. I computed heater resistance values from a third degree polynomial fit of those listed in the calibration spreadsheet vs the average of external active and null temperatures. http://i.imgur.com/ZGv5RBK.png http://i.imgur.com/ZGv5RBK.png EDIT: updated]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 06:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6749</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6746</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco, here's another data point for 1000 °C: 115.0 V rms 11.67 A rms -> 9.85 ohms.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6746</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6742</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, The exact resistance value should not matter as long as the same value is used in calibration and live run calculations. Plotting both power vs temp graphs in one should give us a good comparison.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6742</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6741</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's a link to the google hangout: https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/gx6egljn3gjywl5dt6j5sfghpua We're about to bump up to 1200+ in the core.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6741</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6740</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sanjeev: yes. However, it could be due to the way power is being applied right now (PID control), compared to calibration (constant power). Also, since I've previously used a wrong resistance value, I want to be sure I've got it right this time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6740</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6739</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, Did you find any difference in power compared to the calibration data ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6739</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6738</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For disclosure, I've updated the temperature graph I've previously made as I used the wrong resistance value for calculating input power. Since I really want to be sure of what I'm currently seeing in the most recent data, can others confirm that at the current outside temperatures heater resistance should be approximately 9.65 Ohm?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6738</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6737</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm about to start the ramp up to 900 °C (~1150 C in the core). It's a short ramp, 1 hour.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6737</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6736</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All First blind analysis of GS3 Fuel and Ash back + other (randomly numbered, not known which) Also, Parkhomov Ni and LiAlH4 as in GS4 run - best images yet of Parkhomov Ni. Samples undergoing isotopic analysis this and next week by various parties with differently numbered samples. https://goo.gl/j7gtm4 Please credit University of Missouri / Sangho Bok, MFMP for the work.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6736</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6735</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Rock steady at a little under 900ºC internal.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6735</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6734</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Previous 4 hours at 900°C of core temperature: http://i.imgur.com/qNM1iNQ.png http://i.imgur.com/qNM1iNQ.png EDIT: I previously used the wrong wire resistance value, now it should be correct.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6734</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6733</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For reference: http://i.imgur.com/Vng7K0I.png http://i.imgur.com/Vng7K0I.png (thinner line: extrapolated data)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6733</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6732</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We started the second ramp, 4 hours up to 900 °C (core) at 02:44 UTC. The pressure started rising immediately, so there's still hope for a good run. The Google hangout seems to be free of timeout, so check in there to see the GC, gamma and live video: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/gza7ru565jrp7uwcubdmjumsbma The streaming data is at http://data.hugnetlab.com Scroll to the bottom of the list and click on GS4]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 02:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6732</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6731</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It might still be worth performing the full run to 1200+°C even if hydrogen is leaking. There will still be a residual hydrogen atmosphere and the leak might heal itself enough at high temperature to let hydrogen out but not air in. Besides, I don't think that Parkhomov's mullite tubes have always been very tight. Also, if the fuel powder splits water like Celani wires, maybe steam traces from the SiO2 reacting with the residual hydrogen at high temperature could be enough. And if Si particles are formed from this reaction as well, nanosilicon seems very capable at splitting water too: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl304680w]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 02:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6731</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6730</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yuck, the other Swagelok was also leaking a bit, at the null end of the tube. Fixed now, but the pressure went down to 12 psi before the fix. Rising again now...I DONT LIKE MULLITE!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6730</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6728</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Where are we at? Is there a youtube? Thanks.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6728</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6727</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I found the mullite cell tube had cracked cleanly at the Swagelok connection point. I replaced the fitting with a fresh ferrule set, and tightened just two flats rather than three as used on the alumina tube. The test was restarted at 21:30 UTC. If there's enough hydrogen left in the LiAlH4, we'll run the full test. If no pressure rise is seen, I'll pull the fuel cartridge out and replace with a fresh one, which may delay things until tomorrow. Either way, I'm not giving up on this run.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6727</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6726</link>
			<description><![CDATA[From Alan "The Swagelok seal on the active end of the tube is leaking, so I stopped the test. No point in continuing without fixing the problem. Once it cools, I'll remove the fitting for inspection. It's possible the mullite isn't strong enough to accept the required swaging pressure even with aluminum ferrules. If it's fixable, we need to decide whether to retest with the current fuel load. It saw a peak of about 200 C in the core, so at least some of the hydrogen will have been lost. I have enough AP ingredients for one more attempt if we decide to not re-heat the current batch."]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6726</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6725</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Swagelok seal on the active end of the tube is leaking, so I stopped the test. No point in continuing without fixing the problem. Once it cools, I'll remove the fitting for inspection. It's possible the mullite isn't strong enough to accept the required swaging pressure even with aluminum ferrules. If it's fixable, we need to decide whether to retest with the current fuel load. It saw a peak of about 200 C in the core, so at least some of the hydrogen will have been lost.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6725</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6724</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fuel is loaded and locked. We just calibrated the gamma spectrometer and will be starting the live run shortly.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6724</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
