<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:11:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Danielgop says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26612</link>
			<description><![CDATA[На платформе MEGA имеется более 5 000 дилеров предлагающих богатый ассортимент продуктов. Здесь вы непременно найдете подходящий вариант. Между прочим, на MEGA есть возможность обмена биткоин на CARD, альтернатива использованию Telegram - анонимные чаты между клиентами через Privnote. Если возникают конфликтные ситуации, можно разрешить их через функцию "диспут" с модератором или продавцом. И это только некоторые из фишек и уникальностей, которые можно найти на отдельной странице маркетплейса, посвященной функциям и особенностям данного ресурса https://megaweb777.com. https://xn--megweb17-4dd.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Danielgop</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 05:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26612</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SamuelTucky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25530</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Кракен сайт: Ваш персональный щит | кракен даркнет ссылка на сайт тор кракен тор браузер - https://loxovnet.com Покупка амфетамина должна быть безопасной. На narkotiki.name мы обеспечиваем максимальную защиту ваших данных и гарантируем, что каждый товар прошел проверку качества. Мы знаем, как важна для вас безопасность, и поэтому предлагаем только проверенные товары от надежных поставщиков. Купить амфетамин с гарантией безопасности и качества у нас — это правильный выбор. Кракен даркнет часто используется людьми, которые хотят Купить героин, но скрытно. Анонимность, которую предлагает даркнет, привлекает многих, но стоит помнить, что такие сделки нарушают закон. Риск попасться на мошенников или получить некачественный товар всегда высок. Поэтому важно быть очень осторожным при совершении сделок в таких анонимных пространствах, как КРАКЕН. кракен даркнет вход - https://littlerus25.com/index.php?showtopic=0001&pid=1647&st=0& Кракен онлайн-рынок мессенджер]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SamuelTucky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25530</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SamuelTucky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25486</link>
			<description><![CDATA[кракен сайт зеркало рабочее: Ваш ключ к темным уголкам интернета | кракен зеркало 2 веб где купить героин - https://besedka-online.com Цены на наркотики в интернете могут колебаться, в зависимости от множества фак торов. онлайн-рынок цены на наркотики регулярно обновляет информацию, чтобы вы всегда знали актуальные расценки. Если вы хотите получить качественный амфетамин, сделайте заказ на KRAKEN. Мы всегда проверяем качество каждого товара, чтобы вы могли быть уверены в его эффективности. Мы гарантируем, что все препараты соответствуют самым высоким стандартам. Наши эксперты помогут вам сделать правильный выбор и предложат лучшие варианты. Купить амфетамин — это выгодно и надежно. кракен настоящее зеркало - https://alluaix.com Кракен онлайн-рынок мессенджер Telegram]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SamuelTucky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 21:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25486</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ZacharyAlarl says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25193</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Подскажите где найти лучшие рецепты со всего мира: от классических блюд, которые согревают душу, до современных кулинарных шедевров, которые впечатляют даже самых взыскательных гурманов - https://hexagon.vn/2023/06/22/harnessing-the-power-of-social-media-for-business-growth - простые рецепты в домашних условиях]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ZacharyAlarl</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25193</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Charles says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25059</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow, incredible blog layout! How long have you ever been running a blog for? you made blogging look easy. The tootal look of your web site iis great, let alone the content! My site ... Dario: https://Www.facebook.com/fleetcostcare]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 01:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-25059</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Danielgop says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-24871</link>
			<description><![CDATA[На официальном маркетплейсе MEGA вы найдете богатый выбор товаров и услуг, удовлетворяющих любой вкус. Здесь https://xn--megweb18-4dd.com можно найти все, что только возможно представить. Но самое интересное заключается в том, что проект не является обычным интернет-магази ном. Он функционирует как платформа объявлений, предоставляя посреднические услуги. Это означает, что вы сможете найти множество диллеров и магазинов, сравнить цены, ознакомиться с отзывами, оценить конкуренцию и выбрать наиболее подходящий вариант. https://xn--m13-psa.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Danielgop</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2025 07:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-24871</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Publickt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23931</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Мы поможем вам обращайтесь Р РёС‚СѓР°Р»СЊР ЅС‹Рµ С‚РѕРІР°СЂС‹ РІ Р•РіРѕСЂСЊРµРІС ЃРєРѕРј СЂР°Р№РѕРЅРµ: РєСѓРїРёС‚СЊ РІСЃРµ РЅСѓР¶РЅРѕРµ]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Publickt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 18:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23931</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Venetta says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-22840</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thank you for some oother exfellent post. The place else may anyone get that type of information in such an ideal way of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and I'm at the search ffor such information. Feel free to surf to my homepage тюнинг фар: https://store.auto-style.com.ua/shtatnaya-magnitola-sigma-pro-x108128/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Venetta</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-22840</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kara says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-18237</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nu je weet wat SEO: https://articles-info.com/blog/op-zoek-naar-een-seo-specialist-in-jouw-nederlandse-regio/ is en hoe zoekmachines werken, begrijp je hoe je content moet creëren die rankt. Er is sprake van natuurlijke zoekmachine-opt imalisatie als je daarvoor geen trucjes gebruikt en je er niet voor betaalt.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kara</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2023 02:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-18237</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Etsuko says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-17200</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Today, while I was att work, my cousin stole my apple ipad and tested too see if it can survive a 40 foot drop, jusst so she can be a youtube sensation. My apple ipad is now broken and she has 83 views. I know this is entirely off topic but I had to share it with someone! Also visit my blog post: discuss: https://linkvault.win/story.php?title=navigating-cheap-uk-vpns-a-comprehensive-guide]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Etsuko</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-17200</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Popular Software says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9562</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I blog frequently and I really appreciate your information. The article has truly peaked my interest. I'm going to book mark your site and keep checking for new information about once per week. I opted in for your RSS feed as well. Popular Software: http://softwaredw.download popular software: http://softwaredw.download#]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Popular Software</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9562</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlannaJuicy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9228</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello. I see that you don't update your blog too often. I know that writing articles is boring and time consuming. But did you know that there is a tool that allows you to create new articles using existing content (from article directories or other pages from your niche)? And it does it very well. The new posts are unique and pass the copyscape test. You should try miftolo's tools]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlannaJuicy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 15:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9228</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>79Ted says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9172</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I can see that your blog probably doesn't have much visits. Your articles are awesome, you only need more new readers. I know a method that can cause a viral effect on your website. Search in google: dracko's tricks make your content go viral]]></description>
