<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 12:43:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Cynthia says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-30668</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Découvrez le charme et l’élégance de cette époque iconique de la mode. Visit my web page black gay porn sex video - big ass xxx video sex porn: https://jeux.ca/instant-casino/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-30668</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ug44zef says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26692</link>
			<description><![CDATA[А вы довольны своим такси? С каждым днём всё больше водителей жалуются на дешёвые расценки, а пассажиры — на комфорт. Почему так обстоят дела? Не время ли что-то исправлять? https://diler-gpz10-vbf.ru/zakaz-taksi-i-transfera-prostota-i-udobstvo-peredvizhenija/ Мы, как команда с опытом, считаем, что комфорт и надёжность должны быть основой. Что считаете? Каким должно быть идеальное такси в 2025 году? Пишите своё мнение — важно мнение каждого!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ug44zef</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26692</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ZacharyAlarl says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26556</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Подскажите где найти лучшие рецепты со всего мира: от классических блюд, которые согревают душу, до современных кулинарных шедевров, которые впечатляют даже самых взыскательных гурманов - https://hexagon.vn/2023/06/22/harnessing-the-power-of-social-media-for-business-growth - рецепты в домашних условиях]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ZacharyAlarl</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 19:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-26556</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Danielgop says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-24604</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Хотите попасть на крупнейший маркет торговой сервиса в России и СНГ? Тогда просто кликните по ссылке mega официальный сайт и введите капчу, затем пройдите авторизацию или зарегистрируйте сь на веб-сайте. Это займет всего несколько минут, и вы быстро окажетесь на платформе MEGA. Вам не понадобится Тор браузер - наша площадка работает без него. https://xn--m14-psa.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Danielgop</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-24604</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rickyrix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23651</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If you're a fan of Sherlock Holmes-style adventures, this Victorian-theme d casino slot will blow you away. Designed with atmospheric visuals and immersive audio, this slot game feels like a mystery novel come to life. Expect high-quality design, exciting bonus features, and symbols straight out of a 19th-century London crime story. Ready to uncover the secrets of this unique slot? Start your adventure here: https://drghazalabutt.com/official-site-bonuses-mobile-app-6/ Your next favorite online slot might just be this one — themed, thrilling, and full of surprises.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rickyrix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 01:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-23651</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Elva says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-20299</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My spouse and I absolutely love your blog and find a lot of your post's to be precisely what I'm looking for. Do you offer guest writers to write content for you personally? I wouldn't mind producing a post or elaborating on a number of the subjects you write about here. Again, awesome blog! Also visit my homepage: nitric boost ultra supplement: https://web.archive.org/web/20240823155451/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DdasHXUiCfsQ]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Elva</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 06:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-20299</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Buford says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-20296</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What's Happening i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have discovered It absolutely useful and it has helped me out loads. I hope to contribute & assist other users like its aided me. Good job. Review my web blog: alphabites: https://concretesubmarine.activeboard.com/t71055744/what-is-alpha-bites/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Buford</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 05:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-20296</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Preston says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-20286</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am sure this article has touched all the internet users, its really really good post on building up new webpage. my web page ... billionaire brain wave review: https://bbs.pku.edu.cn/v2/jump-to.php?url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7cXE5xLls4]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 03:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-20286</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lida says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-16238</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Refunds take 7-10 working days to course of from the day we obtain the merchandise again. My website; Funny candles for him: https://www.diigo.com/item/note/5fr9c/si57?k=291af2963f9aa76c7458c7adb94fc3ac]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Lida</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 23:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-16238</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bitcoin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11894</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an edginess over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again since exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bitcoin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 21:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-11894</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>baccarat singapore says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10542</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey this is somewhat of off topic but I was wanting to know if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I'm starting a blog soon but have no coding knowledge so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be greatly appreciated!