<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 19:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Natalia says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9126</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You could certainly see your expertise within the work you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to say how they believe. At all times go after your heart.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Natalia</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 10:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9126</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MilesSmall says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8957</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have checked your blog and i have found some duplicate content, that's why you don't rank high in google, but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique articles, search for: Boorfe's tips unlimited content]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MilesSmall</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 22:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8957</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MilesSmall says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8956</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have checked your blog and i have found some duplicate content, that's why you don't rank high in google, but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique articles, search for: Boorfe's tips unlimited content]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MilesSmall</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 22:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8956</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3249</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Still, the power supply doesn't seem to be performing exceptionally well even at 1 hz.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3249</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3248</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The sweep function was not working well at those low frequencies, so it will sit right near 1 hz all night. We had it up to 21 hz and that messed with the power control algorithm pretty good.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3248</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3247</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is the DC polarity switching frequency slowly being increased over time at the moment, by the way? Wire resistance data suggests so to me.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3247</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3244</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Will the cell still run with the current 1 hour on-30 minutes off cycle? I think it will be more of interest to explore the polarity switching response at various frequencies while the cell is running at a steady state. I guess this will require continuous human presence, though.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 18:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3244</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3243</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just added in a DPDT mechanical relay powered by a bench top signal generator. It will start at 0.7 hz and we'll just play from here. I don't expect anything out of this particular wire, but we'll continue to play a bit.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 18:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3243</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3240</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We are installing a shelf just above that test to make more room for equipment. I think we are bumping it around a tiny bit as we disconnect the vac pump.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3240</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3238</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, your wish is our command. B]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3238</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3236</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan, How to you decide what temp to run the cell at and also what pressure? I was going over the data from the Mica cell from back in Feb and the temp that we got all the excess power was like 100C less than the temps that appear to be running now. When we had roughly 275C and .75 bar we had 10% excess power (and even a bit more).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3236</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3233</link>
			<description><![CDATA[From the experiment log: Just manually switched the polarity of the power wires. Weĺl see if that does anything overnight. Well I didn't know you could do that already! Can polarity be switched while the cell is running or does it require manual intervention possible only when power is off? If it's as simple as pressing a switch, it would interesting to do that repeteadly when power is applied and see what happens. Sort of like when you ring a bell, if you get the idea.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3233</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3231</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A really great piece of information in this puzzle soup would be a nice graph of the resistance of a wire in pressurized hydrogen at room temp over some period of time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3231</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3230</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco - Actually, it looks like our new water flow calorimeter that works with the same lenr sticks will likely be used for the multi wire test. Your idea of pre-loading by heating without the use of a calorimeter and monitoring the resistance and pressure make a lot of sense. For best results, though, it is good to do a calibration test with each stick.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3230</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3229</link>
			<description><![CDATA[True, but that would delay the more promising upcoming multi-wire experiment. An idea could be to have more spare "sticks" containing active wires and store them in a safe place (preferably heated), under highly pressurized hydrogen. In that way it would be possible to "pre-load" them for a long time while performing other experiments on a different stick in the CTC cell. Then, after experimenting with that stick (which might take several weeks or months), a different one could be swapped, and tests with new preloaded wires could quickly resume again. I'm not sure however if: - Sticks can be stored with pressurized hydrogen in a simple manner. - Calibration would be needed before reusing them again.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3229</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3228</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We could always do the deep evac if the the simple evac doesn't net any results. The bad thing about the deep evac is that it will be another couple of weeks to get the H2 loaded again.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3228</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3226</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Deep or light vacuum? Since there is apparently little to no progress I would go for a deep one (with some heat even). Maybe it's possible to "reset" the wire that way.