			<dc:creator>79Ted</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 01:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9172</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cheap essay writer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9151</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks for every other informative website. Where else could I get that kind of info written in such a perfect way? I've a challenge that I'm just now running on, and I've been on the look out for such info.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>cheap essay writer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9151</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SalinaJuicy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9141</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I often visit your blog and have noticed that you don't update it often. More frequent updates will give your site higher authority & rank in google. I know that writing posts takes a lot of time, but you can always help yourself with miftolo's tools which will shorten the time of creating an article to a couple of seconds.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SalinaJuicy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2018 14:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9141</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cheap essay writer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers? I'm kinda paranoid about losing everything I've worked hard on. Any tips?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>cheap essay writer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 05:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>VictorChief says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9079</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have checked your site and i've found some duplicate content, that's why you don't rank high in google's search results, but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique content, search for: boorfe's tips unlimited content]]></description>
			<dc:creator>VictorChief</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9079</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Uk Web Agency says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8964</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This gives a website web presence and it gives you a major advantage over your competition. There are always product demonstrations and distinctive displays unfold through Hamleys seven dynamic floors. Whether you promote yourself as a solo or business brand (< learn 10 ways to improve your SEO with Google+) Google+ is now a necessity.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Uk Web Agency</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 10:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8964</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FirstAdam says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8907</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I see you don't monetize your page, don't waste your traffic, you can earn additional bucks every month because you've got high quality content. If you want to know how to make extra bucks, search for: Mrdalekjd methods for $$$]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FirstAdam</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 08:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8907</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GlowFish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6512</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Did you manage to do an additional run? Any further news?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GlowFish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6512</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6495</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'll be opening the GS3 reactor on Monday after checking the residual pressure. Then I'll pump it down to vacuum and leave it for a while to de-load the hydrogen. After reinstalling the core thermocouple I'll do a final calibration run. These steps will be done with the reactor in place on the test stand, without disturbing the thermocouples or heater coil. As a final step I'll remove the fuel and divide it into samples for isotopic analysis.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6495</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6494</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Also, Charlie, don't forget the second law of thermal dynamics. There is no such thing as a cyclic reaction or ingredients that magically replenish--you would be creating energy from nothing. Once fuel is consumed, it's over. You can argue for a different fuel source, but there are no additional fuel sources other than hydrogen and very limited amounts of Al and Fe. I don't think there's enough to make a thermite reaction that would even be visible, since we're talking about milligram amounts here.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6494</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6493</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, ror some scale: 1 lb of coal can produce 0.95 kWh of energy (roughly 2 MWh for 1 ton of coal), while a gallon of petroleum is about 13.6 kWh. It really doesn't matter if hydrogen is reducing aluminum. It's good to bring up points to be considered, and thankfully this has been looked in in depth already by Pekka and others. We already know if we take the entire mass of all the reactants--all the hydrogen, the nickel, aluminum and lithium, which is just a few grams total (no where near a lb of coal)--that it isn't remotely close energy wise. You're still "burning hydrogen" in such a redox reaction (all combustion is redox). There is simply not enough atoms, unless somehow more mass is being created, and that would be far more fantastic than LENR! At most, chemical is something like 0.4 eV per atom or something like that. So you can use that to calculate the max energy available from all the atoms in the fuel. Obviously the reactor body itself is not involved (never hot enough to melt the Al2O3), as we don't see the reactor dissolving or breaking down (heater coils break from high temps, not really the reactor bodies themselves, even in the Fairfax or Me365 experiments that blew out like a roman candles). At MWh levels of energy, that entire small reactor body would be eaten up in a matter of moments.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6493</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6492</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ged that quote is almost exactly what I was saying to Ecco about reducing thermite adding the oxygen back into the system. From what my small mind can understand redox reactions are not nessesarily involving oxygen but electrons adding electrons would oxidize removing them reduces I think. Regardless I only bring dumb stuff up because of what you just did (started thinking about it) i don't know where to find stuff like that, thanks. Also maybe that's why the reactor tubes fail they are being reduced and getting weak.still can't explain the oxogen replenish ment keep looking stuff up for our H.C.T.R.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6492</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6491</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie tapp: you would need to come up with a plausible explanation for a hypothetical cyclic thermite reaction... good luck! A thermite reaction between Fe2O3 (rust) and Al produces Fe and Al2O3. Al2O3 (alumina) is a very stable compound and incidentally it's what these reactor tubes are made of. EDIT: I'm actually taking charlie tapp seriously. This might be of interest: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11837-000-0047-7 http://i.imgur.com/hWKoLA0.png http://i.imgur.com/hWKoLA0.png ]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 04:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6491</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6490</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ged maybe all the ingredients keep replenishing. And no one can really go off of any of Rossis tests or anyone else's until someone qualified like mfmp can recreate. So far I am going with the thermite is what has happened in the short excess everyone has had.