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>baccarat singapore</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 12:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10542</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>play baccarat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10436</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just wish to say your article is as astounding. The clearness on your put up is simply excellent and that i could think you are a professional on this subject. Well with your permission let me to grasp your RSS feed to stay updated with approaching post. Thank you a million and please continue the gratifying work.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>play baccarat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 08:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10436</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>play baccarat online says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10395</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'd like to find out more? I'd love to find out some additional information.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>play baccarat online</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10395</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10283</link>
			<description><![CDATA[두툼한 보지를 만져 보았다.항상 습하던 고모 보지가 오늘은 매말라 있었다.고모! 나... 하고 싶어.......? 나 졸리니 국산 야동 까 니가 알아서 해]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10283</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>바카라 전략 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10248</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Do they got baccarat]]></description>
			<dc:creator>바카라 전략</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10248</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bbs.yx20.com says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10146</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Executive Protection in Florida and More tampa orlando lasvegas LA security bodyguard]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bbs.yx20.com</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 19:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-10146</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>야동 사이트 추천 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9913</link>
			<description><![CDATA[제한이 나타나는 매우 명백한 때 우리는 말에 대한 체중을 획득과 손실을,그러나 현실에서,이러한 논의와 함께 보다 더 단순히 음식을 섭취. 일주일에 세 번 우리 체중 코칭을 우리는 그것에 의하여서만 사용되는 우리의 체격 무게 저항입니다. 해야 당신이 결정하여 사용하는 각 유형의 기저귀를 가능하게 할 수 있는 젊은이는 십대에 넣어 pin-에 기저귀 바지 및 플라스틱을 위한 4nights 며 일회용 기저귀한 세 가지 일(또는 그 반대로)궁극적으로 어머니와 아버지를 해결 자체에 대한 여부는지를 모두 사용할 수 있도록 종류의 기저귀한 침대 자녀. 거기에는 또한 다양한 유형의 핀에 기저귀-prefold, 평면,와줍니다. 에 대해 더 깊이의 대화에 대해 완전히 다른 스타일의 천 기저귀조 제 7 장의 새로운 기저귀 프라이머입니다. 이 장은"로 알려진 기저귀 종류"그리고 협상에 관해서는 몇 가지 유형의 천 기저귀와 완전히 다른 종류의 직물 피복 기저귀로부터 제조될 수 있다. 에서 모두 금융 시스템 차원에 위치한 5 매트리스룸 휴 객실을 찾을 수 있습니다 바로 여기에 있습니다.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>야동 사이트 추천</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-9913</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3386</link>
			<description><![CDATA[... PX= 6% if T1=T2; PX=0 if T1 = 1.06 * T2, etc. (Of course, this is true only if temperature vs power is linear.)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3386</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3384</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Rather than varying the control cell input power to match the active cell water temperature, how about adding water to the active cell while maintaining constant input power to both? Add 6% volume and measure the temperature differential. Just a thought...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3384</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3251</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There is a limit to what can be done with insulation. For a give insulation we can use more passes of wire. Eight passes of wire can be operated at 1/8 the input power and give the same temperature drop as one pass at full power.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3251</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3179</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Bob You are right on there. The idea is that we create derivative of this cell that is modular & flexible, allows powders and wire in the same unit as well as ways to stimulate or trigger it. So we would have high voltage and light guide passthroughs to allow arc/glow and laser discharge. Make the chamber length correct to allow for standing microwaves and have a mounting point for components inside the steel cell that could emit soft x-rays, microwaves etc. Nano powder is difficult to control according to Defkalion as too much potential for thermal runaway - they got round this by using nano foam and triggering with glow discharge which not only heats but allows ionisation etc. Wire is too spread out for effective cross talk between hot-spots so in the "How many Celani wires can we fit in a tube" I propose in the comments that packing all but the monitor wires tightly together to maximize chances of thermal cross talk. Also phonon resonance might play a role... once the right conditions are identified for sufficient thermal runaway, in a reactant geometry, duty cycle of stimulation or trigger will maximise COP.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3179</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bob says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3178</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The water bath apparatus is nice because I think it readily adapts to different reaction chambers down the road. The most obvious down the road step is to go from nano coated wire to nano powders. Meanwhile what triggering experiments can be performed on the wire apparatus? plasma? The one nagging question I still struggle with is why an apparently exothermic LENR reaction requires electrically generated heat to sustain itself. Is this because we have a coated wire substrate? ie. heat dissipation rate is too high for surface LENR reaction to be selfsustaining. or is the voltage gradient along the wire surface important? Can't wait to see the data from your next runs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3178</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3177</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And now the major concern is making the test bullet proof. That's very encouraging!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3177</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3176</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes, this experiment was most promising so far and it just needs to be made bullet proof, just like Ecco said. Slowly reaching there.