<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 23:00:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>JosefJuicy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9374</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi. I see that you don't update your page too often. I know that writing articles is time consuming and boring. But did you know that there is a tool that allows you to create new posts using existing content (from article directories or other pages from your niche)? And it does it very well. The new articles are unique and pass the copyscape test. Search in google and try: miftolo's tools]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JosefJuicy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9374</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TandyBold says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9133</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have checked your blog and i've found some duplicate content, that's why you don't rank high in google's search results, but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique articles, search for: SSundee advices unlimited content for your blog]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TandyBold</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 22:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9133</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4614</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Alan G We have been advised to silver plate the copper. @charlie tapp That is part of the point of this experiment, to establish the potential material point yield significance from this effect. That is why having a material that is very good at catalysing recombination (platinum) on one thermocouple and another that is bad will give help us understand the spread.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4614</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4612</link>
			<description><![CDATA[MFMP wrote: The last issue we see is that the Cu is oxidizing and turning black. This will continue to affect the temperature reading. It may affect the catalytic recombination as well. Could there be another metal to use? Should we replace the copper each time, or should we only run without oxygen? In the Hokkaido experiments on H1 catalysis by glass (at 300c), selective gold plating was used to prevent recombination in the apparatus outside of the test vessel. Gold-plated copper wire is easy to source from jewelry supply outlets.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4612</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Walker says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4611</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi MFMP people. It is always worth noting that the Fleischmann Pons effect if it is in the Nuclear forces range of energy output obeys e=m c^2 and that total amount of Uranium mass that was actually converted into energy in the Hiroshima bomb was just 0.6 of a gram. Incidentally that e=m c^2 seems to pass by many people who consider the amount of atomic mass that may be altered in say the Rossi apparatus, especially the ones who expect to make a killing on the nickel market. Not that I think Nickel is a major contributor to the energy output by its transmutation. The amount of Tritium being reported as out put and then sucked back in leads me to think the Fleischmann Pons effect is a Hydrogen Isotope Cascade to Helium. IMHO When an energy differential is applied to a hydrogen loaded crystal lattice of sufficient strength, causing the looser hydrogen electrons and atoms to oscillate building up as a synchronized wave with increasing energy, the geometry of cracks and uneven surfaces acts to lens electrons and maybe whole protons and neutrons between a rock and a hard place, forcing then inexorably together. Possibly two or three adjacent columns of hydrogen reaching surface discontinuities geometrically tuned into a Goldilocks zone to spit out hydrogen up the next isotope in the chain until tritium and then H4 and then Helium. Test tritium in a working LENR to see if it was quicker at producing heat.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Walker</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4611</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bob says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4607</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie The best common example of time shifting energy is a rechargable battery. If one's test apparatus didn't properly account for the energy input during charging one could easily get "fooled" into thinking that a transient burst of discharge energy at some later time was internally generated (eg. by LENR type processes). If your test apparatus takes account of charging energy you won't be fooled because no rechargable battery is 100% efficient. ie. you'll never get all the energy back out on discharge that was input during charge no matter how carefully you perform your test. H2 dissociation/re combination or water vapor splitting/refor mation are examples of chemical processes not unlike those in the rechargable battery above. We have to design our calorimeters to accumulate all energy (input + internal chemical reactions + LENR). thermalize it and vector all the resulting heat flux out a well defined and calibratable pathway. eg. conduction through solid layer a la water bucket test. We also have to design our experimental protocols to trigger and sustain the LENR effect for longer than brief transients to eliminate the possibility of false time shifted chemical reaction positives.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4607</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4606</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@bob wouldnt there be water vapor in the cell, or is it only recombinating h into h2 ? i sent ryan an old exerpt from a 1950's modern chemistry book i have, it explains the atomic hydrogen torch dr. langmuir invented. they explain recombination yielding not only heat in the forming of water vapor but additional heat equal to the dissociation of the h2 into h. mabee i read it wrong]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4606</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bob says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4602</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie You can't get net energy from dissociating H2 and then recombining it. In fact this sequence is likely to consume more energy during dissociation than is returned on recombination. The challenge with the open glass calorimeters is that these reaction steps are likely to be separated in time. If we don't use an integrating heat collector calorimeter (eg. Water bucket test) then this temporal separation could have recombination energy get mistaken as instantaneous heat generation.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4602</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Giorgio says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4601</link>
