<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 18:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2630</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There is a saying in psychoanalysis "the slower you go the faster you get there". It applies here.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2630</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Edwin Pell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2629</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Slow and steady wins the race. You are doing the right things.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Edwin Pell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2629</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2628</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@charlie tapp We want that too. If we get 10 cells out there - or fortune allows 100, these kinds of parameter sweeps will be trivial. We need to work within our resource constraints to get the basics done right. Celani is reporting cells of the type we are prepping with the 400+ layer wires he has supplied and running V2 protocol should see clear excess. With calibration and SB based excess power estimation and differential control experimental set up - if we see what he saw, we can stop debating the validity and move on to the fun bit! I am afraid it is a necessary evil.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2628</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlie tapp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2627</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i know we are trying to replicate here but couldnt you guys build a simmilar cell to play with were you can try doing whatever you want. for instance mabee someone in the crowd has an idea how to make the reaction start, without all of the calibration process and waiting around we can at least be doing something and that might help prove. let me be the first one crank that sucker up to 5 bar after vacum turn it on no stepping up power or anything if nothing signifigant happens try the next bloggers idea, he might want a different wire or something. it would make it more like live science.please! !!!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>charlie tapp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2627</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2624</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Andreas 1. I would start it right now believe me :) Unfortunately, I got a problem this morning, I have to redo the internals of the cell 1.3A. I will let people know what is the ETA for the experiment to start. I will be in another lab monday and tuesday to do SEM/EDS and training on a mass-flow calorimeter. Wednesday should see it back up. Right now the schedule is made on a day-to-day basics, we are working harder than ever to do ASAP. 2. Since we a reproducing the experiment made by Celani, we can make the same mistake because of the same apparatus architecture. I am very confident about this design actually. The cleverness of Celani implementing his wires in it is truly remarkable. Nevertheless, we are fully aware of such possible flaw, that is the reason that pushes me to have a mass-flow calorimeter. I am currently designing a calorimeter that operates at high temperature, very similar to what is classically known, but a little innovative on some dynamical aspects. @Bob Findlay In the range of IR generated by those heating wires, the Schott-Duran tube thermalize all of them. This issue has been extensively discussed in the past.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2624</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2622</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Ecco Sorry - can you move to US blog thread]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2622</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2621</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Temperature on cell US1.3B slightly but suddenly increased before power got shut off. Were there problems?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 22:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2621</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bob Findlay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2620</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Pursuing a pure replication stategy is good as long as the Celani apparatus doesn't contain a design flaw which gives false positives. In my opinion have an IR transparent apparatus opens the door to just such a flaw. You have apparatus that eliminate that IR pathway and in my opinion you should elevate these experiments in your job queue. bob]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bob Findlay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2620</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2618</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Andreas Van Rooijen 1. Best answer is SOON. Mathieu wants to add averaging copper rings like those in the Steel and Glass cell and that are being added to the american cells. 2. We will, it is intended for later. Right now, we are replicating an approach first done by Celani with his type of cells. If we see the approx. 26% he did with the V2 protocol we will have our lab rat, especially since we will have a control cell in both the US and EU.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2618</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Andreas Van Rooijen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2617</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mathieu, I have two questions: 1) When do you think the experiment will start? I mean after the calibration and loading is finished. 2) Why don't we use the mass flow calorimetry? I understand that the equipment is (nearly) finished. Or are they being used in the US?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andreas Van Rooijen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-2617</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