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 22:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3176</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3172</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ok so you already made the graph while I was typing. Its approx 1C per day, seems minor to me. It would be nice to know the heating rate degrees per Watt for both units, so we can compare.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 08:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3172</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3171</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Thanks for the data. I made the graph of cool down part to take a closer look. I see very minor difference in the rate of cooling. It started with a difference of 0.25C and ended with 0.5C approx. (in 6 hours). Is that significant ? http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/4365/cooldown01.jpg Full size: http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/4365/cooldown01.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3171</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3170</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@123 Star So highest boiling point lowest viscosity.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 06:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3170</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123star says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3169</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer #74 I'm not sure about the oil type. I'd go for generic mineral oil. Oil is harder to stir, though, due to its viscosity.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123star</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 06:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3169</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3167</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@123 Star That is a very interesting video, but not practical for this experiment as the stirrers vigorously agitate and mix the water and the oil would not stay as a film/layer. What it does point to is that using some type of oil ALONE would be a very good approach. Firstly, it could go to a higher temperature, secondly, it would suffer less from evaporation. Any suggestions on the type of oil that should be used?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 05:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3167</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123star says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3165</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer Adding a (thin?) layer of oil could greatly reduce evaporation effects http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfa3y6d8zHE]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123star</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 21:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3165</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3164</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Can we see a zoomed in graph of the tail in graph #5 ? The linked data file has that part missing. It looks like both buckets cooled at exactly the same rate, which rules out a bias due to there being two walls surrounding the active bucket. That last part is important. Is it lost with HD?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 19:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3164</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3159</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco I think we are getting towards the nub of a protocol that is both practical, cost effective and easy to understand. Perhaps, as I said earlier, a dummy steel cell of same volume (water displacement) as active cell with a simple joule heater in the equivalent atmosphere (for rate of rise) or filled with more gas (for faster time response would be even more cost effective. Then, lastly, the switch.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3159</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3158</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm for either going with perfect insulation and precise heating energy calculation or going for bob's uninstulated setup suggestion as long as most biases by water container location, lack of ventilation/coo ling, ambient temperature variation, etc, are carefully eliminated or greatly reduced (of course, uninsulated containers should still be sealed to avoid water loss by evaporation). This should of course go along with an increase in the SNR by using more active wire. Again, the larger the signal, the less the need for accurate calorimetry (which given complexity and economic constraints, is a good thing).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3158</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3157</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Bob I tend to agree, too much insulation and you'll only be able to do rate of rise experiments, in which case, you will have to have the cells near identical (as they are here) so time constant and thermodynamics are equivalent. I still think it is valuable to prevent evaporation.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3157</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bob says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3156</link>
			<description><![CDATA[my back of the envelope calculations show that 60W-day = 5.2MJ of heat energy. This should be more than enough to raise a perfectly insulated kettle of 10 litres of water to the boiling point. During the last 12 hr slice from this last experiment the excess heat in the active cell was 0.26MJ. This should have been enough to raise our hypothetical 10 litre perfectly insulated kettle 6C. If I'm correct these calculations put to rest the notion that we should attempt to build an insulated calorimeter for any extended LENR experiment with this magnitude of heat output. We have to opt for the steady state heat balance apparatus instead.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 10:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3156</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>carlp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3155</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Historical weather data wunderground.co m is usually available at]]></description>