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 04:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6490</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6489</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Alan, did you crack it open yet? if not, what pressure is it at? Thanks. I am in California this week. Got time for a visit on Sunday? edpell@optonline.net]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 03:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6489</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6488</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thermite sure as heck won't burn for months (lasts seconds), let alone at MWh levels. If you remember the energy density plot, the E-Cat test was orders of magnitude past chemical. All chemical reactions, no matter what they may be, have a hard limit of the amount of energy that can be released. Both burning thermite or burning glucose in your cells, can never release more energy than that hard chemical limit.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 02:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6488</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GlowFish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6487</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Charlie The only way to rule out a chemical reaction is to have sustained excess heat. Eventually any thermite reaction would have to die out as the aluminum and iron get used up. Yes, short "bursts" of supposed excess heat can be chemical. One hopes that some replication somewhere can show sustained excess.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GlowFish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6487</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6486</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@stephen I did not realize iron oxide was in Lugano fuel to me that most certainly would go with wat I mentioned. It would 100 percent create a thermite reaction at those temps thermite can get up to 3500 degrees maybe rossi has figured out how to control thermite not lenr.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6486</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stephen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6485</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If the glow stick is still available and the pressure continued to decrease at the same rate about 20 psi per day, it should be close to 0 by now. I wonder if another post test can be run ? If so perhaps we could also keep a steady temperature above Li melting point say 250 or so degrees for an hour or so and at 650 degrees for a couple of hours or so to see if LENR kicks in at steady state.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6485</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Henderson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6484</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I would like to see a bit of iron added for other reasons ... it was in the Lugano fuel, it catalyzes the splitting of molecular hydrogen to its atomic form, it could be a neutron donor.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mike Henderson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6484</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6483</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie tapp: it should be easy to check out by adding iron oxide to the powder. That will be easier to confirm when a water flow calorimeter like the one I suggested will be used.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 03:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6483</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6482</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco looking at some similarity between this and a nickel hydrogen battery and different things lithium does at different stages and molten aluminum, could this whole thing be as simple as a thermite reaction starting and reversing from the ac power source refreshing itself every half cycle once started. I have read that lithium is ferromagnetic in a gas phase and was used in the very first nuclear reaction man made transmuting to helium. the lithium could simply be the heat source for the thermite reaction from reacting violently with the water created from the catalytic activity of the nickel with the hydrogen and oxidized surface of the nickel . The thermite reaction would be harder to explain but you already have the molten aluminum and one oxygen molecule from the steam hydrogen gets driven off to start over can you have the thermite reaction with out the iron I believe you can. Maybe the opposite half cycle reduces the thermite adding oxygen back to the system to start over. I think I should go back to propetual motion I'm getting crazy]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 03:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6482</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter G. says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6481</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG Ah, thanks for the info. Yes, your approach makes a lot of sense, from what I can judge. So the calibration was the key to eliminating the errors due to diode-drop ect. On the whole, I've got a much clearer picture of your power-measureme nt-setup and procedures now. Thanks for taking the time. Maybe you can improve the system on occasion, so that already a single reading is meaningful. In conjunction with a quasi-steady heater power, this would also enable to capture short-lived events, thought I don't really expect any. But who knows.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter G.</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 18:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6481</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6478</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Glowfish: a thermal camera or a pyrometer still can't directly measure the overall output heat energy of the reactor tube, which is what even a very simple calorimeter like the one depicted can easily do (apparently rather efficiently, even without elaborate insulation). This one is also open ended, and would allow using Swagelok fittings and even a pressure sensor if desired, compared to other calorimetry methods (like Parkhomov's water bucket system). Thermocouples on the reactor tube could still be used for temperature monitoring and control if needed. Spot temperature measurements might be "simpler" but most experiments performed so far have shown that end results are usually inconclusive and subject to possible errors and drifts of all sorts. Match this with a properly set up wattmeter for input power measurements and you will have an experiment which will be difficult to refute in case abundant excess heat arises.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 06:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6478</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GlowFish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6477</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Didn't Rob Greenyer use an Optris camera for some experiments? Cameras are expensive so maybe a pyrometer instead of a thermocouple could be used? A pyrometer is less accurate for determining excess heat as pointed out in the document but it is easier to set up than a whole water jacket, pump, flowmeter etc etc. I would imagine it would be simpler to start with the pyrometer and see if there is any indication of excess heat. Once that is established then can go the whole route of designing and making the water jacket.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GlowFish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 06:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6477</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6476</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG: would you consider using flow calorimetry? GSVIT some time back came up with a simple and cheap yet very effective design (less than 2.5% overall error margin on heat estimation) which seems well suited for long and thin reactor tubes like these Dog Bone/Parkhomov replications: https://gsvit.wordpress.com/2014/10/28/misura-del-calore-emesso-da-una-lampada-ad-infrarossi-da-2kw-tramite-calorimetria-a-flusso/ Try using https://translate.google.com/ to translate this to English. http://gsvit.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/foto-009.jpg http://gsvit.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/foto-007.jpg http://gsvit.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/foto-006.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 03:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6476</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6475</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Right, so all the O2 in the cell will become water vapor at 600 C or earlier. Does that have an effect on LENR? Who knows...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 21:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6475</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GlowFish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6474</link>
