<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 14:12:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4029</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP: before you start the next live run try checking if you can fix the live data feed at the moment - it's currently silent.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-4029</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3840</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@MFMP: under such a vacuum, seeing how resistance is settling at a still relatively low value [actually it appears it's increasing more or less linearly at the moment, although at a rather slow rate], the active wire in US Cell A must be receiving a very limited amount of heat through small patches in contact with the mica support and through some heat radiation by the Ni-Cr wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3840</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3796</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AH, yes, sorry. I was looking at Cell A and didn't realize B was powered too since I assumed that A was in loading phase and when that happens, B is usually left unpowered.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3796</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3795</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, 07/15/2013 12:00:00 07/15/2013 23:23:48 US 1.3B -- Pb(bar) shows .01 ... do you see something different?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3795</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3794</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B: the cell has been filled with 2 bar of H2, the Vac (mbar) field isn't reporting meaningful values anymore.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3794</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3793</link>
			<description><![CDATA[07/15/2013 12:00:00 07/15/2013 23:23:48 It seems that pulling the stronger vac on US1.3B is increasing the temps, is that expected? I guess I could see the mica temp going up, but the ext temps as well?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3793</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3789</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Edwin Pell Well, part of the MiniProject is to put across some of our ideas and get you guys to critique it / suggest ways to optimise it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2013 12:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3789</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3785</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Excellent, I am excited. Do you have an order of magnitude feel for the cost of making one? Thanks.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3785</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3764</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All We are readying our latest designs for the sequel to the Steel and Glass, for a mini project to let you guys let rip. It will be very flexible, allowing for single and dual chambers, flow through, fluid calorimetry, arc/glow and RF triggering. Bob]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3764</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3760</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think the control cell should be pumped through the active cell. This way the control cell is effectively in the ‘back-water’ and should follow the pressure rise of the active cell. This setup should enable de-convolution of any heating effect from LENR and simple pressure rise. Using, different lengths of active heating wire in the two cells (say ratio of 1:3) should enable other spurious excess energy results not linked to gas pressure rise to be de-convolved from the LENR effect. @Ecco The cells could also be coated with black ceramic paint.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3760</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3744</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@David Jones: it still won't prevent all possible issues/artifact s that could arise by having a transparent glass tube.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3744</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3740</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron That is an excellent idea.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3740</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3739</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco, You know, if we could demonstrate that the hydrogen remains in the wire under high pressure inert gas, it might be possible to do side by side tests with inert gas in both cells. Prepare the two cells, one with a hydrogen loaded wire and the other without]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3739</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3736</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B: that could be an interesting test to try out. An option to prevent this from happening could be to not start the test I previously proposed as soon as the wire is loaded, but to apply power under dynamic vacuum for a while first. I believe most of the hydrogen gets outgassed during this phase, when active wire resistance increases (EDIT: corrected) the most.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3736</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3735</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco, Do you think that the out-gassing would occur even if the inert gas pressure was very high? If you did that we could check to see if the pressure drops as it did with hydrogen. I understand that the atoms of H are much smaller but still, if there's a drop in pressure with the inert gas then we can make some assumptions about hydrogen.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3735</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3734</link>
			<description><![CDATA[By the way, I wonder if before removing the active wire from Cell A you could do as follows: - Quickly reload Cell A in H2 - Once the wire has loaded, power the cell off - Flush Cell A and Cell B from their current gases, then fill them with Helium at low pressure, while power is still off. Do this a couple times. - Apply vacuum again, connect both cells' vacuum lines together (as in EU Cells) - Apply power again This test should clear at least in part issues about the difference in thermal conductivity of the residual gases. However, Cell A will keep outgassing hydrogen under load and this might interfere with this test.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3734</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