			<dc:creator>carlp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 09:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3155</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3150</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would like to know if you have a bake out phase what vacuum do you hold? Is there a protocol written down and available? Thanks. Also, it seem this experiment can be duplicated at a reasonable cost for a stripped down version. Just the glass container and two flanges and o-rings(?), one thermocouple in water bath, one thermocouple reader, one power supply per cell, one vacuum pump (how good?), some piping and some valves (3 or 4 per cell, hydrogen tank and regulator. All told less than $2000 for both cells??? This would not be as informative as the design you are using but it would be something a single professor could pay for out of his discretionary budget.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 03:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3150</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123star says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3149</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Also, maybe it could be important to monitor humidity variations, as evaporation speed is proportional to humidity and air speed and some power is lost by evaporation. Maybe humidity variations could explain some of that large noise in the data (who knows?).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123star</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 02:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3149</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123star says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3148</link>
			<description><![CDATA[1) As Paul suggested in message #53, swap the cores in the middle of a run! This is mandatory IMHO! There could be a "coupling to the wall" artifact. 2) Try to measure the timing constant of the system. It seems pretty long, and of course in the graphs there's a lot of noise probably coming from the ambient temperature variations(?). It would be useful to include the ambient temperature in the graphs as well. Once you know the timing constant, you can decide how long to keep the power constant in order to get meaningful data from the system.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123star</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 01:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3148</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3143</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Bruce Might be a good option if we cant get the Unis data. @Bob Keep those suggestions coming!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3143</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bruce Ikelheimer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3141</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hourly weather data (including historical data) is freely available from NOAA (http://gis.ncdc.noaa.gov/map/viewer/#app=cdo&cfg=cdo&theme=hourly&layers=1&node=gis) . This website lets you zoom in and pick your site. Another place to look is WeatherBug, although I don't think they save their data.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bruce Ikelheimer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3141</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bob says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3135</link>
			<description><![CDATA[To put to rest any questions about preferential ambient bias on a particular water bath, it might be worth running a double null experiment where simple resistance heaters are used to heat the baths to constant 45C for several days. A comparison of the input power to the heaters would reveal any bath location bias. Another idea to control the ambient sink temperature would be to use an active sink by wrapping the buckets in small neoprene hose and trickle tap water through to actively remove the 60W of heat from the water bath. Continuing on the active sink thought train, why not a bucket in a bucket where the outer bucket water temp is maintained at room temp by active thermoelectric cooling.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3135</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3132</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Ellefson Dammit you, I had the same idea in my sleep and you posted before I got up! I guess there should be a good record somewhere, it was sited at EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland. From the universities Wiki: "There is also a sensor network installed in the I&C building called SensorScope which reports live temperature and light measurements"]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 05:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3132</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Ellefson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3128</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Nicolas Chauvin: Do you have any idea where we might find historical weather data from a station nearby this laboratory? This would help us correlate some of the larger ambient swings. Temperature history would be most useful, of course, but windspeed, precipitation and cloudcover history would be helpful also.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Ellefson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3128</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3126</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Blaze Thanks, we believe the power of the crowd is all encompassing. Great suggestions come from everywhere, people that have no scientific experience can point out the obvious that people suffering group think or stuck within their own experience might miss. We hope we are creating a new way of doing science, indeed we are going to be launching a platform site intended to allow anyone doing science to work in this way, it will be at LiveOpenScience .com / org / net etc. currently pointing to this project, the project that spawned the idea/approach. For the people, by the people. This experiment here is entirely funded by the crowd and the team members of the MFMP. We are lighting the New Fire together!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 20:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3126</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>blaze says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I just wanted to say something here, btw. What you guys are doing is freaking incredible. Crowdsourced science experiments. You're taking suggestions from the crowd as well as donations and providing immediately, useable feedback data. All in pretty much real time. Freaking brilliant! Do you have any idea how revolutionary just this process is? Nevermind solving cold fusion (or whatever), just the process itself is a quantum leap over and above everything else we've done. This is amazing. Just freaking amazing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>blaze</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 19:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3124</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>blaze says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3122</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How about a 3rd cell which has the same input as the LENR cell?