			<description><![CDATA[According to Google, apparently NiO reduces back to Ni in the presence of H2 at about 600 'C anyway.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GlowFish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 21:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6474</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6472</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for that Glowfish. The surface area of the Ni particles is pretty big, but they will only oxidize on the surface, and that would already be mostly oxide from manufacturing and storage in air. And the amount of H2 released by the LiH is many times the volume of the cell, thus the high pressure seen.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 20:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6472</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GlowFish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6470</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ok, It turned out to be a silly question. I calculated an potential loss of 0,2% of the Ni to NiO or 0,5% of the generated H2 gas to H2O. The NiO would be generated first at 400 'C while the H2O only generates at about 570 'C apparently.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GlowFish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 20:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6470</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6469</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Good questions!. The molar quantities of each gas can be found from the experiment documents. Do some calculations and let us know what you find.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6469</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GlowFish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6468</link>
			<description><![CDATA[At the start, the glowstick is filled with air? Could the oxygen in this bit of air be interfering with the initial adsorption of the hydrogen by forming a nickel oxide? Could the oxygen eventually react with the hydrogen at high temperatures and pressure? Could the the glowstick could be flushed with a bit of hydrogen at the start of the experiment?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GlowFish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6468</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6467</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dieter, it's never a waste of time to clarify experimental data, and I welcome your questions. As far as the possible timing issues in my power measurement method, the duty cycle time of the PID on/off behavior was programmed to be longer than the time constant of the ac/dc converter. I tested this part of the system by comparing known steady-state power vs temperature against the power data collected during the GS2 calibrations. The resulting chart showed a very good match, so I committed to using this technique for the Glowstick experiments. It is the result of a series of compromises and so isn't perfect. But I believe I can claim an accuracy of ±2% or so over most of the operating range. http://magicsound.us/MFMP/GS2_Power_test.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6467</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter G. says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6466</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ups, sorry then for wasting your time. Well this setup will give reasonable results then, if the heater is operated continously (no on/off-switchin g). The problems arising from switching are 1.) The resulting voltage (after the rectifier) is not the average, because charging and discharging of the filter-capacito r happens at much different time-constants (charging happens through the low impedance of the transformer, discharching happens through the high impedance 11K-Resistor(+1 00K from HugNet)) This can be solved of course by adding about 10K in series with the transformer. 2.) even if 1.) is solved, it still is not the squared mean, which is required. Now without switching, the basic waveform is known (sine) and stays the same all the time. The whole waveform is just scaled up or down due to the variac, thus it is valid to do the squaring afterwards. What you can do now is kind of a two-pronged approach : Leave everything as it is, but have the solid-state-rel ay "on" all the time by default (set PID-setpoint to 1 million degrees). Regulate the power with the variac only whenever possible. As long as you do so, you should get reasonable values for the heater-power. If then you are tired or for whatever reason need the PID-controller you can still activate it, sacrificing the heater-power-re adings then and only then. Btw.: The other approach (without rectifier, sampling the AC at high frequencies and processing the data on the fly) will also work with a switching setup. It will also be more acurate (no voltage loss due to the recifier) and straight forward to calculate.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter G.</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 12:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6466</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6465</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dieter, the 9 v.d.c analog block used to monitor the coil voltage was modified as you described, using 100 uf and 11k for a ~1 second time constant. Then it was connected to the DAQ system (100k input impedance) and carefully calibrated against an accurate RMS meter on the variac output.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 21:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6465</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter G. says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6464</link>
			<description><![CDATA[On the other hand : all those improvments are an embellishment; If there would have been LENR, you'd have "seen" it, even with the current setup. Unfortunately (in this case), I'm not a physicist, I'm an electronic guy. The main question remains, why LENR didn't happen. Maybe Parkhomov and Songsheng were somehow lucky. It could be a small detail, considered irrelevant by everyone, that makes the difference. Damn, I really had hoped you would replicate the effect as I don't really trust parkhomov and songsheng to be honest. But who knows, the "fight" isn't over yet. Good luck !]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter G.</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 20:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6464</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter G. says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6463</link>