			<description><![CDATA[repeating the same test with copper and platinum wires swapped may give some important indications]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 16:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4601</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4591</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan Hunt: it appears that "cell design" is still too big. It must be due to the large embedded photos. EDIT: it's 65.6 MB big, in fact. The other one is only 2.6 MB big.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 21:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4591</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4588</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco- I just split that note into #1 - Experiment design and #2 - Calibration and design verification. Let me know if that works for you.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 21:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4588</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4587</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP: my version of Evernote is complaining that the latest note on the H2 splitting experiment is larger than 25 MB and it would require a Premium account to correctly view.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 21:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4587</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4579</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@AlanG As ever - good suggestions. We know Celani has been employing Tungsten in his tests and your suggestion to have a known active source is a good one.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4579</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4577</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie tapp This is not just about addressing the critics on the Langmuir debate, there is a second, very positive reason for this study as mentioned in the google doc. If mono-atomic hydrogen is important in LENR as many claim, and Celani is no exception, being able to create it in situ with controllable low input energies is very desirable. An apparatus that can determine the rate of H production and conditions for may help define optimum operating conditions and which wire processes create higher performing wires.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4577</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4571</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i dont see why it matters if the exess is from recombination of h it is still more power out than in who cares were it is from as long as it is there]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 20:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4571</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4570</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sveinn Olafsson Indeed, not only that, it is what we set out to do... and record the whole story from beginning to end (frankly, we did not expect it to take this long... who were we kidding!) If I recall correctly, Piantelli discusses in his patent that if there is too much pressure, 2H is recombined to H2. Running the experiment over a range of pressures will give a good indication of where to set the pressure in our definitive experiments such that any potential influence from this effect could be considered non-material.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4570</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sveinn Olafsson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4569</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi good to take care of everything. It will be fun to see at what H2 pressure you start to see difference between the thermocouples.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sveinn Olafsson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4569</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4568</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sveinn Olafsson Thankyou for your valuable contribution. Taking on board what you say, some influential scientists are suggesting that this effect could account for the apparent excess over control or calibrations, though they did concede that further runs of the Steel and Glass cells might settle this sticking point. We are trying to find incontrovertibl e proof, hence why we are going to such extremes to settle this outstanding question. @Bob Detractors say that the energy is imparted into the splitting of H2, that may then get absorbed into the crystal at large quantities, then it gets released and recombines on the borosilicate glass, releasing the net of the binding energy. This can not occur in inert calibrations or with passive wires in H2. I guess the claim is that the 'loading' energy is then released on de-loading. The S&G cells demonstrated that there was a net gain, but we need to be thorough if we are going to make extraordinary claims and this is part of the scientific process. The fact is that we are seeing differential or calibration based apparent excess heat for many weeks at a time - see the currently long running EU test as an example. @Ecco We are looking at implementing an auto generation of Google doc from the Evernote so that can be embedded using Zapier.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4568</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sveinn Olafsson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4567</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Langmuir effect is a low pressure effect. If the pressure is high 1 bar H2 then dissociated H2 molecules recombine everywhere in the H2 gas. The thermal conductivity is high for H2 gas so there is no extra heating on the glass wall. The mean free path for Hydrogen at 1 bar H2 is 70 nm but 10cm at 10-3mbar so there is only concern if calibration is done at low pressures. Sveinn]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sveinn Olafsson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4567</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bob says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4566</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Haven't read the Langmuir paper. However I'm curious how one could get any net heat production via the H2 dissociation/re combination reaction pathway. Would not the energy required to dissociate the H2 be returned upon recombination? From my understanding of H2 in metal systems it is easy to visualize dissociated hydrogen happening upon adsorption to the surface and with absorption into the lattice. I can't see dissociated H existing in the gas phase however. So how will it migrate to your reactive surfaces?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4566</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4565</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Did any active wire that was not in a glass cell configuration ever achieve a high loading level (R/R0 < 0.80)? I don't remember this happening, although if it didn't it could still be a coincidence. As for the Camera Cell experiment, it's say it's essential that you verify thermocouple behavior under helium, rather than vacuum first, then 'maybe' helium. Note: the Evernote document link isn't accessible. By the way, it would be helpful if the entire notebook was made available instead as then one wouldn't have to track each note individually, then.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 01:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4565</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