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>blaze</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3122</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3121</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How about placing each device on separate, small tables (even chairs would do) in the middle of the room; run a fan as suggested. This level of separation will mostly eliminate any thermal coupling while sharing the same environment. Swap the cores after the first run.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3121</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3120</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greener With uninsulated cells, it's probably worth thinking of improving climate control. Forced air cooling can only move ambient-tempera ture air around. Having to open windows periodically to decrease room temperature doesn't look like an optimal solution.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3120</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3118</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@bob / Ecco A forced cooling approach and a joule heater in both cells to start them at the exact same steady state above ambient (a slight bit above the ball park expected from the active cell for a given power input) and we will have a good kick off for an experiment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3118</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3117</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@bob I now realize you have a point on that. Having no insulation at all (though a lid should be added to stop water loss and limit energy loss through evaporation. Some sort of shielding between cells and/or keeping them separated would help too), but with powerful forced air ventilation + good climate control at disposal should be an equally good solution to reliably demonstrate excess heat compared to other proposals.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3117</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3111</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Dan Woodward We believe a derivation of this cell/experiment is a good step in the right direction. We have posted a graph one of our followers has produced from the second tranche of data pulled from the Laptop the other day which we posted yesterday. Check it out!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3111</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dan Woodward says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3110</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This experiment is very important! It is the first from your lab that extracts useful heat from the LENR process. I am impressed with the difference in input power required to maintain equal heat in the two water tanks. This clearly shows that the celani wire does generate power in excess of what can be done with a bare resistance wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dan Woodward</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3110</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bob says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3108</link>
			<description><![CDATA[more on update 2: Is there any reason why in the next run you couldn't add a third bucket with the resistance heater control? That way you could compare performance without dismantling your existing setup.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3108</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bob says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3107</link>
			<description><![CDATA[regarding Update 2: I see no reason why a resistance heater couldn't be used in the control bath as long as it was encased in a steel tube about the same size and shape as the active cell. To be credible both baths should have the same water volume, water geometry, undergo the same temperature profile (ie. always be at same temp) and be exposed to same external environment (sink). When the bath temp is stable we know that heat flux entering the bath from the steel cell = heat flux leaving bath from bucket walls, lid and base. We assume that if water is stirred and environment outside bucket is the same then for a given bath temp heat flux leaving each bath is the same. You might be able to improve the equivalence of the heat sink by actively blowing air at the buckets rather than relying on natural convection currents in room. You could lower the thermal inertia by reducing bath water volume.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3107</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AB says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3106</link>
			<description><![CDATA[> The active cell being in the corner could skew the results. Also, the wall looks uninsulated to me, and if that's the case, it will absorb more heat than the insulation material. The cells are not truly identical at the moment for this reason.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AB</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3106</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AB says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3105</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The active cell being in the corner could skew the results. Both cells being so close together could skew the results as well.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AB</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3105</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andrew Ma Toronto says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3104</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just as in most court matches, this experiment should be run twice with the wires on different "court" on the second half of the experiment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Ma Toronto</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 10:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3104</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3103</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ketil Your idea is a good one - but for the the effect of ambient. It is certainly worth considering. @Ecco This is my point. Makes the experiment far cheaper. 