			<description><![CDATA[alternatively, if it is not possible to process data on the fly with the hugnet-system, you could rectify the output of the transformer. With a filter capacitor of e.g. 1000µF after the rectifier and an artificial load (resistor) of 1K-Ohm you'll get a time-constant of 1s. The averaging is done in hardware by the capaticor in conjunction with the restor with this setup. The square of the resulting voltage will be proportional to the power of the heater. Of course there will be an offset due to the forward-voltage drop of the rectifier (low voltages will be "absorbed"). Also, you would need to keep the recticier at a more or less constant temperature (say, within 5°C) beacause the forward-voltage drop depends alot on temperatue. It will be a bit difficult to determine the actual power in watts with this setup, but the resulting values will be proportional to the power with a fairly constant factor (It won't vary alot from time to time, so experiments will be comparable even if the actuall watts can only be roughly guessed)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter G.</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 19:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6463</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter G. says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6462</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I@AlanG As I already said : It's not about producing tons of data, it's about determining the peak at the secondary side of your 9V-transformer. You must discard most of the data on the fly and keep only the peaks. At 60Hz mains-frequency you'll get 120 peak-values per second. Sum up 600 of them, calculate the average and store this single value only. That would result in one value each 5 seconds. alternatively, instead of searching for the peak, you could just calculate the quadratic mean out of the samples. Of course, it would not make any sense to store all those samples as this would bloat your datafiles alot. regarding the feasability of manual control : parkhomov and songsheng both did it. I'd expect the system to be fairly steady, so I don't think there will be the need to "turn the knob" every 5 Minutes. Think about it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter G.</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 19:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6462</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6461</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Dieter, these experiments run continuously for days at a time. It isn't practical to require manual control over such a long period. And data sampling at 1 kHz would produce files far to large for any spreadsheet I've seen. Practical compromises are required to achieve a workable system.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 16:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6461</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6460</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ https://dev.hugllc.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page https://dev.hugllc.com/wiki/index.php/Project:HUGnetLab]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 16:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6460</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter G. says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6459</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is there something like a datasheet available for the "HugnetLab Data System". Who made it ? Did you build it yourself ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter G.</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 16:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6459</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter G. says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6458</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yes, using pure sine-waves makes sense, as it avoids a lot of RFI-problems. So using the variac is nice from this point of view. As Mike Henderson also pointed out, determining the actual heater-power is somewhat painfull with your current setup. One (the simplest and cheapest) solution would be to kick out the PID and the solid-state-rel ay, regulating power manually with the variac only. This in conjuction with an increased sample-rate of about 1KHz on the DataAquisition of the "heater voltage" (*1) would already result in much more consistent readings of the heater-power, eliminating the need to average hundreds of samples to get a reasonable value. (*1) what is actually needed is (not alot of samples but) the peak-value of the voltage of your 9VAC-transforme r. Another solution would be to get hands on a single-phase power-controlle r like "Jumo TYA 201" (Goolge) however these are somewhat expensive (about $800 for the above one). These devices are capable of a mode of operation called "burst firing mode" where only whole halfwaves are passed to the load or blocked. The device then switches at the zero-crossings of the mains only. This avoids the RFI-Problems associated with cutting on or off in between. The devices are also able to regulate to a certain power directly. That is, if you feed e.g. 2V to the control-input (ranging from 0-10V), you will get 20% of the maximum power on an ohmic load.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter G.</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 11:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6458</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter G. says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6457</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Glowfish 1.) Any PID-controller should be able to output an analog signal, as this is mandatory for normal operation. Using a PID as an on/off-controll er (where no analog output is needed) is somewhat special. 2.) regarding the 0-5V linear input : My warning was not targeted at [if the regulation will work or not], you are right, the PID can handle it. Instead its about knowing the heater-power or not. I just wanted to point to the fact, that an analog input-signal of 1V will not yield 20% of power (as suggested by a linear function). There will be no linear relation between input-voltage and power-output if the "input is linear in terms of phase angle". Instead, it will be the integral of a sin²-function where the integral goes from zero to [somewhere between zero an PI, now with a LINAER relationship to the analog input signal] (That is : the point where the integral ends, will move linearily between zero and PI, depending on the input voltage). Sorry, I don't know if this is understandable. Its hard to express for me. But I think the guys know already. Additionally, there will most likely be a "dead zone" at low voltages where the output stays zero for small input-voltages. Also, the opposite is possible, like e.g. in a dimmer, where you cannot really go down to zero output. Depends on the application the phase-angle-con troller is targeted to.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter G.</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 11:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6457</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6455</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Answers to many of your questions can be found in the complete documentation of the experiment, available at: tinyurl.com/o8k uxxc I've included a system block diagram showing the control and power components, a drawing of the cell and all the data files. The decision to use sine wave power was made to ensure that thermocouple data was free of RFI problems. PID control was employed to permit automation of the desired complex temperature rise profile, with uninterrupted, detailed data collection over an experiment lasting several days.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 16:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6455</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6454</link>
			<description><![CDATA[But I like the spaghetti... sniff.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 15:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6454</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6452</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When I can get to it, the phase chopper here will be used with the Optris and PCE830 -may even get a spot on the Optris to drive the virtual PID, so should be fine.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6452</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GlowFish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6451</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Apologies. I meant PID controller. I seem to have PWM on the brain recently. That shouldn't matter too much. The little bit of non-linearity should be handled by whatever PID controller AlanG chooses to use. The control setpoint is temperature, not power and the relationship between temperature and coil power is probably quite nasty already. Potential interference can be reduced by twisting the thermocouple leads together until they reach the measurement inputs in a tight braid. It can also be helped by covering the twisted cable with a foil shield and tying the shield to Negative just at the measurement side (except the foil might melt at the higher temperatures so just twist the pairs and leave the shield unless you really need it). As for ground loop issues, as far as I understand it, AlanG has put the voltage measurement signals through an isolation transformer. The HUG board is powered through an isolated supply and I imagine the laptop power supply is of an isolated flyback type. The HUG board also uses isolated RS485 communications so there shouldn't be any major ground loop issues.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GlowFish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6451</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter G. says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6447</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG, reg. Post#329 of course it could be just leakage and permeation causing the lower pressures in their setups, but I think we cannot be sure. (I found this (diagram on page 3) http://www5vip.