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3226</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3225</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That resistance jump 22:42 CST was pretty funky. The power output level is higher than the calibrated error, but it's so small that I still can't have much confidence in it. I think it's time to move on and vacuum it out and then put in 0.5 bar H2, which is what Celani and STM said they had good success with]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3225</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3224</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't think we will get rid of the carbon with a vacuum. Celani saw higher power outputs with the carbon. We'll just get more Hydrogen into the system and less oxygen and other gasses. The data is up to date, again, after we installed a dedicated server for the data to go through. Sweet! .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3224</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3222</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think you might have a good idea here, is there any way to remove the carbon from the wire?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3222</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3221</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Woohoo.. the data from the CTC is up-to-date! That's the good news, and the bad news is that there was a 6 degree delta in the ambient! :o We are sure seeing some odd waveforms from this unit. It's nice to see the resistance climbing even though it seems to have gone through some machinations it's on the rise now. Can we assume that the 6 degree drop in the core temp is related to the drop in ambient? At least the excess power is climbing at the moment! : )]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3221</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3216</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the delay on the data. The laptop collecting this data's experiment was bogged down, but we couldn't reset it till it had completed a calibration cycle. The next bottleneck is the server on our campus receiving the data. That is a virtual server on hardware that is getting challenged. We are in the process today and tomorrow of putting a new dedicated hardware server for that task. We are hoping to launch a new Live Open Science website aimed at hosting these and other experiments and facilitating rich interactions and crowd-sourced science. The goal is that we will pull together a good group of software developers to make a database that is designed for this task from the start.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3216</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3212</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco I can't wait to see what the current data looks like. The local folks at HUG know, right? Does the excess continue to increase along with resistance increases?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3212</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3210</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When we tested and calibrated the CTC, the room temperatures were nice and constant. Now that it is getting warmer and we have more equipment in the little lab room, we are seeing ambients going higher. It seems the CTC can't maintaing the constant outer shell temp that it needs for the cleanest data, so we are going to have to shop for an air conditioner]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3210</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3208</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When the ambient went high yesterday evening, the outer shell temp rose, which through off the calorimetery and made an apparent dip. The pressure and the resistance seemed to be dependent on the internal temperature. I don;t see anything much exciting, so we are going to try reducing the pressure while hot in a couple steps. Then we'll pull a light vacuum and load with hydrogen after that. It'll be interesting to see what the resistance does with clean Hydrogen gas over everything. The carbon seems to have made the resistance quite high.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3208</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3206</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, Very interesting indeed. There was a bump up on ambient but to see both the pressure and resistance doing that dance is fascinating. Notice the power input? Any guess at what the cause is to make it go into oscillation like that?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3206</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3201</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Newly updated data (which has about a 12 hours delay) shows again a very interesting cell behavior. It would be nice to be able to follow this in real time.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3201</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3199</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco, Good morning! :) I know you spend lots of time with the data and I thank you for that. Someone has to do it and it's great that you're stepping up to the time investment. I suspect there are others quietly spending hours each day analyzing data. It would be nice to know who they are too. I hope we can find some magic stick to make the reaction happen more quickly.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3199</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3197</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I mean, we know from the literature in CF/LENR. As for the excess power in the first cells, I wouldn't take that too seriously. Too many unexpected and likely variables might have affected output power calculation, which ended up not being reliable anymore.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3197</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ron B says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3196</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We do know however that some sort of direct external stimulation definitely has a role in making relatively large amounts of excess heat show at command. How do we know this from experiments at MFMP? It took more than a month to achieve 14% excess power on the first cells and that was mostly with just "time in the test" without any planned stimulus (right??) Mica Cell 01/11/2013 00:00:00 - 02/20/2013 00:00:00 Ecco, you're sure right about there being lots of variables.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ron B</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3196</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3189</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ron B: yes, the CTC solves pretty much most of the problems there were with the clear cells, in my opinion. As long as testing conditions are within calibration ranges, any sudden and unexpected increase in output power should be taken seriously. This is not the "bullet proof" experiment you would show to skeptics, but for internal testing it's almost ideal.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 01:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3189</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3186</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A more readable wire resistance graph since the acetone experiment started, without the sudden peaks (with the data I have access to): http://i.imgur.com/jTvUimF.png http://i.imgur.com/jTvUimF.png It looks like the spread between resistance under load and off load got larger over time. I'm not sure, but this maybe is a result of the increasing internal pressure. BTW, you can see that the pressure anomaly started on the last June 9 cycle, which was causing a resistance increase. What happened in the following graph? It looks like the active insulation fan stopped working for a while, as there wasn't a corresponding core temperature increase: http://i.imgur.com/UVQyiDl.png http://i.imgur.com/UVQyiDl.png CEST times.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 01:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3186</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