2 Freezers like the image I posted yesterday are £250 each and after the experiment maybe sell for £150 loss total. For both fridges, make sure the compartment drain/interior is properly sealed, fill with 60 degree water and a TC, turn on stirrers, close lid and see rate of thermal loss over a number of days (recording ambient). maybe do a room temp start and just turn on stirrers to asses effect on water temp. Put a joule heater into both cells. Have some internally weighted sealed cylinder with same volume as S&G cell to displace the same amount of water ensuring equivalent water contact with inside freezer wall. Fill with same volume of water. Ensure sealed at top to prevent water loss. Heat to a steady state starting temperature above ambient with the joule heater over 24 hours (or appropriate). Turn off joule heater in the freezer containing the active cell and apply constant power to active cell with outer cavity and power optimised to allow for steady state temp of water to be reached. Continuously monitor passive cell and apply sufficient power into Control to reach the same water temperature as the active.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 10:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3103</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3101</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greenyer Was there any particular reason for this experiment to have a perfectly identical S&G cell as a control run? If both cells are completely submerged in water and if you're simply comparing water temperature vs input power, it shouldn't matter if the control is a simple joule heater of about the same mass as the the active cell. This would make the experiment simpler and cheaper, but you have to make sure that both water containers are equally insulated (as the active cell would have more cables, which would affect this somehow, etc).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3101</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3100</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All Should we use a different heater? New update to S&G for comment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 06:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3100</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3099</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Rats We are hoping to produce a chart of the last block of data where things are closer to steady state. You can download from the link in the first update yourself and take a look. There are good signs of excess, but with the valid criticisms noted in the comments and our own reservations for this test, we may have to wait for results from the next round of tests before we are more comfortable about making any claim. That might be frustrating for some, but we have to be credible.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 05:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3099</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rats says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3097</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi guys, I'm getting quite confused (again) about what's happening. In layman's terms are we seeing any excess energy or is it too early to make that call?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rats</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3097</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3092</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I still do not know how the wires are made. I read Celani's paper. "The reproducibility increases, e.g., when the surface is nano-coated, multilayer geometry, with proper multiple materials (like Th, nano-Pd, Sr salts, colloidal silica, as we introduced since 2002)." What exactly is being used on the wires in this experiment?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3092</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3088</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Ellefson Celani cell replication efforts by the MFMP started in October 2012. Eight months later, we're still here debating if the effect is real and trying to define a good experiment to determine that. After all this time, I think it is probably best to move onto double digit excess heat % as it will be more useful to this cause. By the way, rumors (from what I gather from Paserini's blog: http://translate.google.de/translate?sl=it&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2F22passi.blogspot.de%2F2013%2F06%2Fnew-advancements-on-fleischmann-pons.html. Search for "Celani" in the Google Translated page I linked) are that INFN, the institution Celani works for, blocked him from further pursuing this research. Conclusively demonstrating excess heat from his Constantan wires as a third party would probably help him big time, in addition of fulfilling the curiosity of followers of this website. Just saying.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3088</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Ellefson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3087</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Man, everybody is a critic. Can I get a witness? How about an analyst?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Ellefson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3087</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3086</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Anyway, regardless of the calorimetry used, all these discussions could easily and quickly be put to rest by demonstrating a large effect. This is what I and others (skeptics mainly) have been asking all along, by the way. What prevents MFMP from putting large amounts of active wire into the cell? If your active cell starts showing 30-50% excess or more compared to the control cell, that would be pretty much conclusive. The larger the excess, the less the requirements for calorimetry accuracy. Putting 2x400L active wires (the reportedly very active type) as planned is a good start, but what about also quadrupling the amount, for example? I'm aware that Dr. Celani is currently under strong peer pressure, but this would ultimately benefit him too. Is manufacturing these wires expensive or time consuming? As of today it's still an unanswered question, to me.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3086</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3085</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@bob: this could be just my impression since it's outside my expertise, but I feel that designing a good, cheap and reliable simple long term steady-state experiment is not an easy task. Maybe it could be an idea to attempt building a Seebeck calorimeter rather than dealing with water bath calorimetry: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEdescriptioa.pdf http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEhowtomakea.pdf http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEuseofavery.pdf http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEthemethoda.pdf Heat determination would not be straightforward though (calibrations needed, etc).