<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 12:34:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5003</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco, we have been completely ignoring it while we work on the new powder cells. We were in that room, so we might have inadvertently affected it, but we did nothing intentional or noticeable to it. We still have the possibility of writing a script to time sample the gamma file, but other than that long shot, we ran out of ideas about how to test to see if it was something convection related vs something else.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 14:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-5003</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4915</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Due to the usual problems with the Evernote app stopping receiving notebook updates after a while and fooling me into thinking that nothing was going on, I switched to the clunky Evernote web interface. I see you're currently attempting a 1W step down experiment. Interestingly, it seems that temperatures are getting noisier as power gets decreased. I would have expected the opposite happening. It's still hard to figure out what's going on exactly, though. I didn't initially realize there's a cooling water jacket in this cell, so it might be an idea to switch it off and empty it completely from water for a few hours to make sure it's not causing side effects (since temporarily stopping the water flow alone seems to affect significantly cell behavior as you tested yesterday).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4915</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4894</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fixed the evernote image.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4894</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4893</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I see a related update in the Evernote logbook, but the attached image isn't loading either from the Evernote web interface or from the official application.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4893</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4886</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ All I did some more playing with the cell this morning. I detached the power supply from the cell and used a power resistor to test our control software. It works fine on a resistor. We may have a loose connection or short somewhere in the cell. Currently the cell is not powered and we will decide what to do. We are going to open up the cell to rule out any shorts or loose connections. The test will not be collecting while the cell is unhooked.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4886</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4880</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It appears that the cell has 3 modes it has operated under during the last week. The write up is int he lab notebook entry for today.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4880</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Malachi Heder says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4878</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco They should be now every 1-2 seconds. I found that the system was trying to read a board that was no longer attached, that was slowing everything down.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Malachi Heder</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4878</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4877</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Malachi: thanks, it looks like high resolution data points are slowly coming in; still not quite every second, though.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4877</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4875</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It looks like there is an inverse correlation between T_Board (ambient temperature?) and Active Wire resistance: http://i.imgur.com/PJ92yW4.png http://i.imgur.com/PJ92yW4.png This could imply that the strange repeating signals/cell behavior were due to a hardware fault somewhere.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4875</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Giorgio says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4873</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco point [0011]: https://data.epo.org/publication-server/rest/v1.0/publication-dates/20140101/patents/EP2680271NWA1/document.pdf It's possible that monoatomic hydrogen is a pre-condition for "ultradense hydrogen" http://www2.chem.gu.se/~holmlid/ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ----- Francesco Celani says that a prolonged permanence in air may damage his wires, while keeping them in hydrogen atmosphere for long time may be useful.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4873</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4872</link>
			<description><![CDATA[http://world.std.com/~mica/nanortechnology.htm This is the only official source I could readily find. There are video lectures on Youtube and Powerpoint slides available elsewhere but I don't remember reading very detailed descriptions about these devices. What I am aware of is that NANORs use "pre-loaded" active materials. They do contain deuterium, but not in gaseous form. This is how they look like: http://www.e-catworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/NANOR-2014_edited-1.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4872</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Giorgio says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4871</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Where can I find a detailed description of NANOR ? Are you sure that it does not use hydrogen or deuterium ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4871</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4870</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Giorgio: what about non-gaseous, "solid-state" systems, like Swartz's NANOR? If it does work, it implies that active catalytic hydrogen/deuter ium splitting is not actually needed for LENR to occur. It would be more like a trigger to achieve the proper conditions for it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4870</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Giorgio says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4869</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco " might have a positive energy balance?" I don't know, but prof. Sergio Focardi clearly stated the importance of H2 splitting in the E-cat reactor: http://22passi.blogspot.it/2011/07/intervista-di-focardi-energylab.html "Attraverso il catalizzatore l’idrogeno si trasforma da molecolare ad atomico..." "Could long-term exposure to H2 be the key?" I'll forward the question to Francesco Celani]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 14:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4869</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4868</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Giorgio: do you think the entire process in this specific case, assuming no artifact is occurring (which might not be the case), might have a positive energy balance? If yes, then the cell's exterior surface should also be slightly hotter than normal for the given input power. It's a bummer that it's not being monitored, although I understand that assessing the cell's thermal output wasn't the original purpose of this experiment. The only question would be why is it acting like this way only now? Could long-term exposure to H2 be the key?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4868</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Giorgio says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4867</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco I mean that, if this is not a bug of the experimental setup, the endothermic H2 splitting at active wire and successive exothermic recombination in Pt wire may explain the anticorrelation of temperatures. This may also explain the significative difference beetween Pt and Cu wire temperatures.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4867</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4866</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Giorgio: if H2 is getting split at the active wire, wouldn't it too decrease in temperature? What we have instead is that since the onset of this repeating signal its temperature has always been higher than prior it. I would really want to make sure there isn't some fault somewhere, though. Not just physically (cabling, cell integrity, power supply, etc), but also on the software part.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4866</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Giorgio says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4865</link>
			<description><![CDATA[H2 splitting is an endothermic process, this may explain the anticorrelation between the active wire temperature and Cu and Pt wires temperature.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4865</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4864</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When T_Wire suddenly increases, T_Pt and T_Cu decrease. I wonder if pressure spikes caused by the very quick rise in T_Wire temperature cause them to act the opposite. It would be interesting to see what happens with more or less gas inside the cell. http://i.imgur.com/YiJvPeB.png http://i.imgur.com/YiJvPeB.png I've managed to plot this with "history" data. Are you able to run data polling at a higher rate, even just temporarily? It's possible that spikes might be actually higher than what can be seen here, but are getting averaged out by the 0.1 Hz data rate.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 21:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4864</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4863</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What instead about physically bothering the cell with a hard tool? Without of course damaging it by hitting too hard. If the effect stops, then there likely is something loose inside. --- I tried downloading the past three days of data to attempt different kinds of visualization than what the live data page provides, to hunt for patterns. Have a look at this for active wire temperature: http://i.imgur.com/Cb1cxTg.png http://i.imgur.com/Cb1cxTg.png Standard one, with connected data points: http://i.imgur.com/LvbzbgO.png http://i.imgur.com/LvbzbgO.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4863</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
