<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 15:19:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3741</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B I think that is a great idea (having an inert gas in a differential like this) - as I said in the other blog thread... Hydrogen is smallest molecule known to man - it leaks - some say Hydrogen Fuel Cell cars loose 10% of their fuel tank a day! B]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3741</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3738</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ecco, You know, if we could demonstrate that the hydrogen remains in the wire under high pressure inert gas, it might be possible to do side by side test with inert gas. Prepare the two cells, one with a hydrogen loaded wire and the other without.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3738</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3728</link>
			<description><![CDATA[One common thread of all the experiments is that hydrogen pressure is dropping. Is there some assumption that there's been a leak in all the cells constructed? It would sure be nice to know if this is a weakness in the design or something that's part of the reaction. As an engineer, I wouldn't be able to go past a leak in the system. It would have to be fixed since it can't be controlled in any way and that it would just add yet another variable to the many we already have. Would you consider using a different gas in a test cell just to check for obvious leaks?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 19:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3728</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3727</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Sveinn Olafsson The italian rock crushing research shows 10^3 more neutrons from crushed magnetite over background. This is an easy experiment to do and the evidence of transmutation is in the before and after sample analysis. The process is piezo (though no Hydrogen/Deuter ium loading). Given that Rossi was working with pyro electric crystals before his LENR research, the DARPA / NSF funded research from 2005 linked to below and the new Finnish claims there might be something to this. Should we ignore it when the potential benefits are profound. Here is the rock crushing presentation of that research. http://theatomunexplored.com/wp-content/docs/1carpinteri.pdf I have met some of the authors and we have been invited to replicate the experiments - of course, our DNA would require us to do it live with a video stream. It is the combination of resonantly excited condensed matter in specific combinations with triggers that give rise the events claimed. Our job is to get to the bottom of this in an open way.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 19:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3727</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sveinn Olafsson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3726</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Piezoelectricit y/Pyroelectrici ty is a long way to create neutrons to trigger a LENR. First option is to just wait for a cosmic ray to create a neutron in the experimental chamber, it will take a while. Simpler way could be to cover radioactive Am241 alpha source from smoke detector with Beryllium powder and keep it mixed within the experiment. The Am241 source (4000 alpha particles/sec) can maybe only give one neutron/sec from the 9Be(alpha,n)8Be reaction At least the neutron is in right place at right time, one stochastic variable less in the experiment. So is AmBe, RaBe powder mix needed in the LENR soup ? ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sveinn Olafsson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3726</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>arian558 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3709</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Another paper about this in journal of applied physics. http://fire.pppl.gov/accel_crystals_japhys_05.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arian558</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2013 12:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3709</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3708</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@arian558 I also think that Rossis previous work on Pyroelectric materials could have something to do with the secret sauce in his e-cat.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2013 07:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3708</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3707</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Arian558 We are getting there - there is never been a more appropriate time to launch a world wide open effort to make this science provide its potential benefits to the whole of humanity, for the people, by the people. This last pdf, the one in letters to Nature - using pyroelectric crystals, links to - Italian rock crushing experiments (piezo electric) - the finnish patent application (piezo electric/pyro electric) All about accelerating particles at the nano size to kinetic energies in specially prepared states such that advantageous effects are triggered.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2013 07:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3707</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>arian558 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3706</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Interesting paper from nature about successful cold fusion experiment http://fire.pppl.gov/cyrstal_fusion_nature.pdf]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arian558</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2013 07:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3706</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3704</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@arian558 We had already started testing with piezo additives and will no doubt add the pointers suggested herein to our experimental path. We need to focus on ICCF18 and our key fundraising push because we want to massively increase the number of researching bodies collaborating in this endeavour openly.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2013 06:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3704</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3697</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Arian558 - Interesting patent. Filing a patent based on an idea is totally different from having made a device work. Has he said anything about having applied his theories successfully? I would be very interested in playing with this theory if someone wants to study it up and design an experiment. We can easily do 20 bar and 400C. Who wants to help figure out what we need to do with the pyroelectric lithium tetraborate?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2013 02:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3697</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>blaze says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3693</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nickel nano powder plus pyroelectric lithium tetraborate plus hydrogen under pressure heated up to 400 degrees and pressure up to 20 bar ... That experiment would be cool :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>blaze</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2013 01:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3693</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>arian558 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3691</link>
			<description><![CDATA[More about Pekka Soininen R&D manager at Beneq Oy pekka.soininen@beneq.com ,+358405827898 Beneq Oy, based in Finland, is a leading supplier of industrial production and research equipment for thin film coatings used in solar photovoltaics, flexible electronics, strengthened glass and other emerging applications. Industry-proven Beneq equipment and thin film experience is used for improving the efficiency of crystalline silicon and thin film solar cells, producing transparent conductive oxide (TCO) coated glass and making touch screen glass more durable. Beneq has introduced several revolutionary innovations within its coating technologies, including true roll-to-roll atomic layer deposition (ALD) and high-yield atmospheric aerosol coating (nAERO®). http://www.beneq.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arian558</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 08:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3691</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>arian558 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3690</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Pekka Soininen a scientist from finnish apparently replicated e-cat and filled a detailed patent for it his name is on patents for number of companies, including Nokia , Another company he’s worked for is Beneq Oy, which is a company specializing in thin films/atomic-la yer-deposition/ nanotech and microclusters… download patent http://www.4shared.com/get/U5J-ZHML/WO2013076378A2.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arian558</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 04:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3690</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3688</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Charlie Tapp Interesting, would you like to make a small report about that? Are you considering research in this field?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 20:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3688</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3682</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@robert greenyer 304 stainless has about 8 percent nickel in it probably where your hydrogen is going.whene i was working on my stanley meyers type cell made from stainless i had lots of unexplained heat on my feed through bolts melting the sch 80 pvc pipe, not high enough amperage to do that i did not think. i thought the 5 psi presure was causing something in resistance or something electricaly related while investigateing on the net i found you guys]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3682</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3674</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Do you have time to put a black body object at the same distance from both reactors and see if it heats up differently? I think you proposed this test some time back. It would probably have a relatively large error margin, but it might reinforce your apparently positive results.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3674</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3673</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All Hmmm, the wire seamed to load... what to do?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3673</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3662</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Simply no time before Mathieu leaves on Friday.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 21:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3662</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3659</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You could attempt recovering the wire by oxidizing it in standard atmosphere, in other words the same procedure used by Edwin Pell to prepare plain constantan wires.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 19:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3659</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3658</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Not before ICCF - but maybe afterwards. Seeing as the wire appears pretty dead, we plan to do an experiment with 3 to 4 Celani wires in the active cell, 2 will have potential to be connected.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 19:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3658</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3657</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is GREAT - we know now we can kill a wire... this will be important at the end of the US dual cell run.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 19:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3657</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3656</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Do you have time to make a comparative test with smooth aluminum or copper foil placed in the same way around both glass tubes, and thermocouples placed on the foil (not under)? This would solve all issues about emissivity.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 19:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3656</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3654</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yup it's toasted!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 19:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3654</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