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/4814137.pdf about hydroge permeation btw.) In one of your glowstick-tests (it was the first one with "original" parkhomov nickel-powder) the pressure declined remarkably more during the course of the run, if I remeber right. Thats why I stumbled over the -by comparison- small decline this time. But it is just an idea, just keep it somewhere back in your head. (just as a reminder : I speculated, that the loading-process was hindered somehow; This is different from [the pressure having a direct effect on LENR], as refered to by Robert Greenyer in Post #341)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter G.</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6447</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6446</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@David Roberson Denis Vasilenko/Firax Tech is at the leading edge of near-exact Parkhomov original reactor design evaluation. See here: https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/976657919031574 In addition, Songsheng Jiang claims that they did not see pressure effect the output too much. With these to research threads in the open and operating in Parallel with our efforts, it is probably best that Alan & Skips work builds on their understanding and expertise to date, with the next variation to have a fatter bore.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6446</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6445</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG I was interested in the Parkhomov reactor that was placed into the water calorimeter which you discuss within your post. If his data is accurate and the COP was real then that would be the ideal system to test. It is unfortunate that he did not detail that one well enough for a close replication. Your plans do however appear to include another closer attempt that might yield good results. You have performed productive research and now can achieve the tube seals that he was apparently not able to obtain during his earlier experimentation . But, it appears that the reaction may work without such a high quality seal. My suspicion is that it is more important to keep the core surrounded by a high temperature cavity that does not have an attached cold region that degrades the LENR reaction. Parkhomov did not measure the pressure within the core during that first test so we can not ensure that it was hydrogen tight. Of course, when I look at the massive quantity of cement enclosing the core ends and extending outwards several cm I can believe it is fairly tighly sealed. This type of design also acts like a reasonable heat seal along those directions. Alan, it does not require a very careful examination of Rossi's tested Hot Cats to realize that they were not that well sealed either. So, we are left with one question. Did either or both of these designs actually produce excess power? If the answer to that question is no, then you are not going to be successful in your research along this path. Parkhomov claims to have calibrated his calorimeter by using a know power source. If performed properly, that should establish beyond much doubt that he saw excess power during his initial testing. That is what I am basing my thinking upon.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 07:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6445</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6444</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ glowfish confirmed just tried it the magnetic field passes right through to a piece of steel. the only thing I am not convinced with on the magnetic stimulation is at certain temps magnets fail to be magnets. you can take a strong magnet from a hard drive and when heated up they cease to be magnetic even after cooling.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 22:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6444</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6443</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ glow fish stainless is not magnetic should pass through I would think]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 22:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6443</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6442</link>
			<description><![CDATA[David, which Parkhomov reactor would you want to see exactly replicated? He published an image of a box of failed ones, leading up to the one in the water calorimeter that was reported to work. He never revealed sufficient details of that design to allow accurate replication. I tried his specified sealing method several times and found it did not work when applied to alumina tubes. Only later did he reveal that he had used ~50% silica tubes (Mullite), after he had abandoned that design in favor of one closer to my approach. A future series of MFMP experiments will use Mullite tubes closer to the reported dimensions of Parkhomov, with sealing by compression fittings or epoxy, both of which he has tried. Regarding metal vapors in the tube, the evidence suggests they do not occur in significant quantity, nor does liquid metal appear to wick out between the core and the filler rods. But I'll have a look at the GS2 rods. If molten metal hits the rod end and penetrates any distance around it, a gas-tight plug might form. Where the metal touches the cooler ceramic just outside the heater, it would freeze in place. Increasing gas pressure (as in a slow ramp-up) would force more molten metal into any gaps and plug them all. Then what would the pressure gauge show?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 21:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6442</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GlowFish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6441</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The experiments so far used a non-conductive reactor core. If however you used a stainless steel core, aren't you essentially creating a weakly coupled air core transformer with the primary winding being the heater coil and the secondary being a single shorted turn? If that was the case, does the waveform matter at all in generating LENR as essentially the fuel would be somewhat shielded from magnetic effects by the steel? Any thoughts?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GlowFish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 20:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6441</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6440</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG, do you understand why the metals would not deposit upon the much cooler surfaces if they exist in a vapor form? This may be an obvious hint that Lithium or aluminum vapor is not being released in significant quantities. Are you assuming that Parkhomov did not actually see excess heat during his first replication experiment? Perhaps I missed the analysis that showed a problem in his technique. Where can I find a reference to that determination? Of course, if Parkhomov did get excess heat it suggests that the leaky seals are not a critically major problem. That is why I am concerned that we have not given his original, simplified design a fair hearing. Your GS device is quite elegant and offers plenty of useful features, but LENR is what we want to replicate and it may not like all of the external structures.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 20:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6440</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6438</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@David R I've disassembled two GlowStick reactors and there was very little migration of metal vapors along the filler tubes. Parkhomov's original short tube design isn't viable because of the high temperature at the seals. It's also difficult to build a durable heater coil in the shorter working length, and he also abandoned it in favor of longer tubes for those same reason.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6438</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6436</link>