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3085</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bob says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3082</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco. Depends on what the purpose is. If it is to measure the actual heat produced by the LENR reaction then I would agree. However if the goal is simply to show that the active cell produces excess heat (compared to the null cell) well above a chemical threshold then I have to disagree. If MFMP wants to demonstrate LENR in this apparatus then ideally they will want to run these types of experiments for very long time windows. These long time windows make insulation and calorimetric calculations problematic. If you do a steady state heat balance on this system and assume that the null and active baths are at same temp and exposed to same heat sink the difference in input power = heat generated]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3082</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3081</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Robert Greener: that is a good plan, although I have to point out that for the experiment I suggested it's important that heat remains strictly inside the water container without leaking to the surrounding ambient, however small it may be.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3081</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3080</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All Who is up for a mini-project? We think this kind of setup has great potential, but you guys are putting forward some really good suggestions. How about we launch a mini-project in the collaborate section dealing with various protocols/exper imental arrangements for the S&Gs. People can work together then to propose and refine a number of potential experiment designs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3080</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3079</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco The plan is immerse the cells into sealed water containers (to stop water loss) in chest freezers like these A-class energy efficient ones (must be good insulation) - but the cooling bit turned off. And still measure ambient. http://markselectrical.co.uk/images/full/RCAA100P.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3079</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3078</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@bob: with two ideally insulated water containers (zero external influence, zero heat loss) it's extremely easy to precisely and reliably calculate output energy with the q = mcΔT equation. Given enough water mass and limiting goal temperature, the experiment could still run long enough to warrant very good, reliable results without having to manage high temperature water (which would increase heat loss and potentially cause other problems). As seen in the last experiment, without properly insulating both cells it's very hard to maintain good testing conditions. There's also the risk of crosstalk (as in this case) which further complicates things, potentially invalidating any apparently positive finding. Having separate, closed insulated systems is the way to go in my opinon, if the goal is to cheaply and reliably demonstrate XS heat for once and for all to universities. Since the XS is apparently small (3-4%) it's important to be precise.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3078</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bob says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3077</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am of the opinion that you don't want to insulate your water containers. All that will do is to cause the water temperature to rise higher for a given energy input which will complicate your water management etc. Your aim with this experiment should be to show that the active cell produces significant excess heat when compared to the null over a long period, not precision calorimetric measurement of heat. The key is to strive for as close to steady state (constant bath temps) as you can get. Rather than insulation I suggest you strive to insure that both baths are exposed to the same exterior environment and have sufficient thermal inertia to bounce through transient fluctuations in that environment. Strive to balance the two bath temperatures by actively adjusting the input power to the null bath. You could put a lid on to minimize evaporative water loss.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3077</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3076</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Example of very well insulated hot water tank for home heating purposes (section): http://images.publicradio.org/content/2011/02/08/20110208_jeff-scholten-_33.jpg See how thick the insulation is and how it surrounds the tank completely without leaving gaps. Misc images to show the same concept: http://www.daviddarling.info/images/water_heater_insulation.gif http://images.neutralexistence.com/Water_Heater_Insulation.jpg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3076</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3070</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@All Some great suggestions. We are just pulling the last lot of data off the server for this run - the data from the 21-25. It looks like it will take for ever to upload it from the laptop. Will post it here in a minute. Afterwards, we'd like to produce a graph from it similar to the first period above with annotations.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3070</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ketil Olsen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3068</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yet another suggestion. 1. Put both cells in the same insulated water container. Ambient temprature is constant. 2. With a known starting watertemprature , run the inactive cell with a fixed power for a few days. 3. Refill water. 4. With the same starting watertemprature and power, run the active cell for a few days. 5. Compare results.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ketil Olsen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3068</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andreas Van Rooijen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And another suggestion, put the same wire in the cc tube device. I understand that this thing is very sensitive.