<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 17:04:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2762</link>
			<description><![CDATA[(continued) 3. Wire diameter is stated in patent item 033 as 200 um. (0.2 mm). This is consistent with previous descriptions in MFMP blogs. The surface area of the 40 cm long wire in the CC test cell is 2.51E-04 m2 and the wire would therefore contain at least 5 mg of oxygen. This is 3.14E-04 mole of atomic oxygen 4. According to the MFMP molar calculations 6.92E-04 of H2 was lost during the initial loading phase. Therefore, it seems likely that nearly half of the hydrogen and possibly all of it went into reduction of the oxides in the wire coating, producing H2O. This is not loading in the LENR sense, and would not represent absorbtion of hydrogen into the metallic lattice, which is what we are interested in.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2762</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlanG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2761</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We don't know the precise composition of the 400 layer Celani wire. It can be estimated with the following clues from Celani's patent application US20120134915 dated May 31, 2012: 1. Item 20 on page 1 states the oxygen content bound to the wire to be "not less than .05 g/m2" This appears to apply to a single layer. IF the layers are thin, concentric and chemically similar, a 400 layer wire would then contain at least 20 g/m2 of oxygen bound to the wire by the process described. 2. The process described in the patent to create the layers uses both NiNO3 and PdNO3 in solution as well as SiO2 as a binder vehicle. The final composition of the layers may therefore contain oxides of both Nickel and Palladium as well as residual silica. Subsequent reduction by H2 will not react equally with these constituents and the binding / dissociation energies should be looked at further. For now, assume H2 fully reduces each of the possible constituents mentioned in the patent.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlanG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2761</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andreas Van Rooijen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2753</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ryan, we are a few days further now. 1) Is there any news regarding this device? 2) Can I see the results for this device for myself live? How do you call it? 3) Do you have a definite number on it's accuracy? Is it still 100 mWatt as projected?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andreas Van Rooijen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2753</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Ellefson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2748</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Absolutely. Consistency and reliability of results are much more valuable than unreliable "positive" results. You need to know what you're doing to understand what you've done.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Ellefson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2748</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2745</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A null result is every bit as valuable as a positive result. I understand this is just a first look. Ed]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 02:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2745</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2737</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Loading Hydrogen into an 'active' Celani wire... More detail in linked document https://docs.google.com/document/d/114Kw2-CuuCB4NSYIQVZohywlS6jHXSQbglMWoo_Yyow/pub]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2737</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2736</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Could you define what a "loading test" is exactly? I might be missing something, but I see: - an 'active' wire is being loaded in Hydrogen in a tube calorimeter - temperature data is being compared with that of a previous run with an inert wire - that direct heating is being applied In which way this qualifies as a test? It seems similar in principle to previous experiments performed so far. The 'other conclusions' in the document (which are the main conclusions? It's not clear, although I've only quickly skimmed through he document twice) also seem to pass over the lack of excess heat seen so far. Unrelated to the report, but speaking of this page, on Chromium browser under Linux pressing the left and right keyboard keys in this message box causes some problems with the scrollable photo slideshow immediately above it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2736</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