			<description><![CDATA[To me the results are clear, excess heat maybe as much as 200 watts. Alan's plan to make the fuel tube a bit larger in diameter is a sensible next step. Alan has given us a design that most university machine shops can produce in short time with short budget. All materials are listed, available and modest cost. The HUG board is nice to have but pencil and paper still works.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6436</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6435</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is there any plan to go back to the basic design used during the original Parkhomov experiment? I have a concern that the added long inner core tube may be killing the results. Surely the cold extensions of that tube allow any metal vapors to be condensed in those areas which would not happen within the original, short core design. I would also expect heat to be transferred by the gasses from the hot center region towards the outside in a similar fashion. I realize that this would mean that no pressure readings could be taken, but LENR is what we are searching for after all. My fear is that you are going to become frustrated and move on to other systems because of a lack of clear results. Please go back to the simple arrangement for at least one more experiment before that occurs! You can use your newly obtained knowledge of sealing, etc. to make the old test more viable.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6435</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6434</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Dieter I think the lower pressure reported by Parkhomov was due to the materials used. My design uses high-purity thick alumina tubes and Swagelok seals, and this combination has proved to be hydrogen-tight over soak times of many weeks. The mullite tubes and cement seals used by Parkhomov would probably not be as good in this regard. The experiment reported by Songsheng is also different in that the reactor core is stainless steel, known to be porous to hydrogen. In addition, the reactor was pumped down to vacuum and out-gassed prior to and during early stages of heating. Both these reportedly successful experiments offer useful hints on ways to modify my design and protocol for future tests. In particular, the use of a stainless steel core would make fabrication and gas plumbing easier to implement.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6434</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dieter G. says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6433</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I still wonder why the pressure during the first run stayed so high. In contrast, it seems that the chinese guy added hydrogen several times during his experiment and it all got consumed. Look at Figure 6 in his report (https://www.scribd.com/doc/267085905/New-Result-on-Anomalous-Heat-Production-in-Hydrogen-loaded), the yellow line is pressure. I guess the sharp increases occuring occasionally over time (saw-tooth-like pattern) is when he added hydrogen. One can speculate, that something hinders the loading process in your setup. But I have no real idea what it could be at the moment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dieter G.</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6433</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6432</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I've uploaded the GS3 background-corr ected gamma spectrum files, which can only be opened with the USX software that comes with the SpecTech spectrometer. The software can be downloaded for free from http://www.spectrumtechniques.com/software_downloads.htm The archive is here: http://tinyurl.com/qcvsasn For quick viewing convenience, I made an animated .gif from screenshots of each spectrum record. The animation is included in the archive and attached here. http://magicsound.us/MFMP/spectrum-.gif]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 22:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6432</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6431</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It was the HUGnetLab inputs that were switched in the retest of 2 June (GS3-3), and the test confirmed that the DAQ system was working correctly. It also showed that significant error in the active TC data came from axial constraint of the heater coil. This is an important finding, because the unconstrained expansion of the coil is a key part of the GlowStick mechanical/ther mal design, one that will be improved as a result of this test. The data may have utility beyond that, but the active temperature values have wide error bands and should not be used for comparison with the other runs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 15:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6431</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peter Mobberley says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6430</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mike and Ed, Nobody ever said (per se) that Li7 transmuted to Li6. The Lugano Elforsk data says the following: Of a fuel SAMPLE Li7/Li6 ratio is 93/7 Of an ash SAMPLE Li7/Li6 ratio is 7/93 This is possible in 3 ways: 1. Li7 transmutes to Li6 -------- energetically unfavourable. 2. Li6 breeds -------- unlikely 3. Li7 disappears ------ Likely p+Li7 >Be8> 2alpha +17Mev The 2 alphas moderate within the reactor giving up their 17Mev as heat. (approx figures throughout) Best wishes Pete.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peter Mobberley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6430</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6429</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Given the complications of the switch in columns and TC compensation, probably yes. It did show that the hugnet was working.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6429</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6428</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG: should the previous run be ignored for the time being?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 04:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6428</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6427</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The data files from the third retest are at http://tinyurl.com/ngxez2l Here's a detail image of the temps toward the end of the test: http://magicsound.us/MFMP/GS3-4_end_detail.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 00:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6427</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6426</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Quick video review of last post "Active" run test of the *GlowStick* GS3 []=Project Dog Bone=[] http://youtu.be/um9pN00HiVA]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 23:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6426</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6425</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'll work on the background corrected gamma spectra once today's test completes.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6425</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6424</link>
			<description><![CDATA[All, is the background subtracted gamma spectrum available?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 20:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6424</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GlowFish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6423</link>
			<description><![CDATA[LAH was initially added to provide the hydrogen for the reaction. If, however, the LAH plays a more functional role due to the added Li and Al then you might want more of it in the mix. If I understand correctly, adding more LAH to the mix would increase the internal Glowstick pressure above safe limits when it starts to decompose. Why not add a small safety pressure release valve to "burp" the excess hydrogen gas from the reactor while it is running. There should be automatic release valves rated to operate at a certain pressure. That way, you can increase the LAH to Nickel ratio. You will obviously waste a bit of hydrogen in the process but the aim to see what causes the effect.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GlowFish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 20:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6423</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6421</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mike, I have not gone through the numbers for the Rossi experiment. I think you are telling me that the number of neutrons gained by the nickel is orders of magnitude more than the number of hydrogen atoms in the fuel? And more than the number of Li plus H. If so, there is no obvious reaction more like {/sarc on} magic. I went and read the report. You are right there are far too few hydrogen to supply the neutrons.