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andreas Van Rooijen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 07:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3065</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andreas Van Rooijen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3064</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think that Ecco is making some good suggestions. On top of that, have you considered boosting the signal? For instance by putting in more wires? This should increase the effect and would be an extra indication that it is not a measurement error.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andreas Van Rooijen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 07:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3064</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3063</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would add a ruler to the inside of each tank so you can gauge how much water is lost to vapor and how much energy is carried off due to the heat of vaporization.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 06:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3063</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Ellefson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3059</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Nicolas Chauvin: do you recall any details from the afternoon of 5/15 that could provide insight into potential differential ambient heat sources? This is the period surrounding the first addition of insulation.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Ellefson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 03:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3059</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Ellefson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3058</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The more I stare at the Cell2 water temp curve that I posted in message #2, the happier I get. Look at the first inflection point in the yellow curve, starting at 14:36. It shoots upward at a rate equivalent to several watts flux, as demonstrated by comparison with the control bath step responses. During this 2-hour period, the insulation is installed, and causes temporary disturbances to both curve trends, which then resume their initial trajectories. Both curves started with negative slope, prior to 14:36, but then the active water bath starts climbing for at least two hours, and continues the same trajectory it had been on prior the disturbance. This magnitude of differential heating is not exhibited anywhere else during the experiment. If an ambient source had been applied differentially, I believe that sufficient crosstalk is exhibited between the tanks to reflect the source in the control cell. This differential behavior seems anomalous, IMHO.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Ellefson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 03:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3058</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3054</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Anyway, regardless of the actual data, which despite my observations, do look promising, my impression is that this method of trying to balance water temperature by adjusting input power in real time can have several problems (thermal inertia, differing water evaporation, etc, etc). The best way for comparing a control and active cell in my opinion is, as I described in different threads: - Have two identical relatively large water containers, very well insulated and with a sealed lid. Fill them with a predefined amount water at the same temperature. Add stirrers if necessary. - Submerge both cells completely, apply the same input power to them. From now on, don't alter input power anymore. - Measure the increase of water temperature over time, calculate total input and output energy. - Stop after a predefined amount of time and/or a goal water temperature is reached by the hottest cell.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3054</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3053</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Nicolas Chauvin: as a control, have you tried swapping cell position? When I asked which one was the active cell, my skeptical sense was already telling me that the the top right one in the photo might have been it, as to me it appeared that its location would have likely caused the least heat loss during the experiment.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3053</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nicolas Chauvin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3051</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fig 1: active cell (cell#2) is on the top right side of the image.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nicolas Chauvin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 21:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3051</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Ellefson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3049</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I find the period just preceding the second step up of input power to be the most interesting. Notice how the behaviors diverge around the time the insulation was added. Here is a zoom-in of that area. Note where the inflections occur: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6m5NHInkuurSkRIZXRZX2Z2VVk/edit?usp=sharing http://www.robertellefson.com/MFMP/SG2/SSCell2_PT_Step2Zoom.png]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Ellefson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 21:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3049</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3047</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Figure 1 - which one is the active cell? Figure 2 - possible electrical hazard Figure 3 - possible fire hazard Some improvements I would do besides safety: - Make sure that both cells do not share the same insulation. - Try making the insulation more tightly fit. Do not leave gaps. Think of boiler tanks. - Add a lid. Most of the heat loss on open containers is though water evaporation from the top. - Put both cells at the same distance from surrounding walls. One of the cells from the photos looks as if it's more insulated because of this. - Monitor flange temperature. Since both cells do not seem to be completely submerged, there's the chance that the inactive cell is for some reason less efficient in transfering heat to the water than the other one. Its flange would get hotter as a result and this would cause an apparent need for more power to heat water to a certain temperature.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 21:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-3047</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