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 19:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6421</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Henderson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6420</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin Pell I understand mass deficit, binding energy, and E=MC^2 ... those amount should be nanograms. The problem I am pointing out is at a far more macro scale. If Ni really does gain 3 neutrons per atoms and Li loses one per atom, there is a gap of .047 GRAMS (not nanograms). Where do I get the extra neutrons from to complete the mass deficit calc?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mike Henderson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6420</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6419</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Charlie, I like the idea of separate Ni and LAH with separate heaters. It would show if it is the H that causes the effect. That is the liquid Li and Al would be contained separate from the Ni powder, only the H gas would mix with the powder. There could be several segments with LAH each with its own heater so that varying amount of H can be released. Mike, mass loss is what we want. It is the turning of mass to energy that is the goal. Ecco, from your graph and Sanjeev's graph it is clear something happened at 600C. There are dozens of good experiments to try with the existing configuration but maybe we will need to move to calorimetry to decide what is happening at 600C? Bob's idea about cylindrical conduction calorimetry looks useful.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6419</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6418</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mike, I get 0.006 grams of H in Alan's glowstick. Or, 6E-6 Kg of H. A typical proton and electron of mass ~1000MeV releases on the order of 1MeV when added to a Ni as a neutron. Do not ask how we get to the neutron. That is shifts the mass by 1 part in 1E3. Factoring all these together 6E-6 x 1E-3 = 6E-9 Kg of binding energy released. Using E=mc^2 we get 9E16 x 6E-9 = 5.4E8 joules of energy released if all the H is used. That is 150 KWHr. Or, 150 watts for 1000 hours (42 days).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6418</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Henderson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6416</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Corrections: Li7 to Li6 causes a loss of .0022 gm, not .022. The net mass loss between Ni and Li is .0467 gm. There are only .010 gm of H in the LAH (not .001). We would need at least 4.67 times as much H for it to contribute all of the missing neutrons.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mike Henderson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6416</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6413</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Ecco Here is the corrected gif animation https://goo.gl/byCHif]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6413</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6412</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mike Henderson: I replotted the graphs using 0.000559 * T + 8.605. The difference doesn't seem to be very large. Calibration: http://i.imgur.com/W04rSxg.png Run 1: http://i.imgur.com/7ukcnHR.png Run 2: http://i.imgur.com/R2feEZS.png Run 3: http://i.imgur.com/GKdSuq5.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6412</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Henderson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6410</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco ... I recommend using .000559 for the slope parameter, not .0006. AlanG apparently rounded to only one significant digit and .000600 is quite different from .000559.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mike Henderson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6410</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Henderson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6411</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco ... I recommend using .000559 for the slope parameter, not .0006. AlanG apparently rounded to only one significant digit and .000600 is quite different from .000559.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mike Henderson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6411</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6409</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mike Henderson: yes, this is what I did in the code for my graphs (from which you might understand why I swapped by mistake Calibration and Run #3 data; I got confused on poorly chosen variable names): http://i.imgur.com/4UAmk0Z.png http://i.imgur.com/4UAmk0Z.png This is what happens with hastily written ugly code….]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6409</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6407</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: I'm sorry to inform you that I previously sloppily swapped Run #3 with Calibration by mistake. I've fixed that. You should download the updated graph for Run #3 again and recreate the gif animation. Interesting comparison, though.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6407</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6406</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco I made a gif anim of them https://goo.gl/rmQR8g]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6406</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6404</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: have a look at these graphs. I've plotted as a scatter plot raw input power data against "active temperature" http://i.imgur.com/kpj8Btgl.png Full size: http://i.imgur.com/kpj8Btg.png Run #2 "reheat": http://i.imgur.com/wjWMnRXl.png Full size: http://i.imgur.com/wjWMnRX.png It's got a much lower peak power than the previous run. Run #3 http://i.imgur.com/9VzQ2dQl.png Full size: http://i.imgur.com/9VzQ2dQ.png EDIT: I think there's need for a wattmeter to be 100% sure on the amount of energy going into the heater and confirm if there's really some correlation between temperature and input power choppiness/qual ity or if it's just an electrical/calc ulation artifact implying that the average energy input over time is actually lower when input voltage is set up to be constant. EDIT2: for completeness' sake, here's one for the calibration run: http://i.imgur.com/6WPboz1l.png Full size: http://i.imgur.com/6WPboz1.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6404</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6403</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco I would suggest a DC test]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6403</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6402</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer: as temperatures seem to be lower when constant voltage is applied (even taking into account a shift in the heating coil as hinted in some of the screen grabs in the latest Google folder), could that be because the PID started to work harder/choppier for some reason in an attempt to maintain temperatures close to the desired target? (but causing higher temperatures instead as a side-effect. This assumes some sort of anomalous reaction occurring)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6402</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6401</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Ecco, So I can hypothesise that wire/TC shift or loading of fuel between control and fuelled run could explain the shift to the left from control, but I am not sure how to explain the departure at 600 in the first run from the other runs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6401</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6400</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Updated graph with the latest raw data (orange data series) http://i.imgur.com/iHne1Wwl.png Full size: http://i.imgur.com/iHne1Ww.png I've plotted only the slow power up section. And this is the other section with constant voltage steps (upward and downward). Very interesting. Temperatures appear to be lower this way. http://i.imgur.com/gda2Sj2l.png Full size: http://i.imgur.com/gda2Sj2.png Raw data from the latest run here: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxxJkjesxe4kfnlRcFB2ZzFVdDdDTGhDdFNNVEx4T3FuUXNpRm1YOVdHRkdERHlhaUZtcjA&usp=sharing]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6400</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6399</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I took the time to make my own graph with the available raw data, following Sanjeev's efforts: http://i.imgur.com/cIKrBd6.png (using Python3 + Matplotlib + pandas) EDIT: graph corrected, I previously put a label in the wrong place. EDIT2 see next comment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 07:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-6399</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
